John Proctor As A Tragic Hero In The Crucible By Arthur Miller

638 Words2 Pages

In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, John Proctor is described as a common farmer in Salem, Massitussisess. He is a proud man who cares for his reputation in this puritan community and when the play begins, the audience sees him struggling with his one flaw, his affair with Abigail. As a cause of this affair, Abigail's jealously grew and expanded into the full hysteria of the witch trials. According to Aristotle, a great philosopher, a tragic hero has five qualities that distinguish him. These qualities are that the character must be good according to class, have a fitness of character, must be realistic and consistent, should be logically constructed and idolized. According to Aristotle, the protagonist would accidently bring his own downfall because of a lack of …show more content…

He need not have been a partisan of any faction in the town" (Pg 20). However, despite him being a common farmer, he was quite "respected and even feared in Salem" (Pg 20). Therefore, according to Aristotle's criteria, Proctor is a common farmer rather than a higher class individual. Furthermore, according to Miller's concept of a tragic hero, John Proctor was a ideal tragic hero as Miller thought that rank or nobility did not define them. Further, a fitness of character is that the character suits the position he or she takes. For Proctor, he did suit his character because he had an affair with Abigail and this eventually started the witch trials. He is right away characterized as "a sinner, a sinner...against his own vision of decent conduct (Pg 20). He had made a mistake with his affair and therefore suited the personality of a tragic hero who makes a mistake. He also realizes his mistake and therefore tries to fix it by confessing to his adultery even through his respected image would be ruined in the community. However, his confession leads to his own arrest. It is his mistake that eventually makes him fall as an

Open Document