Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Terms of effectiveness and limitations of international law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Italy and the International Law of the Sea: the Italian marines case as a case study in the scope of the International Law of the Sea.
1. Introduction.
The following essay means to analyse the case of the Italian marines Massimiliano Latorre and Salvatore Girone, arrested and taken in custody by the Indian authorities and waiting for the end of a criminal trial for the killing of two Indian fishermen off the coast of Kerala in India. The case is significant from the point of view of the application of international law to a dispute which put a State(in this case Italy) in opposition to another State (in this case India) at the level of international relations. It is a case that provides a chance for the use, by Italy, of international legal
…show more content…
4. Significant consideration about international law to apply to the case.
4.1 Applicability of the Convention on the Law of the Sea to the case.
The key legal issue in the "Italian marines case" concerns the exercise by India of criminal jurisdiction over the Italian soldiers accused of killing the two Indian fishermen off the Kerala coast.
Both the marines’ defense during proceedings before the Indian court and the official communications of the Italian Government argue against the Indian jurisdiction on the basis of two arguments.
First argument concerns the location of events. They occurred around 22 miles off the coast of Kerala, outside India’s territorial waters but within Indian exclusive economic zone and contiguous zone.
According to the Italian opinion the art. 97 of UNCLOS, to which both Italy and India are party, should apply to these
There continues to be a growing debate to this day over the use of international law in the Supreme Court, and even though the case of Roper v. Simmons and Justice Kennedy, are nearly a decade old, they are both frequently
Humanitarian intervention after the post-cold war has been one of the main discussions in the International Relation theories. The term intervention generally brings a negative connotation as it defines as the coercive interference by the outside parties to a sovereign state that belongs in the community. The humanitarian intervention carried out by international institutions and individual sovereign states has often been related to the usage of military force. Therefore, it is often perceived intervention as a means of ways to stop sovereign states committing human rights abuse to its people. This essay will focus on the key concepts of allowing for humanitarian intervention mainly in moral and justice in international society. This essay will also contribute some arguments against humanitarian intervention from different aspects of theories in International Relation Theory.
For the past 200 years, Colombia and Nicaragua have been disputing ownership over the maritime border near San Andrés, Providencia, and Santa Catalina. After originally being under Colombian control, the ICJ extended Nicaragua’s maritime borders. However, Nicaragua’s intentions are purely economic while Colombia’s are more vested in the culture and wellbeing of both the natives and the environment. Therefore, the ICJ should return the maritime sovereignty to Colombia.
The judicial statement of Roskill LJ observed in The Albazero [1977] AC774 held plenty of arguments in modern world today. To reach an extent of agree or disagree the judicial statement, it should be critically analysed from a legal perspective:
International humanitarian law regulates situations of armed conflict. It applies in the whole territory of the States involved in a conflict, regardless of whether combat actually takes place there.
According to Article 38 of the 1946 Statute of the International Court of Justice, the Court shall apply “international custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law” in its decisions (Kritsiotis 123). In other words, the International Court of Justice cites customs as a formal source of law. According to Roberto Unger, author of Law in a Modern Society, customary international law is best defined as “any recurring mode of interaction among individuals and groups, together with the more or less explicit acknowledgement of these groups and individuals that such patterns of interaction produce reciprocal expectations of conduct that out to be satisfied (Shaw 72-73). In other words, customary international laws are primarily concerned with how and why sates behave in a particular manner. Customs derive from the behavior of states (state practice) and the subconscious belief that a behavior is inherently legal (opinio juris). Evidence of state behavior is documented in the decisions of domestic courts, international courts, and international organizations. Unlike treaty law, customary laws are binding on all states. Additionally, if a treaty derives from a custom it is also binding on all states. Some of the international court cases that have been instrumental in the development of customary international law include the Nicaragua v. United States case, the Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries case, the Scotia case, the Asylum case, the Paquete Habana case, and the Lotus case.
In order to do that, first, the essay will define what understand by “jurisdiction” and the elements of the extraterritorial jurisdiction. Next, it analyses some key decisions and advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice and the European regional system in order to prove that extraterritoriality jurisdiction is already applicable and therefore, if the State fails to guarantee the rights contemplated in the human rights treaties, it incurs in international responsibility. Lastly, the essay will sum up the analysis and make some final remarks.
Although merchant ships spend most of their lifetime outside the territorial waters, the current international maritime legal regime is ironically revolved around nationality of the vessel. Every vessel engaged in international trade must register in a country and is subjected to the regulatory control of that country whose flag it flies as per the existing international maritime law. Resultantly, any country has the right to allow a vessel to fly its national flag and to therefore bestow its nationality upon that vessel. When a vessel owner registers a vessel with a nation, the owner agrees to abide by that nation’s law and regulations of that ‘flag state’ in return for protection and the right of its vessel to be of that sovereign state. A system commonly known as “Flags of Convenience” (FOC) has developed, in which commercial vessels register in countries with “open registries” and consequently the ships contain practically no link at all to the flag states in which they are registered.
‘he is not the one who has jurisdiction over the sea or holds the trident that
...of violation of fundamental rights the defense of sovereign immunity cannot be accepted. Therefore, the view as to liability of the state changed in both ways that
Omar, Imtiaz. Emergency Powers and the Courts in India and Pakistan. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002.
Currently, International system is focusing on issues related with maritime security. Maritime security coxncern with threats that prevail in the maritime domain (Klein 2011; Kraska and Pedrozo 2013; Roach 2004; Vrey 2010, 2013). These threats include interstate-dispute, terrorism, piracy, drugs trafficking, people and illicit foods, arms proliferation, illegal fishing, environmental crimes, as well as accidents and disaster which happen in maritime domain. Thus, generally, maritime security can be defined as the absence of those threats. Meanwhile, there is an argument that inter-states dispute should be categorized as national security instead of maritime security. Thus, there is another definition of maritime security which define maritime security as good or stable order at sea (Till 2004; Vrey 2010; Kraska and Pedrozo 2013: 1). The definition of maritime security from one to another is different as the scope of maritime security is broad and each actor has different point of view on the issue. There is no universal legal definition about maritime security. The United Nation itself only
Many laws, standards, and controls have been set to satisfy the requirements of the military. It secures benefit in the military, the protected privileges of administration individuals, the military criminal equity framework, and the International Law of a furnished clash. This region of law utilizes extraordinary legal and different plans to authorize those laws, while others utilize regular citizen legal frameworks. Lawful issues are one of a kind to military equity incorporate the safeguarding of good request and train, the legitimateness of requests, and proper direct for individuals from the military. A few states empower their military equity frameworks to manage common offenses conferred by their military in a few conditions. Military justice is from the inconvenience of military power on a regular citizen populace as a substitute for common power. The last condition is, for the most part, named military law, and is regularly pronounced in times of crisis, war, or common turmoil. Most nations confine when and in what way military law might be pronounced
About the power of the subjects of international law, it is the basic properties, the special legal ability of the subjects that inherited the rights and shoulder the obligations, legal responsibility in international legal relations. Subjects' power includes two aspects, and only when ones get all these two aspec...
Before we delve deeper into this topic, it is imperative to properly provide a definition of sovereignty and lay down some foundation on this topic. There are four different definitions of sovereignty – international legal sovereignty, Westphalia sovereignty, domestic sovereignty and interdependence sovereignty. International legal sovereignty deals with “the practices associated with mutual recognition, usually between territorial entities that have formal juridical independence” (Krasner 4). The main definition of sovereignty that this paper will use is the ...