Imagine about four-hundred years ago, in present day Europe, a civilization arose. It was split into many chunks of land, called kingdoms, which contained even smaller communities inside them, called manors. In this manor many men, called knights, had just returned from war covered in poop, mud, blood, and many other disgusting things. This mess was cleaned up by a squire, aspiring to be a knight himself one day, that had to go through rigorous and dirty training to achieve his goal. Halfway across the world another civilization, in present day Japan, somewhat like Europe, doesn’t have children do their work for them. Instead, adult workers clean the clothes of their warriors, called samurai. Although weren’t as similar as you thought, in fact, …show more content…
they were probably more different than similar. Knights and Samurais were different because of the differences in how they use their religion, their codes, and their training and fighting. Religion was very important to both these fighters and their civilization.
Japan’s education system was based off of their religion and everything that was Europe had something to do with their religion. But there were still even more differences to be had about religion. First of all, they had completely different religious practices. Zen-Buddhism, the religion of Japan, was taught to trainees in a samurai training school. They taught the trainees to keep inner-peace whilst on the battlefield (Document C). This example shows that Japan directed most of their religion into their education system. Japan used their schools to teach their religion to children at a young age, but pages were taught at an even younger age. Peasants that wanted to be a knight would have to become a page at the age of four or five. Pages were taught to receive religious instruction and how to fight. At the age of about fourteen a page became a squire, who was taught to show mercy if asked (Document C). This shows that Europe incorporates most of their religion, Christianity, into the battlefield. This civilization taught children, aspiring to be knights to incorporate religion into their decisions on the battlefield. The different codes was very influenced by religion …show more content…
too. The code, crucial to understand and follow, was present in both militaries, but very different. These codes were taught to children hoping to be fighters in the future. The Song of Roland says that the knights should be loyal until they die (Document F). This means that the knights should fight and follow orders until they die. They should never give up on their orders or fighting. Loyalty is also important in the Code of Bushido, but the two codes are not completely the same. The Code of Bushido says that the samurai should also be loyal to what they do, but there is much less wiggle room than the knights have (Document E). This shows how, while both ask for loyalty, the Code of Bushido is even more strict than the knight’s Code of Chivalry. One thing that both knights and samurai had is armor. Armor was the most important thing a warrior could have had when training or fighting on the battlefield.
A samurai’s armor was very different from a knight’s armor. A samurai’s armor was made of small iron scales and leather. Having small plates of iron bound to leather made the armor flexible and light, whilst still being almost as strong as a knight’s armor. The downside being that if this armor got wet it would become very heavy (Document D). This shows how well crafted the armor was and it’s usefulness in a battle. A samurai’s armor was much better than a knight’s armor. A knight’s armor was a completely metal plated suit of armor. It was really hard to move in because of its weight of forty to sixty pounds. If a knight fell of his horse on the battlefield then he would be dead because he wouldn’t be able to get up. The knight’s suit of armor was so heavy he had to have his squire put his suit of armor on and take it off (Document D). This shows that this suit of armor was as much inconvenient as it was convenient. The two fighter’s armor both have their disadvantages and their
advantages. In conclusion, the differences were greater than the similarities because of the differences in their training and fighting, codes, and how they use their religion. In Japan, young children were taught to keep inner peace with Zen Buddhism, while Europe taught their children mercy with Christianity. The samurai’s armor was more flexible than a knight’s because it had small iron plates rather than a huge, heavy, completely metal plated suit. -codes recap-. Although both civilizations taught religion school, they both taught different things. Europe taught mercy and Japan taught inner peace. The historical significance of the codes that were used in these civilization’s militaries is that the American military’s code is somewhat based off of these. Loyalty is more important than ever, in today’s world.
Even though knights and samurai have many similarities, they have their differences. Knight’s armor and weapons were different. The knights also had different training. Lastly, they followed different codes. The little differences that set knights and samurai apart give knights an advantage in a one on one
A samurai warrior was a member of a powerful Japanese military. On the other hand, a knight warrior was a man of noble birth who after a couple stages, would be raised to honorable military rank. While knights and samurais have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in their armor, beliefs, and their training techniques. The first way that samurais have an advantage is with their armor. In document D written by Terry Bennett it says that the knights have pure metal on them which weighs from 40-60 pounds.not only do the knights have tons of weight, but they also put armor on their horses which slowed them down a whole lot.
Document C states that trainees did physical training, poetry, and spiritual discipline in school. They also studied Kendo, the moral code of the samurai, and Zen Buddhism. At age 14, the trainees officially became samurai in a ceremony called genpuku. On the other hand, knights began at age 4 or 5 with learning to ride a pony. Then, he would be sent to serve as a page to his father’s lord at age 7 or 8. There, he practiced with wooden and blunted swords. They also practiced with riding a horse and religious practice. At age 14, they could become a squire. Squires were obligated to fight other men, and help his master knight. If a squire had approval from the knight, they could become a knight themselves. This shows that knights and samurai had a similar training when they were younger. Document E proves that they had to live a similar lifestyle. Samurai followed bushido, which was the way of the samurai. Bushido said that they had to serve their master, be loyal to their friends, and devoting himself to his duty. Knights were obligated to follow chivalry, which said to do no bad deed, be loyal to the king, to give mercy to those who want it, and to be courteous to women. Therefore, samurai and knights both had similar
As learners of Europe and Japan, the question “ who would win a battle-a samurai or knight” is commonly kept in mind. A samurai and knight are similar in many ways. A samurai would mostly win the battle because they have better weapons, armor, and training. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in weapons, armor, and training.
Do you know someone in the military? A loved one, a friend, do you know what they go through? I may not, but I do know about the harsh training and war that occurred for the Samurais and Knights. In Europe and Japan the empires were falling and Clans were taking over Japan. The government came up with an idea to create feudalism. There was an agreement in both Europe and Japan that exchanged land for protection. The similarities between Samurai and Knights were greater than the differences. This can be shown by looking at the three most similar areas: social position, training and armor, and life, honor, and death. The Samurai and Knights has their differences, but were the similarities greater than those differences.
As can be seen above, European knights and Japanese Samurais shared lots of differences including training, armor, weaponry, true values and rules. This is because they both came from different countries, and have different lifestyles, cultures, and religions, which influenced them to develop
Japantown, in San Francisco, is an ethnic enclave to the Japanese who migrated to the US and it is a space created by themselves for themselves to practice their old traditions and remind them of home. The Kinokuniya building in Japantown is home to many generations of Japanese and they would often celebrate traditional festivals and more than often there are many subculture groups within the Japanese here in San Francisco. One subculture that is evident is the Ikebana group located in Japancenter where they display flower arrangements called Ikebana. Being an outsider, the need to observe and research is very important to understand this art form flourishing in San Francisco. The empirical evidences I have gathered allowed me to dwell deeper into the history of Ikebana and the Ikebana group as well as the importance of this group to its fellow members.
Western influence played a significant role in the downfall of the Shogunate. The arrival of Commodore Matthew Perry in 1853 and the signing of the ‘unequal treaties’ lead to further discontent in Japan’s Feudal Structure and rebellions against the government. Although in the lead up to the arrival of Perry, there were already problems within the Feudal structure of Japan, it was the response of the Shogunate to Western influence that ultimately lead to an alliance, which sped up the downfall of the Shogunate.
Japan lasted from 1185-1603. During that time Japan had emperors, shoguns, daimyos, samurai, and peasants who were all apart of a social class, and all together it was called the Samurai Society. The emperor was just a figurehead for the shogun. The shogun was a powerful military leader that ruled in the emperor’s name. Daimyo were powerful landlords. The daimyo often led armies of samurai. These samurai were trained professional warriors who served daimyo and shoguns. The samurai had to follow a certain code of rules for samurai called Bushido. One of their rules included to always have self-discipline to become a good samurai. The samurai warriors wore light armor, helmets (usually shaped like an animal), and had two swords around their waist. Their armor had a lot of detail and color to it, like their unique helmets. After the samurai comes the peasants, which included farmers and fishermen. They usually always work, then pay takes to the shogun. They usually gave the shogun what they earned from working like food or crops. What made their jobs a bit difficult was their topography. Japan’s topography included many mountains, undersea volcanoes, and barely any flat land to farm on. The Japanese didn’t only work they also practiced their religion. For example, they practiced Confucianism, Buddhism (...
The first way knights had an advantage was in their armor. Within document D, it was stated, “ Not only was their entire body covered, but knights also wore helmets, gloves, and shoes of steel.” The complete coverage was important because it left no part of themselves vulnerable, allowing them to continue after being hit. This is opposing to the samurai who kept one arm armor less. Also within document D it was stated that when a samurai’s armor was wet, the silk and leather cords absorbed the water and made the armor too heavy to really run in. The fact that their armor got heavy wasn’t good for the samurai because their main
Western Influence on Japan Japan, as a nation, is a continually changing society. Ever since Western nations became involved with Japan, its changes over recent times. have increased at a substantial rate. Japan now faces cultural, economic and economic challenges. and social differences as a result of the western involvement.
I chose to compare and contrast the United States culture with the culture in Japan. There are a few similarities between the two, such as a love of the arts, fashion and baseball. However they are more culturally different than similar in very major aspects.
I believe we can all agree that Japanese samurais and European knights are two of the most skilled and famous forms of warriors in history, right? Well both warriors began their trade at a very young age, and went through multiple stages of training throughout their lives. They both had a code of honor basically, but they differed from one another in quite a few ways. The big question is, “Were the similarities greater than the differences?”. Right off the bat I began to ponder the technicalities of the answer to this question. Before I get too scrambled up in the technicalities, let’s discuss some these differences and the similarities and figure out how this plays out. Before we conduct this discussion, let’s review our key terms. A clan is a group of close-knit and interrelated families. Feudalism was a political and economic system that flourished in Europe from the 9th to the 15th century, based on higher classes giving random services and items in exchange for something else. Knights were men who served their lord as a mounted soldier in armor. Samurai’s were members of a powerful military social class in feudal Japan. A shogun was a hereditary commander-in-chief in feudal Japan. Chivalry was the medieval knightly system with its religious, moral, and social code. Bushido was the code of honor and morals developed by the Japanese samurai.
Stories about war and implements of such can be observed throughout the course of Japanese history. This shows the prevalence of martial training and the profession of arms as a tradition that has not faded since ancient times (Friday and Humitake 13).
There are many historical aspects of the Japanese, but the most interesting is the history of the Samurai. In Japans history war played a large role in the country. Controlling clans fought for parts of the land and overall control of the country. These clans were powerful families that resided in the country and who all wanted power and control of Japan for themselves. The families that would be in control were known as Shoguns. These shoguns would have warriors that fought for them if any of the other clan families would try to attack him in order to overthrow him and take his power from him. The Samurai followed a code that developed from Chinese beliefs when in battle. The Samurais code was known as the Bushido. This code was also known as “The Way of The Warrior” which was the main belief s...