Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Death penalty and deterrence
Impact of capital punishment
Opinions on death penalties
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Death penalty and deterrence
Imagine laying on a table awaiting your lethal injection to die, people watching from behind the glass. You killed someone so you deserve it, don’t you? The death penalty should be legal as a form of punishment. It’s not fair for someone to kill another person or more than one person and either get away with it, or sit in jail living their life. They deserve to die just like the person they murdered.
It’s unfair for murderers to stay alive in jail rather than die for their crime. Criminals should suffer the same death that they did to others rather than live the rest of their lives. For a huge proportion this would instantly rob them of every last ember of hope and increase by up to 20% the number of inmates who will grow old and die. ( Is Life in Prison without Parole a Better Option Than the Death Penalty?) It’s a law that, whoever murders in the first degree can be put on death row and killed for their actions. (18 U.S. Code § 1111 - Murder) Also, murderers can kill again in prison. The death penalty is necessary in these cases. (Is Life in Prison without Parole a Better Option Than the Death Penalty?)
Victims and/or victims’ families feel a sense of relief and closure. Studies cast doubt on
…show more content…
(CNN: Does death penalty bring closure?) “She felt comforted to know he will be put to death.” said the woman’s aunt who was stabbed to death. Also, a 2008 study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found that people who were taken advantage of financially by someone else thought they would feel better if they exacted revenge. “It’s justice.” Fred Romano said, who’s sister was beaten & killed. “It’s not revenge.” (CNN: Does death penalty bring closure?) After criminals are killed, victims and/or families of victims feel
Many people are led to believe that the death penalty doesn’t occur very often and that very few people are actually killed, but in reality, it’s quite the opposite. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1,359 people have been executed as a result of being on death row since 1977 to 2013. Even though this form of punishment is extremely controversial, due to the fact that someone’s life is at stake, it somehow still stands to this very day as our ultimate form of punishment. Although capital punishment puts murderers to death, it should be abolished because killing someone who murdered another, does not and will not make the situation any better in addition to costing tax payers millions of dollars.
The promise of closure seems like an illusion more than a reality; the idea of it suffers from the assumption that the murder victims’ families’ desire that the offender be executed in order to feel liberated from grief and all the pain that the criminal has caused. According to Berns, closure is something many families of victims’ pursue, but do not often achieve and it has become a protruding cultural narrative for defining the needs of the victims’ and also the broader concept of justice. Those that are for capital punishment and those who are oppose it don’t really have a true definition for the word and argue whether it exists or not. There are many arguments on how to achieve c...
The death penalty is inhumane in my opinion, and I am highly against it. I am all for the end of the death penalty.
The United States should use the death penalty because it is economical and continues to be a deterrent for potential offenders. Take into consideration that the Constitution states that life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness can not be taken away without due process. The offenders committing the brutal, heinous crimes have not applied this right to the victims of their crimes. Why should the government take their rights into consideration when the victims rights mean so little to them? People always put forth the idea that killing is wrong in any sense, yet they don’t want to punish the people that commit the crimes.
Cases end up in life sentences in jail. The goal is to end all cases, for murdering someone, to life sentences.
Offenders given mandatory life in prison on charges of murder, on average only serve 16 years before being released back into society. One in three of these killers carries out a second murder even under the supervision of the probation officer.1 If we allow murderers to spend life in prison we run the chance of them getting out and killing again. Capital punishment can also deter future perpetrators from committing such a heinous crime, and it will end the prisoner’s suffering by giving them a humane death and give closure to the victim’s family. Without a concrete meaning of “life in prison” we need the death penalty to put an end to the most evil of people.
Eliminating the death penalty as a method of punishment will only allow criminals to wreak havoc and chaotic in our community without the fear of death. When a person commits a crime, they are disrupting the order in the community. Justice help restore the disruption of that order. The Death penalty restore social order and give the states authority to maximized retribution for the victims. When the state does not have the authority to maximum retribution, the public may put the law in their own hands. Although, execution may be cruel and inhumane, it is nothing compared to the fate of many victims in the hand of the murderers. The purpose of the death penalty is to provide retribution for the victims and their families. However, retribution is not revenge. “Vengeance signifies inflicting harm on the offender out of anger because of what he has done. Retribution is the rationally supported theory that the criminal deserves a punishment fitting the gravity of his crime” (Pojman, 2004).
Eaton, Judy, Tony Christensen. “Closure and its myths: Victims’ families, the death penalty, and the closure argument.” International Review of Victimology, Vol 20(3).Sep, 2014. : pp. 327-343.
The death penalty has been present, in one way or another, for virtually as long as human civilization has existed. The reasons why are apparent; it is intrinsically logical to human beings that a person who takes the life of another should also be killed. This philosophy is exemplified in the famous Biblical passage, "An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth." However, in light of recent research into ethics, criminology and the justice system, the time has come for us to re-examine our ageless paradigm of revenge. Capital punishment is a custom in which prisoners are executed in accordance with judicial practice when they are convicted of committing a “capital crime.”
Many who disagree with the death penalty believe it is immoral, discriminates, is very expensive, increases crime, and is only a way to carry out revenge. This, however, is not true. Capital punishment should be legal because it is moral, by not allowing criminals to roam the streets once again. It does not discriminate against those of color or the poor, and is actually less expensive than life imprisonment. The most important reason why the death penalty should be legal is because it deters crime.
Proponents of the death penalty are right to argue that capital punishment does provide a sense of “closure” to those who are faced with the tragedy of losing a loved one due to homicide, but they exaggerate when they claim that this is the only means by which murderers receive just punishment for their crimes. Advocates of the death penalty fail to recognize that there are alternative methods – such as psychotherapy – that are able to replace the barbaric method of the death penalty.
Klaas isn’t the only one whose first step of healing is to have the perpetrator executed for murdering a relative. “In 2001, there were more than 500 stories per year that claimed capital punishment gave their family closure with the death of a loved one.” Nancy Berns, a sociologist professor at Drake University, researched various healing methods of families who have had someone close to them murdered. She explains what she calls “new retribution” as a method of healing for those who have experiences a loved one murdered. “The healing process beings with the death of the killer, this provides closure and allows families to move on.”
There are always two sides to every issue and capital punishment or life imprisonment is no different. This has been a very controversial issue for decades and still is today. Capital Punishment also known as the death penalty is defined as being the penalty of death for a crime. Some feel that capital punishment should be abolished because it is cruel; others believe life in prison is just as cruel. There are many reasons for the support of Capital Punishment and for Life in Prison.
Sometimes people often wonder why certain things happen, or sometimes often wonder why certain things had to happen to them out of everyone else. A lot of people go insane or depressed over the lost of a loved one. The sad part about this though is that they didn’t just die from old age or cancer, they died from something much worse they got murdered. A lot of people don’t know how to react to such a horrible tragedy. Some people try to seek revenge or try to get closure from losing somebody so unexpectedly but for the states that don’t have the death penalty, not all get that closure or comfort. The death penalty has always been one of the most hotly debated issues in the United States.
Secondly, many believe that capital punishment is right because of the justice given to the victim’s family. These family members feel l...