Judges Allocation and Sentencing Guidelines

853 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The concept of a fair trial

1.4 Judges are typically white men with strong political connections. Do you see any problems with this in terms of fairness in sentencing?

Judges allocation of outcomes is constrained by a diversity of factors; race has no weight on sentencing. What is taken into consideration is the severity of the crime and the individual’s criminal history. The judge has to consult the Constitution and a group of statutes and court rules that governs sentencing procedure in that given jurisdiction.

When considering procedures for sentencing, it is important to know that the outset that sentencing is an area in which jurisdictions vary considerably, and to distinguish the differences in sentencing systems may have an important bearing on the applicable procedures.

Nonetheless, except where mandatory sentencing guidelines apply, criminal judges maintain a fair degree of discretion. However they are compel to follow the rules of sentencing. Civil judges also have considerable flexibility in fashioning a remedy, in terms of both the type of remedy whether is monetary vs. other restitution and the amount allocated to the victim. In allocating some resource, decision makers can rely on several different principles of distributive justice.

2. What is the Court Room Workgroup? Define the role of each member of the Courtroom Workgroup

A Courtroom Workgroup is an unofficial arrangement between the criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judge who work together are able to smoothly and efficiently handle cases through cooperative plea-bargaining processes. Because of their position in the justice system, judges have the ability to define the level of their involvement in the processing of criminal cases. How they define their r...

... middle of paper ...

...ail is evidenced by a bond, which becomes a record of the court. The bond is in the character of a contract between the state on one side and the defendant and his trust on the other. The agreement fundamentally is that the state will release the defendant from custody the sureties will undertake that the defendant will appear at a specified time and place to answer the charge made against him. If the defendant fails to appear, the sureties become the absolute debtor of the state for the amount of the bond.

The purpose of bail is to guarantee the presence of the defendant, when his or her presence is required in court, whether before or after conviction. Bail is not a way of punishing a defendant, nor is supposed to there be a suggestion of proceeds to the government. Bail is use as a way of guarantee that the defendant will not become a fly risk or a fugitive.

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Bryan Stevenson's Close To Death: Reflections On Race And Capital Punishment

    1861 Words  | 4 Pages

    “A report by the United States General Accounting Office in 1990 concluded that 82 percent of the empirically valid studies on the subject show that the race of the victim has an impact on capital charging decisions or sentencing verdicts or both” (86).

    Read More

  • Canada Should Focus More on Rehabilitation and Less on Retribution

    3232 Words  | 7 Pages

    Society has long since operated on a system of reward and punishment. That is, when good deeds are done or a person behaves in a desired way they SP are rewarded, or conversely punished when behaviour does not meet the societal norms. Those who defy these norms and commit crime are often punished by organized governmental justice systems through the use of penitentiaries, where prisoners carry out their sentences. The main goals of sentencing include deterrence, safety of the public, retribution, rehabilitation, punishment and respect for the law (Government of Canada, 2013). However, the type of justice system in place within a state or country greatly influences the aims and mandates of prisons and in turn targets different aspects of sentencing goals. Justice systems commonly focus on either rehabilitative or retributive measures.

    Read More

  • Sentencing Guidelines in the Criminal Justice System

    3268 Words  | 7 Pages

    The criminal justice system has been in place the United States for centuries. The system has endured many changes throughout the ages. The need for a checks and balances system has been a priority for just as long. Federal sentencing guidelines were created to help create equal punishments among offenders. Judges are given the power of sentencing and they are not immune to opinions, bias, and feelings. These guidelines are set in place to allow the judge to keep their power but keep them within a control group of equality. Although there are a lot of pros to sentencing guidelines there are also a lot of cons. Research has shown that sentencing guidelines have allowed the power to shift from judges to prosecutors and led to sentencing disparity based on sex, race, and social class.

    Read More

  • Racial Disparity in the Correctional Population

    2356 Words  | 5 Pages

    Kansal, T. (2005). In M. Mauer (Ed.), Racial disparity in sentencing: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project. Retrieved April 12, 2005, from The Sentenceing Project Web site: http://www.sentencingproject.org/pdfs/disparity.pdf

    Read More

  • Racial Disparities In Sentencing

    1536 Words  | 4 Pages

    This research essay discusses racial disparities in the sentencing policies and process, which is one of the major factors contributing to the current overrepresentation of minorities in the judicial system, further threatening the African American and Latino communities. This is also evident from the fact that Blacks are almost 7 times more likely to be incarcerated than are Whites (Kartz, 2000). The argument presented in the essay is that how the laws that have been established for sentencing tend to target the people of color more and therefore their chances of ending up on prison are higher than the whites. The essay further goes on to talk about the judges and the prosecutors who due to different factors, tend to make their decisions

    Read More

  • Disparities in Sentencing: The Role of Race and Gender

    1274 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Most modem sentencing systems in the United States express an explicit commitment to ensuring that a defendant 's sentence is not affected by the defendant 's race or gender (Hessick, 2010).” Even though individuals are protected through the Bill of Rights and Sentencing Reform Acts, there are still disparities in sentencing within the criminal justice systems. Often, race and gender bias negatively affects sentencing.

    Read More

  • Racial Disparities In The Criminal Justice System Essay

    802 Words  | 2 Pages

    Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System “We simply cannot say we live in a country that offers equal justice to all Americans when racial disparities plague the system by which our society imposes the ultimate punishment,” stated Senator Russ Feingold. Even though racism has always been a problem since the beginning of time, recently in the United States, there has been a rise in discrimination and violence has been directed towards the African American minority primarily from those in the white majority who believe they are more superior, especially in our criminal justice system. There are many different reasons for the ethnic disparities in the criminal justice system between the majority and the minority, but some key reasons are differential involvement, individual racism, and institutional racism to why racial disparities exist in Institutional racism is racism that is shown through government organizations and political institutions. In a report done by David Baldus in 1998, he discovered that when it comes to the death penalty, blacks are more likely sentenced to death than whites, and those who kill whites are more likely to be given the death penalty than the killing of blacks (Touré).

    Read More

  • Racial Discrimination in the U.S. Justice System

    4767 Words  | 10 Pages

    In modern-day America the issue of racial discrimination in the criminal justice system is controversial because there is substantial evidence confirming both individual and systemic biases. While there is reason to believe that there are discriminatory elements at every step of the judicial process, this treatment will investigate and attempt to elucidate such elements in two of the most critical judicial junctures, criminal apprehension and prosecution.

    Read More

  • Diversity within the Criminal Justice System

    2181 Words  | 5 Pages

    Ward, G., Farrell, A., & Rousseau, D. (2009). Does racial balance in workforce representation yield equal justice? Race relations of sentencing in federal court organizations. Law & Society Review, 43(4), 757-806. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00388.x

    Read More

  • The Justice System In Bryan Stevenson's Just Mercy

    1756 Words  | 4 Pages

    In many cases, bias piles up resulting in an unfavorable situation for African-American defendants. According to research done by Richard Dieter for “The Death Penalty in Black and White: Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Decides” compared to all other eligible defendants, African-Americans have a 40% higher rate of being sentenced to death. One main cause, Dieter concluded, was that almost all prosecutors who make the decision whether or not to give the death penalty are white, in fact 98% are white, which is a factor in the racial imbalance in the practice of the death penalty. Another element in the racial disparity regarding capital punishment, is that prosecutors fail to treat the family of the victims depending on race equally. While often times prosecutors reach out to white families about whether or not the death penalty should be pursued but failed to do the same for the families of an African-American victim. The emotional decision of the distraught white families to push for the sentencing of the suspect’s death is a cause of why, despite African-American victims being over 60%, almost 80% of people on death row are in for committing crimes against white people. Among other things, juries play a big role in the role of race in capital punishment. Despite Batson v. Kentucky which ruled the expulsion of jurors based on race

    Read More

  • Racism In The Justice System Essay

    1377 Words  | 3 Pages

    When a person of color is being sentenced the unjustness of sentencing is blatantly shown such as in the article Race Sentencing and Testimony which stated, “ These scholars conclude that black male arrestees “face significantly more severe charges conditional on arrest offense and other observed characteristics” and attribute this primarily to prosecution charging decisions” (Mauer 4). This piece of writing explains that for no other reason than race do these people get convicted far more significantly than others who have the same charge but are white, which continues as far as giving a person of color the max sentence that they can have on a certain charge just for the color of their skin. The justice system has turned into the opposite of what it claims to be and continues to grow as a racist overseer, bashing down on those that they believe should be punished as harshly as possible simply for the color of their skin. The system has gone as deep as to making it so that even if a person has not committed a crime, but are being charged for it they can agree to a plea bargain, which makes it so even though the person did not do it the system is going to have them convicted of it anyway (Quigley 1). “As one young man told me ‘who wouldn’t rather do three years for a crime they didn’t commit than risk twenty-five years

    Read More

  • Proportionality In Sentencing Essay

    773 Words  | 2 Pages

    The principle of proportionality obliges courts to enforce sentences that allow a proportionate correlation to the offender behaviour in question. The principle drives the prevention of the burden in sentencing that is manifestly excessive or lenient. The sentence is supposed to express society’s emotions of the offense and allows dealing with an offender fairly (Kannai, 2004). It has been debated that proportionality is connected to retributivism (Demleteiner et al. 2003), however, proportionality has also been depended on to upkeep utilitarian objectives of penance, such as deterrence. It has been argued that a structure of justice that dispenses proportional sentences can motivate offenders to commit offenses of a smaller severity to obtain a lesser sentence if found (Von Hirsch & Ashworth, 2005) in turn presenting the principle as effective and a deterrent within itself. The principle is a major device for guaranteeing that rulings enforced upon offenders are reasonable. It functions to ‘restrain excessive, arbitrary and capricious punishment’ (Fox & Freiberg, 1999). It is of utmost significance to sentencing law and is a value that is engrained in defence for the basic human rights of individuals before the court (Fox,

    Read More

  • Essay On Bail

    351 Words  | 1 Pages

    Bail is a process wherein the suspect gets released from of prison in with a condition of paying the bail amount. The amount of bail is in the form of insurance which the suspect will show up for the scheduled court dates and trials. Bail bonds are available from when trials take several weeks or months before making the decision. The bail process allows the suspect to wait for the trial in their home and gain normalcy in his/her life.

    Read More

  • Court Room Observation Paper

    3274 Words  | 7 Pages

    ...rounding individual offender needs and courtroom management and organizational concerns. Although courtroom actor reliance on different focal concerns is theorized to be uniform across jurisdictions, the relative emphasis and subjective interpretation of these considerations is likely to vary across court communities (Ulmer and Johnson, 2004). This is because "the meaning, relative emphasis and priority, and situational interpretations of them is embedded in local court community culture, organizational contexts, and politics" that vary across courts (Kramer and Ulmer, 2002: 903). From this perspective, judicial departures can be understood as the result of the complex interplay between formally rational guideline recommendations and substantively rational sentencing concerns, based on varying interpretations of different focal concerns across courtroom communities.

    Read More

  • Classical School Of Criminology Essay

    1422 Words  | 3 Pages

    Offenders are protected today by both the rule of law, ensuring that all offenders are treated equally, regardless of their age, sex or position in the community, and due process, which ensures that all offenders are given a fair trial with the opportunity to defend themselves and be heard (Williams, 2012). Beccaria’s emphasis on punishment being humane and non-violent has also carried through to modern day corrections. It is still the case today that offenders must only receive punishment that is proportionate to the crime they have committed and the punishment is determined by the law. The power of the judges and the magistrates to make decisions on punishment is guided by the legislation and they do not have the power to change the law (Ferrajoli,

    Read More

More about Judges Allocation and Sentencing Guidelines

Open Document