Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religious influences on society
Contrast evolution vs intelligent design
The relationship between social and religion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Religious influences on society
I think the intended objective was to establish that religions are irrational and that the idea of God is unprovable and, therefore, unscientific. If that is true, I think I have understood the article clearly. I guess I cannot find a reason to contend this theory. My question is why does it have to be scientific? Why do we need to prove something? Is it necessary that to explain everything? And, is it necessary to explain everything correctly?
After reading this, I am more confident that I am capable of understanding, to some extent, why believers tend to dislike atheists. That piece was so cold and insensitive, if not bluntly contemptuous. ;-)
This contempt probably stems from the assumption that to understand and to reason is intellectually
…show more content…
Yet, it is effective in bringing out the nonsense we see associated with religions and rituals. It is probably religious beliefs that have contributed to the pervasive dogmatism in our culture. Even then, it is not entirely right to let go of our basic instincts to believe irrationally, for without which we may not exist for long. Let me elaborate. For social animals like ours, water and oxygen are not the only requirements for life. We need to not just exist but co-exist. In a society like ours, concepts like morality, loyalty and love prevails as a consequence. Perhaps, we have prevailed because of them. Belief in God and the ability to excuse our need to explain things we cannot control is one other concept that has certainly helped bring people together, fight together and live together. In an ideal world, maybe we do not need these concepts to bind us (or divide us). We are certainly not living in an ideal world. Neither can we expect to live in one in the near (or distant) future. There is, however, a possibility that we can understand how these concepts benefit us and how we have evolved to use these irrational beliefs as crutches or safety nets or as weapons to survive and to eliminate. To gain this understanding we need not trivialize these ideas or attempt to stymie the people who profess ideologies that are obviously flawed. Because only when we stop antagonizing people can we respect them, and only when we respect them can we communicate with them and only when we communicate with them can we understand them and their
Those who are against the ideas, think they have their own way to view people. However, we need to think back to what we have in common; the thing that we have in common is that we are sharing the same root, which is that of the Mother Earth. In the short-story “What, of this Goldfish, Would You Wish?” by Etgar Keret, it is asked, “if you found a talking goldfish that granted you three wishes, what would you wish for?” (3). Most people in the story want to wish for the world to be in happiness and peace- no war. Without doubt, one can assume that no matter how different we are from others, we are still come from one same
There is no society without religion. James has also states that religion is “personal destiny”, which means that it existence is infinite in human life. Human lifestyle has been influence by the religion, so religion is a principal factor in universe. Religion is based on different believes and practices of humans which is totally understandable, despite of difference in religion people have same shared belief of putting their God above the others and shows the love and affection toward it. God has created this universe, the specious around us is the sign of his existence.
In the novel "Brave New World" civilized society lives in a world of science and technology. Major changes have occurred during the future; Utopia now revolves a religion of drugs and sex. God and the cross have been replaced by Ford and the symbol T, the founder of the age of machines. Instead of Sunday church, members now attend solidarity services where morals and tradition are not learned, but rather faith is taught in the belief of hallucinations produced by a substance known as "soma." Soma has effectively replaced the belief in a higher being by its elimination of problems and stress resulting in a lack of imagination , creativity, or "soul." Yet religion can still be found in today's society because of man's continuing need for answers to questions that cannot be solved by science or technology.
... uses the lack of proof of Gods existence for God’s existence. This then essentially leads to a battle between science and religion on the idea of whether or not God can be proven to exist and whether that proof is essential to determine if science or religion has the right answer.
Fundamentalism and Religion For a vast majority, the term “fundamentalism” evokes images of hostage crises, embassies under siege, hijackings, and suicide bombers. But these images hardly present a comprehensive picture. People in the west associate fundamentalism with Islam, this is indeed a mistaken belief. Fundamentalism is defined as " the affirmation of religious authority as holistic and absolute, admitting of neither criticism nor reduction; it is expressed through the collective demand that specific creedal and ethical dictates derived from scripture be publicly recognized and legally enforced ." (Lawrence) Therefore the essence of fundamentalist belief is doctrinal confirmity, of not only oneself but the conformity of the rest of society too .While
Religion is a set of faiths or beliefs that is based around one or more central powers. Religion can take what is good and turn it to evil, especially in the case of the Taliban and crusades. Religion can be used for good as well, in the case of several modern day religions.
Theology and science tend to go hand in hand in epistemological philosophy. The process of scientific inquiry in itself is epistemology. Studying religion and the ideas of God also directly relate to the study of knowledge and opinion. How much can be known about God? Is there evidence to rectify the existence of such an all-powerful being? If so, what would count? These questions have quickly become the epitome of my educational journey and are what I have been struggling to decipher. However, through exploration of this course and its included texts, I have reached an understanding; science and religion are not only compatible, but also mutually exclusive. Each idea substantiates the other and gives rise to the other, and for this reason
The author argumentatively explains his opinion as to why the concept of god and religion is erroneous, why religion contradicts every fundamental aspect of...
Religion and science are complementary elements to our society. The notion that religion and science should not be merged together, does not mean neglecting to understand the parallel relation between these two concepts and will result in a better understanding of our surroundings. This will put an end to our scientific research and advancement because we will be relying on answers provided by religious books to answer our questions. If we don’t argue whether these answers are right or wrong, we would never have studied space stars or the universe or even our environment and earthly animals. These studies have always provided us with breakthroughs, inventions and discoveries that made our lives better.
Religious leaders ought to be the epitome of goodness and morality and are supposed to live lives worthy of emulation. Yet, in Voltaire’s Candide and Goethe’s Faust, the church is infested with hypocrisy what with religious leaders being hypocritical characters that are corrupt, greedy and immoral. These are seen in so many instances in both texts as will be discussed below.
...wever, in the best interest of advancing education and an enlightened society, science must be pursued outside of the realm of faith and religion. There are obvious faith-based and untestable aspects of religion, but to interfere and cross over into everyday affairs of knowledge should not occur in the informational age. This overbearing aspect of the Church’s influence was put in check with the scientific era, and the Scientific Revolution in a sense established the facet of logic in society, which allows us to not only live more efficiently, but intelligently as well. It should not take away from the faith aspect of religion, but serve to enhance it.
“In thinking about religion, it is easy to be confused about what it is.” (Smart, 1992) To combat this, Smart uses seven dimensions to define common characteristics of religion. Much of what will be explored will fit his dimensions. The practical and ritual dimension can been seen in all three religions through worship and rituals and patterns of behaviour. The latter are those acts that help the believer develop spiritual awareness or ethical insight, such as yoga or meditation in Buddhism and Hinduism. The experiential and emotional dimension of religion explains that religion feeds on human emotions and key events from history to illustrate this is, the enlightenment of the Buddha, or the visions of Muhammad. A person will not follow something without meaning or emotion driving it. The narrative or mythic dimension of religion refers to the use of story telling in religion. Typically, all faiths use stories to illustrate their beliefs or events in history, whether they might be of things to come, or like in this essay, stories of the Buddha, or Muhammad. The use of story telling is important as the stories are often based on accounts of history or documents that have been found. Story telling can enhance the believers faith and are often integrated into rituals. The doctrinal and philosophical dimension of religion talks about the importance of the holy books/ doctrines. Since the doctrines typically have an account of the leaders life, and the leaders are usually educated, believers read the doctrines to gain an insight into the leaders life; and thus strive to become more like them or abide by their teachings. The ethical and legal
When considering the basis for the understanding of both science and religion it is interesting to distinguish that both are based on an overwhelming desire to define a greater knowledge, and comprehension of the universe that surrounds us. Now while, science has based its knowledge of experimental basis, researcher, and scholarly work; religion
While faith alone cannot be said to necessitate truth, it is by no means useless as a basis for knowledge in the areas of knowledge of religion and the natural sciences. Faith allows a knower to make the decision of what is knowledge and what is not, even when the knowledge claim cannot be justified by evidence or empirical reasoning. Yet simultaneously, this quality of faith renders it useless in finding absolute truth. In the natural sciences, faith can be seen as both a necessity, as it is essential for the building of knowledge, and yet also it must be challenged, as the advancement of science is through the disproving of current theories.
First off, it is important to realize that religion and science have to be related in some way, even if it is not the way I mentioned before. If religion and science were completely incompatible, as many people argue, then all combinations between them would be logically excluded. That would mean that no one would be able to take a religious approach to a scientific experiment or vice versa. Not only does that occur, but it occurs rather commonly. Scientists often describe their experiments and writings in religious terms, just as religious believers support combinations of belief and doubt that are “far more reminiscent of what we would generally call a scientific approach to hypotheses and uncertainty.” That just proves that even though they are not the same, religion and science have to be related somehow.