Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Interest groups power in politics
Creation of public policy
Interest groups power in politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Interest groups power in politics
The way in which political policy is created in the United States can be very complex and occur in many ways. One of the most common ways in which policy is established is through a framework described as an iron triangle. In this essay I will describe the structure of the iron triangle and how the various roles of the iron triangle work together. I will also express my own opinion about the impact of the iron triangle on the policy making process.
In the iron triangle model there are three roles interacting with one another in relation to one or more specific types of policy. The three roles are congressional committees, bureaucratic agencies, and interest groups. The primary role of a congressional committee is to control the federal budget and legislation. The primary role of a bureaucratic agency is to carry out or act on legislation and use funds allocated through the budget to do so. The primary role of an interest group is to influence the congressional committee in order to obtain some benefit that is then carried out by the bureaucratic agency. These roles are mutually bene...
An iron triangle is defined as a three-sided, mutually advantageous relationship between members of Congressional Committees, Bureaucrats, and interest groups. Most of the Congressional Committees and Subcommittees have relationships with the agencies whose programs they authorize and appropriate money for. The committees and the bureaucrats from the agencies have close relationships with interest groups that want to influence policy. The literal components of an iron triangle, such as one involving agriculture, include key members of the House and Senate committees on Agriculture (such as a committee chairman), officials from the US Department of Agriculture (such as a director of a division), and lobbyists who represent an interest group such as the American Farm Bureau Federation. The relationship is simple, and simple.
When creating and enforcing federal policies each of these 3 factions within the triangle influence one another in what is called sub-governments. Depending on how well each of these factions interact and build relationships with one another it can be a base for a strong control over policies in any area. This entire process of the iron triangle starts with interest groups and their support with congress in areas such as funding, electoral support or even information surrounding politics. By doing this for congress, interest groups gain assistance in areas that directly benefit their individual cause such as laws being passed in their favor. The bureaucrats on the other hand get their funding directly from decisions that congress members make. Congressional funding and the power to oversee operations allow members of congress to have a slight advantage of this faction of the iron triangle. Yet Bureaucrats do have the power to render policies that can be either beneficial or detrimental to congress leaving both factions needing to be in each other’s good graces. Lastly the relation between interest groups and bureaucrats intertwine because of the support each of the factions can give to each other based on special favors. Bureaucrats can implement programs that are not highly regulated while
The United States of America is one of the most powerful nation-states in the world today. The framers of the American Constitution spent a great deal of time and effort into making sure this power wasn’t too centralized in one aspect of the government. They created three branches of government to help maintain a checks and balance system. In this paper I will discuss these three branches, the legislative, the executive, and the judicial, for both the state and federal level.
Kernell, Samuel, Jacobson, Gary C., Kousser, Thad, & Vavreck, Lynn. 2014. The Logic of American Politics 6th ed. Los Angeles: CQ Press
Many governments in the world, like the US have subgovernments, systems that help make the voices' of small groups interested in specific things heard. Without many subgovernments small interest groups would not even be recongnized. The iron triangle is one of those subgovernments; congressional committees work with interest groups and a bureaucratic agency to have demands met. Thanks to the iron triangle may small interest groups have a voice in their country governments' legislature.
"American Government: Institutions and Policies [Hardcover]." American Government: Institutions and Policies: James Q. Wilson, Jr. John J. DiIulio, Meena Bose: 9781111830014: Amazon.com: Books. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Nov. 2013.
In the United States of America, there are a number of national issues that go unresolved and become more of a major issue subsequently. The lack of resolution in some of our nation’s most critical issues is due to the lack of a common ground between opposing political parties. Issues such as healthcare, climate change, abortion, same-sex marriage, taxes and welfare are reoccurring problems in the United States due to congressional gridlock. The cause of congressional gridlock can be attributed to the difference in liberal and conservative views, which can be further examined through some of the nation’s most prominent reoccurring issues such as immigration and gun control.
In discussing the problems surrounding the issue of factionalism in American society, James Madison concluded in Federalist #10, "The inference to which we are brought is that the causes of cannot be removed and that relief is only to be sought in the means of controlling its effects." (Federalist Papers 1999, 75) In many ways, the nature of American politics has revolved around this question since our country's birth. What is the relationship between parties and government? Should the party serve as an intermediary between the populace and government, and how should a government respond to disparate ideas espoused by the factions inherent to a free society. This paper will discuss the political evolution that has revolved around this question, examining different "regimes" and how they attempted to reconcile the relationship between power and the corresponding role of the people. Beginning with the Federalists themselves, we will trace this evolution until we reach the contemporary period, where we find a political climate described as "interest-group liberalism." Eventually this paper will seek to determine which has been the most beneficial, and which is ultimately preferable.
The fundamental of policymaking consists of a lengthy time process that goes through many steps in becoming a Bill. The process of policymaking is introduced in the beginning step of the Policy Formulation Phase, as the problem goes through a Legislation it goes into the Policy Implementation Phase, which than forms into a law or vetoed. Many policies do not become a Bill’s, but the certain ones that do they achieve the goal to guide the society with immense decision making and balanced outcomes.
Most legislation originates from governmental departments and agencies. In committees, a majority vote decides and often, compromise must be reached in order for a bill or law to survive committee action. This frequently requires that a delegate alter his position in order to achieve a compromise. This compromise may or may not reflect the wishes of the people he/she represents. The Modern Bureaucracy in the United States serves to administer, gather information, conduct investigations, regulate, and license.
The pluralistic scholar David Truman notes that “the proliferation of political interest groups [is] a natural and largely benign consequence of economic development” (Kernell 2000, 429). That is, as American economic development increases, in the form of industry, trade, and technology, factions are produced in order to protect special interests. Factions have a large platform on which to find support from various political parties, committees, subcommittees, and the courts, as well as federal, state, and local governments (Kernell 2000, 429).
Edwards III, George, Andrew Barrett, and Jeffrey Peake. "The Legislative Impact of Divided Government." American Journal of Political Science. 41.2 (1997): 545-563. Web. 11 Feb. 2014.
The New Deal period has generally - but not unanimously - been seen as a turning point in American politics, with the states relinquishing much of their autonomy, the President acquiring new authority and importance, and the role of government in citizens' lives increasing. The extent to which this was planned by the architect of the New Deal, Franklin D. Roosevelt, has been greatly contested, however. Yet, while it is instructive to note the limitations of Roosevelt's leadership, there is not much sense in the claims that the New Deal was haphazard, a jumble of expedient and populist schemes, or as W. Williams has put it, "undirected". FDR had a clear overarching vision of what he wanted to do to America, and was prepared to drive through the structural changes required to achieve this vision.
Michael Asanasious#2769752 Professor Sharifan GOVT 2306 April 15, 2017 Interest Groups, Lobbyists, and Lawmakers The Iron Triangle Have you wondered why interest groups have become so powerful?
In political science, there is a term called the iron triangle. The best example is the current defense setup in the United States. The three players are the defense contractors, the Department of Defense, and US Senators on defense spending committees. The DoD goes to the contractors as a whole saying they need a new model airplane. This spending has to be approved by a Senate committee. So, these contractors, in order to get the absurdly big contracts, work with senators in backdoor deals to create jobs in their states in exchange for passing the spending. The biggest loser: taxpayers.