Do you think Hamlet is victorious? There is a lot of debate on whether he is, or is not victorious at the end of the story. I am writing about William Shakespeare's, Hamlet and I’ll be listing pieces of evidence on why he is victorious at the end of the story. Hamlet is victorious because he got revenge for his father, he ended Claudius’ regime of being king, and he eliminated everyone tried to stop him.
A good piece of evidence why Hamlet is victorious is the scene where he explains what he did that deceived everybody. “ Which was the model of that Danish seal./ Folded the writ up in form of th’ impression, placed it safely,/ The challenge never known” (Shakespeare 5.2.52-55). At this point in the story, the new King of Denmark, Claudius
…show more content…
“The point envenomed too!-Then, venom, to thy work./...Here, thou incestuous, murderous, damne’d Dane,/ Drink off this potion. Is thy union here?/ Follow my mother” (Shakespeare 5.2.323-28). During this scene is where Hamlet killed Claudius, the man who took everything from him. The man who killed his father, and ruined the chance of him becoming king one day. Hamlet was able to end Claudius’ rule of king, he avenged his father for his death and therefore, another victory for Hamlet. On the other hand, there is some debate that he isn’t victorious. The main reason is because he died. “ The potent poison quite o’ercrows my spirit./ I cannot live to hear the news from England./ But I do prophesy the election lights/ On Fortinbras. He has my dying voice./ So tell him, with th’ occurrents, more and less,/ Which have solicited. The rest is silence”(Shakespeare 5.2.355-60). This is concrete evidence for opposing viewers that believe he is not victorious. However, Hamlet was set out to kill Claudius, which he did. The death of Gertrude was not his fault. Claudius is to blame on that as well. Everybody will die at some point in a person's life so that is a poor reason to say Hamlet is not victorious. Also, to call Hamlet not victorious after all the obstacles and journeys he went through just to reach his goal is outrageous. Hamlet is well deserved to be considered
Claudius greedy intentions take him to his murderous action. Claudius says, “The whole kingdom/to be contracted in one brow of woe”. (Shakespeare1.2.3-4) Claudius killing old king Hamlet knows that was the only way to have the kingdom. He gives the kingdom a new start under his new government and things that favors him but he still has those devious ways. He also gives the people a speech to represents how good of a ruler his is going to be and he even acknowledges his brother’s death. He gets to maintain the country affairs in his own way. The
In the beginning of the play, the title character himself, Hamlet, experiences devastation after devastation. His father, the former king of Denmark, had perished unexpectedly. Following the death of his father, his uncle, had claimed the throne and arranged to marry his brother’s wife, Gertrude. All in which took Hamlet on a whirlwind of saddened emotions, which had led up to his selfish thoughts of committing suicide. Everyone in the palace is blinded by the celebrations of a new King to take notice of Hamlet. Therefore, he finds himself secluded and hostile wandering through the palace mindlessly. “Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of the outrageous failure or to take claims against a sea of troubles, and by opposing them?” ( 3.1.58-60). Hamlet asks himself whether or not it is better to push through the
Hamlet is a character that we love to read about and analyze. His character is so realistic, and he is so romantic and idealistic that it is hard not to like him. He is the typical young scholar facing the harsh reality of the real world. In this play, Hamlet has come to a time in his life where he has to see things as they really are. Hamlet is an initiation story. Mordecai Marcus states "some initiations take their protagonists across a threshold of maturity and understanding but leave them enmeshed in a struggle for certainty"(234). And this is what happens to Hamlet.
... and for the betterment of society. King Hamlet was able to be avenged by the killing of Claudius, and Fortinbras was crowned the king of Denmark. In contrast, Claudius, who used his power for personal reasons, did not succeed in the end, but rather died while he still needed to confess his sins, a fate similar to that of his brother.
...the king. By killing the king, they put Denmark in better hands, and they save both of their lives. Also, Ophelia and Hamlet could get married and take the throne. Just by changing Laertes decision, the ending of Hamlet completely changes. Everyone is alive and healthy, except for King Claudius, and Denmark is not taken over by Fortinbras, an officer of a foreign country.
In conclusion Hamlet's plan did exactly what it was supposed to allow him to do. Hamlet shows really well the natural reaction to stressful situations by which he acts through emotion not logic. Hamlet would have been a exeptional king because of his logical thinking, but a short lived king because of his inability to act upon it.
At this moment the main problem of "Hamlet" could be ended. Hamlet could kill his Uncle Claudius and avenge his father's death, and the case would (excepting the case of some unknown tragedy) be closed. He would not accidentally kill Polonius, and perhaps he, Ophelia, Gertrude, and Laertes would not end up dead. The play might not have such an entirely tragic ending after all.
The fact that Claudius has become king is not really surprising. Only late in the play does Hamlet complain that his uncle had "popped in between the election and my hopes." The country had been in a nervous state expecting an invasion by young Fortinbras, at the head of a lawless band of adventurers, in revenge for his father’s death at the hands of King Hamlet. A strong new king was immediately needed; the election of Claudius, particularly in the absence of Hamlet, was inevitable. What is more, it was immediately justified, because Claudius manages to dispel the threat of invasion by appealing to the King of Norway to curb his nephew, Fortinbras; the ambitious young soldier was the more ready to cancel the projected invasion because the object of his revenge, Hamlet’s father, was now dead, and in return he received free passage through Denmark to fight against Poland.
...e his goal was to get and retain power. He wanted to prove Claudius to be an unfit king, and he did so, but only as Hamlet himself was about to die. Hamlet had to cause grief by killing the king, but in the end, he is seen as a hero, because he unmasked his father's killer.
Hamlet should have acted decisively and killed Claudius as soon as possible after the Ghost told him to avenge his murder. But then comes the indecisive character in him that thinks it though. he debates that if he does not kill Claudius, he may forever be locked in the stressful mental state in which his obsession puts him, but then again if he attempts or succeeds in killing Claudius he is released from all the responsibility he feels for represtenting his father. Whether he does or doesn't kill Claudius, he faces enormous psychological pain. This allows him to mope about the castle for months on end. He's convinced a few people that he's mad. Hamlet could have killed Claudius and gotten away with it. Hamlet was incredibly popular with the people, and Claudius wasn't.Instead he wiles away the time, playing mad and deceiving people, but accomplishing nothing.
Hamlet appears to be a rather philosophical character. He is skeptical and expresses views that nowadays can be described as existential and relativist, but those terms did not exist in Shakespeare’s time. Existentialism analyzes existence and the way humans appear to exist in this world. It is concerned with the individual; finding oneself and finding a meaning to life by one’s own measures.That is exactly what Hamlet is going through. Presented with the jarring conflict of avenging his father’s death, Hamlet finds his meaning to life shortly before dying himself among others tangled in this mess. He was tasked by the ghost of his father to kill Claudius in an act of vengeance, which would be considered noble (though in this case, it is a regicide avenging a regicide; treason for treason). The ideals of society demand that he...
Hamlet the Anti-Hero Hamlet certainly isn't a hero in this game. He exhibits many of his weaknesses that contradict other characters in the play. A hero is a person who shows great courage through his actions, and one who is noble and self-sacrificing. He does exhibit courage in parts like when the ghost came and Hamlet followed it, but yet he certainly isn't self-sacrificing. He sacrifices other characters' lives to benefit his chance of getting revenge with Claudius.
With his thinking mind Hamlet does not become a typical vengeful character. Unlike most erratic behavior of individuals seeking revenge out of rage, Hamlet considers the consequences of his actions. What would the people think of their prince if he were to murder the king? What kind of effect would it have on his beloved mother? Hamlet considers questions of this type which in effect hasten his descision. After all, once his mother is dead and her feelings out of the picture , Hamlet is quick and aggressive in forcing poison into Claudius' mouth. Once Hamlet is certain that Claudius is the killer it is only after he himself is and and his empire falling that he can finally act.
The Success of Hamlet Is this Shakespearean tragedy Hamlet as successful a play as some critics say? Wherein lies the success? Is the protagonist the prime reason for the continued success? J. Dover Wilson in “What Happens in Hamlet” attributes much of the success of the drama to the characterization of the prince. Finally, this compound of overwhelmingly convincing humanity and psychological contradiction is the greatest of Shakespeare’s legacies to the men of his own quality.
...m to put his life in danger to find out more information about Hamlet, which ultimately leads to his death. Claudius also planted the idea of murdering Hamlet into Laertes’ mind, and this became the main goal of Laertes towards the end, which leads him to his death. Hamlet has hurt the women that he loves, both Ophelia and Gertrude die. Claudius and Hamlet also die, which is ultimately how the corruption of the nation of Denmark ends, through this it can once again be the great nation that it once was.