Juror Seven

732 Words2 Pages

Everyone has different opinions when it come to the classes of society. Some of the lower class thinks badly of the upper class and some of the upper class thinks badly about the lower class. And there are some in different classes that respect people that aren’t in their class. Reginald Rose uses the theme of Reflection of American Society in 12 Angry Men to show what the higher class thought of the lower class. Juror Three is a man that will not be convinced that there could be some good in the lower class. Juror Seven just doesn’t care about the lower class. Juror Ten is a rude man that give the upper class a bad name. And Juror Eight is a man that thinks that every man deserves to have justice. Juror Three is a man that is completely stuck …show more content…

He is a man that only does things for his benefit. If he can use anyone or thing to help get him ahead he will. This man does not care about the trial, he only cares about his plans afterwards. Even though this is a trial with a boy who could possibly be sentenced to death, he still tries to rush everyone. And once everyone starts to vote “Not Guilty” he changes his vote because that way looks like he could leave quicker. All of this shows that he has absolutely no respect for the lower class. He may just not try to say anything about them because he just doesn’t care. But in this case, it’s better to make an argument than just agree with everyone else. Juror Seven is just a man in the upper class that only cares about himself and no one else. He is another great example of the upper class treating the lower class like …show more content…

The man is almost like Juror Seven but is almost worse. This can be seen at the very beginning of the play, he thinks that the boy was lucky to get a fair trial. He doesn’t think that the boy could afford it. And everytime he tries to make a point, he feels that he has to yell it so that the whole town can hear him. He even says in the play that he doesn’t want any part of the lower class. He even goes as far as to call the boy an “ignorant slob”. This shows that he wants to judge the boy before he even gets to know him. Every time that this man is wrong he always has to comeback with rude comment or a mean glare. This man clearly has no respect for people that are under him in

Open Document