Jean Paul Sartre Philosophy

1310 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The impact of existentialism

What originally drew me to Jean-Paul Sartre was his ideas about freedom and choice. Over the year we have read many different philosophies, but up until recently most of them included some sort of God or force that can’t be proven. Since I don’t believe in any God, it was hard to pick out points that I agreed with, since most of the time, the philosophies were rooted in or used God as a given. As an atheist, Jean-Paul Sartre seemed like he was worth looking into. While there are other atheistic philosophers, Jean-Paul Sartre’s philosophy seemed to have few or close to no holes. His ideas about freedom, responsibility, and defining ourself seemed to be exactly what I was thinking or an extrapolation of it. These ideas have helped me better understand my actions as well as others. Additionally, they have encouraged me to pursue my passions. I. “Life has no meaning a priori. Life itself is nothing until it is lived, it is we who give it meaning, and value is nothing more than the meaning we give it” (Satre 51). Within this statement, Jean-Paul Sartre is making points about a number of things. He discusses freedom and choice, but also makes the point that we have the power to create ourselves because our acts define us and we freely choose our actions. In January this year, I was trying to reconcile why I shouldn’t be angry or upset with people following religions. It seemed like people were wasting their lives because they were devoting it to a nonexistent being and believed in a sting of lies. However, that lead me to thinking about what is truly a waste of time and what is not. A number of philosophers will say that doing one thing is better than another. I always thought that being educated was better than not b... ... middle of paper ... ...ur dreams and other places, but you cannot know what it contains or control what goes in it. I believe that you have no control over your actions. However, the point Sartre is trying to make the unconscious is that you cannot your “unconscious” as an excuse. I think it is an excuse, but nonetheless you are responsible for your actions due to it. I disagree with him on the existence of the unconscious, but agree that you are still responsible for your actions, whether they derive from your unconscious or not. Jean-Paul Sartre has allowed me to understand my actions as well as others and realize how much my life is undetermined. The initial draw to him was his idea about the meaning of life. It resonated with me and my beliefs. Since reading his works, I have gained a greater understanding of my direction for my future and the possibilities that it holds.

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Sartre's 'Anti-Semite And Jews'

    765 Words  | 2 Pages

    Sartre then proceeds to take this theory and applies it in an attempt to find a solution to anti-Semitism. The author writes that a plausible idea to get rid of anti-Semitism is to have a National Socialist revolution. In that way, all citizens are on the same footing and there is no need for the anti-Semite to "create the Jew" as a form of managing the anti-Semite’s aggression. In hind sight, it can be seen that it is not a feasible solution and that National Socialism does not work. So in that sense Sartre's work is probabl...

    Read More

  • Existentialism In 13 Going On Thirty By Jean-Paul Sartre

    1391 Words  | 3 Pages

    In his lecture, Existentialism is a Humanism, Jean-Paul Sartre discusses common misconceptions people, specifically Communists and Christians, have about existentialism and extentanitalists (18). He wants to explain why these misconceptions are wrong and defend existentialism for what he believes it is. Sartre argues people are free to create themselves through their decisions and actions. This idea is illustrated in the movie 13 Going on Thirty, where one characters’ decision at her thirteenth birthday party and her actions afterwards make her become awful person by the time she turns thirty. She was free to make these decisions but she was also alone. Often the idea of having complete free will at first sounds refreshing, but when people

    Read More

  • Free Will and Choices

    1530 Words  | 4 Pages

    So I believe that Sartre prepares the best argument out of Darwin and Freud to explain the choosing of our paths in life. As Freud applies that child develop is chosen and Darwin thinks it was a process of natural selection, we are in fact the result of choices both of others and ourselves to make the actions and effects that we create society. We are all are not to blame higher power for choosing of accountability when we negatively affect others. In lacking of the higher power that no other source can value to the other our own actions. From Sartre’s argument, it is obvious that we are giving the freedom to choose our purpose in life and that we presented with free will in all the situations.

    Read More

  • Plato's Allegory Of The Cave

    1521 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...ar idea with Stephen; they both wanted to do anything and create their own human nature, and our value of freedom through those free choices. Generally, Sartre suggested that men have freedom to construct their nature and essence through their actions.

    Read More

  • Jean-Paul Sartre's No Exit and Existentialis

    981 Words  | 2 Pages

    the play may be pass to modern society, that one may not learn, or even

    Read More

  • Human and Human Nature: Aristotle and Sartre

    2166 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...on their situation, and that for me seemed unfair. So for Sartre to show that humans can create their own lives, versus having it prearranged for them on some deeper level, seems much more appealing.

    Read More

  • Jean-Paul Sartre and Radical Freedom

    1790 Words  | 4 Pages

    Jean-Paul Sartre claims that there can be no human nature, or essence, without a God to conceive of it. This claim leads Sartre to formulate the idea of radical freedom, which is the idea that man exists before he can be defined by any concept and is afterwards solely defined by his choices. Sartre presupposes this radical freedom as a fact but fails to address what is necessary to possess the type of freedom which would allow man to define himself. If it can be established that this freedom and the ability to make choices is contingent upon something else, then freedom cannot be the starting point from which man defines himself. This leaves open the possibility of an essence that is not necessarily dependent upon a God to conceive it. Several inconsistencies in Sartre’s philosophy undermine the plausibility of his concept of human nature. The type of freedom essential for the ability to define oneself is in fact contingent upon something else. It is contingent upon community, and the capacity for empathy, autonomy, rationality, and responsibility.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Jean-Paul Sartre's No Exit

    1149 Words  | 3 Pages

    Three people, trapped in a lavish room, and stuck together for all of eternity. The only communication any of them can have is with the other members in this room. Not bad, right? Wrong. These three people exemplify one another’s imperfections and create a high level of torment with one another. Welcome to hell. Literally, this is the view of hell according to Jean-Paul Sartre in his play, “No Exit.” The characters are unknowingly alone, in terms of finding betterment within inner selves. The only thing the other people in the room create is anguish for one another. The epitome is although these characters are truly not alone, each is lonely and the hell in this is a timeless never ending torture in one another dragging each of themselves into furthered grief and despair. What is hell then? Simply, it is our current living. Sartre is clear in saying “hell is other people” (Sartre 45). The repulsiveness of human nature makes us all infinitely empty and it is something that is inescapable. Depression and loneliness are simple byproducts of acceptance of the ugliness of our world at least according to Sartre. Even if the concept of “hell is other people” is refuted, it does not place one’s own inner nature. Regardless, “No Exit” holds a message of being forever alone at least to achieve a state of happiness. Therefore, loneliness must be examined in three scopes sadness, love, and communication as to understand the purpose of this life, which John G. Mcgraw addresses in his article, “God and the Problem of Loneliness.”

    Read More

  • Jean-Paul Sartre’s Philosophy: Radical Freedom and Responsibility

    1238 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...vious objections. In this paper argued that man creates their own essence through their choices and that our values and choices are important because they allow man to be free and create their own existence. I did this first by explaining Jean-Paul Sartre’s quote, then by thoroughly stating Sartre’s theory, and then by opposing objections raised against Sartre’s theory.

    Read More

  • Early Sartre: Unsatisfactory Account of Alterity

    7833 Words  | 16 Pages

    The first properly philosophical work written by Sartre-The Transcendence of the Ego (1) -is an investigation into the problem of otherness, of alterity or-to use Sartre's terminology-of transcendence. Sartre develops the notion of transcendence in a radical opposition to that of immanence i. e. of a uniform and homogenous sameness. His ultimate aim is to arrive at the notion of immanence purified of any transcendent elements and to use that notion as a clue for his definition of subjectivity. That is to say, to the question: "What am I?" Sartre would reply: "I am an immanence without transcendence. I am a pure stream of consciousness without any contents. I am an absolute transparency without opacity. I am no more than the temporal unity of my life-which means-a pure self-contained flow that no alien element can interrupt or contaminate".

    Read More

  • Sartre: Authentic Existence in Living in Bad Faith

    311 Words  | 1 Pages

    We choose, act, and take responsibility for everything, and thus we live, and exist. Life cannot be anything until it is lived, but each individual must make sense of it. The value of life is nothing else but the sense each person fashions into it. To argue that we are the victims of fate, of mysterious forces within us, of some grand passion, or heredity, is to be guilty of bad faith. Sartre says that we can overcome the adversity presented by our facticity, a term he designs to represent the external factors that we have no control over, such as the details of our birth, our race, and so on, by inserting nothingness into it.

    Read More

  • John Paul Sartre

    808 Words  | 2 Pages

    Sartre based his views on the basic ideas of existentialism. The idea that existence precedes essence is the central factor in the atheistic view of man. The belief that existence precedes essence states that there is "no pre-existing concept of man." (2) In the existentialist view, man is what he makes of himself.

    Read More

  • Existentialism By Jean-Paul Sartre: The Common Man's Meaning

    1287 Words  | 3 Pages

    Man goes through life, waking each day and participating in his own existence without truly existing. He is always in search of a greater meaning, and in the process fails to find one as he is on a constant search for something that cannot be grasped by the normality that is the human psyche. A similar example can be found in the capitalistic work force of modern day. Man works the majority of his life, always training and aiming for more, only to retire and live on a portion of what he was making. During his time working he lost out on his family, his sleep, often times his own enjoyment, for an ideal that often times is never achieved. This is a trivial situation, yet it is painted in a rather angelic light in our society. Why is it, then, that Sartre can be dismissed as trivial when trivialities exist in nearly every day to day life? Quite likely, this is because Existentialism is an “on-paper theory” so to speak, and in theory is looks quite differently than in reality. Man, as in this case, does not realise that he often follows the rules which he opposes. In addition, much of today’s society exists under a form of organized religion, a society with which Existentialism exists in

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Fall By Albert Camus

    2761 Words  | 6 Pages

    “It is better to encounter your existence in disgust, then never to encounter it at all.” What Sartre is saying is that it is better to determine who you are in dissatisfaction, rather than never truly discovering yourself. Sartre’s worst fear in life would be to realize that you have never truly lived. For example, if you were to land a career that you were not interested in and you were just going through the motions of everyday life, Sartre would say that life was not a life worth living. Sartre’s goal in life was to reach the ultimate level; he said life was “Nausea” , because we are always trying to reach the next level, we are always in motion. Sartre had two theories that determine our way of life, Being-In-Itself and Being-For-Itself. Being-In-Itself is the ultimate level, if you reach this level you have fulfilled yourself completely, you have lived your life to the fullest. Being-For-Itself is where we as human beings are, we are always trying to work to become perfect. Our goal in life is to find an authentic existence, and we get there by saying no. Sartre’s philosophy of freedom is obtained by saying no, when we say no we are giving ourselves the option of what we do in our life. By saying no, we receive freedom of our life. “You should say no about every belief if there is a doubt about it.” Sartre also says our human existence is always in

    Read More

  • Jean-Paul Sartre and Our Responsibility for Teaching History

    5485 Words  | 11 Pages

    ABSTRACT: Historical research was one of Jean-Paul Sartre's major concerns. Sartre's biographical studies and thought indicate that history is not only a field in which you gather facts, events, and processes, but it is a worthy challenge which includes a grave personal responsibility: my responsibility to the dead lives that preceded me. Sartre's writings suggest that accepting this responsibility can be a source of wisdom. Few historians, however, view history as transcending the orderly presenting and elucidating of facts, events, and processes. I contend that Sartre's writings suggest a personally enhancing commitment. A lucid and honest response to the challenges and demands of history and the dead lives that preceded my own existence is an engagement that requires courage, wisdom, and thought. The consequences of this commitment for teaching history is discussed.

    Read More

More about Jean Paul Sartre Philosophy

Open Document