Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay about john williams
Essay about john williams
John Williams essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay about john williams
San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank admits anti-Bitcoin stance
It’s probably the world’s worst kept secret. This is because most are already aware of the fact that the banking industry doesn’t view Bitcoin in a positive light. In some countries, banks are doing all they can to control or even crush the cryptocurrency movement. While America might proclaim to be the home of the brave and land of the free, freedom is not something it’s willing to allow cryptocurrencies. In a pretty damning statement, John Williams - the soon-to-be president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank – believes that cryptocurrency “doesn’t pass the basic test of what a currency should be.”
Leaning on a tired argument
Pro-establishment and anti-Bitcoin, Williams is the current head of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank. His arguments against the rise and adoption of Bitcoin all hinge on the tired “store of value” argument, as he claims that any viable currency has to be “something with a store of value”. He furthered that by claiming that currencies also need to be extremely resilient – almost elastic-like – in order to push through varying economic and financial conditions. It’s safe to say that it’s not the first time that the world has heard these arguments and it certainly won’t be the last.
…show more content…
Williams - a man that has spent his entire career in and around the banking industry – has admitted that he’s “very biased” against cryptocurrencies. He also explained the reason behind this way of thinking when he said, “The setup or institutional arrangement around Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, first of all they have problems with fraud, problems with money laundering, terror financing. There is a lot of problems there. My view is it’s more a promise of technology.”
Position of
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew’s proposal to introduce a woman onto American currency, although meant to make up for an injustice, does not come without a major flaw. Lew’s proposal to remove Alexander Hamilton from his prominent position on the ten dollar bill relegates an influential historical figure. Although it is important to recognize women’s contributions to America, it should not be done at the expense of Hamilton when an undeserving man such as Andrew Jackson is honored on the $20 bill. Due to the debate surrounding America’s currency, Thomas Jefferson’s worthiness of being on the nickel has also been questioned. Admittingly, all men and women have their weaknesses, but it is important to recognize when those weaknesses outweigh their strengths.
When the first Europeans settled in what would become the United States, the need of a currency to make trade easier rapidly arose. Before the US Dollar as we know it, the American Colonies went through several currency systems. Since most settlers were from the United Kingdom, the colonies were under the authority of the crown, and used the British system of pounds, shilling and pence. The use of Spanish dollars was also very widespread, and the name of the country’s official currency comes from this common practice. While the first trades took place with British or Spanish currency or commodities, the Massachusetts Bay Colony was the first to issue some paper currency, which it denominated in British terms at first, and then in both British and Spanish terms. For the first time in the colonies, a colonial authority delivered a piece of paper, regardless of the Crown’s opinion, which people trusted would be worth money. This was therefore the first fiat currency of the colonies, which would later become the United States of America. In this paper, we will explore the evolution of fiat currency in the United States, and the process that led to the adoption of the US Dollar still in use today. It will cover the period from 1690 to 1863, separated in three parts that correspond to currency evolution: Colonial currency from 1690 to 1775, the Revolution and the first banks from 1775 to 1860, and finally the US Dollar, the Legal Tender Act and the National Banking Act from 1860 onwards.
This was an easy scapegoat because nobody ever knew what the Arabs were doing with their money, which made the explanation hard to prove for or against. In reality, these steep market fluctuations weren’t the cause of mysterious money movements in the Middle East. They were only a scapegoat as the Wall Street bankers often had no idea what moved the markets. I found the book a very interesting account of life on Wall Street, especially because I hope to go into Investment Banking and my dad worked on Wall Street as well. While many of the themes expose the negatives of Wall Street, Lewis narrated from a more neutral point of view, leaving the reader to come to conclusions themselves.
There is perhaps no other political issue in our contemporary society that is more pertinent, pervasive, and encompassing than a nation’s economy. From the first coins used in Greece and the Asia Minor in the 7th century BCE, to the earliest uses of paper money, history has proven time and time again that the control of a region’s economy is absolutely crucial to maintaining social stability and prosperity. Yet, for over a century scholars have continued to speculate why the United States, one of the world’s strongest and most influential countries, has one of the most unstable economies. Although the causes of this economic instability can be attributed to multiple factors, nearly all economists agree that they have a common ancestor: the Federal Reserve Bank – the official central bank of the United States. Throughout the course of this paper, I will attempt to determine whether or not there is a causal relationship between the Federal Reserve Bank’s monetary policies and the decline of the U.S. economy. I will do this through a brief analysis of the history and role of this institution, in addition to the central banking system in general. In turn, I will argue that the reckless and intentional manipulation of the economy by the Federal Reserve Bank, through inflation and the abolishment of the gold standard, has led to the current economic crisis in the United States.
The year 2008 was a very scary one for anyone involved in the US stock market. Due to subprime lending, and cheap mortgages, the housing market became grossly overinflated. Naturally, as with a balloon that’s filled too much, it “popped”. The resulting collapse of the housing bubble had severe implications for the rest of the US economy, housing, and related industries such as lumber, construction, and realty all came crashing down, and the people employed in those fields soon found themselves out of work. As with the stock market crash of 1929, fear of the economic instability caused people to pull their money out of any investments they had. This can be a problem for a healthy bank, being unable to supply the money people are requesting if it’s tied up in loans. However, this would prove to be an even bigger problem if the money never existed in the first place, and would take down one of the largest scams in American history.
There are a couple of things that someone could immediately say to reject this argument. One could ...
has been the subject of a debate for years. It is unlikely for there to be
“The Economist Explains, How Does Bitcoin Work?” The Economist (2013): n. pag. Web. 08 Apr. 2014.
Major banks are cutting back on some of their legally permitted operations, such as- market making, and that has led to liquidity issues in the bond markets. Proprietary trading could become unregulated if more banking activities continue moving towards the shadow banking system. This would essentially defeat one of the main purposes of Volcker Rule. [d] The third major unintended consequence has been the degree by which the Federal Reserve has become the main regulator of the finance industry. In order to discourage future bailouts similar to the ones during the financial crisis, the Dodd-Frank Act limited the Fed’s emergency powers. However the liquidity and capital standards now imposed by Fed has purportedly become one of the most important regulatory developments of the Dodd-Frank Act.
Banking on Bitcoin acknowledges these opposing arguments throughout the film but negates them with many different rhetorical elements. The opposing argument does not stop this documentary from being effective in persuading people to use Bitcoin. Cannucciari has supplied sufficient evidence and logic along with rhetorical elements to persuade one into using Bitcoin. The concepts in this documentary support themselves and are still growing today. It would be no surprise to find that this documentary helped the growth of Bitcoin over the last
The greatest question many have sought to answer is the creation vs. evolution debate. How did we get here? Were we created or did we evolve randomly? Are we the product of purposeful intelligence or are we the result of countless mistakes? Does it even matter? The story of money is similar to the story of humanity. Was money created or did it evolve. If it was created we can assume it will die. If money evolved then we can assume the future is unknown. In his book, The Ascent of Money a financial history of the world, Neil Ferguson historic analysis of money answers many of these questions. Ferguson believes money essentially mirrors mankind, magnifying back to us our progress, failures, values and weaknesses.” (The Ascent of Money, 358) The history of money shares many similarities to the history of man; Ferguson parallels between finance and Darwinism, illustrating the natural mechanism of our financial ecosystem that evolves, creates, competes, and dies.
Michael Rodriguez James Maughn English 1A 20 May 2015 bitcoin fantasy. The Nation. The World. The World. ARE DIGITAL CURRENCIES THE FUTURE OF MONEY?
"Regulation of money supply needs to be depoliticized... especially as it applies to virtual currencies" - Al Gore
No economic systems can regulate the production or value of the currency, the system that crypto-currencies are based upon was created by Satoshi Nakamoto - purposely creating Bitcoin which the practise of fractional reserve banking would be virtually impossible. Bitcoin is currently the most successful crypto-currency to date - created in 2009, this anonymous decentralized digital currency has been the target of several raids and hacking sprees; the media are contemplating the significance of Bitcoin in our current worlds economy. Whether it has potential of overruling fiat-currencies or if it’s just a puerile project created by the aberrant Satoshi Nakamoto. Global Perspective Since its creation in the ‘60s, the Internet has paved the way for numerous phenomenons that have affected the way that we live, the way we communicate and that have affected the worlds economy.
The invention of money is perhaps one of the greatest achievements of human civilization. From the very beginning of society, people have used money to circumvent the difficulties of bartering and to foster trade and commerce. Since then, money has come a long way. No longer do we need to rely on silver coins, cocoa beans, or even anything of intrinsic value to conduct our business; today, we use paper currency, which is convenient and easy to carry around. But slowly, we are moving into the digital age of money, an age in which less of our money is actually tangible and more of it is just data on a computer server.