Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In The tragedy of Julius Caesar, caesar could never possibly be known as a tragic hero due to his major flaws that lead to his downfall and assassination. Most people thought brutus was the antagonist but that's not true. But brutus was the underdog protagonist of the play. Caesar was liked by many but many never seen his flaws that overwhelmed him and cause himself to be assassinated. brutus was the overseen tragic hero who wasn't superior to everyone and they thought he was bad but what he actually saved rome from getting a leader who could possibly abuse his power. His tragic flaw and downfall was killing caesar even though it was for the better for rome but he decided to kill himself. Brutus’s action was to help protect rome from a leader who would abuse his power but citizens never saw how he couldn't be a good leader. Brutus discussed his assassination with cassius who is a long time friend of caesar but also thinks he has too much power. Nevertheless Brutus’s actions could be justified because he knew caesar becoming a leader would be a very bad thing. And disagrees with antony crowning caesar instead of himself. He …show more content…
thinks it’d be selfish if he says he's the one who should be crowned instead of caesar. “I do fear the people choose caesar for their king”(1.2.78-79). He knows what caesar could be capable of if he becomes king and he doesn’t want that happening so he decides to make sure himself that it doesn't happen. Brutus’s tragic flaw could be him jumping to conclusions which made him make a bad decision and killed caesar. He could of chose another option instead of jumping straight to killing him. His tragic flaw of jumping to conclusions basically lead to his downfall. If he didn’t jump to conclusions maybe he would of been wrong about caesar. Rome might of been perfectly fine with him ruling. “Then he offered it to him again; then he put it by again; but to my thinking, he was very loath to lay his fingers off it”(1.2.239-241). brutus’s edgeness pushed him to jumping to clusions doubtedly leading to his tragic flaw and his downfall. It eventually lead to his death and basically failing. Brutus killing himself was to justify killing caesar because of him thinking over his actions were wrong and he should of done something else to keep the power hungry leader from abusing his power. Brutus try to persuade the citizens that killing caesar was for the better for rome. He was trying to prove to people that caesar was bad and no good for rome. “The ghost of Caesar hath appeared to me Two several times by night; at Sardis once, And this last night in Philippi fields. I know my hour is come”(5.5.16-19). Shakespeare was trying to prove that brutus killing himself could be justified by him killing caesar without really thinking consequences of killing the leader of rome and what it could bring. Some people might think caesar was the tragic hero in the story but he had major flaws that lead to his downfall.
Most people thought he was amazing but actually people saw a different caesar. caesar made it seem like he didn’t want to be crown but he did that to make people think he didn’t want to be crown but in reality he did. “He put it on for the third time by; and still as he refused it, the rabblement hooted, and clapped their chopt hands, and threw up their sweaty nightcaps, and uttered such deal of stinking breath because caesar refused the crown, that it had almost, choked caesar; for he swounded and fell down at it”(1.2.242-248). People are wrong because they didn’t see a side of caesar that brutus did and knew he’d possibly abuse his power. So Brutus decided to take rome into his hand and kill caesar
himself. Most people think brutus was the antagonist in the story but what he did was for the better of everyone from getting a ruler who would of possibly abused his power and make wrong choices. Brutus killing caesar was justified by him seeing a side of brutus that not everyone seen and he knew it wouldn't bring rome anything good with a ruler who would abuse his power. Answering this question is very important, many people just figure caesar was the tragic hero since the story is about him but that’s not true. If people read carefully to actually get to know about brutus they would realize that brutus killing caesar was for the better for everyone. Most people was uneducated and not realize that brutus could be justified.
In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar could definitely be thought of as a tragic hero. A tragic hero is a character in a story that is high standing in society, but has a flaw that inevitably leads to their downfall. Julius Caesar definitely fits this description. He is a leader in Rome and has everything he could ever want. However, he does have a weakness which will be devastating to his life. There are many people who would like to kill him but Caesar is not worried. Julius Caesar’s flaw is arrogance and believes he is invulnerable. He also, right before his death discovers a discernment more devastating than the knife wounds, and finally he is and unsympathetic character because of many reasons.
On the other hand some people may believe that he is honorable. Some may say that Brutus had the best interest of Rome in mind while he murdered Caesar. Also, some might try and argue that Brutus would have made a better ruler and that is why is chose to do this act. What these arguments fail to consider is the fact that Brutus failed to stand up for his morals, agrees to take the life of a dear friend, and he goes to kill himself because he is too afraid to face the consequences. Brutus is a dishonorable man because he allows Cassius to make him go against his morals. Another thing is that he shows his weakness by going and not facing the consequences that came with his
Brutus was a man of noble birth. He had multiple servants and was often referred to as “Lord”, which indicates a certain level of respect for him. He was a very highly thought of person in Rome. At no point did he ever betray anyone, although he did kill Caesar, he did it to better Rome, not to mislead him. Everything he did was for the advantage of someone else. Even after Brutus dies, Marc Antony says “This was the noblest roman of them all; all the conspirators, save only he, did that they did in the envy of Caesar; he only in a general honest thought and common good to all...” This shows that regardless of brutus killing Caesar, he is still considered noble because he had good intentions. Brutus was also the best friend of Julius Caesar, the most powerful man in Rome. Had he been a commoner, Caesar most likely would not have associated with him or trusted him as a friend.
Throughout most of the play Brutus is constantly internally conflicted. Does he do what he believes is best for Rome or stay loyal to his friend and leader? Should he assist in the murder of one person to benefit many? Although killing Caesar was in the end a bad choice, Brutus always tries to do what is best for Rome and for the people. However even though all of Brutus’ motives are good he still has the tragic flaw of pride, which ultimately leads to his downfall. The reason that Brutus gets caught up in the conspiracy is because Cassias appeals to his pride and flatters him with forged letters from the Roman people saying he is a greater leader then Caesar.
The second reason why Brutus should not be a tragic hero is because he has a tragic flaw and this flaw leads to his ultimate downfall. The tragic Flaw for Brutus is his idealistic view of the world. He contracts this view about Caesar after Cassius persuades him by saying that Caesar will be a tyrant. Because of this, Brutus joins the conspirators and kills Caesar. This shows that Brutus, like other tragic heroes uses his tragic flaw and thus will cause his eventual defeat. Later in the play Brutus directs, as any ideological man would, to charge rather than wait for the enemy to attack. This is an excellent exemplar of the Brutus’s tragic flaw since Brutus did this so that he would not lose support in Rome.
The tragic hero is one of literatures most used (and sometimes abused) characters. The classical definition of a tragic hero is, “a person with heroic or potentially heroic qualities. The person is doomed by the Gods or some other supernatural force to destruction or suffering. The hero struggles against the fate, but due to a personal flaw, ultimately fails in the battle against fate. It is my personal opinion that Brutus,as he is portrayed in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, is a tragic hero by this definition. I came to this conclusion due to the fact that Brutus shares many similarities with other tragic heroes in literature such as Oedipus, Hamlet, and Ralph from Lord of the Flies. All four characters share the two critical traits that are needed to be tragic heroes: a tragic flaw that eventually leads to a tragic downfall. The tragic hero was defined by Aristotle, yet the “invention” of the tragic hero goes to Sophocles.
In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, I saw two main characters as tragic heroes. First, I saw Julius Caesar as a tragic hero because his will to gain power was so strong that he ended up losing his life for it. The fact that he could have been such a strong leader was destroyed when he was killed by conspirators. I saw Marcus Brutus as a second tragic hero in this play. Brutus was such a noble character that did not deserve to die. The main reason why he did die, however, was because he had led a conspiracy against Caesar and eventually killed him. These two characters were the tragic heroes of the play in my opinion.
Brutus is classified as the tragic hero of “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare because he is blinded by single-minded focus on personal ethics that combined with a tragic flaw dooms him to make a serious error in judgment; however, he himself maintains his morals and his spirit lives on.
Brutus’ tragic flaws are part of what makes him a tragic hero. In Julius Caesar, Brutus is a great example of a tragic hero. His tragic flaws are honor, poor judgement, and idealism (Bedell). In Shakespeare’s plays, the tragic hero and his flaws cause the downfall of the play (Tragic Flaws).
Brutus’s arrogance, aided by Cassius’s equally prevalent arrogance, caused them to make the murder of Julius Caesar an acceptable idea. It took only a few weeks for Brutus to be completely convinced that there was nothing wrong with the murder of an innocent man. “Let’s be sacrificers, but not butchers, Caius” (Shakespeare, Julius Caesar II, i, 166) This quote is Brutus explaining to Cassius that killing Caesar is fine, but killing Antony would be too much; that, if they were to kill anyone other than Caesar, they would become murders in the public eye. This quote, in order to completely connect, needs more corroborating information. At first, Brutus was skeptical, unsure of the decision to kill Caesar. However, Cassius had a greed for Caesar’s power and his greed began to toy with Brutus’ arrogance. “Why is Julius in power? Why is he so special? Why aren’t you in power” are questions Cassius began to plant on Brutus. After weeks of t...
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is the story about the men who conspired and followed through with the assassination of the great Julius Caesar. These men fear that Caesar will take the crown and become the next king of Rome. The roman people had a true averse feeling toward the idea of monarchy. So in order to prevent this they come up with a plan to end Caesars life, which is duly followed through on March 15, 44 B.C. Out of these conspirators there is one man that stands out to be a tragic hero, and that is a man by the name of Brutus. He was a great friend of Caesar who ultimately became one of Caesars worst adversaries. He betrayed Caesars trust and friendship when he agreed to be part of the assassination plot. A tragic hero is someone who is in a place of high standings or a place of power. This leads to a huge fall from greatness to death. A tragic hero must have many deep complex character flaws that are revealed throughout the course of the story. They then must ultimately accept responsibility for their mistakes; along with being humbled and enlightened. Brutus demonstrates all of the attributes of a tragic hero.
Julius Caesar is a play written by William Shakespeare that takes place in the year 44 B.C. in Rome. This play is based on a true event-- the assassination of the ruler, Julius Caesar, by the traitorous conspirators that stood beside him at the capitol. This group of conspirators consisted of Marcus Brutus, Cassius, Casca, Trebonius, Ligarius, Decius Brutus, Metellus Cimber, and Cinna. This play is a tragedy, meaning that it is a work that brings the main character or characters extreme suffering, usually at the fault of one or several tragic flaws. The possession of one or more tragic flaws is what marks the difference between a hero and a tragic hero.
First, Caesar had declared himself dictator for life. Brutus loved the republican principle and wanted to defend it: "not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more." Brutus appreciated Caesar's friendship and he honored his good fortune and bravery, but living in a country that is not free or being enslaved is not worth all that to him. It was Caesar's ambition to become king that Brutus was worried about: "Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men? As Caesar loved me, I weep for him. As he was fortunate, I rejoice at it. As he was valiant, I honor him. But, as he was ambitious, I slew him." It was his best friend or the greater good of the country and its people. He joined the conspiracy to kill Caesar because of his ambition to be crowned.
His overall character and personality was nothing like Cassius's. Brutus alone was an important public figure to the people of Rome. He has strong assets that Cassius lacks. Without Brutus, pulling off murdering the beloved Caesar would've been nearly impossible. Brutus strongly believes his actions were all in favor of Roman's republic. After killing his close friend and washing his hands in Caesar's blood Brutus needs to explain his reasoning behind it all. "Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all freemen? As Caesar lov’d me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honor him; but, as he was ambitious, I slew him." (Act 3 Scene 2 Page 589) It was hard for Brutus to murder Caesar, he was an honest and truthful man, but as quoted his actions were in the best interest of Rome. "He was my friend, faithful and just to me. But Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man." (Act 3 Scene 2 Page
Tragic Hero in Julius Caesar A tragic hero is the character whose actions deeply affect the other characters and who creates a series of events that eventually lead to the character’s downfall and the downfall of his loved ones. Such a hero possesses a flaw in character that influences his actions and thinking and especially his judgments. In logically determining who the hero in Julius Caesar is, one simply must find the one character who fits the above guidelines. Marcus Brutus is the only one, and, thus, he is the tragic hero.