Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Themes in Lord of the Flies free essay
Lord of the flies characterization and theme essay
Comment on two themes in the text the lord of the flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Themes in Lord of the Flies free essay
Which is better- order and civilization, or discord and complete anarchy? This book is about a group of adolescent British boys, ages six to twelve, who are marooned on a deserted island during World War II. With no adults around to tell them how to do things, they are left to create their own mini society. The main character, Ralph, is nominated to be chief. He is in charge of the fire and building shelters. The other main character, Jack, the head choir boy names his boys the hunters of the group. They hunt for pigs. An acrimonious conflict evolves between Ralph and Jack as they both want to be in command. Jack’s “hunters” have become savage and aboriginal, under his control, while Ralph is suffering to keep his group humane. The growing bitterness between the two boys leads to a gruesome and shocking outcome. In the story Lord of the Flies by William Golding the government that is authorized on the island crumbles because of a lack of ideals, …show more content…
rights, and the organization of their economic and governmental systems. One of the most significant ideals for a successful island is importance of life. Life is the most important ideal of them all because people should know that they are loved and that their lives matter. On the island in the story the boys do not care very much about preserving life or mourning death. They are only young so they do not see life and death as something to worry about. The boys think this is just a game and that they will be able to go home soon. The boys do not think of life as precious or short. “‘May we believe in and hallow the inherent beauty of the other, the earth, and ourselves, and...may the love we learn to share enrich us all’” (With Or Without God). In other words, the author is saying that everyone should love everything around them and believe in other people, things, and the world. The author is trying to tell the reader that they should value life and value other people. Only a few times did they ever think about the importance of life and death. “His mind was crowded with memories of the knowledge that had come to them when they closed in on the struggling pig, knowledge that they had outwitted a living thing, imposed their will upon it, taken away its life like a long satisfying drink” (Golding 70). In other words, Golding is saying that one of the boys is remembering what the feeling was like when the boys were killing the pig. This quote is displaying that only a few of the boys ever even thought about life or death. The way this boy is thinking shows the way the boys are slowly turning savage because in the quote the author says that the boys take the life of the pig like a long satisfying drink of water. If the boys had thought about the preciousness of life and sadness of death, their government might not have crumbled. This is one way the boys in the story fail to live up to these critical standards for their island to succeed. Which leads to the next ideal to have a successful island. The second ideal for a succeeding island is equality. The reason equality is the second ideal for a succeeding island is because all people should have the same rights, no matter what gender, race, or ethnicity. The boys on the island do not have equality. They allow every boy the right to freedom of speech, but when certain people want to talk, the boys ignore them or laugh at them. “‘Shut up, fatty!’” (Golding 21). In other words, what the author is trying to show is that the boys discriminate by looks and do not always give everyone a chance for what they have to say. They call the boy, Piggy, fatty because they do not care what he has to say because they discriminate by looks. The boys do not have equality between their people, which causes many problems throughout the story. All of the boys should think they can say whatever they want without repercussions. “All people should be able to think of themselves as worthy of respect and none should have to see themselves as subservient” (Cockshott 153-154). In other words, the author is trying to say that all people should not see themselves as servants, but as equals. The boys on the island all do what they want but when they have meetings, they do not let everyone speak. The boys are not equal. This is another reason why the boys’ island is unsuccessful. Which leads to the last ideal for a successful island. The last ideal to a successful island is justice.
Justice is the last important ideal because it is the act of keeping good and executing bad or evil. Justice is crucial for having a safe society. The boys on the island want to have justice but they cannot keep it in control. Like when Ralph suggests rules to keep the group in order, Jack becomes elated to set the rules right away. But they never get a chance to set the rules. “The world, that understandable and lawful world, was slipping away” (Golding 91). In other words, the author is saying that the easy world the boys knew is slithering away because of their loss of innocence and maybe a loss of justice. In the story, the boys struggle to keep the rules under control and to maintain justice. People have “...ideas of fairness and justice may be instinctual in nature” (Knauerhaze What Does Justice Mean To You?). In other words, the author is trying to tell the reader that everyone has a natural instinct to deliver justice to evil and keep things fair between
everyone.
The fictional novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding is one of the first popular endurance novels of it’s time. The Lord of the Flies takes place during World War 2 and during this time, children were being brought out of war zones via plane. A group of boys were being evacuated from their homes to escape the war, when their plane crashed on a remote island, the only survivors a group of young boys. The island that they landed on would become the center for their savageous “game”, until they get rescued at the end of the novel. Once arriving on the island, Ralph, the book’s hero, is voted leader by the boys and he sets out to create a functioning and reasonable civilization amongst the boys. Conflict is present right away when Jack, the
Simon, sitting between the twins and Piggy, wiped his mouth and shoved his piece of meat over the rocks to Piggy, who grabbed it. The twins giggled and Simon lowered his face in shame.
The Lord of the Flies by William Golding is a novel about human nature and the functions of society. One of the main characters in this novel is Ralph, who is chosen to be the leader of a group of boys. He assigns tasks to the boys and tries to keep them accountable for it. However, the boys begin to slack because they can no longer see the point of these tasks and rules. As a result of the constant slacking the boys soon turned into savages. Ralph’s struggle to maintain order amongst the boys shows how without rules it is human nature to descend into savagery due to the avoidance of authority.
The novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding is about a group of boys that were on a plane crash in the 1940’s in a nuclear War. The plane is shot down and lands on a tropical island. Some boys try to function as a whole group but see obstacles as time goes on. The novel is about civilization and social order. There are three older boys, Ralph, Jack, and Piggy, that have an effect on the group of younger boys. The Main character Ralph, changes throughout the novel because of his role of leadership and responsibility, which shapes him into a more strict but caring character as the group becomes more uncivilized and savage
William Golding’s novel ‘The Lord of The flies’ presents us with a group of English boys who are isolated on a desert island, left to try and retain a civilised society. In this novel Golding manages to display the boys slow descent into savagery as democracy on the island diminishes.
Lord of the Flies is an intriguing novel about a group of English boys who are stranded on a remote island during World War II after their plane was shot down. The schoolboys quickly use the resources they find and create a temporary form of order. As they continue to stay on the island, their proper English ways quickly turn into savage like instincts. In William Golding’s, Lord of the Flies, Golding uses the conch, the Beast, leadership, murder, and fire to show that without rules there is chaos.
Importance of Leadership Leadership is something that stands out in people. In a group, people tend to look for the strongest person to follow. However, the strongest person may not be the best choice to follow. In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, Ralph and Jack each have leadership qualities. Jack is probably the stronger of the two; however, Ralph is a better leader.
Imagine flying on a plane and crash landing on an unknown island with a select group of people. How would humans deal as a result of this horrific situation? Is cruelty and violence the only solution when it comes down to it? In Lord of the Flies, William Golding explores the relationship between children in a similar conflict and shows how savagery takes over civilization. Lord of the Flies proves to show that the natural human instincts of cruelty and savagery will take over instead of logic and reasoning. William shows how Jack, the perpetrator in the book, uses cruelty and fear for social and political gain to ultimately take over, while on the other hand shows how Ralph falters and loses power without using cruelty and fear. In Lord of
William Golding’s novel. Lord of the Flies, is an exceptional novel focusing on the difficulty of effectively running a civilization, society, and government. In the midst of evacuating Britain due to a rampant war, a plane carrying schoolboys was shot down and crashed on a deserted island. After gathering all the boys up, the boys realized they are alone, without adults or supervision, and assume responsibility of their own caretakers. The boys establish a hierarchy and democratically vote Ralph to be their leader against his counterpart Jack. Ralph appoints Jack to be in charge of the choirboys, which Jack decides their purpose will be to serve as hunters. Things start off presumable well until Ralph and Jack begin to clash ideas. Ralph’s main focus is getting off the island and getting rescued. When Ralph realizes that focus is not Jack’s main goal, he becomes infuriated. Instead of lighting a fire that could have been seen by a nearby passing boat, Jack’s focus was ritualistically hunting a wild pig. The situation and clash of ideas lead to major polarization and eventually, separation, in the group.
As the story opens, the boys are stranded on the island without any type of authority and must fend for themselves. A meeting is held and the chief, Ralph, is quickly named. A reader at once can notice there is already a power struggle between Jack and Ralph but this is overlooked when Jack says rational and sensible remarks about what should be done. The stability of civilization is still apparent when Jack says, “I agree with Ralph. We’ve got to have rules and obey them. After all, we’re not savages. We’re English, and the English are best at everything. So we’ve got to do the right things,” (Golding 42). The boys are still influenced by the restraints they learned from a controlled society. Joseph Conrad asserts that “there exists a certain ‘darkness of man’s heart’ that is suppressed by the light of civilization” (Introduction to Lord of the Flies 2). “Although Golding suggests the harmony of an ideal society, he does not indicate any faith in its creation” (Kennard 234). The more meetings that are held the more futile they become. “ ’We have lots of assemblies. Everybody enjoys speaking and being together. We decide things. But they don’t get done,’ ” (Golding 79). The boys realize that there are no punishments for what they do and disregard their priorities. “The idea that the absence of the restraints of civilization can lead to a subversion towards savagery” (Introduction to Lord of the Flies 2). The makeshift society that the boys have created is already starting to weaken.
In the literature, The Kite Runner, by Khaled Hosseini, the idea and representation of justice, and its relationship to that of the treatment of women in Afghan society, the ever-changing politics of Afghanistan, and the desired results of redemption and forgiveness, become illustrated through the novel’s characters and motives. Justice can be defined as the quality of being guided by truth, reason, and fairness. The Kite Runner illustrates the power of influence from an outside power and its effects on society, and the minds and lifestyles of the people. In relationship to the Cheverus High School Grad-at-Grad profile the actions and wrongdoings that take place in the The Kite Runner and in Afghanistan prove to be injustice.
To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee is centered on the moral values and ideas of the people in Maycomb and how they react to things that go against their normal beliefs. All of the characters have their own senses of what is right or wrong, good or bad, etc. Aunt Alexandra's moral values are expressed throughout the book, especially in her feelings through her brother's case, but in public are confined to the indifferent and self-aware values of the county. While Aunt Alexandra has her set of displayed ideas and values shaped by the people in Maycomb, there are some hints to a hidden sense of justice in her throughout the story that gives her a sense of compassion for those discriminated in her world.
William Golding's first book, Lord of the Flies, is the story of a group of boys of different backgrounds who are marooned on an unknown island when their plane crashes. As the boys try to organize and formulate a plan to get rescued, they begin to separate and as a result of the dissension a band of savage tribal hunters is formed. Eventually the "stranded boys in Lord of the Flies almost entirely shake off civilized behavior: (Riley 1: 119). When the confusion finally leads to a manhunt [for Ralph], the reader realizes that despite the strong sense of British character and civility that has been instilled in the youth throughout their lives, the boys have backpedaled and shown the underlying savage side existent in all humans. "Golding senses that institutions and order imposed from without are temporary, but man's irrationality and urge for destruction are enduring" (Riley 1: 119). The novel shows the reader how easy it is to revert back to the evil nature inherent in man. If a group of well-conditioned school boys can ultimately wind up committing various extreme travesties, one can imagine what adults, leaders of society, are capable of doing under the pressures of trying to maintain world relations.
The novel; “Lord of the Flies” is a highly renowned novel written by William Golding and published in 1954. The novel embodies many themes and events that are mysterious and unanticipated for the reader. During the course of the essay I will explain how the conch shell that is found at the foundation of the first chapter plays a significant role throughout the novel and how diverse themes are brought on from this influential shell. This essay will express an opinion on the conch shell, in the end has more power and order than the actual ‘beast’ that is signified on the island. I will also explore the social leadership of the conch throughout the novel which will also touch on a few themes that the conch shell plays a role in. The conch shell is one of the first real theme/symbol that readers are introduced too and stands its power for most of the novel which is why it should be explored in further detail in this essay.
William Golding wrote of his novel "Lord of the Flies" that the theme was an attempt to explore how the defects society are based largely on human nature rather than the structure of civilization. Golding used "Lord of the Flies" to allegorically explain that the architecture of a society depends on the morality of the individual rather than a social or political construction, regardless of its inherent merit or esteem.