Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on Classical Liberalism
Essays on Classical Liberalism
Classical versus modern liberalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
God has gifted modern society with many exceptional men and women. One of those men is Jonathan Edwards. Jonathan Edwards was a great theologian during the time of Colonial America. He is often regarded with being “a key figure in what has come to be called the First Great Awakening” (“Jonathan Edwards American Puritan Theologian and Philosopher”). The First Great Awakening was a religious revival that swept colonial America, and forever changed protestant America. Edwards was also an incredibly intelligent man, graduating from Yale at seventeen, as well as achieving the honor of valedictorian. He then went on to receive his masters three years later (“Jonathan Edwards American Puritan Theologian and Philosopher”).
On October 5, 1703 in East Windsor, Connecticut, Jonathan Edwards was born to Timothy Edwards, the pastor of the area. “As a youth, Edwards was unable to
…show more content…
accept the Calvinist sovereignty of God” (“Jonathan Edwards American Puritan Theologian and Philosopher”). Although he was the child of a pastor, Jonathan Edwards did not come to conviction until the age of 18 because of his inability to accept the sovereignty of God. While reading 1 Timothy 1:17, Jonathan Edwards came to understand the sovereignty of God and “delighted” in it, which he recognizes as his conversion to Christ (“Jonathan Edwards American Puritan Theologian and Philosopher”). In 1727 Edwards became a student minister to his grandfather, Solomon Stoddard, minister at Northampton. Edwards went on to take his grandfather’s place when he past in 1729. During his time at Northampton (1730s-40s) he began to preach, and his sermons brought about great revivals, which made him key in the First Great Awakening (“Jonathan Edwards American Puritan Theologian and Philosopher”). In 1750, Edwards was dismissed from the Northampton congregation because he did not continue his grandfather’s practice of communion as a part of conversion (“Jonathan Edwards American Puritan Theologian and Philosopher”). After his dismissal from the congregation, Edwards went on to write The Freedom of the Will (1754). Four years after writing his work, on March 22, Edwards died of a fever after “experimental inoculation for small pox” (“Jonathan Edwards American Puritan Theologian and Philosopher”). Though much of Edward’s teachings were generally wide-ranging, he most commonly covered the topics of “reformed theology, the metaphysics of theological determinism, and the Puritan heritage” (“Jonathan Edwards American Puritan Theologian and Philosopher”).
Theological determinism is the “view that God determines every event that occurs in the history of the world” (“Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy”). Ironically, theological determinism is the exact aspect of Christianity in which Edward’s was puzzled by as a child. He defends theological determinism in his book Freedom of the Will (“Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy”).
In my own opinion theological determinism is a hard topic to wrap my brain around. Man was created to have free will but if God has already determined the events of one’s life then ‘how is it free will?’. This is one question I have always asked myself, not that it affects my beliefs. In class we covered God’s Decreed will, which has clarified some of my confusion on the subject. God knows when things will happen and how they will happen, even if we do not know
ourselves. Jonathan Edwards made a major impact in not only the Great Awakening but in modern day society as well. Edwards has taken a place in many American history books that are still taught today, and I speak with experience from my American History class last year in which we were taught about Jonathan Edwards. Not only has he taken a place in history books but his sermon Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God has as well. The major topics of the sermon are: “corrupt sinners face a fearful judgment”, “time is short for the unrepentant”, and now is the time to repent (Julich, Daniel). All of these topics still hold prevalent in today’s society. In fact, they are topics that will always hold a place in Christian theology.
1) Jonathan Edwards delivered this sermon during the first Great Awakening, a time of religious revival in Europe and America. During the Great Awakening, christianity shifted its focus from ceremonies and rituals, and began to realign itself with introspection to encourage fostering a deep sense of morality and redemption. Edwards was a key preacher and minister that delivered many sermons preaching about revival and reformed theology.
Edwards died roughly 20 years before the American Revolution, which means he was a British subject at birth and death. Edwards believed that religion is tied to nations and empires, and that revivals were necessary in history. Edwards’ belief in revivals began what is known as The Great Awakening. Edwards’ purpose in ministry was the preaching that God is sovereign, but also loving towards his creation. Since God is sovereign, Edwards claimed that God worked through revolutions and wars to bring the message of the gospel (Marsden, Jonathon Edwards, 4, 9, 197). Edwards’ most known sermon Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God was preached to revive the demoralized congregations. The congregations of New England had low memberships within different churches, and competition from denominational pluralism was stagnant (Lukasik, 231). Getting the colonists to return back to God was the mission and purpose of The Great Awakening. Through this, Edwards hoped that this movement will foster a great increase in learning about God (Marsden, Jonathon Edwards,
Starting in his younger years, Edwards struggled with accepting the Calvinist sovereignty of God. Various circumstances throughout Edward’s own personal life led to him later believing in the sovereignty of God. Jonathan Edwards is known greatly as a key figure in what has come to be called the First Great Awakening of the 1730s and 1740s. Fleeing from his grandfather’s original perspective by not continuing his practice of open communion, there was a struggle to maintain that relationship. Edward’s believed that physical objects are only collections of sensible ideas, which gives good reasoning for his strong religious belief system.
Anne Bradstreet and Jonathan Edwards were both Christians who had great faith in God and put Him first in their lives. They were both aware of God’s almighty power and that God had greater plans for mankind than what was visible on Earth. Their core way of thinking was similar but their personal understanding of God’s nature was strikingly different. Bradstreet saw a kind and compassionate God and Edwards saw a harsh and jealous God. However, both knew that eternal life awaited those who accepted God into their hearts.
In the first few weeks of class we have discussed the thought and religion of the early people that first began the development of our counrty. As we have looked at the literature in class the works of these writers seem to be simlar in that each one talks about a higher being that these people all worshipped. However, that is where the comparisons would end. One of the writings that I found interesting was that of Jonathan Edwards. Born in 1703 in East Windsor, Connecticut, Jonathan Edwards lived at a time when the Calvinistic Puritanism of the American colonies, particularly New England, was giving way to thoughts coming out of Europe. We had discussed in one of first classes the reason that so many of the laws and rights found here in the United States were the same as in Europe. The reason was for this is because that is where the people of early America came from. This is the reason for the large population of people believing in these thoughts and beliefs coming from Europe.
Jonathan Edwards's sermon, "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" is moving and powerful. His effectiveness as an eighteenth century New England religious leader is rooted in his expansive knowledge of the Bible and human nature, as well as a genuine desire to "awaken" and save as many souls as possible. This sermon, delivered in 1741, exhibits Edwards's skillful use of these tools to persuade his congregation to join him in his Christian beliefs.
The strongest objection to determinism is in my view the following: (3) Truth, i.e., accurate knowledge of the facts of a case is only possible for me when I can cognitively get involved with the subject. However, the precondition for this is that I am not determined by irrelevant constraints in connection with the subject — e.g., by physical factors or by my own biological-genetic constitution, but also not by prejudices and preconcieved notions: precisely because I could not involve myself in the subject because of such constraints. Reduced to a formula, this means: truth presupposes freedom.
He was a man whose very words struck fear into the hearts of his listeners. Acknowledged as one of the most powerful religious speakers of the era, he spearheaded the Great Awakening. “This was a time when the intense fervor of the first Puritans had subsided somewhat” (Heyrmen 1) due to a resurgence of religious zeal (Stein 1) in colonists through faith rather than predestination. Jonathan Edwards however sought to arouse the religious intensity of the colonists (Edwards 1) through his preaching. But how and why was Edwards so successful? What influenced him? How did he use diction and symbolism to persuade his listener, and what was the reaction to his teachings? In order to understand these questions one must look at his life and works to understand how he was successful. In his most influential sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”, Jonathan Edwards’ persuasive language awakened the religious fervor that lay dormant in colonial Americans and made him the most famous puritan minister of the Great Awakening in North America.
The argument of free will and determinism is a very complex argument. Some might say we have free will because we are in control; we have the ability to make our own choices. Others might say it’s in our biological nature to do the things we do; it’s beyond our control. Basically our life experiences and choices are already pre determined and there’s nothing we can do to change it. Many philosophers have made very strong arguments that support both sides.
Consider this argument: 'If the future is already determined, then it must be possible to know in advance what will happen. But, if that is so, then free will is impossible.' Do you agree? Is there any satisfactory way of acting freely if determinism is true?
Because of these techniques, Edwards’s emotional sermon Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God remains to be his most famous work. It sparked curiosity in religion and contributed a great deal to the Great Awakening movement. Although the oratory is not as popular as it once was, traces of it can still be heard in courtrooms and churches. The oratory will always play an important role in America’s history and future.
John Winthrop and Jonathan Edwards were two different authors, writing in two different time periods, but had a common goal. They were working bring people both to Christ and back to Christ. Winthrop was preaching his sermon called, “A Model of Christian Charity” on the ship to the “New World.” Winthrop preached about men giving gifts to other men so that God could give people who have gifts the satisfaction of helping someone in need. On the other hand, Edwards was writing, "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" in a time period called the Great Awakening, in an attempt to bring “corrupted people” back to the church with scare tactics. Winthrop and Edwards were both exceptional authors and preachers, but lived in different times with different
Determinism is the theory that everything is caused by antecedent conditions, and such things cannot be other than how they are. Though no theory concerning this issue has been entirely successful, many theories present alternatives as to how it can be approached. Two of the most basic metaphysical theories concerning freedom and determinism are soft determinism and hard determinism.
I totally understand from reading and my research that these die-hard supporters of the First Great Awakening were trying to draw people out of the depressing tenets of Puritan religion. These preachers realized that people throughout the American colonies were in utter darkness believing that their good deeds and works would provide them an eternal life in Heaven. However; these great ministers wanted people throughout the colonies to understand and realize that the only way to have eternity in Heaven was through salvation in Jesus Christ. “The Great Awakening was said to be so effective because it sparked spiritual renewal by suggesting that redemption was available to everyone who would accept it, not just those that were the privileged ones in society.” It is good to see that these men totally understood the heartbeat of God; that the gospel is meant for all people. I also believe that the unity and shaping that came from the Great Awakening is what helped bring the American colonies together to fight and gain its freedom from England. These believers came to the New World seeking and desiring freedom from England and they gained it; while at the same time coming into a deeper relationship with Jesus
Imagine starting your day and not having a clue of what to do, but you begin to list the different options and routes you can take to eventually get from point A to point B. In choosing from that list, there coins the term “free will”. Free will is our ability to make decisions not caused by external factors or any other impediments that can stop us to do so. Being part of the human species, we would like to believe that we have “freedom from causation” because it is part of our human nature to believe that we are independent entities and our thoughts are produced from inside of us, on our own. At the other end of the spectrum, there is determinism. Determinism explains that all of our actions are already determined by certain external causes