Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why orders need to be followed and the impact of not following orders
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The definition of Extradition is the act of one jurisdiction of handing over or delivering an individual who has been accused of committing crimes in another jurisdiction. Usually, two jurisdictions have to have an extradition treaty or deal for them to honour the extradition of an individual. However, there are many grounds of refusal and challenges that extradition is subject to. The grounds of refusal are based on nationality, political offenders, the Principle of Non Bid In Idem, and the death penalty. In the case of Juan Cruz, a member of the Mexican army who was part of the military death squads and was responsible for executing 150 people without knowing who they were, he deserted the army and ran away from Mexico to Canada. The Mexican government requests his extradition for the atrocities he committed including deserting the army. However, Cruz claims that he was just simply following orders whereas Cruz was arrested multiple times and jailed for 13 days while serving in the army. He often failed to obey orders, sleeping on duty, and frequently being absent without leave. Juan Cruz faces the death penalty, a rule under which Canada has the right to refuse extradition …show more content…
requests made by the Mexican government. The case maybe met with mixed opinions, but an individual with a clear conscience would refuse to kill this number of people while they still disobeyed orders set out by the leader of the death squads.
Cruz knew what was being done and choose only to act when it benefitted himself. Individuals on the other side of the aisle may argue that he was forced to make those decisions. Was it the same when Cruz denied other military orders for which he was jailed for? Four years is a long time to realize what is happening. Justice must be served to those individuals and their families who happened to be political prisoners and were killed by Cruz during his tenure in the death squads. Cruz should be extradited to Mexico so that justice should be served to him as well as to those he
affected. The case here is not only about justice, it is also about the fact that an individual, who had a clear conscience of killing 150 people, may live freely in Canada. This disrespects the rights and freedoms of Canadians who live around him because of Cruz being such a dangerous individual. Juan Cruz’s case could also be compared to that of Edward Snowden, a former CIA official who revealed that the US government was spying on its citizens and those around the world as well. His passport was revoked and extradition proceedings were underway when Russia gave him immunity where he currently resides as well. Snowden’s case was for the people as he made the world realise the illegal activities that were taking place whereas Cruz was the individual who took the lives of those had not committed any crimes. No one would want a lunatic, or any person with a dark past living around them. Even if Cruz is arrested in Canada, the Canadian taxpayers would have to pay for his court proceedings and for the time he serves in jail. Therefore, Cruz should be extradited and should be dealt with according to the crimes he committed.
In June 2014, Justin Bourque was charged with three counts of first-degree murder and two counts of attempted murder after shooting three RCMP officers and wounding two others in Moncton, New Brunswick (Chronicle Herald 2014). He was subsequently convicted and sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for seventy-five years (Chronicle Herald 2014). Bourque’s sentence is unprecedented and is the longest sentence in Canadian history (Chronicle Herald 2014). A Canadian judge has not given a harsh a punishment since the final executions in 1962 (Chronicle Herald 2014).
In June 2014, Justin Bourque was charged with three counts of first-degree murder and two counts of attempted murder after shooting three RCMP officers and wounding two others in Moncton, New Brunswick (Chronicle Herald 2014). He was subsequently convicted and sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for seventy-five years (Chronicle Herald 2014). Bourque’s sentencing is unprecedented and is the longest sentence in Canadian history (Chronicle Herald 2014). A Canadian judge has not given a harsh a punishment since the final executions in 1962 (Chronicle Herald 2014).
Don Simon Bolivar wrote a letter, which is known as La Carta de Jamaica, to an uncertain person but many believe it was the English Governor of Jamaica. The letter was dated September 6, 1815 and confirmed the revolutionary figure’s commitment and determination to rid latin American from the bonds of the Spanish Empire. Throughout his letter, Bolivar criticized spanish colonialism and called for unification and opposition against foreign rule. This was before Argentina, Chile, and Peru were liberated from the Spanish Conquistadores. However, Simon Bolivar was able to free his home country Venezuela from the Spaniards in 1811, but he knew that there was more he can do to help the other countries under Spanish rule. However, Bolivar also understood that uniting such countries could be difficult for many reaso, but th most difficult obstacle Bolivar had to overcome the fact he had been exiled. Banished, yet determined,
Glen Burns and Atif Rafay were two Canadian Citizens accused of murdering Rafay’s family in Bellevue, Washington. The two returned to Canada and later confessed to an undercover officer for the crimes they had committed back in the United States, once confronted, they claimed that they had fabricated those confessions but the process of extraditing them to face justice in the United States was started. It is important to mention that this case followed the Charles Ng case which means the ruling that had preceded it could and was used in the favour of the accused. Burns and Rafay used every legislation possible to avoid being extradited and put on the death row. Being Canadian citizens this allowed them to employ Section 6 of the Charter, which states “Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada.” and protects them from exile. Section 7 which protects their right to live “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.” in concordance to Section 12 “Everyone has the
“We are never more truly and profoundly human than when we dance.” Jose Arcadio Limon was a dancer and choreographer born and raised in Mexico. He was inspired to begin his studies in modern dance when he saw a performance of Harald Krutzberg and Yvone Georgi. Limon enrolled at the dance school of Doris Humphrey and Charles Weidman. He continued to work with Humphrey until 1946, when he founded the José Limón Dance Company. His most successful work is called The Moor's Pavane and it is based on Shakespeare's Othello. The Limón Dance Company still exists and is part of the Jose Limon Dance Foundation, an institution dedicated to preserve and disseminate his artistic dance work and technique. Jose Limon is important in the American Dance History
Through the study of the Peruvian society using articles like “The “Problem of the Indian...” and the Problem of the Land” by Jose Carlos Mariátegui and the Peruvian film La Boca del Lobo directed by Francisco Lombardi, it is learned that the identity of Peru is expressed through the Spanish descendants that live in cities or urban areas of Peru. In his essay, Mariátegui expresses that the creation of modern Peru was due to the tenure system in Peru and its Indigenous population. With the analyzation of La Boca del Lobo we will describe the native identity in Peru due to the Spanish treatment of Indians, power in the tenure system of Peru, the Indian Problem expressed by Mariátegui, and the implementation of Benedict Andersons “Imagined Communities”.
Learning is important for countless reasons, the most important reason being that it molds a person into who he or she is. What people choose to learn, and also what they choose not to, create the core of their opinions as individuals. Though people do not admit it or openly declare it, it is fair to say almost everyone is self centered. Because of this, and the fact that learning dramatically affects a person, learning is not only thrilling, but also expressive. Furthermore, since learning is expressive, its meaning varies from person to person, therefore making each person’s experiences with learning unique and life changing.
As the Latino population in the United States continues to grow, U.S. Census Bureau, 2001, increasing attention is being turned toward understanding the risk and protective factors of immigrant Latino and U.S.-born Latino children and families. The demographic data relating to Latinos in the United States estimate that one of every two people added to the U.S population was Latino, in July 2009 Latino population was the fastest growing minority group U.S Census Bureau, 2010. Despite the increased risk of growing the immigrant families are in lower risk of Social Economic Status, having parents with less education and limited with language and knowledge about education. Immigrating to one place to another is often the most stressful event
Victor Cruz is one of the NFL'S best wide receivers. He is fast, strong, skinny, and he can juke out several people in one play. The NFL would be so different if he was not in it.
As Americans, we like to believe that the U.S. is the greatest country in the world. There is more freedom, protection, and benefits that are ideal for someone who is looking to improve their life. However, our country is not perfect and there is one issue that has become quite controversial over the last few years: immigration. More specifically, immigration into Texas. The concept of immigration should not be looked upon as a problem. Our country was founded on immigration so it is not something that we aren’t familiar with. It is when people cross into the U.S. illegally that is the problem and one that should not be taken lightly.
A conjugal visit for an inmate allows for family members to have an extended private visit with the inmate. Many times this visit is just the legal spouse of the inmate and the couple may engage in sexual activity if they so choose. All information in this paper will focus on the idea of conjugal visitation with a legal spouse for the purpose of sexual activity between the inmate and the spouse while confined to a penal institution within the United States. Inmates have gotten creative in their petitions to the courts; while they are persistent in claiming violations of their First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights, the inmates have not been successful in obtaining the opinion of the courts that favor their position.
Immigration law is a very interesting area of the law in which one has the wonderful opportunity to help people in great need. In the United States, immigration law refers to the different governmental policies that control foreign immigration to the country. Also, immigration law governs the legal status of people already in the country in matters such as citizenship and permanent residency. The United States maintains strict immigration laws; these laws regulate both the right of entry and internal rights of a foreigner. These rights can involve the duration of stay and the right to participate in government. Additionally, the United States has laws that allow for a naturalization process to take place by which immigrants may become U.S. citizens.
On May 11, 1871, Mariano Fortuny y Madrazo was born in Granada, Spain. As a child, Fortuny’s father, Mariano Fortuny Marsal, was and painter along with many other members of his family. His father was also known for collecting metal armors, oriental carpets and tissues, and rare properties. At the age of 3 years old, Mariano’s father had passed away and his mother was left to raise him alone. His mother, Maria Fortuny, was also highly involved in the arts. After that passing of his father in 1874, his mother moved him and his family to Paris, France. While in Paris, he began to study painting. Later in 1889, Mariano and his mother moved from Paris to Venice, Italy.
During the 1960s , the British made a secret agreement with the United States to sell the land of Diego Garcia for a military base. Not only is this area one of the U.S’s biggest military bases, but this base has been used to strike attacks in both Iraq wars (MacAskill 2004). It has become the a platform for the U.S to police the world. Consequently, before it became a military base for the U.S, the generations of Chagossians who inhabited the island, who were all forcibly deported from Diego Garcia, never to be able to return home again.
Transmigration according to Tibetan Buddhism is this, when a host dies, the soul will migrate to another body (host), a human, vegetation, an animal, or even a celestial. So, a soul will never just disappear but just like energy, a soul is never destroyed but passes down. Most people think that karma is fate or predestination, that a person has no power over what kind of karma he/she has done in previous existence. Because karma means “action” or “doing,” it is an action that is intended and deliberate. A person can choose to create karma of two varieties, wholesome karma (good karma) or unwholesome karma (bad karma). A person’s decisions in one life completely dictates what happens to him or her (the fruits he/she bears) in the next life, after the rebirth. A person, animal, or other being could very well be living with good things, good health, riches, etc. in this life but lose all of that and ends up being evil or a suffering creature in the life to come. According to Thanissaro Bhikkhu in his study guide titled Kamma, an individual that is “undeveloped in [contemplating] the body, undeveloped in virtue, undeveloped in mind, undeveloped in discernment: restricted, small-hearted, dwelling with suffering” is going to hell if he operates evil deeds. No one wants to go to hell because it is believed to be the worst place imaginable, a place of agony and Bhikkhu clearly explains who gets thrown down there. This is easily explained by the analogy of the salt crystal thrown in the cup of water or in a river. The evil deed in this case is the discharging of the salt crystal but what determines who goes to hell depends on how that individual discharges the salt crystal. If a man discharges the salt crystal into the river, it will not a...