Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The house of the seven gables judge pyncheon essay
The house of seven gables research paper
The house of seven gables research paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The house of the seven gables judge pyncheon essay
Judge Pycheon Kryptonite. Even Superman had a weakness that could lead to his death in a matter of minutes. Why? No man is all-powerful or has no flaws. Does true character always shine through one’s public persona? The answer is no. In the House of the Seven Gables, Nathaniel Hawthorne effectively shows his disgust towards Judge Pyncheon whose later exposed as someone different from his public image. What breathes life and interest into the passage? It is Hawthorne’s deft use of sarcasm and his cunning delivery intertwined with society’s. The first verbal attack is placed in parenthesis as a kind of foot-note revealing his real thoughts alerting to the verbal irony. Hawthorne says " without, in the least, imputing crime to a personage of his eminent responsibility." The part that says " in the least" clarifies that Hawthorne is being sarcastic tone. Moreover, what does Hawthorne call Pyncheon’s whole being and life as? " Splendid rubbish." It would have been an opportune time to just leave it as " rubbish." However, the oxymoron shows how he is holding back and " sugarcoating" the assault with a positive adjective preceding it. It foreshadows the rest of the passage making clear to the reader to not drift off elsewhere. The comment is also a metaphor to Pyncheon’s hypocrisy and " two- facedness" in his lifestyle and moral judgment. The style of delivery used is very distinctive. It seems that the reader is in for a boxing match between Hawthorne’s and society’s view of Pyncheon. For example, Pycheon is placed on a pedestal as having" purity of judicial character, while on the bench." The latter portion of the quote demonstrates the benevolent mask that the Judge is wearing yet only " while on bench." Hawthorne ch... ... middle of paper ... ...tely not a surprise after the tongue-lashing Hawthorne has obliged him with. He, moreover, says that Pyncheon will not change " except through loss of property or reputation." He is concerned more with having wealth and status than anything else. Not even " sickness...will help him to it; not always the death hour," will break Judge Pyncheon’s stubbornness. The Judge is totally caught up with the public’s holier-than-thou image of him that his he sees himself free of imperfections. The style of Hawthorne is deft and effective. His examination of Pyncheons two-facedness is formatted like a courtroom interrogation with Pyncheon on the witness chair. The climatic last tirade of the narrator releases all of Hawthorne’s disgust and revulsion in a captivating fashion. The organization and attention to what the reader is expecting keep the argument subtle and critical.
The Dark Side of Judge Pyncheon in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Novel, The House of the Seven Gables
Nathaniel Hawthorne, author of The House of Seven Gables, reveals Judge Pyncheon’s character in a strategic manner to show the shallowness in Judge Pyncheon’s good deeds. The author uses the position of details, diction, and tone to express his dislike for Judge Pyncheon’s character and also to reveal the judges character as two-fold, first good, then evil.
Near the end of his description of Old England life, Hawthorne places two sentences with similar structure, and similar meaning, side by side. He first says, “there was some shadow of an attempt of this kind in the mode of celebrating the day on which the political year… commenced”. He then goes on to state, “the dim reflection of a remembered splendor… they had beheld in proud old London” (lines 11-13). Both sentences, side by side, begin with noting how Puritan celebrations were less, in every way, than the celebrations in Old England. The words “shadow”, and “reflection”, have the same effect; the same purpose. They seem to convey that they were a distorted version of the original celebrations. Then both sentences go on to praise “proud old London”. Through Hawthorne’s use of parallel structure, he creates an immediate effect on readers, causing them to see Puritan celebrations as a distorted, confused, and lesser version of the pure celebrations in the Old World. Ultimately, Hawthorne’s goal is to convince readers that the Puritan culture - their customs, their traditions, their way of life - is wrong in that it suppresses the joy, and freedom, that is necessary for a society to thrive. He attempts to convince them that the Puritan religion, as a whole, is overbearing, and clearly unjust. Hawthorne wants his audience to go through a logical progression of cause
...to establish community in a predetermined world. The latter painting only results in isolation, in the “death-in-life” state even Coverdale cannot escape at the end. The “bubbled” world encapsulated in the revelers’ painting offers a momentarily glimpse into the ending Hawthorne does not give the romance. Rather, he leaves us with the last painting’s lesson, the “broken bubble” that not only describes Blithedale, Hollingsworth, and Zenobia, it also describes Coverdale, who sits in judgement on others, even in his memory, and leaves himself, like the “New England toper,” in isolation. If, in Hawthorne’s view, we should accept a predetermined course, acknowledging that we have no free will and no possibility for a Paradisiacal world devoid of corruption, then we should also learn to share together in a communal spirit that ultimately defeats absolutism and isolation.
The House of The Seven Gables by Nathaniel Hawthorne chronicles the generations of a Puritan family and the curse which haunts their fates. Although the Pyncheons are a respected family in their small Massachusetts town, their past is riddled with secrets, mysterious deaths, and the curse of a dying man. Few in the family ever believed in the curse, giving the generational disasters of the family the name of coincidental misfortunes, the simple results of human action. And, while the author attempts to explain away these coincidences with logic and science, he also conveys mysterious hints as to the supernatural phenomena existing within the house of the seven gables. Because of the secrecy surrounding the story, we, as readers, are tempted to believe in Maule’s curse, even though it is possible to interpret the misfortunes of the family as the result of a different curse which perverts the world even today.
Scharnhorst, Gary. The Critical Response to Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter. New York: Greenwood, 1992.
Kaul, A.N. “Introduction.” In Hawthorne – A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by A.N. Kaul. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1966.
Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novel The Scarlet Letter has a very wide cast of characters, but settles upon three distinct main ones. These three characters are all very different, but still suffer from the same internal conflict regarding their relationships with one another. One theme can be associated with each individual character, but a single trait is common among all three. Love, fear, and revenge are all primary themes present in The Scarlet Letter, but no other emotion is as prevalent to the characters’ developments than their guilt. These themes give us a sense of how different, but also how similar, these characters are.
“To the untrue man, the whole universe is false,--it is impalpable,--it shrinks to nothing within his grasp. And he himself, in so far as he shows himself in a false light, becomes a shadow, or, indeed, ceases to exist.” (Hawthorne 115) Throughout the hostile novel The Scarlet Letter, author Nathaniel Hawthorne used contrasting settings to represent opposed ideas that were central to the meaning of the work. Some have argued that when it came to the theme that secrets have a destructive effect on the secret-keeper and truth, by contrast, was natural, a character evaluation would best advocate these differences. However, two settings, Dimmesdale’s house and the secrets that lie within, and the scaffold representing the truth, better embody the adverse ideas posed by the point at issue.
Short Story Criticism, edited by Rachelle Mucha and Thomas J. Schoenberg, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 113-117. 89, Gale, ed., 2006. Literature Resource Center, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/H1420071520/LitRC?u=troy25957&sid=LitRC&xid=268bd900. Accessed 8 Dec 2017. Originally published in Critical Essays on Hawthorne's Short Stories, edited by Albert J. von Frank, G. K. Hall & Co., 1991, pp.
III. Comparable aspects of Hawthorne's characterization in The Scarlet Letter and The House of the Seven Gables
Although he should lose faith in himself as an effective human, husband, and master the absurdity of Hawthorne’s tale lies in the anomaly of Wakefield’s return home as if having been gone no longer than the week he intended to stay away. However, because Hawthorne judged not the actor but the actions, we still rally in the wonderment of knowing "each for himself, that none of us would perpetrate such a folly, yet feel as if some other might" (Hawthorne 76).
... like Hester. He is implying that she is the victim and that the Puritans are actually at fault for this sin. Hawthorne's main goal is to convey the Puritans as sinful and unholy. He does not approve of the sin they hide and he thinks there should be punishment for their actions.
Jacobson, Gary. The Critical Response to Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter. New York: Greenwood, 1992.
In Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Novel The House of the Seven Gables, the passage describes Judge Pycheons outer public image while hinting at the within. Judge Pycheon’s characteristics are embodied by the actions of someone who is self-indulged with luxury. Hawthorne subtly hints at his internal character with the listing of social status in contrast to his position followed by hypocritical actions, all of which is embraced by an insurmountable amount of wealth.