Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Arguments against retribution
Essay on retribution
Pros and cons of retribution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Arguments against retribution
Justice means having justification for the actions being taken. Vengeance means taking action because of being wronged. This movie has a little of both, in my opinion, but it is something a little different. There’s justice for the sake of justice, and then there’s justice for the sake of vengeance. Each one could be called something different, but the meaning of each one is the same. Justice for the sake of justice is when something is done for the sake of the law, such as Ringo being taken back to “the pen” because he escaped. Curly does not want to, and, in the end, he doesn’t, but he keeps saying he is going to. Justice for the sake of vengeance is when action is taken against someone or something who has wronged you and it is justified.
The definition of revenge: “to punish somebody who has harmed you or harmed a friend” (Revenge, web).
Forgiveness and justice are very similar than we believe them to be. We believe that justice is
Retribution – is a correctional aim which is to hold a person who has committed a crime accountable for committing a crime against another or society in the form of punishment. (Stojkovic and Lovell 2013) What we look at in retribution is when someone is punished there is legitimacy in the punishment of a particular crime that was committed. Some of the pros of retribution are retribution can make a person or society feel safer or a feeling of justice being served when a person is punished for the crime they committed. The con of retribution is during court proceedings the prosecution and the offender’s lawyer may come to a plea agreement which could give the offender a lesser sentence than what he or she would have gotten originally. (Stojkovic and Lovell 2013)
Revenge is a channel of hatred and anger fueled by an action of someone who crossed a person in some way. In The Crucible, because John Proctor had an affair with his old servant Abigail Williams, Elizabeth Proctor fired her. Abigail then took it one step farther and cried witch on any one who got in her way of love including John's wife. Grudges and personal rivalries played a huge role in the witch trial hysteria because people want to acquire other people's land, to ruin people's names, and it was the only "Christian" way to get revenge.
Justice is part of revenge; as also for revenge is part of justice. “Justice” comes from a Latin word that means “straight, fair, equal”, it’s the quality of being righteous and loyal towards one’s state, although serves the interests of the stronger (Hourani, 1962), while revenge is the act of taking retaliation for injuries or wrongs. What ever the circumstances are being the individual who experiences a unjust act, results in the hunt for one of these two things: Justice or revenge. What are the key differences between the two? Justice can be defined as the concept of moral rightness, which is based on the rules of law, fairness, ethics, and equality among the governed citizens. Revenge, on the other hand, refers to an action taken by an individual as a response to an act of injustice. The principle of revenge is “an eye for an eye”…. Can revenge be justified and be as equally part of justice if they both seek retribution for a wrongdoing?
Revenge is such an enormous part of a being human. It is something that no matter how much you try to avoid part of you will persistently lust for it. When you are hurt in any way your natural instinct will always tell you to make the one who hurt you feel just as bad if not worse as how you felt. It is such a natural and powerful feeling, that when revenge is incorporated into a story it makes it so much stronger. Revenge will make you see so many more sides of characters and make them seem much more complex. Revenge can give fictional characters a more human quality. That is why so many writers use it as their theme.
The Republic by Plato examines many aspects of the human condition. In this piece of writing Plato reveals the sentiments of Socrates as they define how humans function and interact with one another. He even more closely Socrates looks at morality and the values individuals hold most important. One value looked at by Socrates and his colleagues is the principle of justice. Multiple definitions of justice are given and Socrates analyzes the merit of each. As the group defines justice they show how self-interest shapes the progression of their arguments and contributes to the definition of justice.
Vengeance is a dangerous temptation to fall under. People often are very easily lured into taking vengeance upon another individual. The cause of this is that some people often think to take justice into there own hands when it is not there duty. This is how people can become trapped and obsessed with taking vengeance upon someone else and how it can change a persons motives to evil ones, motives that are far from justice. To counter the poison of vengeance, people must act in forgiveness rather than hate and anger towards another. When showing forgiveness for others, you will also be shown forgiveness.
Throughout act V of Macbeth William Shakespeare displays different examples of justice. Justice is a quality of being fair, reasonable, or honest. It is the administration of law or punishment to maintain peace and equity. Justice is helped by truth and fairness. In act V of the play Macbeth, William Shakespeare shows the justice of Macbeth's murder.
Retribution is a justification for punishment and not a theory about substantive criminal law. But what justifies also limits. Retribution offers solid moral bases for opposing overcriminalization. Retribution is the type of punishment that indicating the vengeance or revenge. It is the idea of an ‘eye for an eye’ or ‘tooth for a tooth’ basis. The punishments given are for the response to the offender to the crime that he had done. For example, the death penalty to the crime of murder. It is a form of ‘striking back’ . Basically, there are two rationales in this theory of punishment are first, for the victims or their relatives in the case of death, that the state represent for their dissatisfaction towards the offender. Besides, this also protect from they having private retaliation to the offender. Second, is for the public at large that the public has a need for revenge. Punishment is considered an expression of justified anger by the victim due to the violation of trust demanded by society .
In Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice, the concept of Justice is a prominent theme throughout the play. Specifically, Antonio and Shylock’s different ideas of justice is what fuels their animosity towards each other and how it compares to the concept of justice of the Venetian court.. Antonio”s quest for “justice” is fueled by anti Semitism and hate, while Shylock’s is fueled by the need for revenge. Antonio’s concept of justice is the more barbaric because he robs the Jew of his basic identity, although Shakespeare makes out Shylock’s concept of justice to appear inhuman.
Of course I looked “justice” up in the dictionary before I started to write this paper and I didn’t find anything of interest except of course a common word in every definition, that being “fair”. This implies that justice would have something to do with being fair. I thought that if one of the things the law and legal system are about is maintaining and promoting justice and a sense of “fairness”, they might not be doing such a spiffy job. An eye for an eye is fair? No, that would be too easy, too black and white. I could cite several examples where I thought a judge’s or jury’s ruling was not fair, but I won’t because frankly, we’ve all seen those.
retribution exacted for an injury or wrong. In The Tempest, both of these ideas are demonstrated clearly, but vengeance plays a much more prominent role. Although virtue has more value, vengeance is a more powerful motivator.
“What is a revenge tragedy?” Well a revenge tragedy is when a character takes vengeance for a murdered victim, the character is usually a family member of the avenged victim. A Revenge tragedy conventionally results in the death of both the murderer and avenger. This type of play was very popular during the Elizabethan and Jacobean eras. In order for a tragedy to be labelled as a revenge tragedy it needs to have certain components and characters
The meaning to justice is behaving and acting to what is consequently good or fair. The act of justice is based upon equality being that people should get what they deserve. The Bible says in Deuteronomy 32:4 “He is the Rock, his works are perfect, and all his ways are just. A faithful God who does no wrong, upright and just is he.” We see here in this verse that God is merciful and in all He does he is just in his discipline. As sinners we fall short of Gods glory and because of this when we commit our wrong doings such as adultery, lying, coveting, thieving, murdering, and worshiping false idols, etc is when we are judged for our sins and according to what God finds just is how we will be persecuted. Justice is an attribute that is showed to us everyday because of His sanctity. Man cannot understand justice if they don’t understand sin, we can try and hide from God or prolong our recognition to our actions because we know Go...