Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on diseases transmitted by mosquito
Similarities between african and european culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on diseases transmitted by mosquito
“Why do white men have so much cargo and we, Papua New Guineans, have little?” This question sparked one mans journey to find out how one country could have so little and another could became so prosperous. That man was Jared Diamond, a professor at UCLA, a biologist by training and a specialist in human physiology. Diamond spent many years in Papua New Guinea studying birds but one year, a man on the beach asked him a question. That question has since taken him to the Fertile crescent, South America, and Africa to study one of the most important question about our history. Jared diamond believes he has the answer to the question. Eurasian societies prospered, when other countries did not, because of how they were geographically located and …show more content…
how much knowledge they had of the land they were given. Luck, a word that describes how fortunate you become without actually putting forth any effort. Many could say that Eurasians had luck and new Guineans did not have any. Further than luck though is knowledge. Eurasians were dealt an amazing hand when it come to how they were geographically located and Papua New Guinean’s hand was not as good. The fertile crescent was the first place to farm or domesticate animals. They farmed hardy grains and handled mammals able to preform many different tasks. The knowledge and goods the Fertile Crescent had spread east and west along the same latitude, right into the heart of Eurasia. Because of the climate and soil, Eurasia was able to grow hardy crops that fed the whole village. They were also able to use the animals that came from the fertile crescent in many different ways: milking, for labor, meat, for warmth from their hair and many more things. Back in new guinea they didn't have the same crops as eurasia. They were dealt a different hand geographically. There they would have hunters and gathers to get food which took long hours and a lot of work. They also could farm small things, but it would go bad easily and wasn't able to be stored for years like they could in Eurasia. The plants they had also lacked protein, something that is substantial for growing a city. When there is more food to go around there is a growth in the population. Then they are able feed pharaohs, scribes, artist, and generals. In the end, Papua New Guineans were not able to become as technologically advanced as Eurasia because the spent so much time feeding themselves. It is crazy to think that food could have so much of an impact on a society. In the next situation Diamond looks at, food is not the problem. The Incas were a large organized city of native americans in South america. They grew there own food, domesticated animals, and had a huge army but yet they were still at a disadvantage compared to Eurasia. This time knowledge about your land and where you are geographically located played a huge part. The Fertile Crescent started playing with fire years ago and since then, after spreading to Eurasia, the knowledge had time to be perfected. Eurasians had guns and horses and high tech metal gear. The incas had their own type of weapons but they were no match for guns. The Incas domesticated animals like the, docile creature, llama. The llama had no way to be harnessed as an aid in battle nor was it able to do hard labor. Eurasia controlled all the big domesticated animals. When put head to head the incas out numbered the conquistadors by thousands. yet when in battle the Eurasians slaughtered the army of Incas because they possessed horses to carry them, guns to shoot and scare them and last but not least the incas were truly not ready. it was unfair war but what happened after was even more unfair and deadly. The biggest weapon of all was brought in secret and the Conquistadors did not even know they possessed it. After capturing the Emperor, the Conquistadors started to strip the land of all of its resources and no one stood in their way because the deadly germs they brought with them had swept through the city of thousands killing many. Eurasians were not as susceptible to the diseases because they grew up becoming immune. Working and living in close corders with the domesticated animals helped save the eurasians from being affect from the viruses the animals possessed when conquering other lands. Steel and guns helped the conquistador conquer an amazing society so easily. To only think what if they both had the same geographical location, would it be a better match? We will never know, but what we do know for sure is that the location Eurasia possess has helped them be twenty steps ahead. Germs worked in the favor of the Eurasians when conquering the Incas but when they reach Africa the tables seem to switch.
Eurasians decide the next place they would like to colonize is Africa. There journey starts at the cape of Africa, where they first land. The natives they meet there are not violent and quickly release their land to the Eurasians. Here the weather and climate are almost the same as back home so there crops and animals prosper just like before. After a while some decide they are going to move inland to find more land, expecting it to be like the cape. Further in on their journey they realize that the native people here are not as docile and things come to a war. Many on both sides were killed but the eurasians prevail due to their guns. The eurasians begin to settle down next to rivers and large bodies of water not knowing this will be there downfall. Here, the natives know there land very well. They know the diseases that are here and how to avoid them. They were not dealt the most amazing geographical position but with what knowledge they have, they have been able to survive. The Eurasians and their animals begin to die and their crops wont grow here like in the cape. They settled in big groups which used to work but now it is working against them. Malaria is a diseases carried by mosquitos. The natives in Africa knew the ways to keep from everyone getting sick. They settled in small groups making sure it did not spread that much, they settled in dry …show more content…
areas away from large bodies of water and had made a sort of vaccine that helped them become more immune. It had seemed the Africa had defeated the guns, germs and steel. if they had beat the Eurasians in a sort of way, many asked why they are so behind. Currently Africa is still not a very technologically advanced society because their geography is holding them back. It is hard for a country to advance when so many people are sick. There ways of life that saved them a long time ago are no longer helping. Diamond believes that just because they were dealt this hand does not mean they will not some day prevail. Hopefully, they can conquer germs so they can go on to develop a better society, with of course guns and steel. Watching this documentary i was shocked at how the answer to a huge question could be so simple.
After hearing the entire argument and its supporting factors I agree with diamonds argument. Imagine trying to build an entire city if you have no food, it would be almost impossible if everyone was needed to gather food. With farming and the domestication of animals, Eurasia had the upper hand when it came to technological development. With the fertile crescent so close, they gained many things that helped push them into one of the richest societies. Because, of their geography they had a chance to grow the right crops and domesticate the right animals. It isn't weather they could farm it is what they can farm. Societies like Papua New Guinea did not have a chance to develop steel because they did not have the resources to spare someone to do things like that. When you have an abundance of food that only takes a little bit of people to make, you have enough to feed people who invest their lives in things that better a
society. After everything has been presented it is clear to see why certain societies prospered and other did not. It comes down to one small but yet huge thing: geography. euasians had the upper hand because they were geographically located right next to the Fertile resant. The information and goods that spread from there to Eurasia allowed the society to grow, create, and prosper. In Papua New Guinea, their society was held back because they could not make enough food to support the growth of a complex society. The Incas on the other hand were effected by the guns and the germs that the conquistadors brought. Then the africans were just effected by germs all together. All of these societies have different levels of societies all dependent on their geography. Diamond reminds us that the societies are doomed, this is not a reason to quit, but to say that if they master the lands they were given they could come out in the end with a complex society as the Eurasians. In the end, Gun, germs, and steel where all a result of luck, and geography.
In conclusion, during the 15th and 16th centuries Europeans visited the Atlantic Coast in the African states to observe for gold and silvers. They took advantage of the Africans to get their desires when the Africans acknowledged them to be equal which drove into Africa’s downfall.
Jared Diamond begins Guns with a prologue which sets the stage for the rest of the book. Approached in New Guinea by his friend and local politician Yali, he is posed a question: "Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own?" Yali's question flared a nerve in Diamond. This question brought about the thesis of his book, that environment is more persuasive on development of civilization than people may have once thought.
Prior to the arrival of European traders, the continent of Africa had developed sophisticated society as it demonstrated its ability to maintain advanced civilizations, withhold three major empires, and gain wealth through trade. Although European traders did advance organized society in Africa, it would be false to say that prior to their arrival Africa was underdeveloped.
Human mobility, in terms of European transcontinental exploration and colonization, began to truly flourish after the 1400s. This travel, inspired by financial motives and justified by religious goals, resulted in the European dominance and decimation of countless cultures in both the Americas and Eurasia. While at first glance it seems as though this dominance was achieved through mainly military means - European militias, like Spanish conquistadors, rolling over native tribes with their technologically advanced weapons - the reality is significantly more complex. The Europeans, most likely unknowingly, employed another, equally deadly weapon during their exploits. With their travel, they brought with them the infectious diseases of their homelands, exposing the defenseless natives to foreign malady that their bodies had no hope of developing immunities against. Because of the nature of disease and their limited knowledge about its modes of infection, the Europeans were able to dispense highly contagious and mortal illnesses while limiting their contraction of any native ones to the new territories. In short, they were able to kill without being killed. In this way, the travel of disease in conjunction with the travel of humans in a search for exotic commodities was able to limit or even halt the development of some cultures while allowing others to flourish at exponential rates.
During the late 19th century and the early 20th century many of the European nations began their scramble for Africa which caused Many Africans to suffer from violence like wars, slavery and inequality. Although the Europeans felt power as though they were doing a great cause in the African continent during the Scramble for Africa; Africans had many reactions and actions including factors as rebellion for freedom, against the white settlers and violent resistance.
Diamond wrote this book to answer the question of a New Guinean politician, Yali. He asked “Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own.” Diamond set out to find the answer to this question, to find out why history unfolded like it did. Diamond credits the inequalities in history to differences in environments not biological differences as so many people like to say. Most of the advantages the Europeans had were a direct result of geography. The main points that Diamond attributes to European dominance are early plant and animal domestication and as a result of close contact to animals the deadliest germs were given to the Europeans. As result of its East-West axis the diffusion of food production, technologies, humans and ideas were easily spread throughout Europe. The axis mean that there were similar climatic, geographic, and disease conditions to migrants and no barriers. So anything that could be grown in one area was sure to quickly spread and thrive in the neighboring locations. Moreover, political administration, economic exchanges, incentive for exploration and conquest, and making information available to every individual were facilitated after the development of writing.
...conomically beneficial trade and technology development. In this regard the Epilogue uses sound logic to plausibly answer the wealth question. On the other hand, Mr. Diamond uses the same "national competition" thesis to purport that Asia's large, centralized governments were conspicuously growth-inhibitive. This argument would not seem to pass muster given what we have learned about the role of governments. Professor Wright's slides state that "Centralization may limit predation and even allow for growth" as "centralized predation = incentives to maximize the haul " This clearly refutes Mr. Diamond's argument that centralized, monopolistic Asian governments impaired societal advances. Thus, Guns, Germs, and Steel can scantly explain why China and the Middle East remain emerging markets while Western and Northern Europe enjoy significantly larger national wealth.
In a poem written by Rudyard Kipling, “Take up a White Man’s Burden… The savage wars of peace… Fill full the mouth of Famine… And bid the sickness cease,” (Doc. F). This poem illustrates that the European powers intended to aid Africa and be a cure to their issues. At the same time, judging from the words above, Europe also saw it as an obstacle, perhaps even a hindrance. Whether that is true or not, the article Technology and Imperialism quantifies, “Method of getting quinine from cinchona tree bark,” as well as evidence portraying the making of revolutionary weapons such as machine guns (Doc. C). With such technological advancements including a cure for a deadly disease, Europe had it’s opportunity to colonize Africa, and took it. They were ahead in every way possible, and therefore inhabited Africa, even if meant to support
The Columbian exchange was the widespread transfer of various products such as animals, plants, and culture between the Americas and Europe. Though most likely unintentional, the byproduct that had the largest impact from this exchange between the old and new world was communicable diseases. Europeans and other immigrants brought a host of diseases with them to America, which killed as much as ninety percent of the native population. Epidemics ravaged both native and nonnative populations of the new world destroying civilizations. The source of these epidemics were due to low resistance, poor sanitation, and inadequate medical knowledge- “more die of the practitioner than of the natural course of the disease (Duffy).” These diseases of the new world posed a serious
William H. McNeill makes a monumental contribution to the knowledge of humanity in his book Plagues and Peoples. He looks at the history of the world from an ecological point of view. From this viewpoint the history of human civilization is greatly impacted by changing patterns of epidemic infection. Plagues and Peoples suggests that "the time scale of world history...should [be] viewed [through] the "domestication" of epidemic disease that occurred between 1300 and 1700" (page 232). "Domestication" is perceived "as a fundamental breakthrough, directly resulting from the two great transportation revolutions of that age - one by land, initiated by the Mongols, and one by sea, initiated by Europeans" (page 232). This book illustrates how man's environment and its resident diseases have controlled human migration, as well as societal successes and failures. McNeill discusses the political, demographical, and psychological effects of disease on the human race. He informs his audience that epidemics are still a viable threat to society, and warns of potential future consequences.
While the Europeans were traveling to the New World, they often brought domesticated animals with them for sources of food and livestock. When animals and humans are living in close quarters together, it is very likely for exposure to germs to occur. New diseases were brought over by foreigners looking for fame and gold that killed off many of the natives in the new lands. The natives did not stand a chance against these new threats because of a lack of knowledge and supplies to cure themselves. Once the Europeans established diseases as they made land in the New World, their journey had only become easier as their competition were being wiped out from the rapid spread.
“History followed different courses for different peoples because of differences among peoples ' environments, not because of biological differences among peoples themselves” (Jared Diamond). In the book Guns Germs and Steel he accounted a conversation with Yali, a New Guinean politician that had asked “Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own?”. Diamond tries to answer this by describing the difference in use of government throughout history by bands, tribes, chiefdoms, and states.
...ngaea looking for more resources and wealth. The divergent landscapes caused by the break up of Pangaea, were then homogenized by the plants and animals that were brought with theses new explorers. Crosby goes into great and often times overabundant detail as to how and why this spread happened, and where it was successful and where it was not. He makes a clear distinction between colonization and assimilation, colonization in the more temperate zones and assimilation in the more hostile climates such as the tropics. How sometimes those that seek to conquer are often overcome by the very pathogens that ensured their success in other parts of the globe. In the story that is human history we often forget that while we may be the architects of a plan it is often those small things, like pathogens, that are the are the reasons for our successes and failures.
As the Europeans started to invade Africa and split up the land, they paid no attention to the already existing natural boundaries. Over time, villages with different cultures had set these boundaries. The Europeans ignored these invisible borders as they invaded. This caused soci...
There is no doubt that European colonialism has left a grave impact on Africa. Many of Africa’s current and recent issues can trace their roots back to the poor decisions made during the European colonial era. Some good has resulted however, like modern medicine, education, and infrastructure. Africa’s history and culture have also been transformed. It will take many years for the scars left by colonization to fade, but some things may never truly disappear. The fate of the continent may be unclear, but its past provides us with information on why the present is the way it is.