Jack And Ralph Leadership Analysis

589 Words2 Pages

A leader is defined as “a person who has commanding authority or influence” by the Webster dictionary, while good is defined as correct or proper. In the book Lord of the Flies by William Golding, Jack and Ralph are the leaders of the group and carry good leadership skills throughout the book, but both are completely different leaders in the book. Ralph is the leader in the book that is always thinking about what is best for the group and is the moral leader, while Jack is always tempted by evil and once he is leader he only thinks about gaining more power, no matter the consequence. From the beginning of the book, Ralph is assumed leader once he blows the conch. Once Ralph begins his new found leadership, he learns quickly that he must be a polite leader. For example, when Ralph decides that a fire would be beneficial to the group, he first takes Piggy’s glasses, but later in the …show more content…

Ralph can be compared to a leader such as Gandhi, while Jack can be compared to a leader such as Hitler. Ralph is more like Gandhi because he is constantly thinking about what is best for the group and not himself. He doesn’t hold himself above the group at all and is equal with the group. On the other hand, once Jack gains leadership, he holds himself on a golden pedestal above the rest of the group like Hitler did during WWII. Once he gains some power and just wants more. Once he has more power, he starts to judge and kill others for no apparent reason other than that they would compete with him for leadership, just like Hitler would. A good leader is not exactly one with the best morals or the person with the most power, but one who can lead others efficiently. Therefore, in Lord of the Flies by William Golding, both Ralph and Jack can both be described as good leaders. While Ralph seems like the best leader, Jack still held his own while leading the group before getting

Open Document