John Locke Nature And State Of War Analysis

1718 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: John locke the state of nature

Introduction
John Locke introduced the two treatise of government and they are the state of nature and the state of war. These two treatises of government are basically giving us an idea of a state of men before government interferes in their lives. These two are suggest different ways of dealing with a dispute or whatever situation there maybe. They are telling us the nature of man in the absence of government or judge whereby men are able to make decisions on their problems. This paper is going to compare and contrast the two.
The state of war
The state of war is against what is suggested by the state of nature which is that a man cannot harm another man’s life but in the state of war one is able to do so.
The state of war is a state of hostility and destruction; so declaring by talking or action, not a passionate a settled design on another man’s life, putting him in a state of war with him against whom he has professed such an intention. This is the state whereby a man is able to take an unfriendly action to the one who had threatened him or had an intention of putting him in a state of war.
In the state of war if a man has exposed his life to the other man’s power, he is giving the other man’s power/ right to compel him by force to which is against the right of his freedom (make him a slave). This state makes it lawful for a man to kill a thief even if he did not hurt anyone. If a man threatens the other by the means of destruction he permits the other’s own defence and the right of war, freedom to kill him (the aggressor) because the aggressor refuses the common judge. The state of war ceases when the actual force is over.
State of nature
A state in which men are naturally in must be considered and that is being free to ...

... middle of paper ...

... has been hit by a car would want to punish the owner of the car. These are not of the same value but because of the law of nature everyone should receive equal treatment. Same thing applies in the state of war someone may find wrong evidence on someone being a thief and then he receive punishment he didn’t deserve.
In concluding this, in my opinion these two treatises put at risk the state of fairness because as I have mentioned in the previous paragraph one cannot have absolute truth on what he heard about the other and this may lead to conflict. Looking at these two one may conclude that the state of nature may lead into the state of war because as men are allowed to be judge of themselves in the state of nature there are small chances for them to judge outside interest of themselves and this brings quarrel between the aggressor and the one whose right is harmed.

Show More
Related

  • John Locke's Second Treatise on Civil Government

    1358 Words  | 3 Pages

    freedom as long as one does not disturb others in their state of nature; in this

    Read More

  • Comparing Morality in The Prince, Second Treatise of Government, and Utilitarianism

    2060 Words  | 5 Pages

    Approximately three hundred years separate the earliest of these works, The Prince, from the most recent, Utilitarianism, and a progression is discernible in the concept of morality over this span. Machiavelli does not mention the word "morality," but his description of the trends and ideals of human political interaction allow for a reasonable deduction of the concept. Locke, too, does not use the word, but he does write of "the standard of right and wrong." In contrast, Mill writes explicitly and extensively of morality in its forms, sources, and obligations. A logical starting point in this examination is a look at their relative views of human nature.

    Read More

  • John Locke's Second Treatise On Government

    702 Words  | 2 Pages

    Locke believed that the role of the government was to protect property and resolve disputes through administrative justice or by creating legislation. The government would be created through the consent of the people. Locke believed that freedom in the state was “having the liberty to order and use your property and to be free from the arbitrary will of another.” No one person can claim divine right to rule, because there is no way to determine if that person is actually divine or not. If government is not fulfilling their duty, the people have a right to overthrow it (i.e. revolution; was a major influence for American revolutionaries). For Locke, law is enlightening and liberating to humans. “law manifests what’s good for everybody.” The key reason for political society is for men to improve land. Locke believes men have mutual interest in coming together to protect land. Men must enter an agreement because there are a few bad apples, though not everyone is bad. If these few apples can be dealt with, their impact can be

    Read More

  • Jefferson and Locke

    898 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Locke’s essay, Book II called Second Treatise he explains his philosophical approach to the state of nature and how men are bound to a social contract giving consent to the government to protect their unalienable rights.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of John Locke's The Two Treatises Of Government

    1295 Words  | 3 Pages

    John Locke wrote the Two Treatises of Government. In his work Locke talked about how governments are not created by God, but by human beings. He claimed that by nature all people are free and equal against the claims of God and that a government should work between the governor and the ones being governed, instead of a governor and God. Locke also wrote several religious essays that served as an early model for the separation of the church and the state. His phrase of “life, liberty, and property,” would end up influencing the United States’ early documents. Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding expressed the idea that knowledge neglects inmate ideas and in order to discover the truth beyond simple experience, he suggested methods of experimental science. Thoughts Concerning Education expressed Locke’s idea on how the mind can be educated by having a healthy body, a pure character, and the right academic curriculum. Later on, it would be acknowledged by Jean-Jacques Rousseau.

    Read More

  • Analysis of Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations

    1192 Words  | 3 Pages

    the role of the state and also from the perspective of how the decision to fight impacts the

    Read More

  • Stuart Mill and John Locke Conception of Freedom

    1907 Words  | 4 Pages

    John Locke (1632-1704) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) are two important thinkers of liberty in modern political thought. They have revolutionized the idea of human freedom at their time and have influenced many political thinkers afterwards. Although their important book on human freedom, John Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government (1689) and John Mill’s On Liberty (1859), are separated 170 years, some scholars thinks that they are belonging to the same conceptual tradition, English Liberalism. In this essay, I will elaborate John Locke and John Stuart Mill view on human freedom and try to find the difference between their concept of human freedom despite their similar liberal tradition background.

    Read More

  • Revolution: Locke vs Kant

    2600 Words  | 6 Pages

    The writings of Locke on the subject of revolution in his second treatise of government were one of the founding and seminal texts on the “right” of a populace to resist the power of the state if a government was to overstep its defined power and become an unjust tyranny. Kant, however, took what could be labelled a surprising view for a republican and made the denial of the logical and legal coherence of this “right”, as well as the potential harm caused by the rejection of what Kant saw as an individual's moral duty in maintaining the rule of law by the preservation of a government. This essay aims to examine the arguments put forward by both thinkers, draw out their key foundations and assess their coherence with the component parts of their arguments, as well as their wider philosophy. It is my conclusion that whilst Locke's stance on the matter clearly stems from his key ideological tenets of inalienable individual rights and the duty of self preservation, Kant's argument sits uneasily with his stance on moral autonomy, as well as leaving certain areas (such as the right to resist on the grounds of injustice) untouched, and thus is lacking in both scope and coherence when placed in comparison to the writings of Locke.

    Read More

  • On War by Carl Von Clausewitz

    1315 Words  | 3 Pages

    Carl von Clausewitz, “What is War?” On War. Edited and translated by Michael Howard and Peter Paret, 139. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of War

    1543 Words  | 4 Pages

    To explain the necessity of war, we must explain what it means for something to be necessary. For something to be necessary it has to be “unable to be changed or avoided.” Well at least

    Read More

  • The Moral Equivalent of War by William James

    1130 Words  | 3 Pages

    War is a hard thing to describe. It has benefits that can only be reaped through its respective means. Means that, while necessary, are harsh and unforgiving. William James, the author of “The Moral Equivalent of War”, speaks only of the benefits to be had and not of the horrors and sacrifices found in the turbulent times of war. James bears the title of a pacifist, but he heralds war as a necessity for society to exist. In the end of his article, James presents a “war against nature” that would, in his opinion, stand in war’s stead in bringing the proper characteristics to our people. However, my stance is that of opposition to James and his views. I believe that war, while beneficial in various ways, is unnecessary and should be avoided at all costs.

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau

    2134 Words  | 5 Pages

    The constant state of war is what Hobbes believes to be man’s original state of nature. According to Hobbes, man cannot be trusted in the state of nature. War among men is consequent and nothing can be unjust. Notions of justice and injustice or right and wrong will not hav...

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan and John Locke's Second Treatise of Government

    3013 Words  | 7 Pages

    Hobbes’ Leviathan and Locke’s Second Treatise of Government comprise critical works in the lexicon of political science theory. Both works expound on the origins and purpose of civil society and government. Hobbes’ and Locke’s writings center on the definition of the “state of nature” and the best means by which a society develops a systemic format from this beginning. The authors hold opposing views as to how man fits into the state of nature and the means by which a government should be formed and what type of government constitutes the best. This difference arises from different conceptions about human nature and “the state of nature”, a condition in which the human race finds itself prior to uniting into civil society. Hobbes’ Leviathan goes on to propose a system of power that rests with an absolute or omnipotent sovereign, while Locke, in his Treatise, provides for a government responsible to its citizenry with limitations on the ruler’s powers.

    Read More

  • The Governments and States of Locke, Aquinas, and St. Augustine

    1359 Words  | 3 Pages

    In John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government, he identifies a government that is of the peoples consent with his essential raison d΄être being the preservation and protection of personal property. This type of government is extremely comparable with the type of government that St. Augustine describes in his work City of God, while at the same time contrasts the views of Aquinas in the ways a state should operate. The end goal of how each of these philosophers’ states purposes presents the greatest split between each of their philosophies. To understand how each of these philosophers’ states are similar and different from each other, a deeper analysis is necessary.

    Read More

  • Negative Effects Of War Essay

    850 Words  | 2 Pages

    War has been around for centuries. From the time modern civilizations began, war has played an integral part in human history. It shaped the world into the modern world we live in. War has been said to be a great motivator, for example, the Great Wall of China was built to fend off the attackers from the north. However, the negative aspects of war far outweighs any positive effects it might have. The destruction of civilizations, cities and countries, mass killings of men, woman and children alike, the disastrous effect it has on economy and the after effects of war can last for centuries.

    Read More

More about John Locke Nature And State Of War Analysis

Open Document