Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The grapes of wrath movie and novel comparison
The grapes of wrath movie and novel comparison
The ending to grapes of wrath
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The grapes of wrath movie and novel comparison
When perusing The Grapes of Wrath, a reader is taken on an emotional roller coaster. Characters die left and right, to the point where their deaths become almost meaningless - but not quite. Steinbeck uses these deaths to highlight injustices against the migrants, and also uses his characters to explain justice by leading each one through the search for understanding. Each character has a different definition of justice, and a different significant role in Steinbeck’s passion play - one might even say it’s like The Passion of the Christ. Indeed, Biblical references and allusions permeate the story, weaving themselves into characters and plotlines. Each main character could be compared to a person from the Bible, so of course the question of …show more content…
the day is: Who is Jesus Christ in The Grapes of Wrath? While an argument can be made for multiple characters, the one who has the strongest evidence backing him is Reverend Jim Casy. Jim Casy goes on an epic journey to find himself, and along the way he discovers what justice is to him. Reverend Casy’s search for justice brings him to understand that fairness requires a love for people; he has to “want to make ‘em happy” (23). His journey reinforces the Biblical themes of the novel, placing Casy in the role of Christ. After questioning himself and observing the migrant’s oppression, Casy realizes that one can only be just if one loves humanity intensely. When we first meet Casy, he is still searching for true meaning in his life. He used to be a preacher, but he realized that his own actions made him a hypocrite and abandoned the practice. Extensive reflection on his soul and actions brings him to the conclusion that “There ain’t no sin and there ain’t no virtue. There’s just stuff people do… some of the things folks do is nice, and some ain’t nice, but that’s as far as any man got a right to say” (23). This is where Casy’s notion of justice begins: nobody has the right to judge others for what they do. He also states that “I only love people… I want to make ‘em happy, so I been preachin’ somepin I thought would make ‘em happy” (23). By this standard, Casy views justice as being impartial toward others at least and actively trying to help them at best. This notion influences his actions as he travels with the Joads to California. Whenever he is called upon to pray, although he is no longer a preacher, he fulfills the request because it is the right thing to do. It is his simple way of helping those he can. Along the journey, however, readers witness Casy’s personal development from a person removed from society - perhaps separated by the lingering aura of a pulpit preventing him from reaching his congregation - to a fighter in the trenches of the migrant workforce. The key moment of change lies in the Hooverville camp fight, when Casy kicks a policeman and knocks him out. During the brief respite before reinforcements arrive, Casy certifies that none of the Joads will be associated with the altercation, although Tom had tripped the deputy first. In this small act, Casy feels justified, as he is the person of least consequence in the family (265-266). It’s an act born of love, the love he has developed for the Joads and for people as a whole. His love for the Joads leads to his protecting them by taking blame from Tom’s shoulders. When in jail, Casy has his second great revelation. He witnesses a strike succeed, when the prisoners protest the food they are given. This success, coupled with the conversations he has with men in prison - often arrested due to minor offenses or trumped up accusations - inspires him to fight back against the system. His expression of justice becomes one of grandiose gestures, expressing his love for humanity as a whole. Casy sees the injustices dealt to the migrants clearly and acutely, and tries to change them if he can through activism. Unfortunately, his search for true justice is cut dramatically short before it reaches its peak, as Casy dies at the hand of a policeman breaking up the strike against low wages. Does this mean his success was invalid? No, because his search led him to the path of justice and a deeper understanding of true equality. Also, his death made a disciple of Tom Joad, who carries out his legacy by fighting for the rights of the migrants. The Grapes of Wrath is riddled with Biblical references and imagery, and Casy is Steinbeck’s Christ figure.
While fairly obvious to anyone looking for it (Jim Casy’s intials are J.C….), Casy’s search for justice and subsequent journey just reinforces the comparison. One might say, “But Casy was a preacher already! How is he Jesus?” Well, Jesus actually had a pretty good following before he was baptized by John, and traveled in the desert for forty days. Like Jesus, Casy wanders in the “wilderness” for a time, searching his soul for sin and trying to reconnect with God. During this time he is developing his philosophy on the world and returns to civilization with a new take on spirituality - the over-soul. (It’s interesting to note that Steinbeck incorporates transcendentalism into a novel so rife with Biblical imagery; one would normally see them as separate as grape jelly and grilled cheese. However, like those happy hearts who have tried the heaven that is jelly and grilled cheese, one can understand how transcendentalism is a wonderful combination with the Bible!) Commonly preached in Christianity is the idea of one bread, one body in Christ. This very easily translates into the One Soul which Casy now touts. Casy also concludes that no man has the right to judge another man, which echoes the biblical sentiment of Luke 6:37: “Do not judge, and you will not be judged.” This sense of what judgement, what justice is, guides Casy on his travels. Casy starts his journey when he collects his first disciple in the form of Tom Joad. Tom is Casy’s Simon Peter, his right hand man and brother in all but blood. Casy joins the Joad family naturally, with hardly a second thought. While traveling west, Casy is called on to be the spiritual leader multiple times: at grandpa’s funeral, Sarah Wilson’s deathbed, etc. Much like how Jesus sometimes reluctantly performed miracles, Casy has a hesitation before prayer, but bows to the request out of love for those asking. Once in
California, Casy reaches the end of both his search for justice and his Christlike journey. The scuffle in the camp is his Garden of Gethsemane, and these lines particularly highlight the parallel: “Between the guards Casy sat proudly, his head up and the stringy muscles of his neck prominent. On his lips there was a faint smile and on his face a curious look of conquest” (267). It seems like Casy premeditated his arrest, just as Jesus was fully aware of his impending doom. Finally, the clincher moment that confirms J.C. as J.C. is when he dies the death of a martyr. Casy is leading a strike, and men come to scatter the protesters. While trying to calm one of the attackers, Casy is killed by a shovel to the head. His martyrdom for a cause, for his desire for justice, makes him into Steinbeck’s Christ figure. Like Jesus died for the sin of the entire world, Casy died for the good of his entire world; that is, the migrants. Jesus’ main message was one of love; love for one another, love for one’s enemies, love for all of humanity. Casy discovers that love is the key to administering true justice to others. Both men sacrificed themselves for a cause they strongly believed in. So, what is the significance of Steinbeck crafting a social protest novel using aspects of the Bible? Given that his audience, 1940’s America, would be overwhelmingly Christian, it’s unlikely the similarities would go unnoticed. Steinbeck uses the biblical savior story in his novel because it’s familiar to his audiences and easy to understand. A “savior” only serves as a catalyst for change, not as the change itself. Tom, Simon-Peter, both men were inspired by their mentor’s sacrifice and went on to actually execute the plans laid in place. He uses the concept of a “savior” and puts it into a starkly realistic context - the savior is idealistic, and honorable, and has a pure philosophy, but ultimately cannot save the people. The people must save themselves.
When times get tough, many people turn away from everyone and everything. It must be part of human nature to adopt an independent attitude when faced with troubles. It is understandable because most people do not want to trouble their loved ones when they are going through problems, so it is easier to turn away than stick together. Maybe their family is going through a rough patch and they reason they would be better off on their own. This path of independence and solitude may not always be the best option for them or their family, though. Often times it is more beneficial for everyone to work through the problem together. It is not always the easiest or most desirable option, but most times it is the most efficient and it will get results in the long run. In The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck makes this point very clear through several characters. Many characters throughout
Along with Jim Casy and Uncle John, Tom Joad secures redemption by leaving to protect his family, promising to continue Casy’s legacy, and developing into a stronger character who aspires to restore justice to the migrants, despite his previous nonchalant attitude toward his crime. Initially, Tom Joad has no inclination for absolution, remarking, “I’d do what I done again...I killed a guy in a fight, knocked his head to plumb to squash” (Steinbeck 35). His words indicate his feelings about his crime, and reveal his apathetic and uncaring persona. However, Tom’s attitude shifts when he kills another man shortly after Casy’s death, and “did not sleep. The nerves of his wounded face came back to life...to shake him” (Steinbeck 528). This foreshadows
John Steinbeck makes many Biblical allusions in his book The Grapes of Wrath. Many of these connections are on a small layer, perhaps applying to only one individual. Jim Casy, the Christ figure, is one example of an allusion from the New Testament. However, the whole book can be seen as a Biblical allusion to the story of the Exodus and the life of Moses. Not only does the story of the fictional Joad family relate to the Exodus, but the story of the Okies and the great migration that took place during the Dust Bowl in the 1930’s. This compelling story of the migrants can be divided into three parts: the oppression, the exodus, and the Promised Land.
In the novel, The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck brings to the reader a variety of diverse and greatly significant characters. However, the majority of each characters' individuality happens to lie within what they symbolize in the microcosm of the Joad family and their acquaintances, which itself stands for the entire migrant population of the Great Depression era. One such character is that of Jim Casey, a former preacher and long-time friend of the Joads. In this story, Casey represents a latter-day Christ figure who longs to bring religious stability to the burgeon of migrant families facing West.
Holiness, sin, and life are repeatedly questioned throughout John Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath, particularly by the former preacher, Jim Casey. As a preacher, Casey only preaches what the bible states and he resigns from his occupation after he feels the urge to pursue life's true meaning and values of the individual - basically to make sense of the world he resides in. Casey closely resembles the character and motives of Jesus Christ, as he is enthused to uncover the answers to his wonders and doubts and begins to hold new beliefs of sacrificing the self to sustain the rights of society.
Steinbeck's intercalary chapters in The Grapes of Wrath have nothing to do with the Joads or other characters of the novel, but help describe the story in different terms. They are similar to poems, offering different viewpoints of the migration, and clarifying parts of the story that the reader might not understand. An excellent example of this use can be seen in chapter 21, where an examination of the attitudes of migrant Okies and the residents of California reveals the changing nature of land ownership among the changing population of California and gives greater meaning to the fierce hostility that the Joads meet in California.
Steinbeck's relationship to the transcendentalists [Emerson, Thoreau, and Whitman] was pointed out soon after The Grapes of Wrath appeared by Frederick I. Carpenter, and as the thirties fade into history, Jim Casy with his idea of the holiness of all men and the unreality of sin seems less a product of his own narrowly doctrinaire age than a latter-day wanderer from the green village of Concord to the dry plains of the West.
The differences between selfishness and selflessness are strong throughout The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck. Everywhere the Joad family goes there is always someone to either push them into the dirt or give them a hand out of the dirt. This happened far and wide, people can be greedy, selfish, and rapacious. It’s in our nature, but even in desperate times when people have a right to be selfish, some will find the will in their heart to aid those who can’t help themselves.
One of the most argued topics throughout history is the conflict of law versus morality. It is hoped that law and morality would work together hand in hand. Unfortunately, there are many instances where law is corrupted and subdues morality. Even in the modern age injustices caused by the law seems like a common occurrence. Literary figures like John Steinbeck and Mark Twain believed that it was important to remain devoted to one's morality, or find new morals when law is corrupted. Through Twain and Steinbeck's most influential works Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and The Grapes of Wrath clearly show the authors' view on the significance of morality. Examples in the novels include the depiction of suffering caused by the law, the idea of
The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck is a novel that does not end with any sort of hope, but does end with the reader learning about how real this novel really was. You do not put this book down after you read it and smile and wish that you could have been living in this era. This is why he ended the novel the way that he does and not 40 pages earlier where he could have made it a happy ending. Steinbeck is just like his novel and he wants you to know what happened, and why it happened. All of this happened because people were forced out of their homes and the only place they had to go was west and almost all of the families ended up like the Jones; with no money, nowhere to go and nothing to look forward to. Even though this is not the way that you wanted the ending of this novel to go, there was no other way that it could have ended.
The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck is considered a classic novel by many in the literary field. The trials and tribulations of the Joad family and other migrants is told throughout this novel. In order to gain a perspective into the lives of "Oakies", Steinbeck uses themes and language of the troubling times of the Great Depression. Some of these aspects are critiqued because of their vulgarity and adult nature. In some places, The Grapes of Wrath has been edited or banned. These challenges undermine Steinbeck's attempts to add reality to the novel and are unjustified.
He chooses to introduce Casy to the story as Tom is on his way home from being put on parole after serving four years on a homicide charge. Tom stumbles upon Casy singing a church hymn and recognizes him as the old preacher. Casy decides to tell Tom how he, “ain’t no preacher no more,” because he, “lost the sperit.” Although Casy believes he has lost the spirit, Steinbeck still manages to make him a symbolic figure of Jesus Christ. He tells Tom about how when he lost the spirit he went out into the wilderness to try and concoct his own ideas about God, holiness, and sin. After being baptized, Jesus Christ fasted in the desert for forty days and nights. They obviously did not do it for the same reasons, but the concept is there. Casy also sacrifices himself in Tom’s place when Tom lashed out against a police officer, knocking him out cold. This could be compared to the story of how Jesus Christ sacrificed himself of the cross in order to save all sinners. Casy knew Tom as a little one, but did not truly know him as a person just like Jesus did not personally know everyone he was dying for on that cross. Another similarity between Jesus Christ and Jim Casy are their intials, J.C. Obviously Casy is not a carbon copy of Christ, as he explains to Tom about his sleeping with almost the entire congregation, but there are a few similarities. To state the obvious, they also have the same initials, J.C. Steinbeck, more
In Steinbeck’s novel, The Grapes of Wrath, the Joad family represents the thousands of migrant families who came to the west with the fantasy of obtaining a peaceful life after the Dust Bowl. Conversely they are faced with something resembling the epitome of human cruelty. Business owners and Californians do what they can to keep the Oklahoma families from breaching the invisible line that divides the privileged and the poor. This line, which only exists in the mind, causes people to loose their sense of humanity. The following quote describes the attitude of the wealthy: “And in the little towns pity for the sodden men changed to anger” (Steinbeck 434).
The plot of Grapes of Wrath follows a simple flowing pattern where every event leads clearly into the next. There are no points in the novel where the reader is taken off track from the main plot of the story. The ending to the novel is neither happy nor unhappy. The Joad family has been largely split apart, however, Tom has decided to take a moral position that could possibly better the lives of many migrant workers. Ma Joad and the rest of the family are forced to leave their newest home because of a horrible rainstorm. But Ma Joad's strength and w...
In "The Grapes of Wrath", Steinbeck takes a great leap forward in his storytelling. His characters are better developed and more human. Steinbeck's development as a writer was linked to his growth as a person and his furthered capacity for understanding in others, particularly the disenfranchised. The process and struggle that ensued during the early years of his career were instrumental in his growth and are demonstrated in the development of his views on industrialization and it's effects on the working class.