Julius Caesar

925 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Julius Caesar analysis

Julius Caesar Expository Essay The decisions that one man makes can determine the length of life. Rome has many people that have the characteristics to be great leaders. Antony is a manipulative man, Brutus is an honorable man, and Octavius is a quiet strength. All three men would do an excellent job in leading Rome. Antony is a manipulative man. This is shown throughout the play in several cases, but most prominently at Caesar’s funeral. “I thrice presented him a kingly crown which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?” (III, ii, 96-96). Antony is very cleaver in the way that he presents his case to the people. He uses rhetorical questioning to show the people that Caesar was in fact not ambitious. Antony also played on the people’s greed, to influence them to his side. “I found it in his closet; ‘tis his will/and they would go kiss Caesar’s dead wounds…” (III, ii, 129, 132-133). Antony is very smart in the way he does this. He knows how to talk to the people to get them to believe his side of the story and revenge Caesar’s death. Likewise, Antony is conniving. He uses this strength by flattering Brutus, and falsely befriending the conspirators into letting him speak at Caesar’s funeral. “I doubt not of your wisdom. Let each man render me his bloody hand.” (III, i, 200-201). Antony presents his case in such a way that Brutus and the other conspirators think that he is on their side, when in fact he really is going to turn the common people against them to revenge Caesar’s death by creating a war. Furthermore, Brutus is an honorable man giving him the chance to be a great leader. Brutus is an idealist man, who is optimistic about assassinating Caesar. “Grant that, and then is death a benefit. So are we Caesar’s f... ... middle of paper ... ... the only way to honor his dead uncle was to revenge his death. Even thought Octavius is the quiet strength of the second triumphant, he displays his leadership qualities and respect for others in a diplomatic way. In conclusion, throughout the play Rome has a source of people who would make excellent leaders and guide Rome to victory. Antony is seen as being a manipulative man and proves that nothing will stand in his way to revenge his friends death. Moreover, Brutus proves that he is an honorable man by keeping his motives pure and standing by his story that he truly loved Rome more than Caesar. Likewise, Octavius played a small roll as a quiet by-stander, yet proved his point that he will not stand for being push around in any sort of matter. Antony, Brutus, and Octavius learn that the decisions they make today could very well be their death of tomorrow.

Show More
Related

  • Antony's Ethos For Brutus Caesar

    620 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since the people knew Caesar because of his friendliness and how nice he was to people he was able to get sympathy for his death. When the people remembered how good he was at one point they wanted to get vengeance on the conspirators,Antony had used persuasion and reverse psychology with the crowd to get mad at the conspirators. Brutus had not connected to the people as well because he did not give as much sympathy about Caesar's Death , and what he will give in return. Antony had touched the people when he sad said that he had money and land for the people of rome but he did not want to read it because it would make them made. Once that had hit there was no way Brutus could fight back against Antony's

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Dbq

    529 Words  | 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar elected himself as the dictator of Rome. He became a favorite to many of the people of the lower classes. Unlike many leaders, Caesar valued the poor. Most people agreed with his decisions, but some of the higher classes’ did not. On March 15 44 BCE, now called the Ides of March, a few of Caesars’ closest peers decided to murder Caesar. Marcus Brutus killed Julius Caesar, on March 15.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar

    510 Words  | 2 Pages

    Who would have been the best suited leader of Rome in sixth century B.C.? Many believe it could have been Marcus Antonius, Marcus Brutus, or the great Julius Caesar. Marcus Brutus is known to be the most honorable man in Rome at the time and was well respected. Caesar is the ruler and has a successful military. He also seeks wealth and power. Antony is Caesar’s right hand man and good friend. He later acquires the position that Caesar had and also seeks wealth and power. All three men are after the job, but Brutus is obviously the one who was most suited for it and also the only one who never got the chance.

    Read More

  • Leadership In Julius Ceasar

    1235 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...derable differences in trust and loyalty are the ultimate factors that influence the conclusion of the play. Both of these characters have great qualities such as intelligence, self-dependence, and reasoning ability that make them excellent leaders. It, however, is their differences that govern the end result of the conspiracy. The single most outstanding decision of the play was when the conspirators resolved not to kill Antony along with Caesar. Brutus’ overwhelming trust of Antony led him to believe Antony was not going to be a problem. There are many implications of leadership as seen in Julius Caesar. Those who tend to exhibit strong leadership characteristics will have much more impact on those who tend to stand back and fall into the crowd, even if the decisions being made are illogical. When two strong leaders interact, there usually is a disagreement on the course of action, which can be harmful for the group. The strong characters of Brutus and Cassius, and the weaker conspirators, prove both these conclusions.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar: Beware the Ides of March

    1003 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Senate of the Roman Republic are the ruling power over most of the known world. Yet this powerful and influential senate is easily threatened by one man; Julius Caesar. To the senators Caesar is the catalyst for the downfall of a Republic they had worked so hard to create and protect. The playwright William Shakespeare dives into this world of betrayal and ambition with his play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Using his voice as a writer he takes the audience into Rome and lets them experience each riveting moment of Caesar’s fall. The play shows that Caesar is not the cause of Rome’s eventual downfall, but the senators who conspire against him and ultimately kill him are the ones reprehensible. Shakespeare introduces the characters of Brutus and Cassius: two men, both of high standing, that spearhead the conspiracy against Caesar’s life. The actions of their scheme are met with chaotic consequences, consequences so dangerous that both Brutus and Cassius flee to Asia Minor. After the Battle of Phillippi, once Octavius and Marc Antony seem to have one, the two men take their lives. This final action sends them back to a world with Caesar, a world they tried so hard to escape. At the end of both Caesar and Brutus’ lives become enlightened to a truth they had so eagerly avoided. For Caesar that truth is his over confidence in his ideals and his ignorance to the warning signs so often shown to him. Caesar’s downfall and untimely understanding makes him a tragic hero.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar: Not a Great Leader

    699 Words  | 2 Pages

    The driving forces in the play Julius Caesar are the characters Marcus Brutus, Julius Caesar, and Marc Antony. Julius Caesar is the center of the ordeal of leadership in Rome when the play begins. When Caesar returns to Rome he is looked upon by the fickle plebeians as a glorious and triumphant hero. The authority of his heroism is questioned when the honorable Marcus Brutus speaks to the townspeople during Caesar’s funeral. Brutus proves to be the better leader for Rome rather than Caesar or Antony. Brutus is wiser and more honorable than the other Romans. He was the only one truly looking out for the good of Rome and not himself.

    Read More

  • How Does Julius Caesar Change Throughout The Play

    888 Words  | 2 Pages

    The play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare showcases many characters and events that go through many significant changes. One particular character that went through unique changes was Julius Caesar. The 16th century work is a lengthy tragedy about the antagonists Brutus and Cassius fighting with the protagonists Octavius, Antony, and Lepidus over the murder of Julius Caesar. Although the play’s main pushing conflict was the murder of Julius Caesar, he is considered a secondary character, but a protagonist. Throughout the theatrical work Julius Caesar’s actions, alliances, character developments, and internal and external conflicts display his diverse changes.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Dbq

    416 Words  | 1 Pages

    Rome is also known as “the eternal city” because the Romans believed that no matter what happened to the world, the city of Rome would last for eternity. Rome is believed to be founded by two twin brothers: Romulus and Remus. Early Rome was once ruled by a King, but later was ruled by a government known as the Roman Republic. The Roman Republic was eventually ended by three men: Marcus Licinius Crassus, Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, also known as Pompey, and Julius Caesar. Although these three men each wanted power for their own and had different views, they agreed to join forces to rise over the Roman Republic and prevent a civil war. These three men formed something called the First Triumvirate. Later when he was in a battle, Crassus was killed

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetoric Analysis

    1235 Words  | 3 Pages

    Antony mentions about the battles Caesar had won that gave more wealth to the country, “he hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill”. Further, he also reminds the people when he offered Caesar a crown, but Caesar rejected it in his statement, “You all did see that on the Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he thrice refuse: was this ambition?” Lastly, he tells the people about Caesar’s affection to the poor, “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept”. Unlike Mark Antony, Brutus does not provide any evidence to prove his point that Caesar was ambitious. This information illustrates how logic reasons alter the people’s opinions. Thus, since Antony provide more evidences to support his opinion, people sided him instead of

    Read More

  • Comparison of the Two Speeches in Julius Caesar

    888 Words  | 2 Pages

    In William Shakespeare's play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, two speeches are given to the people of Rome about Caesar's death. In Act 3, Scene 2 of this play Brutus and Antony both try to sway the minds of the Romans toward their views. Brutus tried to make the people believe he killed Caesar for a noble cause. Antony tried to persuade the people that the conspirators committed an act of brutality toward Caesar and were traitors. The effectiveness and ineffectiveness of both Antony's and Brutus's speech to the people are conveyed through tone and rhetorical devices.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Persuasive Essay

    671 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the play made by William Shakespeare, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Many of the characters stride for the title of ruler of Rome. After the murder of the previous leader, Julius Caesar. His apprentice (Marc Antony) and his Best-friend turned conspirator (Brutus), speak to the public from an attempt to win their favor. Brutus speaks about why it was needed to kill Caesar. However, Antony speaks to them on how the conspirators, like Brutus, are deadly and wrong. Assuming that these speeches were the final words of these characters before a new election Antony should be given the crown.

    Read More

  • Comparing Brutus And Anthony's Speeches Of Julius Caesar

    332 Words  | 1 Pages

    Brutus and Anthony’s speeches are all spoken with eloquence and reason as well as appeal to the emotions. Both have weighty illustrations and are filled with emotions. However, these speeches carve the ending of the play as some kind of a foreshadowing; one ending with triumph and the other in victory.

    Read More

  • Analyzing Mark Antony's Speech

    404 Words  | 1 Pages

    Devastation rose upon the citizens of Rome as word spread about the death of their leader, Julius Caesar. Julius was stabbed and assassinated by many senators that believed the rights of their people were being restricted. Brutus was a good friend of Julius that played a part in his murder and is now at his funeral, speaking to the citizens hoping to make peace and to regain their trust. Mark Antony is a close friend of Caesar who took no part in the assassination. Antony is giving a verbally ironic speech in order to convince the citizens that Brutus, is not an “honourable man”, he should not be their leader, and he should be punished for what he has done. Antony’s speech won the audience over because his furtive method of degrading

    Read More

  • Brutus: A Tragic Hero

    1899 Words  | 4 Pages

    In scene 3, shortly after Caesar dies, Antony says, “That’s all I seek, and am moreover suitor, that I may produce his body to the market-place, and in the pulpit, as becomes a friend, speak in the order of his funeral.[III, i, L 243-248]” And Brutus obliges, but also adds that in Antony’s speech, he “shall not in your funeral speech blame us, but speak all good you can devise of Caesar, and say you do it by our permission. [III, i, L 264-266]” Brutus’ mistake is believing that Antony will stay true to his word and his honour. Brutus thinks too highly of others. But, as revealed later in the scene, Antony won’t stay true to his word, and will betray Caesar by using his persuasive voice to sway the crowd against the conspirators. This choice that Brutus makes ultimately leads to his downfall, because Antony changes the public view and make Brutus co-conspirators the villains. This vital mistake almost ensures Brutus’ downfall, and it was caused by Brutus himself. This again proves that Brutus is the tragic hero of the play, the honourable protagonist brought down by his own

    Read More

  • Comparing Brutus And Antony In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

    623 Words  | 2 Pages

    Second of all, Antony begins to prove Brutus wrong about a lot of the things that he said would be going on if Caesar was still alive and ruled Rome. Brutus states “had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves,” Brutus never really had prove that Caesar would do all those bad things if he was still alive. He says that “but, as he was ambitious,I slew him” because of Caesar braveness Brutus killed him. Brutus was always honored because his ancestor freed Rome from there last ruler that is why he quote “not that i loved Caesar less, but that i loved Rome more” that is why he felt so responsible if anything bad happened to Rome or the people in it. However that gave him no right to believe that Caesar would become like all those other rulers

    Read More

More about Julius Caesar

Open Document