Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Modern architecture history
Essay on modern architecture
Essay on modern architecture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Modern architecture history
Hrushita Davey
PA101614
Prof. Pratyush Shankar
History and Theory of Urban Design
10 April 2015
The Project of Modernity in India
Background
“I wanted to point out the significance of tradition in architecture and in fact for all creative works. During the 1980’s modernity was frequently accused of abandoning history and tradition. This argument was central to the post modernist ideology…….. History and tradition are complex phenomena and they are strongly present in the dialectical process of questioning the characteristics of the modern attitude” Juhani Pallasmaa, Essay on Tradition and Modernity
The Modern Movement as we have come to understand and experience over time,
…show more content…
It draws strength from innocent faith in a future brought about by new architecture and art. This modernism was largely immaterial and weightless; it consciously avoided symbolism and tried to achieve a sense of timelessness in its spatial experience. The second kind of modernism was rooted in the idea of a realistic view of culture sans illusions. It boldly expresses gravity and stability acknowledging materiality and the earth. This New Modernism seeks time through material and memory. This transformation of modernity did not happen all at once. The momentum of the First Modernism began losing ground in the ‘50’s. Louis I Kahn and Aldo van Eyck appeared as the front runners of this change. Kahn was responsible for bringing back the archaic and supernatural dimensions while Aldo introduced a structuralist …show more content…
This because at any given point in time one has concluded an era or an age as history, be it Nehruvian or Colonial Imperialism, if only for the moment. Relationship between architecture and modernity has been noted by historians such as Lewis Mumford and Walter Benjamin with their main concern being the City. Thus one can confidently conclude that it is in the urban life that we speak of this relationship between Modernity and Architecture. Some of the key elements that establish this link maybe identified as follows: 1) Walter Benjamin’s Arcades Project (written between 1927 and 1940) speaks of the Fig 1.2The Arcades Project materialism in Paris during the 19th century as a result of industrialization. He stresses on the vitality of technology to the aesthetics and economies of Modern Paris. The Hausmannian Paris was based on the deployment of materials in a manner that provided for creation of typical bourgeois life, such as the train station, the department store and the arcade, alongside visual symmetry of boulevards and grand scale public spaces. 2) The second link is the growing dominance of visuals in modern life. Architecture relies heavily on vision. Fig 1.3 Monte Carlo Project, Archigram
Q: Use St. Peter’s Basilica and Donato Bramante’s Tempietto in Rome, in opposition to John Balthasar Neumann’s Pilgrimage Church of Vier(7) in Bamburg, Germany, to argue that a rational engagement with architecture is a more effective means to comprehend and understand architectural form. During the period of Renaissance, human’s thought and intelligence has reached its highest and its effect on the architectural form, it became clear and its engagement of rational aspect on the building. Mainly geometrical forms are the characteristics which can be identified. Not so long after the Renaissance period of Baroque architecture was introduced, rather than logic and reasoning they wanted to capture the emotional atmosphere by using the architectural elements such as light, height, crafted art, costly materials and so on as mentioned by(Scotti 2007, 5-10).
Preservation of modern architecture is unique in its own way and adds a whole different dimension of preserving old buildings. The vast difference in the materials of construction from the traditional ones, the complexity involving preservation and renovation adds to the diversification of preservation. It is not just the difficulties in preserving but the indifference towards the modernist buildings which is the major factor for the neglect. “For all the talk of technical difficulties, in reality it is the unpopularity of modernism that is often the greatest challenge for advocates of postwar architectural preservation” (While 2007, 649)
It is the new decade after the end of world war two and modernism is a well-established practice. Its pioneers and spearheads are prevalent figures looming over the new architects and designers who are trying to make their mark in the shadows of such historically influential people. With new technologies and materials emerging from the world wars the next era of modernism had started to evolved, bringing with it philosophies and ideas which seemed far removed from those of the pioneers of modernism “What emerged in the late 1940s and 1950s was an expanding synthesis of questions utterly removed from the confident statements of the pioneers.”(Spade 1971,10) Two significant buildings were designed in the 50's, both of them for educational institutes and to house students of architecture, there were both designed in completely different styles and methods. The first is Ludwig Mies van der Rohes' Crown Hall, finished in 1956 and designed as a part of a campus master plan for the Illinois Institute of technology in Chicago. Mies' design for Crown Hall is one of his most realised expressio...
“Form follows function.” Every great Modern architect thought, designed by and breathed these very words. Or at least, their design principles evolved from them. Modern architects Le Corbusier, Mies van der Rohe, Frank Lloyd Wright, Pierre Chareau, and Rudolf Schindler to name a few believed that the function determined the space whether the space was solely for a particular purpose or they overlapped to allow for multiple uses. Form didn’t just follow function, function defined the space. By focusing on the relationship between the architecture and the interior elements, Chareau’s Maison de Verre expanded the idea of functionalism to include not only the architecture but also the space it creates and how people function within that space.
Modernism indicates a branch of movements in art (Impressionism, Post-Impressionism, Fauvism; Cubism; Expressionism; Dada, Surrealism, Pop Art. Etc.) with distinct characteristics, it firmly rejects its classical precedent and classical style, what Walter Benjamin would refer to as “destructive liquidation of the traditional value of the cultural heritage”; and it explores the etiology of a present historical situation and of its attendant forms of self-consciousness in the West. Whereas Modernity is often used as ...
(Image taken from Tranchtenberg, Marvin, Isabelle Hyman. Architecture: From Prehistory to Postmodernity. Second Edition. Prentice Hall, Inc. New Jersey: 2002.)
Modernism is a period which is both progressive and optimistic.The Modern period starts with the Renaissance for historians.It’s stem ‘’Modern’’, comes from the Latin which means ‘’current’’.It is a cultural movement which involves changes in art,architecture,music and literature:
Art is all around us. The architectural design of buildings to the ornamentation of jewelry and art is in almost everything. To those who have little prior knowledge of certain architecture styles and or influences, a building can appear, as just a building and a piece of jewelry can appear as just that. With the idea that art is everywhere there are two art styles that have heavily influenced the architecture seen in todays communities, those being Art Deco and Bauhaus. These styles represent so much more than architecture, they represent a time period and a cultural and political reform. The purpose of this paper is that one will be able to understand
The essence of modern architecture lays in a remarkable strives to reconcile the core principles of architectural design with rapid technological advancement and the modernization of society. However, it took “the form of numerous movements, schools of design, and architectural styles, some in tension with one another, and often equally defying such classification, to establish modernism as a distinctive architectural movement” (Robinson and Foell). Although, the narrower concept of modernism in architecture is broadly characterized by simplification of form and subtraction of ornament from the structure and theme of the building, meaning that the result of design should derive directly from its purpose; the visual expression of the structure, particularly the visual importance of the horizontal and vertical lines typical for the International Style modernism, the use of industrially-produced materials and adaptation of the machine aesthetic, as well as the truth to materials concept, meaning that the true nat...
The reason for this piece is to attempt a comparison between two architectural examples that employ classical design from different stylistic eras of architectural history. The two styles I've chosen to discuss are the Renaissance and Baroque periods. An understanding of classical architecture needs to be made, as it is the fundamental style of any period that developed architecturally
Charles Jencks in his book “The Language of Post-Modern Architecture “shows various similarities architecture shares with language, reflecting about the semiotic rules of architecture and wanting to communicate architecture to a broader public. The book differentiates post-modern architecture from architectural modernism in terms of cultural and architectural history by transferring the term post-modernism from the study of literature to architecture.
In the process of development of human society, architecture and culture are inseparable. Cuthbert (1985) indicates that architecture, with its unique art form, expresses the level of human culture in different historical stages, as well as the yearning towards the future. According to his article, it can be said that architecture has become one of the physical means for human to change the world and to conquer the nature. Consequently, architecture has been an important component of human civilization. Since 1980s when China started the opening and reforming policy, a variety of architectural ideas, schools and styles have sprung up. Accompanying with a momentum of...
What makes modern architecture? Before answering this, one would need to understand what the term “modern” exactly describes. In architecture, modernism is the movement or transition from one period to another, and it is caused by cultural, territorial, and technological changes happening in the world. In Kenneth Frampton’s Modern Architecture: A Critical History, he details these three major societal changes that impact and create modern architecture.
At the height of the Second Empire, Paris was one of the leading centres of capitalist culture in Europe during the mid-nineteenth century, made possible by the city’s reconstruction. The modernisation of Paris initiated an unprecedented method of urban planning under Baron Haussmann. It is this concept of modernisation that people immediately think of in terms of Paris and modernity. This focus on Haussmannisation, however, obscures the fact that Paris was already changing before Haussmann, as was evident in the arcades that sprung up during the 1820s and 30s. Plans of renovating the city were already being thought of in order to manage problems of overcrowding, diseases, social upheavals and infrastructure collapse. However, these plans were never realised; it was the small business owners—or the petit bourgeoisie—who saw to the creation of the arcades that drove the changes made within the urban landscape of pre-Haussmann Paris.
Post modern architecture: A revival of architectural elements of the past or a version of aestheticism?