Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of World War 1 and 2 on literature
Impact of World War 1 and 2 on literature
Literature affected by wars
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of World War 1 and 2 on literature
How does the Opening of Journey’s End grab the Audience’s Attention?
R.C Sheriff’s “Journey’s End” is a piece of First World War literature
and presents a realistic picture of life in the trenches as he had
known it and a interpretation of the horrors from the war. It is set
in 1918, and opens on Monday March 18th. It is placed in a dugout in
the British Trenches before St Quentin. It is a powerful play
expressing many different sides of the war from the death and fighting
to the way the recruits spend their spare time. This play involves the
“C” Company including a Company Commander and four officers. In Act 1
scene 1 the previous company has had a quiet posting with only
irregular attacks and the German troup movements are just starting.
The opening is one example of the way R.C Sherriff has tried to make
it fun as well as stern. He opens with Hardy singing a song, “One and
Two, it’s with Maud and Lou…”, which also shows that some parts are
unrealistic and not showing a war the way we all know a war to be
like.
The first two characters we are introduced with are Hardy and Osborne.
Hardy is the incompetent, casual and good humoured soldier which
brings the hilarity and light hearted side of war to the audience’s
attention. Osborne on the other hand is the opposite from Hardy. He
displays experience and discipline to the dugout. He is also very
fair-minded and level headed. In this scene they introduce Stanhope to
the viewers but they have conflicting views on him. Hardy quotes:
“Stanhope really is a freak” showing he doesn’t have a positive
opinion on Stanhope. Whereas Osborne quotes in his favour “He’s a long
way the best company commander we’ve got”. With the contrast in views
and the appearance of Stanhope yet to be seen is making the audience
question: “What is Stanhope really like?”.
During the conversation between Hardy and Osborne we’re told that they
are expecting a new officer, from Osborne saying, “I hope we’re lucky
and get a youngster straight from school. They’re the kind that do
best”. There is also a question over “The Big Attack” which we are
yet to be knowledgeable about. This is known because the conversation,
“…the big German attack’s expected any day now… I should think you’ll
get it right in the neck” between the two officers tells us so, which
keeps us interested to find out more.
This play is a slice of real life with documentary realism. It has all
the right parts to it from the comic of Hardy’s jokes to the
bleachers in centerfield. Ivy was also planted on the walls by Bill Veeck to add
The building and naming of Fenway Park goes back to 1912 with the help of John Taylor. Fenway Park was built by a wealthy man named John Taylor. He was the owner of the Boston Braves at the time and needed a ballpark to play in while the Boston Braves' was under construction. He found a small piece of land called "The Fens" at the time and decided it would be perfect, "The new ballpark was constructed for the 1912 season and was named by then Red Sox owner John I. Taylor. He said, 'It's in t...
In the novel, My Brother Sam is Dead, by James and Christopher Collier, they teach that there are many other ways to solve conflict besides war. War is violent, disgusting, and gruesome and so many people die in war. Families separate in war because of how many people want to be in the thrill of the war and also how many innocent family members die in the midst of war. Lastly, war is worthless and it was caused by a disagreement over something little and the outcome of war is not worth the many lives, time, and money and there are other ways to solve conflict besides to fight. War causes so many negative outcomes on this world that it needs to be avoided at all costs.
War: armed, hostile conflict between different groups with conflicting viewpoints. Though this simple definition may be acceptable to Merriam-Webster, war is a very controversial and complicated subject. Limiting war to the framework of a single definition would diminish the severity and complexity of the issue. Men and women who have engaged in combat often come home carrying a burden of grief and angst. Gruesome images of death or torture can be imprinted in these soldiers’ minds alongside a guilty conscience that may have accompanied their actions during the war. Learning how to deal with these stresses can be extremely difficult. Such is the case for Billy Pilgrim, the protagonist in Kurt Vonnegut’s masterpiece Slaughterhouse Five. Following a plane crash, Billy claims to have traveled to Tralfamadore, a planet far, far away from Earth. The Tralfamadorians teach Billy that free will is only a figment of the human imagination. Even in fiction, meeting little green aliens seems pretty far-fetched, so did Billy really venture through time to see these creatures? No. Billy’s exploits with the Tralfamadorians were all in his mind. Due to brain damage, post-traumatic stress from the war, and reading many science fiction novels, Billy has confused his dreams and coping mechanisms with reality.
...his novel believe war to be the most disgusting and most distructful thing in the universe, the Tralfamadorians enlighten one human on their thoughts of war. They don’t feel Billy should put as much time as he does into dwelling on something like war that is inevitable. They ignore it and rate it relatively low on a scale of importance. From World War II, Billy is left with many vivid memories that he would rather not have. He has first handedly seen what he thinks is the most evil thing in the universe. He is frequently haunted by images of his experiences. But maybe if he would just tell himself that there is nothing he can do about war, maybe if he just looked the other way and ignored it, maybe then he would be happy and in a state of peace like the Tralfamadorians.
The truth to any war does not lie in the depths of storytelling but rather it’s embedded in every person involved. According to O’Brien, “A true war story does not depend on that kind of truth. Absolute occurrence is irrelevant. A thing may happen and be a total lie; another thing may not happen and be truer than the truth” (pg. 80). Truths of any war story in my own opinion cannot be fully conveyed or explained through the use of words. Any and all war stories provide specific or certain facts about war but each of them do not and cannot allow the audience to fully grasp the tru...
Most stories about war show the glory of war and heroism of soldiers. According to OED, war is “a state of armed conflict between different nations or states or different groups within a nation or state”. But, what’s the definition about the stage of confusions in the soldier’s mind? A conflict between two nations or states can be resolved in a particular amount of time but can an experience from a person’s mind can ever be forgotten, can a person ever be able to resolve his own conflict: his fight with his emotions, changes, and his own mind? Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried is a powerful combination of fact and fiction; through description and imagination, O’Brien allows the reader to feel a soldier's hardships in the war and emotional state. His purpose of the book is to tell a war story, which isn’t true, doesn’t have a teaching, cannot be believed, and most of all, which never has an ending & not about the Vietnam War. In his fiction, each man’s physical burden reflects on to his emotional burden caused by different changes in his life throughout the war time. In The Things They Carried, O’Brien wants to convey the emotional experience of soldiers without concern for objective reality.
First, the reader must understand just what makes a good "war story". The protagonist of the novel, Tim O'Brien, gives us his interpretation of it in the chapter "How to Tell a True War Story".
What does O’Brien mean when he says that a true war story is never about war?
He states, "The myth of war is essential to justify the horrible sacrifices required in war, the destruction and death of innocents. It can be formed only by denying the reality of war, by turning the lies, the manipulation, the inhumanness of war into the heroic ideal" (26). Chris Hedges tries to get the point across that in war nothing is as it seems.... ... middle of paper ...
was not the truth. This book showed the harsh reality of war that most people
War; petty arguments caused by those in power that lead to sacrificing young men into battle because they had no other choice. Ironically, war destroys those fighting in battle while making the countries proud of their succession. Past wars are reflected upon the soldiers in a horrifying manner because soldiers bear a huge burden upon them. Physical and mental effects transform soldiers and their countries in negative ways. Only a soldier can go through a true horrifying experience in war and not return the same way as he entered. A trigger of hatred and fear is sent to the rest of society after war has occurred. Dramatic transformations after war leave the country and the soldiers in a way in which they never were before.
Tim O'Brien states principles of a true war story and then exemplifies them through the realistic characters of Curt, Mitchell, and Rat. O'Brien allows individuals who have never experienced war to experience an accurate first hand account behind the scenes of their country. War is constantly misconstrued, The Things They Carried, is a first hand account of the Vietnam War, the truth. There are thousands of publications about many wars, however not all are true. War is either idealized or demonized to
I was trapped in a valley with one entrance and exit. Constant explosions from rockets and mortars worked at intervals like seconds on a clock. It was our tempo, our metronome for counter violence. This was a good day. We came back to base after our encounter, whole bodied and adrenaline fueled, preparing for the next visit from the horrors of war. This was our world and we had only been there for a few months. The indigenous forces had been there for years, frozen in a state of chaos. War was in their blood and culture. Many years of foreign invasion and inter-tribal war had turned violence into the norm of Kunar Province, Afghanistan. Afghanistan is a prime example of the negative aspects of war. A fundamentalist background and nomadic tribe system has left the country without stability for decades, and fighting is the only constant that the Afghani people truly know. It’s very easy to dismiss the prospect of war when given examples such as Afghanistan. But, as much of a failed venture that the War in Afghanistan has become, war still has an important role in society. Many individuals and societies see war as a last viable option, and I tend to agree, but war is still an option worth considering because of the positive outcomes it can have, for example: economic and technological growth, equality for oppressed individuals, and checks and balances of world powers. When all diplomatic opportunities have ceased, sometimes the only way to stop an evil regime is to use force.
Troops are sent into a pointless war and invasions oversea, and result in killing the innocent. Moore quotes George Orwell, "It's not a matter of whether the war is not real, or if it is, victory is not possible. The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous." These small battles are not crucial, as if to win is unattainable, and the endless cycle of war is promised to stay everlasting. Another example, refering to the hunt of Osama Bin Laden, President Bush says “I just don't spend that much time on it, to be honest.” Moore’s remark “'Don't spend that much time on it?' Just what kind of President was he?” President Bush claims, “I’m a war President!” In Implication, that President Bush supports war, not only for the liking, but for his political gain, and financial