Is Alien Civilization Right Or Wrong

In this paper, I will discuss a scenario of an alien civilization coming to earth in peace but, offers all humanity a cure for all diseases especially cancer in exchange of 10,000 involuntary human subjects for their own possibly lethal experiments on whether it is right or wrong. There are three different individuals which are an Ethic Relativist, Rule Utilitarian, and Act Utilitarian who haves their own opinion when it comes to this scenario and whether it is morally correct to exchange 10,000 human beings against their will for a cure of all human diseases in the world. Through the controversy of a relativist determining that there no morals values for any cultures that have their own rules and not intervene with other cultures and a utilitarian

deciding on whether sacrificing individuals unwillingly is morally accurate act that seeks most people pleasure instead of their displeasure.
In the book, “The Moral of the Story, An Introduction to Ethics” by Nina Rosenstand explanation for Ethic Relativism, “individuals believing that there are no universal moral values for each culture that sets their own set of rules are accurate for that culture and no one has a right to interfere as much as they do not interfere with other cultures”. (Page 118, Rosenstand) In the book, “The Moral of the Story, An Introduction to Ethics” by Nina Rosenstand explanation for Utilitarianism but there are two different versions, rule utilitarian and act utilitarian, they both agree to the best action to occur for the best decision but differ on how they make the decision to happen such. A rule utilitarianism is judging the morality of people actions by referring to the moral rules and judging the moral rules by seeing the acceptance in our moral codes for the well-being beside using other possible rules. An act utilitarianism is deciding an action they should do by performing the most suitable action to construct the greatest unity for the most people.