Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Evaluation on euthanasia
Evaluation on euthanasia
Evaluation on euthanasia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Evaluation on euthanasia
Barbara J. King (2015) wrote, that it is estimated that between 3000 and 5000 healthy animals killed in captivity per year. These numbers are steadily rising by the day. This is absolutely unnecessary. The reasons these animals are dying are just idiotic. It is objectively wrong to kill healthy animals in captivity. Most of the killing of these innocent animals is is done by The Copenhagen Zoo in Denmark. One of the most heinous acts of this zoo is the killing of “Marius” a 2 year old giraffe. According to The New York Times (2014), the 2 year old giraffe was killed by a shotgun blast, had a public autopsy, and was then fed to lions. The zoo officials said they had to kill Marius because his genes were well represented among the other giraffes …show more content…
First of all, more than half the animals in these programs are not endangered. Usually any animals that do not fit in the breeding program, are more then often killed. That is why the 4 lions that were mentioned before were killed. Even if they have bred before in the zoo, if they do not fit into the program they are killed.
The breeding process usually goes something like this; the two animals are put in the same enclosure, are monitored very closely, and are controlled by many numbers and statistics. This is to prevent inbreeding and other genetic issues. This is one of the few humane processes that these zoo utilize.
What is euthanization? The term euthanasia comes from the Greek terms "eu" meaning good and "thanatos" meaning death. It is a relatively quick and painless death. The animals are usually tranquilized before being injected with a needle full of substance called “pentobarbital”. This substance depressed the central nervous system, which causes the animal to feel no pain, then it overdoses on the pentobarbital, and easily
…show more content…
They unjustly shot a two year old giraffe with a shotgun. Then before being fed to lions, they dissected the young giraffe in front of a large crowd of people. They did not allow children to attend the dissection, the Copenhagen Zoo is quoted saying, “when looked upon, the killing can be pretty cruel.” So it's too cruel to to show children, but it was not too cruel to kill the animal in the first place. All of the animals I have mentioned so far did not have to die. A simple and easy way to solve all these problems is to just relocate the animals. For example, many zoos offered to take in Marius, the two year old giraffe that was killed and fed to lions. It would be relatively easy to just move the lions into separate habitats, and the young bear cub.
An argument can be made that the natural structure of the zoo will be disrupted if certain animals are allowed to remain in the zoo. Zoos are always looking to take in more animals. It’s not like it would cost much to relocate these animals. The young one especially did not deserve to be killed. It is horrible that most of these killing could be solved so simply. It is just the sheer laziness and tight pockets of these
Considering the many challenges animals face in the wild, it is understandable that people may be eager to support zoos and may feel that they are protective facilities necessary for animal life. In the article “ Zoos Are Not Prisons. They Improve the Lives of Animals”, Author Robin Ganzert argues that Zoos are ethical institutions that enrich the lives of animals and ultimately protect them. Statistics have shown that animals held in captivity have limited utilitarian function resulting in cramped quarters, poor diets, depression, and early death for the animals thus, proving that Zoos are not ethical institutions that support and better the lives of animals as author Robin Ganzert stated (Cokal 491). Ganzert exposes the false premise in stating
Overall, animal captivity has not been solved yet because of people wanting to keep and observe animals to “learn” about them. Also, because people don't realize how places like zoos and SeaWorld are cruel and not actually seeing that the animals captured are not happy where they are placed. However, it is a problem that needs to be solved right away for the benefit of the
Zoo captivity is substandard and inadequate for animals. Zoo animals are deprived of their right as animals they are treated unjustly and unfairly. Animals should not be forced to kept in a cage away from their natural environment and be used as a form of entertainment to humans. The animals also suffer from stress and are driven insane by being trapped behind bars. The zoo is supposed to provide safety to these endangered animals but instead, these zoo animals are put at risk towards a variety of dangers such as vulnerability to diseases and starvation.
Natural hunting and mating behaviors are virtually eliminated by regulated feeding and breeding regimens. Captive animals are not able to choose their own mates. After a captive animal does eventually breed, their mate is taken out of the area. This can be emotionally damaging for those animals who choose a mate for life. Most animals are similar to humans in the fact that they need a connection with their mate. Zoos often eliminate this option. The animals are closely confined, lack privacy, and have little opportunity for mental stimulation or physical exercise, resulting in abnormal and self-destructive behavior.
Captive breeding programs are what make zoos ethical, but several problems need to be confronted. Zoos operate captive breeding programs in which they take animals from the wildlife and breed then in a scientifically controlled environment. They have saved several species from extinction such as the Red Wolf and the Przewalski Horse, and are aiding many others such as the blue-crowned laughing thrush. Before the breeding program saved the Red Wolves from extinction, there were only 14 pure breed Red Wolves remaining. When a species gets endangered it goes on the Species Survival Plan program. There are two issues that I came across during my research. Firstly, some zoos are taking advantage of several species to generate revenue. Cohn said that “to get more white tigers, zoo managers in India and the United States in the 1950s mated fathers with daughters, granddaughters, and even, on occasion, great granddaughters. (Cohn 654)” The question is whether this is ethical? After reading this I felt...
In the film, Madagascar, zoos are depicted as a sanctuary in which all the exotic animals are kept safe and are open for the public to view. But many would argue that zoos are inhumane, the charging of animals for our personal entertainment is unjustifiable. Those who believe that zoos are wrong and should be destroyed are animal rights activists; they believe that animals should be allowed to choose their own destiny. Those that believe that zoos are an important part of our lives are scientists and zoologists. This debate has gone on for generations and average folk are stuck in the middle, not knowing which side to stand on.
This is just one of the countless barbaric tortures forced upon animals. Studies show that in 1994, over 3,500 animals were killed in the United Kingdom, with almost another 21,000 more used in France for cosmetic purposes only (Celebrities, 95). These numbers reflect totals in only two countries. Research by Congress estimates that as many as 22 million animals are used annually for experimental research (Testing, 96). This research is funded by over $5 billion in tax revenue (Bio-Med, 97).
Proving to the world that this is wrong can be provided by so many facts and statistics and even people opposing this topic will make you agree that animal captivity is not right in any way. Our opinion
Animals should not be kept in captivity for any reason unless they have been harmed and need to receive treatment, but they should be released as soon as they are healthy and capable of taking care of themselves again. The use of a captive animal for research, education, or entertainment is just wrong; no creature deserves to have their life taken away for our benefit. Would you want to be captured and put in a tiny box, or a fake little ecosystem, or abused and tortured because apparently that’s the only possible way to train an animal? How about just knowing that your real life is over and now all you get to do is put on a show for people? That is what we put these animals through for our entertainment, we tear children away from their parents.
The lifespan of animals in captivity is far less than animals in the wild. b) Most of the animals at zoos are not even endangered. Breeding in captivity is not the best way to help with conservation. Numerous zoos breed for the sole purpose of having a cute baby to attract the public. (CONNECTIVE:
If you were an animal you would like to be in captivity you would feel like running around the grass plains in Africa with peace instead of living in a ‘prison’ being gawked by random strangers? We must treat them equally as they are also living creatures. Having animals in captivity is bad for their health not only losing their natural instincts the will have stress, shorter life span, repetitive movements, becoming lazier….etc they are all because of us! Have you heard of anti-depressant? People is using even drugs and violence to animals to make them calm down, do you think this is the right way to treat animals?
Animals should not be held captive in zoos because it is inhumane and unfair to the animals. There are so many records of terrible things that have happened to animals in zoos over the past few centuries, the go under the radar too often. Too few people even know about these animal care atrocities, and therefore the New York Times decided to bring light upon this situation. The Times did a first-of-its-kind analysis of 390 elephant fatalities at accredited U.S. zoos over the past 50 years (Berens 3). It found that most of the elephants died from injury or disease linked to conditions of their captivity, from chronic foot problems caused by standing on hard surfaces to musculoskeletal disorders from inactivity caused by being penned or chained for days and weeks at a time.
One reason that animals should not be held in captivity is because they are forced to live in disgraceful conditions. For instance, in a zoo, people try to do the best they can to re-create an animal's real life habitat, but no matter how hard they try, it just won’ t be the same as it is when they are in the wild. Zoo
Zoos are an unsuitable environment for wild animals and should, therefore, be abolished. Firstly, zoo animals are kept in a very confined area compared to their vast natural habitat. Secondly, breeding programmes are far less successful than zoos claim. Thirdly, zoo animals are exposed to many diseases and other dangers. Zoo animals are usually kept in very cramped enclosures and do not behave like their wild counterparts.
How many of you have ever visited a zoo? I am almost positive everyone has been to the zoo at least once. It is a convenient and easy way to have fun with your family. The real question is it ethical to keep these animals locked in cages for most of their lives? Some would say it is okay, but others would have to disagree.