Is Overpopulation A Problem Essay

1060 Words3 Pages

Is Overpopulation A Problem? The human population has increased by 4.5 billion since the last sixty years (Engelman 1), this tremendous growth in the human population has startled numerous individuals. As a matter of fact, the biosphere’s population of humans is expected to grow additional, resulting in a total of nine billion by 2050 (Pearce 1). Some individuals may see this as a concern for the planet, whereas others assume that there are other more imperative hitches that humans should deal with. Although Erle C. Ellis agrees that overpopulation is not a problem for this planet, conversely, Fred Pearce and Joel Kotkin argue that there are other more vital problems to mend; unlike Ellis, Robert Engelman disagrees, proclaiming overpopulation …show more content…

Ellis states that the overpopulation of humans is not a problem for the planet. Dissimilar to bacteria in a petri dish, the rapid increase of the humankind population does not propose dreadful outcomes or come to “the limits of a finite planet (Ellis 1).” According to Thomas Malthus’ theory, “population growth tends to outrun the food supply” (qtd. Ellis 1). Moreover, Ellis argues that humans’ systems that support us, such as social and technological require development (2). Additionally, Ellis claims that there is no necessary intention for utilizing supplementary land for maintaining humankind or being famished for environmental purposes (2). In order for the posterity to be satisfied with the Earth, we must limit “our imaginations and our social systems” (Ellis …show more content…

Planet Earth, or Planet Humanity as Engelman expresses it, consists of individuals who are concerned about “[their] diets, [their] modes of moving, and [their] urge to keep inferior temperatures close to 70 degrees Fahrenheit no matter what is happening outside…[eventually] these behaviors are moving basic planetary systems into danger zones” (Engelman 1). Corresponding to Pearce, who considers consumption is a major issue as well, Engelman claims that the effects of humans’ “needs, greed and wants are” a concern and humans ought to confront the disproportion human being consumption on this planet (1). For instance, the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) predicts that two thirds of the Earth’s population will be encountering water shortage or urgency in fourteen years (Engelman 2). In addition, Engelman declares that we cannot prevent the hasty population expansion instantly, but if women determine whether or not they want to be pregnant then we can reduce the amount of births (3). As mentioned previously, Kotkin suggests that the decline in child births is the chief obstacle; on the contrary, Engelman opposes Kotkin’s declaration arguing that lower births will aid the planet. In brief, “stopping climate change, reducing water scarcity, or keeping ecosystems intact, by contrast, don 't yet seem to be in our skill

Open Document