Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fahrenheit 451 and happiness
Fahrenheit 451 and happiness
Fahrenheit 451 essays on happiness
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Fahrenheit 451 and happiness
Ever-changing Happiness
According to new statistics, only one in three Americans are truly happy. That is, if there are nearly 319 million people in America, only 106 million people will achieve true happiness, despite the fact that everybody has the ability to control it; This idea is prominent in the book Station Eleven, by Emily St. John Mandel. Station Eleven is about people and their ability to manage and navigate through the “new world” put upon them after most of the population is killed from a terrible disaster. The book is essentially split into three parts – the time period prior to the collapse, during the collapse, and after the collapse. In each of these sections, characters unlock new levels of happiness, however the stimulation
…show more content…
of the joy was never because of the same reason. Factors that effected their happiness throughout each part of the book included things like society and the amount of resources that were available. One could definitely see the differences in the things that stimulated the joy that the characters were feeling during the different time periods. This goes to show that the meaning of happiness is constantly changing, effectively giving one the ability to control it. Sometimes, happiness is based off of how much you have in terms of belongings, or if you have found something of importance.
This is seemingly the case in the time period prior to the collapse of society. For example, when a character named “[Jeevan] reached Allan Gardens Park… he found himself blindsided by an unexpected joy. Arthur died… there’s nothing to be happy about. But there was… now he was certain, absolutely certain that he wanted to be a paramedic” (11). When Jeevan finally realized what he wanted to be, his true calling, he was overwhelmed with joy. Even though somebody had just died, all he could feel was happiness because he found something within himself. When Arthur was beginning to reflect upon his life, “He stared at his crown and ran through a secret list of everything that was good… Dancing with Clark when he was eighteen… Tanya sipping wine, her smile… Riding in his father’s snowplow when he was nine, the time [he] told a joke and his father and his little brother couldn’t stop laughing, the sheer joy he’d felt at that moment” (327). All of these different things brought Arthur happiness and eventually sadness at some point in his life, showing that nothing can keep you happy forever. The meaning of happiness is ever-changing. Since happiness was based off of how much you had, people had the ability to manipulate it by obtaining more
assets. Other times, happiness was as simple as when someone you cared for didn’t die from the flu, or when more people were found. Jeevan, a prominent character in the book “thought of Hua as his closest friend, though they rarely saw one another” (17). Hua was a doctor who started treating the flu from the start and although Jeevan didn’t see him a lot, the thought of their youth together brought him happiness even though Hua had just informed of the epidemic. He was also happy that he heard about the breaking news from a close friend, who had remembered about him, rather than the television. For days after the collapse, Jeevan had no human contact, “But on the fifth day he saw three people far ahead on the shore and his heart leapt” (192). Jeevan thought he was dreaming as he had not seen a human for days, but at the same time he was ecstatic because he stumbled upon them. During the collapse, happiness was significantly simpler yet in some cases harder to obtain, making happiness in this circumstance different than others. Happiness in other times, is appreciating your survival and that you have a sufficient amount of materials to live on. People became especially happy when more hope was found. Kirsten and others came to the conclusion that “What was lost in the collapse [was]: almost everything, almost everyone, but there [was] still such beauty” (57). Although they realized and acknowledged that almost everything they knew was gone, they still saw they beauty in the whole situation. These thoughts brought them joy and happiness as they also realized that not everything was lost in the collapse and that they could make the most of it. When Kirsten was called to see something supposedly amazing, “She followed the line of [Clark’s] finger… ‘It’s the most extraordinary thing’… ‘It isn’t possible’… In the distance pinpricks of light arranged into a grid. There, plainly visible… a town…whose streets were lit up with electricity” (311). This discovery gave Kirsten and the rest of the Traveling Symphony hope, as there was no electricity were they were. When they saw that there was in fact electricity remaining, they were overwhelmed with a mix of happiness and disbelief. All that they were doing for the years after the collapse up until then was preparing themselves for a world without electricity, but there it was, and not far from them. This brought them joy and a reason to continue. As shown, the meaning of happiness can change even within a short time period, so you can conclude that it is constantly going to change. Furthermore, the meaning of happiness is never constant and will continue to change depending on different circumstances. From this, we can learn that you can only have happiness and joy if you are content with your environment and the things that are in it. Considering this, you can essentially control your level of happiness. Studies show that countries with the highest poverty levels tend to be the happiest countries because they are happy with what they have, even though it may not be much. This goes to prove that you can be happy in any situation, and that the meaning of happiness is constantly changing for people as well as society as a whole.
People push being happy on society as a total must in life; sadness is not an option. However, the research that has conducted to the study of happiness speaks otherwise. In this essay Sharon Begley's article "Happiness: Enough Already" critiques and analyzes societies need to be happy and the motivational affects it has on life. Begley believes that individuals do not always have to be happy, and being sad is okay and even good for us. She brings in the research of other professionals to build her claim that extreme constant happiness is not good for people. I strongly agree that we need to experience sadness to build motivation in life and character all around.
Thomas Szasz states in his writing that “ happiness is an imaginary condition, formerly often attributed to the living to the dead, now attributed by adults to children and children to adults.” I do not agree that happiness is an imaginary state of mind.
However, happiness also takes into account a wide range of other aspects of our lives, including our thoughts and actions, and even genetics. Therefore, happiness should be defined as the amalgamation of how we think and act, and how we interpret our experiences as positive or negative. What this means is that in order to become happier, we must simply force ourselves to become more optimistic. This is easier said than done, however. In order to have a noticeable increase in happiness, people must be willing to make lifestyle changes in addition to changing their mindset. However, the difference between optimism and delusion is a fine line, so people must be cautious to not exaggerate the positive parts of an experience or become overly optimistic. If we practice seeking out the positive views of our circumstances, with time we will find ourselves happier than
The philosopher Aristotle once wrote, “Happiness is the meaning and the purpose of life, the whole aim and end of human existence.” This famous quote compels people to question the significance of their joy, and whether it truly represents purposeful lives they want to live. Ray Bradbury, a contemporary author, also tackles this question in his book, Fahrenheit 451, which deals heavily with society's view of happiness in the future. Through several main characters, Bradbury portrays the two branches of happiness: one as a lifeless path, heading nowhere, seeking no worry, while the other embraces pure human experience intertwined together to reveal truth and knowledge.
In The Twilight Zone’s “Number 12 Looks Just Like You” and Aldous Huxley's “Brave New World” it is apparent that happiness comes from stability and the ability to get what one wants with little effort, however, the price for this happiness is a loss of individuality and strong emotions, making ignorance truly bliss.
Happiness and sadness have a very interesting relationship. Many philosophers have taken this view point and gone deep into the idea to find out what is really true about it. Some say that if you have never felt sad, then you would never know whether or not you are truly happy, because of this some see that teaching and think of it in a fairly depressing light. Though it is not to say that they can’t exist separately, without sadness there would not be true happiness. This idea is a very interesting topic because there are very few people who can go through their lives and not be unhappy for at least a brief period of time. There are countless ways that somebody could become unhappy. To name a few, one could lose a family member, end
Happiness plays an important and necessary role in the lives of people around the world. In America, happiness has been engrained in our national consciousness since Thomas Jefferson penned these famous words in the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” (Jefferson). Since then, Americans have been engaged in that act: pursuing happiness. The problem however, as Ray Bradbury demonstrates in his novel Fahrenheit 451, is that those things which make us happy initially may eventually lead to our downfall. By examining Guy Montag, the protagonist in Fahrenheit 451, and the world he lives in we can gain valuable insights to direct us in our own pursuit of happiness. From Montag and other characters we will learn how physical, emotional, and spiritual happiness can drastically affect our lives. We must ask ourselves what our lives, words, and actions are worth. We should hope that our words are not meaningless, “as wind in dried grass” (Eliot).
Happiness: an idea so abstract and intangible that it requires one usually a lifetime to discover. Many quantify happiness to their monetary wealth, their materialistic empire, or time spent in relationships. However, others qualify happiness as a humble campaign to escape the squalor and dilapidation of oppressive societies, to educate oneself on the anatomy of the human soul, and to locate oneself in a world where being happy dissolves from a number to spiritual existence. Correspondingly, Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 and Krakauer’s Into the Wild illuminate the struggles of contentment through protagonists which venture against norms in their dystopian or dissatisfying societies to find the virtuous refuge of happiness. Manifestly, societal
In the novel Station Eleven, by Emily St. John Mandel, there are many different topics that can be looked at with examining certain aspects to claim an argument. One idea that Mandel emphasizes is that life before the collapse was still difficult for certain characters. Ways that this can be seen through is with three themes: relationships, lack of purpose, and loneliness. Most of the characters throughout the novel experienced one of the three themes, whether they realized it or not.
Ultimately being happy is not as great as it is talked up to be. Having too much happiness is not good. Being too happiness can cause us to miss the true value of happiness, only focus on ourselves, and it can cause us to be less alert to threats and dangerous situations around us. Being happy is a good thing but like all good things there are also some
In current society, happiness is almost contingent on a lack of reality. The phrase “Ignorance is Bliss” is proved to be true in many cases. People would rather be happy than aware. We are well on our way to creating our own Brave New World. Our society strives for efficiency, and speed, quantity over quality. We are driven by convenience and comfort, operating like a conveyer belt which mirrors the way humans are produced in Brave New
Prager, D. (1997). Happiness is a serious problem: A human nature repair manual. NY: HarperCollins Publishers
I believe that individuals can be happy for short periods of time in society. For example, we do not have to constantly fight for our possessions because we have rights, and security makes us happy. Rousseau would agree with this because he says, “What he [man] gains [from the social contract] is civil liberty and the proprietary ownership of all he possesses” (Rousseau, 27). Unfortunately, security cannot make us happy at all times because it is not usually at the forefront of our mind. It leaves us with a sense of contentedness, and we, normally, only realize the happiness security gave us when we lose
We might think of happiness as an ephemeral thing that floats in and out of our lives, or as our life's essential goal, or as just the opposite of "sadness."One word for "happiness" from the early Pali texts is piti, which is a deep tranquility or rapture.
When we are young children, we are introduced to the concept of "living happily ever after". This is a fairy-tale emotional state of absolute happiness, where nothing really happens, and nothing even seems to matter. It is a state of feeling good all the time. In fairy tales, this feeling is usually found in fulfilling marriages, royal castles, singing birds and laughing children. In real life, an even-keeled mood is more psychologically healthy than a mood in which you frequently achieve great heights of happiness. Furthermore, when you ask people what makes their lives worth living, they rarely mention their mood. They are more likely to talk about what they find meaningful, such as their work or relationships. Research suggests that if you focus too much on trying to feel good all the time, you’ll actually undermine your ability to ever feel good because no amount of feeling good will be satisfying to you. If feeling good all the time were the only requirement for happiness, then a person who uses cocaine every day would be extremely happy. In our endless struggle for more money, more love and more security, we have forgotten the most fundamental fact: happiness is not caused by possessions or social positions, and can in fact be experienced in any daily activity. We have made happiness a utopia: expensive, complicated, and unreachable.