Is Capital Punishment a Human Way to Deal with Criminals?

972 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Capital punishment and ethics

Capital Punishment has been around for as long as there has been written language. It has been used all over the world, in different cultures, and has been executed in different styles. In the past, the death penalty was taken for granted for almost any crime you can think of (Garland). However in today’s society, the question has been asked if Capital Punishment is a humane way to deal with criminals. For most of recorded human history, there has always been records of the death penalty. Most of which were usually extremely painful or just outright disturbing. One of the most disturbing periods in history where the death penalty was widely enforced would be in late 18th century, in France. This time period is also known as the “Reign of Terror.”(Brown) During this time period, the citizens of France would not have trials for the crimes they were accused of. In many cases, this would mean that if you were accused of a crime you were going to be executed. In France, the death penalty of choice would be through the Guillotine. This method was cruel and unusual. It would put the person who was sentenced to death in the center of town so that everyone can see. The only thing that made the Guillotine a somewhat respected form of execution was “that this was the swiftest and least painful mode of death.”(Smith 33), at least for that time period. In today’s society, many argue that the death penalty is inhumane. They call it a form of torture because the convicted wait so long on death row for their execution date. However, according to the United Nations Convention, it is not a form of torture. The United Nations Convention defines torture as “Torture means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is... ... middle of paper ... ...10): 503-535. Academic Search Complete. Web. 3 Apr. 2014. Smith, Philip. “Narrating the Guillotine: Punishment Technology as Myth and Symbol” Theory, Culture & Society October 2003 vol. 20 no. 5 27-51. Web. 3 Apr. 2014. Alarcón, Judge Arthur L., and Paula M. Mitchell. "Executing The Will Of The Voters?: A Roadmap To Mend Or End The California Legislature's Multi-Billion-Dollar Death Penalty Debacle." Loyola Of Los Angeles Law Review 44.3 (2011): S41-S224. Academic Search Complete. Web. 4 Apr. 2014. Lamperti, John. "Does Capital Punishment Deter Murder?." Dartmouth.edu. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2014. . Gross, Samuel R., et al. "Exonerations In The United States 1989 Through 2003." Journal Of Criminal Law & Criminology 95.2 (2005): 523-560. Academic Search Complete. Web. 4 Apr. 2014.

Show More
Related

  • The Guillotine: An Enlightened Way To Kill People

    878 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion, the guillotine was a more enlightened way to execute someone than what people used to do. What they did to execute people before the guillotine was horrendous and inhumane. Hanging people and stoning people isn’t one of the kindest ways to execute a person. The guillotine went along with the enlightened way of thinking, and made executions less painful. The guillotine was one of the best execution devices ever created for its way of killing

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment: California's Financial Burden and Legal Nightmare

    1436 Words  | 3 Pages

    Notwithstanding issues of morality, the death penalty process of California is financially inefficient and ineffective. At the current rate of executions, “it would take 1,600 years to execute everybody on death row.” [The Death of the American Death Penalty, 122] The average delay in implementing a death sentence calculates out to be 25 years, at an added cost of $90,000 per year over normal incarceration. [Guy, 2] This is a “premium that currently totals more than $60 million a year” [Guy, 2]. When you take the added costs of death row incarceration and total them up with the additional costs of prosecution and the handling of the many legal appeals death row inmates are entitled to, the unnecessary amount of spending is significant. We could eliminate “$126 million a year” in additional costs by simply sentencing death row inmates to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. [Guy, 2] Because of the afo...

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment and Torture: Unconstitutional Or Justice?

    518 Words  | 2 Pages

    Capital punishment and torture are often looked down on in today’s societies because they are viewed as cruel and unconstitutional, but perhaps they would help in more ways then we would like to admit. They can be beneficial in many ways such as encouragement to be truthful, encouragement to live by the laws, and as a source of punishment. Capital punishment and torture are thought to be too painful, and the person doing the punishment is also committing a crime.

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment in Canada

    863 Words  | 2 Pages

    As seen, capital punishment is a barbaric tool used for centuries to punish wrong doers. As society evolves, so does its beliefs. But many stare so long at the past they do not see the future. People must realize that society has come a long way and capital punishment is a step in the wrong direction. Capital punishment must remain in the past and not in the future.

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment Essay - True Justice Through Application of the Death Penalty

    1070 Words  | 3 Pages

    The death penalty, as administered by states based on their individual laws, is considered capital punishment, the purpose of which is to penalize criminals convicted of murder or other heinous crimes (Fabian).  The death penalty issue has been the focus of much controversy in recent years, even though capital punishment has been a part of our country's history since the beginning.  Crimes in colonial times, such as murder and theft of livestock were dealt with swiftly and decisively ("The Death Penalty...").  Criminals were hanged shortly after their trial, in public executions. This practice was then considered just punishment for those crimes.  Recently though, the focus of the death penalty debate has been on moral and legal issues.  The murderers of today's society can be assured of a much longer life even after conviction, with the constraints of the appeals process slowing the implementation of their death sentence.  In most cases, the appeal process lasts several years, during which time criminals enjoy comfortable lives.  They have television, gym facilities, and the leisure time to attend free college-level classes that most American citizens must struggle to afford.  Foremost, these murderers have the luxury of time, something their victims ran out of the moment their paths crossed.  It is time this country realized the only true justice for these criminals is in the form of the death penalty.  The death penalty should be administered for particularly heinous crimes.

    Read More

  • Informative Essay On Capital Punishment

    492 Words  | 1 Pages

    Execution by guillotine is also a type of capital punishment. It was invented by French surgeon and physiologist, Antoine Louis and German engineer, Tobias Schmidt. It was developed as a more human method of execution when compared to the breaking wheel. The guillotine consists of a tall upright frame in which a weighted and angled blade raised to the top and suspended. The convicted is secured at the bottom of the frame with the neck held directly below the blade and the blade is then dropped. It is usually done publicly to afflict fear into anyone who wishes to commit capital

    Read More

  • Just Kill 'Em?

    1425 Words  | 3 Pages

    The United States has a long history with the death penalty. The “first recorded execution was in Jamestown in 1608” (“Death Penalty in America” 259). Since then, thirty five states have continued to use the death penalty. Now it can be considered a normal punishment and many people feel strongly about it, but maybe we should forget what we have done in the past and take a second look. The death penalty should not be used in the United States because it is too expensive, affects the poor and minorities more than others, and (even though many people think it is true) the death penalty does not deter crime.

    Read More

  • The Death Penalty

    853 Words  | 2 Pages

    The death penalty continues to be an issue of controversy and is an issue that will be debated in the United States for many years to come. According to Hugo A. Bedau, the writer of “The Death Penalty in America”, capital punishment is the lawful infliction of the death penalty. The death penalty has been used since ancient times for a variety of offenses. The Bible says that death should be done to anyone who commits murder, larceny, rapes, and burglary. It appears that public debate on the death penalty has changed over the years and is still changing, but there are still some out there who are for the death penalty and will continue to believe that it’s a good punishment. I always hear a lot of people say “an eye for an eye.” Most people feel strongly that if a criminal took the life of another, their’s should be taken away as well, and I don’t see how the death penalty could deter anyone from committing crimes if your going to do the crime then at that moment your not thinking about being on death role. I don’t think they should be put to death they should just sit in a cell for the rest of their life and think about how they destroy other families. A change in views and attitudes about the death penalty are likely attributed to results from social science research. The changes suggest a gradual movement toward the eventual abolition of capital punishment in America (Radelet and Borg, 2000).

    Read More

  • Use of the Gas Chamber in Capital Punishment

    526 Words  | 2 Pages

    Execution as a form of criminal punishment has been used throughout various parts of the world since the Middle Ages. In fact, back in that time, even petty offenses such as committing adultery or stealing from a food vendor were considered criminal enough to be worthy of death. During the 18th century, death by execution became subject to public display, and was even thought by some to be a form of entertainment. This “entertainment” took shape via methods such as burning at the stake, breaking on the wheel, and slow strangulation. However, due to a growing humanitarian movement in the late 1800’s, these torturous methods became extinct. Rather, more “humane” forms of execution were implemented, such as by guillotine, hanging, or the headman’s axe. The pain inflicted by these was far less than the first three methods, as death was nearly instantaneous.

    Read More

  • Is Capital Punishment Ethical?

    2399 Words  | 5 Pages

    Capital punishment is a difficult subject for a lot of people because many question whether or not it is ethical to kill a convicted criminal. In order to critically analyze whether or not it is ethical, I will look at the issue using a utilitarianism approach because in order to get a good grasp of this topic we need to look at how the decision will impact us in the future. The utilitarianism approach will help us to examine this issue and see what some of the consequences are with this topic of capital punishment. For years, capital punishment has been used against criminals and continues to be used today, but lately this type of punishment has come into question because of the ethical question.

    Read More

  • The Ethics of Capital Punishment

    1503 Words  | 4 Pages

    Americans have argued over the death penalty since the early days of our country. In the United States only 38 states have capital punishment statutes. As of year ended in 1999, in Texas, the state had executed 496 prisoners since 1930. The laws in the United States have change drastically in regards to capital punishment. An example of this would be the years from 1968 to 1977 due to the nearly 10 year moratorium. During those years, the Supreme Court ruled that capital punishment violated the Eight Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. However, this ended in 1976, when the Supreme Court reversed the ruling. They stated that the punishment of sentencing one to death does not perpetually infringe the Constitution. Richard Nixon said, “Contrary to the views of some social theorists, I am convinced that the death penalty can be an effective deterrent against specific crimes.”1 Whether the case be morally, monetarily, or just pure disagreement, citizens have argued the benefits of capital punishment. While we may all want murders off the street, the problem we come to face is that is capital punishment being used for vengeance or as a deterrent.

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment

    983 Words  | 2 Pages

    The death penalty has been around for centuries. It dates back to when Hammurabi had his laws codified; it was “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth”. Capital punishment in America started when spies were caught, put on trial and hung. In the past and still today people argue that, the death penalty is cruel, unusual punishment and should be illegal. Yet many people argue that it is in fact justifiable and it is not cruel and unusual. Capital punishment is not cruel and unusual; the death penalty is fair and there is evidence that the death penalty deters crime.

    Read More

  • Debate On The Use of the Capital Punishment

    1110 Words  | 3 Pages

    Form the beginning of history, the death penalty has been used around the world as much way to punish people for their crimes. Most countries use that capital punishment are use it for the worst types of crimes for example, murder , treason and spying, many militaries will apply the death penalty and the soldiers or normal people who are doing wrong against their country. In ancient Rome and Greece it was use large range of crimes, and has continued but less the, most places. Some countries will allow it but do not really use it very much. Over time, there was times when it was used for evey crime and times where it was not used at all. In Britain, in the 19th century there were 160 crime that had t...

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment Persuasive Essay

    1461 Words  | 3 Pages

    Capital punishment has been a controversial topic in association to any person condemned to a serious committed crime. Capital punishment has been a historical punishment for any cruel crime. Issues associated to things such as the different methods used for execution in most states, waste of taxpayers’ money by performing execution, and how it does not serve as any form of justice have been a big argument that raise many eyebrows. Capital punishment is still an active form of deterrence in the United States. The history of the death penalty explains the different statistics about capital punishment and provides credible information as to why the form of punishment should be abolished by every state. It is believed

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment Should be Abolished

    869 Words  | 2 Pages

    Capital punishment is the punishment of death for a crime given by the state. It is used for a variety of crimes such as murder, drug trafficking and treason. Many countries also have the death penalty for sexual crimes such as rape, incest and adultery. The lethal injection, the electric chair, hanging and stoning are all methods of execution used throughout the world. Capital punishment has been around since ancient times; it was used in ancient Rome, and one of the most famous people to be crucified was Jesus Christ. Capital punishment is now illegal in many countries, like the United Kingdom, France and Germany, but it is also legal in many other countries such as China and the USA. There is a large debate on whether or not capital punishment should be illegal all over the world as everyone has a different opinion on it. In this essay, I will state arguments for and against the death penalty, as well as my own opinion: capital punishment should be illegal everywhere.

    Read More

More about Is Capital Punishment a Human Way to Deal with Criminals?

Open Document