Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of Islam as a religion
Importance of Islamic religion
Democracy in islam
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of Islam as a religion
Is Islam compatible with democracy? A question that many scholars, politicians, and other people try to find an answer for. Each person would answer this questions based on his/her thoughts, knowledge, and sometimes beliefs. Islam and democracy has been a controversial matter over many years. It never fails to be a point of interest for people whom are involved with politics and/or seek to be on familiar terms with politics. A large literature has built up arguing that Islam has all the elements of modern condition and society. Many Muslim scholars seek to provide evidence that Islam preserves democratic values. Democracy is determined by many several components such as wealth, culture, knowledge. Some people believe that religion is part of democracy’s components as well. In many arguments, religion is mostly seen as an element that hinders democracy, which is something others disagree with. Moreover, many people try to give verifications and evidences to prove that in Muslim countries, democracy is either weak or does not exist. Also, those people use religion, such as Quranic verses, to put in plain words this observable fact. On the other hand, other people believe that Islam, or religion in general, cannot be utilized to clarify democracy or its improvements and expansions. In this essay the topic or the idea of Islam and democracy will be discussed and viewed from the eyes and point of view of the two thinkers, Bernard Lewis, and Irfan Ahmed. Both thinkers disagree on whether Islam and democracy are compatible with each other. In addition, they tend to offer many different arguments on Islam, democracy, and the political nature of Islam among others. As many people oppose different definitions to the words Islam and democrac...
... middle of paper ...
...iting you to dinner?” (pg 462) which by this point he has pointed out that democracy has several meanings and forms between countries, societies, and people. Irfan restate his argument by saying that it is by asset of the contribution in the democratic processes that norms, values, and interpretations of religion get reconfigured, not prior to the inauguration of the democratic process.
Irfan Ahmed and Bernard Lewis are both thinkers that conveyed their ideas on how Islam and democracy are incompatible with each other. Each thinker provided different arguments that supported his point of view uniquely. Though they had the same point to prove, they still supported their point in a different matter, but still agreed in some sense. Although Islam is incompatible with democracy, there are still some democratic practices that may be seen sometimes in the Muslim society.
Fareed Zakaria’s The Rise of Illiberal Democracy expresses the views he has on the differences between liberal democracy and illiberal democracy, and which one causes civil war. He also explains how both types of democracy go hand in hand with other in the formation of the United State government and it constitution. Zakaria also talks about how majority of the countries in the world are democratic, but majority of which are an illiberal democracies. His ideals could also be reflected during the civil rights movement.
Ayoob, M. (2007) The Many Faces of Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Muslim
Tunisia, a country located in the northern part of Africa, marks the birthplace of the Jasmine Revolution –a wave of demonstrations throughout the country all in support of overthrowing the current government at the time and creating a democracy. The Tunisian people saw that their economy, society and country were failing and realized that the current government system and officials were to blame. They succeeded in overthrowing the government and are currently trying to create a fair and stable democracy. A key element to democracy is rule of law. Rule of law is the legal principles that should govern a nation and is essential for a proper democracy. It protects the rights of citizens, as well as their property, from other citizens and the
There is a strong belief that Islam and politics are directly tied. They are tied in the sense that the building blocks of the religion dictate how they ought to behave in the political environment. Through this mandatory follow up behavior that the religion delineates, many have come to believe that its teachings are a form of terrorism. Mandaville argues that what has challenged the Islamic link between politics and religion was the emergence of secularism, which went against the belief that politics and religion could go together. Islam has been a religion that has been accused of supporting terrorist activities in the world. Different assumptions have been brought up to understand better the linkages between what really lies behind the Islam religion and politics. Peter Mandaville argues that Islam is dynamic and that it has changed over time; situated within time and politics.
In his article, Democracy as a Universal Value, Amartya Sen asserts that democracy is a universal value. In order to develop his argument Sen needs to state his definition of democracy and define what he means by universal value. In the course of Sen's argument he gives his view of the relationship between democracy and the economy. He then defends his view of democracy as a universal value against a main argument that deals with cultural differences between regions.
Democracy is more than often lauded for bringing about positive change and progress both at home and the international community, as it held synonymous with the promotion of international peace, greater protection of human rights and resistance against structures of dominance and hegemony etc. However, by just focusing on the positive side one ends up overlooking the less positive side of it, which is more sinister than suggested otherwise. Since, that same democracy is responsible for “domination, hierarchy and violence.” (Hobson, 2008, 75).
The democratic peace theory was not always seen as the substantial argument and significant contribution to the field of International Relations that it is today. Prior to the 1970’s, it was the realist and non-realist thought that took preeminence in political theoretical thinking. Though the democratic peace theory was first criticized for being inaccurate in its claim that democracy promotes peace and as such democracies do not conflict with each other, trends, statistical data, reports have suggested and proved that the democratic peace theory is in fact valid in its claim. Over the years, having been refined, developed and amended, it is now most significant in explaining modern politics and it is easy to accept that there is indeed a lot of truth in the stance that democracy encourages peace. The democratic peace theory is a concept that is largely influenced by the likes of Immanuel Kant, Wilson Woodrow and Thomas Paine.
In the article “What’s Gone Wrong with Democracy”, it had been mentioned how the standards and idealization of democracy that had once been established by western nations, particularly the United States, don’t necessarily carry the same weight. Critiques of democracy have come from regions like China. It has been mentioned that the United
Liberalism and democracy are closely tied together in international politics. They have a central bond which brings out the notion of democratic peace. Today much of Latin America and the European Union practices democracy. The chances of these nations getting into an armed conflict are very scarce in today’s standards. Liberalism promotes the idea of human security and equality and democracy reinforces that idea into the political framework of governing bodies and their higher authorities. Liberalism leads to democracy which promotes democratic peace preventing conflict between nations. This article will look at how liberalism leads to democratic peace through the process of creating democracy.
There have been enormous efforts to spread democracy as a political system throughout the world by the developed democratic countries and the international development organizations including the World Bank. By the late 1990s the United States alone spent over a half billion dollars to promote democratic expansion throughout the world (Diamond, 2003). These were done considering that the democratic system leads towards development. As a result in the late 20th century we saw a huge political transformation towards democracy. During the last few decades a huge number of countries adopted democracy as their political system. However, it retain a big question how far democracy is successful in bringing development of a country? At this stage, some people also criticizes the effort of democratization arguing that it is done without considering the context of a country, sometimes democracy is not ideal for all countries and it is an effort to extinct diversity of political system. In studying the literature regarding the debate, we found a paradoxical relationship between democracy and development. Some argue that democracy has failed to ensure expected outcomes in terms of development. While others confronted that democracy has a considerable impact on development. Another group of people argue that form of political system actually does not have any impact on development process. On the verge of these debates, some development institutions and academics throw light on why democracy is not working properly, and what measure should be taken to make it more successful in bringing effective development of developing countries. Consequently, this writing is an effort of revisiting the different views about impact of democra...
The role and place of Women in Islam has changed drastically, in a positive way, over the past millennium: the changes can be greatly attributed to the Prophet Muhammad, and the Qur’an. To understand the changes in women’s rights and freedoms, one must understand their role and place before Islam was created, which happened in the Arabia Peninsula, now Saudi Arabia (Angha). Before Islam was formed women lacked many of the basic human rights, and they were treated as more of a burden in their culture then someone who should be respected, but that is not the case today. Though women in Islam have gained many rights, there is still some controversy over whether or not women are still being oppressed and treated like second class citizens compared
The current challenges of democracy around the world should prioritize each encounter that should be addressed through networks, global gatherings, and various activities. As a continuous concern, the progress of democracy discusses various strategies and activities. These various strategies and activities lead to lessons that are learned in advancing democracy, making democracy deliver, strengthening democratic fundamentals, and more current challenges. Democracy faces threats from every spectrum as the threats surge the need to reinforce democratic forces through aid and greater international solidarity. Each country reflects on a certain assessment towards the current status of democracy.
“Are political Islam and democracy compatible?” This question has been troubling both Muslims and non-Muslims living in East and West for a long time now. Contemporary Islamic political thought has become deeply influenced by attempts at reconciling Islam and democracy. Muslim thinkers who deal with political debates cannot disregard the significance of the democratic system, as it is the prevailing theme of modern western political thought. Hence, it is necessary for any alternative political system, whether it is religious or secular, to explore its position with regards to democratic government. In fact, a large literature and media publications have developed over the last century on this heated discourse of democracy versus Islam. While many argue that Islam has all the ingredients of modern state and democratic society, many other reject the phenomena “modernism” and “democracy” as a whole because of their “foreign nature”—alien to “Islamic values”. For Islamists and modernists, the motivation for such effort to either embrace or reject democracy often is to remove suspicion about the nature and goals of Islamic movements and Islamic revivalism or resurgence. But before diving into this discourse, one needs to understand the definition and origins of “democracy.” Although purely a Western ideology in its origin, there is no consensus on the definition of “democracy” as a political system. The Oxford English Dictionary describes democracy as: “A system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives” (“democracy, n.”). In my paper, I will examine whether or not democracy and Sunni political Islam are compatible through the eyes of three revolutionary Sun...
In a democracy, free and fair elections which are held after around half a decade, guarantee social rights and equality. These elections ensure that every citizen has the right to vote, and hence they create social stability among the society. Each and every individual casting his vote in the elections reduces discrimination among the people. Citizens are not judged on the basis of religion, race, color, social status and so on. In this way, the dignity of nationals is not damaged and people can live in peace. In addition to voting rights, a democracy also assures access to other services like security, education, property rights, and healthcare facilities. These human rights maintain social equity and involv...
As of now, there’s not a lot being done to stop the Brotherhood, and the only thing that North Africa is doing is changing their laws to be able to execute even more of them. If nothing is done on either side, then more and more people on both sides of the dispute are going to be brutally killed or injured. The Muslim Brotherhood is a growing problem that seems to be getting out of control. What makes this even scarier is that the members of the Brotherhood, who are in charge of the attacks, believe they are serving Islam in a good way and doing the right thing, even if the end result is simply too many unjustified casualties.