Julius Caesar Flaws

785 Words2 Pages

In The tragedy of Julius Caesar, caesar could never possibly be known as a tragic hero due to his major flaws that lead to his downfall and assassination. Most people thought brutus was the antagonist but that's not true. But brutus was the underdog protagonist of the play. Caesar was liked by many but many never seen his flaws that overwhelmed him and cause himself to be assassinated. brutus was the overseen tragic hero who wasn't superior to everyone and they thought he was bad but what he actually saved rome from getting a leader who could possibly abuse his power. His tragic flaw and downfall was killing caesar even though it was for the better for rome but he decided to kill himself. Brutus’s action was to help protect rome from a leader who would abuse his power but citizens never saw how he couldn't be a good leader. Brutus discussed his assassination with cassius who is a long time friend of caesar but also thinks he has too much power. Nevertheless Brutus’s actions could be justified because he knew caesar becoming a leader would be a very bad thing. And disagrees with antony crowning caesar instead of himself. He …show more content…

Most people thought he was amazing but actually people saw a different caesar. caesar made it seem like he didn’t want to be crown but he did that to make people think he didn’t want to be crown but in reality he did. “He put it on for the third time by; and still as he refused it, the rabblement hooted, and clapped their chopt hands, and threw up their sweaty nightcaps, and uttered such deal of stinking breath because caesar refused the crown, that it had almost, choked caesar; for he swounded and fell down at it”(1.2.242-248). People are wrong because they didn’t see a side of caesar that brutus did and knew he’d possibly abuse his power. So Brutus decided to take rome into his hand and kill caesar

Open Document