Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Leadership shown in julius caesar
Julius Caesar: The People's Dictator
Julius Caesar: The People's Dictator
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Leadership shown in julius caesar
Julius Caesar was a remarkable Roman Consul who constantly strove to increase the power of his empire. During the Gallic Wars, Caesar fought against several Gallic tribes in attempt to become the sole ruler of the Roman Empire. Caesar expresses his thoughts on this war in his book De Bello Gallico. In this work, Caesar uses many different writing techniques to convince the audience that the war happened in the way he described and therefore make his view on the war credible. Caesar's techniques of writing in mostly indirect statement as well as using powerful adjectives to describe himself comes off very confusing to the audience. Because Caesar is very confident in his writing, as shown through the excessive amounts of detail he includes, …show more content…
Caesar tries to convince the audience that he is doing all he can to help the Roman people. In attempt to reassure his soldiers, Caesar writes that ex proximis hibernis et a Caesare conventura subsidia, "relief would come both from the nearest winter-quarters and from Caesar" (5.28.9). Caesar is trying to make himself seem more important by giving himself credit for reinforcing the Roman soldiers. By addressing himself in the third person, Caesar declares that he was present which makes his writing more truthful because it shows that he was actually there and knows what he is talking about. Caesar then points out nihil temere agendum neque ex hibernis iniussu Caesaris discendendum existimabant, "that nothing should be done hastily, and that they should not depart from the camp without Caesar's orders" (5.28.5-6). Claiming that he has great influence over his army and naming himself the head decision-maker, Caesar appears as though he was actually there giving orders to his men. By claiming to be present in the battle, Caesar again supports the idea that his story is believable. A final example of how Caesar had great influence on the battle is when he writes Caesarem arbitrari profectum in Italiam, "that he believed that Caesar had set forth into Italy" (5.29.3). Caesar makes it clear that he knows his men know where he is at the present, which proves that he must have been there fighting in the war. To redress, Caesar again proves that he was present and knows everything happening in the war which therefore deems his story as being
In William Shakespeare's, Julius Caesar, rhetorical devices are used throughout Decius Brutus’s speech to Caesar to persuade him to attend the senate, and ultimately meet his demise. Decius Brutus uses repetition to directly play into Caesar’s ego and convince him to show at an event he was previously very unsure of. Decius first uses repetition to make Caesar feel as if he were an irreplaceable addition to the senate. He addresses Caesar as, “most mighty Caesar…” (2.2.74) multiple times throughout his oration. The repetition of “mighty” draws Caesar’s attention away from the fact that he really must not go to the senate and instead focuses on why he must. Caesar is known to be easily persuaded by the promise of attention or rewards. Decius
Caesar sees himself as a protector of the Romans against the northern attackers, he wages war against those who threaten his city. Here, he recalled the great failure—when the Helvetians showed no remorse and killed the Consul of Rome and enslaved his legion. Caesar does not let the Helvetians pass through the Province because of the memory of the killed Consul. In Book I, Chapter 7 of Commentarii de Bello Gallico, it says, “Caesar, inasmuch as he kept in remembrance that Lucius Cassius, the consul, had been slain, and his army routed and made to pass under the yoke by the Helvetii, did not think that [their request] ought to be granted: nor was he of opinion that men of hostile disposition, if an opportunity of marching through the Province were given them, would abstain from outrage and mischief.” This shows the constant war between Rome and invaders and it drives Caesar to pursue his goals, such as, killing the Helvetians—making him a powerful force .
Julius Caesar, even though he is considered great, turns out to contain many flaws. He believes himself to be untouchable, and has a confidence that he cannot be harmed, even though that is not the case. He says so when he says, “Caesar shall forth. The things that threatened me ne’er looked but on ...
Rhetorical devices have been around for many centuries, and they are used to convince and persuade people to believe in their cause. These strategies exploit individuals by influencing them to feel sympathy or trust the speaker. In Julius Caesar, a historic tragedy written by the prominent Shakespeare, Antony’s brilliant rhetorical strategies are used to trump Brutus and prompt the Roman people to unite with his rebellion against the unjust butcher of the beloved Julius Caesar.
In this day and age, persuasion can be seen on almost any screen. The average American views thousands of advertisements every week. Most ads are simply pushed out of a person’s mind, but the successful advertisements are the ones that resonate with people. Some forms of ads are very annoying to those who put up with them constantly. Online pop-up ads, for example, are proven to do worse for products and business than no advertising at all! This is because this form of advertising does nothing to convince or persuade the person viewing the ad, and no effort is put into actually put into proving what it’s worth to make a point. Pop-ads make zero use of something known as “rhetorical devices”. In Julius Caesar, Brutus and Mark Antony both try to convey their point of view to a large audience of Roman citizens. One had a better speech than the other since he used “rhetorical devices” more effectively. Logos (logical; what makes sense), Ethos (ethics and morals; portraying similar beliefs and values), and Pathos (emotions; natural feelings that can be counterintuitive to logos) are the rhetorical devices that Aristotle
Julius Caesar was one of the most important political and military leaders in the history of Rome, with many major achievements. Caesar is known to have never lost a single war. His most honorable conquests include the capture of Gaul that extended the Rome boundaries to the Atlantic Ocean; and the Roman invasion of Britain. Julius was also a historian and an incredible orator. He authored many comprehensive journals, named Commentaries that provided the details of his military campaign.
Julius Caesar was a strong leader of the Romans who changed the course of the history for the Roman world decisively and irreversibly. With his courage and strength, he created a strong empire and guided the empire for almost 20 years. His life was short, but had many adventures. I will tell of some of this man’s remarkable life. He did many things, therefore, I will only discuss a few. His name, part of his reign, one of his greatest battles, and his death will be told.
Undeniably, Caesar was a great general who found out early in his military career that his strength was in leading and executing his plans. Moreover, his most memorable battle was against the Gaul. Adrian Goldsworthy suggests that “Caesar was as much- or even more- a politician as he was a general” (Goldsworthy 1). His political connections helped him climb the ladder, but his military expertise had his name on every Romans lips. However, Caesar was ruthless to his enemies, but due to his fearlessness and slow advances on the battlefield, he single-handedly doubled the size of Rome with the defeat of Gaul. The author Miriam Greenblatt advocates that in Julius Caesar and the Roman Republic “ he discovered that he was very good at warfare,” (Greenblatt 18) and she continues that Caesar was so skilled in his ability that he knew just when and where to place his soldiers to defeat his enemies and that he could obtain the money and taxes from those that he subjugated that he very rapidly bailed himself out of debt, and put the money back into Rome (Greenblatt 19) Greenblatt also suggests that because of the Gallic Wars , “Rome had almost doubled the size of the Roman Empire and brought Roman culture- including good roads an Roman system of laws- to northwestern Europe,” (Greenblatt 24). Due to his great skills as a general, he had the unwavering support of his soldiers. Additionally, Greenblatt proposes that
Julius Caesar Act I Graphic Organizer Name Character Notes Important Quotes Evidence of Loyalty (to whom?) Flavius Annoyed with the crowd because they are too fickle. It is no matter.
In his play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare employs various rhetorical strategies such as direct address, repetition, and apostrophe in Antony’s eulogy to convince the crowd into believing that Caesar was a good ruler. His excellent use of rhetoric begins before he starts his speech through the establishment of familiarity. Before Antony begins his speech, he refers to the crowd as “friends, romans, [and] countrymen” to establish a personal connection, indicating the use of direct address (3.2.82). By referring to the crowd as “friends,” Antony removes any separation between him and the audience, establishing a close bond by choice. As it came first on his list, it emphasizes the importance of his friendship with the audience as friendship implies
Playwright, William Shakespeare, in the play Julius Caesar, utilizes many instances of rhetorical devices through the actions and speech of Caesar's right-hand man, Mark Antony. In the given excerpt, Antony demonstrates several of those rhetorical devices such as verbal irony, sarcasm, logos, ethos, and pathos which allows him to sway the plebeians. The central purpose of Mark Antony’s funeral speech is to persuade his audience into believing that Caesar had no ill intentions while manipulating the plebeians into starting a rebellion against their new enemies, Brutus and the conspirators.
Caesar criticizes his ability to plan strategy beforehand, as he says Titurius, "had foreseen nothing before," (33, 1). Titurius' lack of preparation causes him to "rush around" and "tremble", both of these give Caesar perfect reason to call him "cowardly", (33, 1-3). Finally, Caesar is able to judge that the common sense for Titurius is lacking, as he is completely willing to walk off the battlefield to converse with the enemy. Again, Titurius feels that this will ensure the safety of the soldiers, not using common sense to not approach an armed enemy, (36, 4-6). Caesar is able to determine that Titurius is rather ineffective due to the fact that he relies on feelings and doesn't plan
In addition, “Might fire the blood of ordinary men/ To think that Caesar bears such rebel blood” (III.i.41&44). This quote demonstrates Caesar’s arrogance because he is implying that he is not a commoner, but a more powerful figure. “I rather tell thee what is to be feared/Than what I fear; for always I am Caesar” (I.ii.221-222). This quote demonstrates that Caesar is arrogant because he would never admit to the words he says due to the fact that it is the shameful truth. Also, “Help ho, they murder Caesar” (II.ii.3). This quote shows Caesar’s arrogance because he calls himself from the third person. This can demonstrate his tragic flaw because every commoner refers to themselves using first person nouns and since Caesar is more superior then others, he will act differently around the commoners. In addition to that, “Delay not, Caesar; read it instantly/ What is the fellow mad” (III.i.9-10). This quote demonstrates Caesar’s arrogance because he does not listen to Artemidorus’ warning that during the Ides of March, the conspirators (Metellus, Brutus, Cassius, Cinna, Decius, and Casca) will kill him. The reason he does not listen to his warnings because “Danger knows full well/ That Caesar is
The demise of the Roman Republics authoritative power is an event that still holds the focus of modern society. While he is often held accountable for the fall, Gaius Julius Caesar’s rise to power and continuing ambition was not the only factor that caused its eventual downfall. His involvement and inclusion in the creation of the First Triumvirate and the ongoing civil war between Pompey and himself brought around his rise to power, and his reforms quickly affected the social, economic and political structure of Roman society. His rule both started in civil war, and ended in it; ultimately causing an end to republican institutions.
This fickle nature continues for the remainder of the scene, with him quickly altering his opinion for a third time when coerced by Decius, saying “… this way you have expounded it well.” (Shakespeare 92). Caesar’s temperamental and unpredictable opinion is also echoed in his referral of himself in the third person. The use of third person, when referring to himself, allows the audience to observe the otherworldly and godlike self-perception that Caesar possesses. Such an ethereal self-image is strongly evident succeeding the return of the servant, where the reference and the obvious egalitarian view of Caesar and the roman gods is distinct, saying “The gods do this in shame of cowardice.