Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Korea social, economic, and political structures
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Korea social, economic, and political structures
Traditional definition of middle-power is that the state able to perform its capacity to influence the interests or issues in the region or the global community by coalition building with ‘like-minded’ states for seeking the humanitarian and moral diplomacy, otherwise known as ‘Good International Citizens. Jefferey Robertson, Middle Power in Global Governance.
’ As traditional middle-powers, the state has to demonstrate high level of social equality and establish political value as well as highly integrated global economy and tendency of seeking status quo. As emerging powers, it shows less stable social democracies, high level of inequality and less political value, with less integrated into global economy Jefferey Robertson, ‘South Korea as a Middle Power-Capacity, Behavior and Now Opportunity,’ KINU, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 151-174 (2007)
.
Finally after two decades, since it reached its economical and political capacity, South Korea has recognized its ‘Middle-power diplomacy’ as a three strategic triad and also recognized its role in the Multilateralism with other middle powers as well as Australia, a traditional middle power Woo-Sang Kim, ‘Middle-power Foreign Cooperation Research: Focus on Korea & Australia,’ Jeju Peace Institute, No. 2011-31 (2011)
. South Korea has shown somewhat different behaviors in the past as middle-power state as well as emerging power state. However last two decades of South Korea’s lacking of those middle-power policies was, also an excuse, mainly because of the unique security tensions that exists on the Korean peninsula. That unique security issue with North Korea and the geological relations with traditional great powers, China and US as well as others that has interests in the East Asian ...
... middle of paper ...
...tion and Asian security,’ Strategic Insights, ASPI (Oct, 2010)
Andrew Cooper & Jongryn Mo, ‘Middle Power Leadership and the Evolution of the G20,’ Global Summitry Journal (May, 2013)
James Cotton, ‘Middle Powers in the Asia Pacific: Korea in Australian Comparative Perspective,’ Korea Observer, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 593-621, the Institute of Korean Studies (2013)
Sarah Teo, Bhubhindar Singh and See Seng Tan, ‘South Korea’s Middle-Power Engagement Initiatives: Perspectives from Southeast Asia,’ RSIS Working Paper, No. 265, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Singapore (Nov, 2013)
Stephen S. Roach, Christopher Graves, Richard Dobbs, Shen Dingli, Bill Emmott, ‘South Korea: Finding its place on the world stage,’ McKinsey&Company, (Apr, 2010), http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/winning_in_emerging_markets/south_korea_finding_its_place_on_the_world_stage
North Korea profoundly corresponds with Oceania by being a highly militarized nation. Although it has been decades since the Korean war, there has been an everlasting tension between North Korea and the nations surrounding it. Every minute of everyday the North Korean army remains armed on its border. Whether it is a South Korean or Chinese citizen trying to cross the border, they will be shot at. This highly militarized state of society was influenced by Kim Il Sung, the tenacious tyrant of North Korea from 1912 to 1994. Kim Il Sung was so paranoid about other nations intervening, that he used the conception of violence and war to prevent outsiders from entering, or even North Koreans from leaving. This strange sense of constant tension between North Korea and other nations reflects an important issue occurring in Oceania. The people of Oceania are to believe that Oceania is constantly at war with one of two nation’s, Eurasia and Eastasia. Big Brother uses the word war in the same calculating way to influence the minds of his people. “The very word ‘war,’ therefore, has become misleading... A peace that was truly permanent would be the same as a permanent war. This... is the inner ...
A middle power is a country that uses its influence on issues which are perceived as “minor” in the scale of international politics – often because the great powers are too busy with other incidents1. influential through soft power and multilateralism. Soft power can be defined as having a culture and policies that appeal to other states2. A middle power is also influential because its policies are credible and it is an independent state3. Essentially what this means is that a middle power takes part in international politics (and in doing so, has an influential role) through international organizations and also through multilateral discussions – often during crises. Canada played the role of middle power exceptionally well in the two decades following World War Two by taking part in international organizations and playing an influential role in multilateral discussions.
- Jinwung, Kim.A History of Korea: From "Land of the Morning Calm" to States in Conflict
This response will focus on the key issue of fragmentation. In his book Korea’s Twentieth-Century Odyssey, Michael E. Robinson wrote “Multiple interest groups resided within the bureaucracy and even divided the royal house” (p. 16). Arguably, Korea’s sovereignty was lost in large part, due to the lack of unity among different groups and faction. It was clear from the readings that some Korean individuals and groups prioritized their self-interests above their own country’s benefit. Nowhere was this most evident then the issue of national security.
Caraway, Bill. "A New Relationship." Korea in the Eye of Tiger. Copyscape, 16 Dec. 2006. Web.
The end of the Cold War brought a dramatic turn in the world history. The collapse of bipolar balance brought the need to normalize poor diplomatic relations and also to reassure and mature pre-existing strong diplomatic ties between states. Japan was certainly not an exception to this need. The importance of playing a lager role in regional and global security as a way of ensuring its security interests grew in Japan as the proceeding balance of power, or pre-existing security, became unreliable to her. Indeed, she initiated the regional security entity called the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) to strengthen Asia-Pacific security. But why did Japan take the role to propose such an institution? What is Japan’s stake in this regional security entity? Why is the entity based on multilateralism? And finally, how much can the ARF achieve to strengthen Asia security?
Steinberg, David I., and Donald N. Clark. "Review of The Kwangju Uprising: Shadows over the Regime in South Korea." The Journal of Asian Studies 47.3 (1988): 662-63. Print.
In public, Reagan condemned authoritarian nations such as the Soviet Union, but in 1981, he was negotiating with an authoritarian leader. This is contradictory to what is thought of as Reagan’s strong and unyielding foreign policy against those who go against the American model. In his summit meeting with President Chun Doo Hwan in February 1981, Reagan was essentially establishing a new policy of engagement with South Korea by building a close relationship of cooperation and reliance with President
Kim, Yǒng-jin (1973). Major Powers and Korea. Silver Spring, MD: Research Institute on Korean Affairs. 46.
Moreover, according to the same theory, relations among states are derived primarily by their level of power, which constitutes basically their military and economic capability, and in pursuit of the national security states strive to attain as many resources as possible. The theoretical model explains thus why the nuclear issue has eventually resulted in identifying with a security one, meaning that North Korea main concern is to assure its survivor, its efforts are in the first place finalized at meeting that target and its only means of pursuing it consists of the posing of the nuclear threat. North Korea finds itself stuck in an economic and, to some extent, diplomatic isolation; even though the financial sanctions leading to the just mentioned critical conditions have been caused by the government inflexible, aggressive and anti-democratic behavior, the regime has no other choice than restate and strengthen its strict and, apparently, definitive positions to ensure its survivor, since at the moment any concession or move toward a more liberal approach breaking the countrys isolation could easily cause a collapse of the whole system.... ... middle of paper ...
The book I chose for this book review assignment is titled Korea Old and New: A History by author Carter J. Eckert along with other contributing authors Ki-baik Lee, Young Ick Lew, Michael Robinson and Edward W. Wagner. The book is published at Korea Institute, Harvard University in 1990. The book consists of 418 pages and it is more of a survey of Korean history and reference type of book, rather than selected readings on modern Korean politics. I chose this book because it is a complete survey of Korean history from the ancient Choson period up to the economic boom of the 1990's, a span of over 2000 years. Each chapter covers a different period, but they all share the same organization of describing the social, cultural, political, philosophical and scholarly aspects of the period in respective subsections. This made it easier to later refer to previous chapters and compare different periods in order to learn the comprehensive history of Korea.
.... The two countries are reconnecting rail lines and sent a combined team to the Olympics. Even the United States is providing $500 million dollars a year in food to the starving North Koreans. The new South Korean President, Roh-Moo-hyun was elected on a peace platform and suggested US troops may be gone within ten years. Works Cited North Korean military and nuclear proliferation threat: evaluation of the U.S.-DPRK agreed framework: joint hearing before the Subcommittee on International Economic Policy and Trade and Asia and the Pacific of the Committee on International Relations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, February 23, 1995, Publisher: U.S. G.P.O.: For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs, Congressional Sales Office; http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/2340405.stm http://www.iht.com/articles/95391.html
Korea, suggested by Cummings, was a buffer zone between China and Japan. China acted as the big brother or role model for Korea. Culture, language values and society itself developed by free choices made by the Korean government. However, China was always ready to step in if Korea seemed to get to powerful or weak. Cummings makes this relationship sound as if everything was all right as long as Korea depended on the aid of China and respected China’s dominance of the region. Japan although at times respected China’s power believed that if Korea would consider themselves equal to China Japan could take the role of the regional superpower. Japan also, at times thought they were superior to both China and Japan and should incorporate them both into the Japanese empire and at times had been fairly successful in dong so.
After the Korean war came to a ceasefire both countries continued their development. Even though today North Korea is far behind the rest of the world and often places in last place on world graphs and charts when discussing things such as personal freedom, economy, infrastructure, hospitals, food availability, etc. and South Korea is a technologically advanced first world country which is placed far higher on ranking graphs and charts it was not always this way. During the 1960s the North Korean Won (the DPRKs currency) was held to a higher value than the South Korean Won, not only this but North Korea’s economy and infrastructure was rapidly outpacing that of South Korea as well and began catching up with Japan. Throughout the 1950s-1970s North Korea was thriving, part of this was due to China and the Soviet Union which provided aid and resources to their fellow communist country, due to this North Korea was well on its way to becoming a
With the decline of traditional strong allies and emergence of potential competitors, Australia has adapted to a different diplomacy, the middle power diplomacy(Beeson 2011). This approach can be dated to when Rudd’s government introduced a creative middle power diplomacy to enhance the nation’s interests(Beeson 2011). A similar stand has been taken in countries such as South Korea and Brazil. The questions lie on what is middle power and why take on this diplomacy? Middle power, though has been a rather ambiguous term, is being defined by Gareth Evans (2012) as a state that neither great nor failing, but has the capacity to impact but not dictate the international system. In the article, I would examine the advantages of taking such a position,