Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Iran-contra affair
The Contra Affair
The iran-contra affair was a huge scandal it is also called a Irangate, Contragate or in other words what people would call it would be the Iran Contra scandal. The affair or scandal pedal faster on the second term of Ronald Reagan is the president of the United States of that time. Administration of the CIA of the senior office of the White House had secretly made the sale of weapons to Iran, it was otherwise known as an arms embargo. what an embargo means is to break the band or trade or other commercial activity with another country but that is what officials were trying to successfully do by re securing the release of U.S hostages and to fund the Contras in Nicaragua.
…show more content…
The Contras was a group of rebels in Nicaragua that needed help with financial reasons best to also some weaponry and Calvary.
At the same time there was prisoners in Lebanon that were Americans held hostage, by a group with Iranian connections to the army of guardians of the Islamic Revolution. most of the plans was to ship Israeli weapons to Iran and then the United States will resupply Israel payment then give it to the Contras fighting their own war in Nicaragua against the corrupted government and the rulers of their country.The Iranian promise to do everything to release the hostages so as long as the weapons come in they will release a couple hostages a day if not couple hostages a month. The person that was in charge of the modifications was a devoted leader Colonel Oliver Oliver North of the National Security Council from the 1980s. The portion proceeds from the selling of weapons was going to the anti sandinista to an anti communist rebels at the Contra group in Nicaragua. It was kind of known that Ronald Reagan president like the idea some of the Contra case, which means he might of authorized the money that was getting to the United States by Iran to go to the Contras. There is a note taker called Caspar Weinberger Thomas wrote that he will suspicious of Reagan and aware of potential hostage transfers and Iran, I also knew that there was hot in tow missiles that can level of the whole country going to
Iran. Mostly the whole scandal broke out in 1986 Lebanese newspaper administration arms deal with Iran. Even after getting caught, most of the prosecutors involved in the scandal quit before the end of the month, this includes Vice President Bush and President Reagan as well he stated that he had no idea and was unaware of Trading weapons with Iran and that he was only trying to raise money for contras battling the revolution in Nicaragua . one of the cases which involved MacFarlane and North,well North's case was vacated because of the arrangements and Low key agreement with Senate concerning testimonies. Some departments how to call the guilty in 1991 by holding information about the contras from Congress. Basically the only people that were arrested was Weinberger but he had been parted by President Bush in 1992 but the others were convicted and under investigation of the affair. The questions that people gave the White House or Congress was about the foreign affairs policies and how the United States broke then during all this time to fight a war that wasn't theirs. The secret US Congress and even the US private investigation team had never gotten hard evidence that Ronald Reagan himself in that extent new of the multiple programs that were going on. Most of the country sells weapons was always deemed as a criminal offense but charges were only brought up 25 individuals that support the Contras. At the end there were only 14 officials excluding secretary Caspar Weinberger and maybe 11 convictions, most of them were vacated on appeal in front of the court. in the end or what others might say the aftermath, Ronald Reagan himself had expressed regret to the Nashville situation on television speaking from the Oval Office, the year was 1987 March fourth, and gave speeches. After it was all publicly admitted President Ronald Reagan didn't speak to the people of the United States for well over 3 months. these are his words quote on quote, I haven't spoken to you before this now but you deserve the truth My good people. and as frustrating as the waiting has been I thought it was improper to come to you with sketch reports, or possibly even here in or misstatements from most of the people, which would have been corrected by me, so if there is doubters out there create even more because I will corrected. that's been enough of that. He then even took full responsibility of the ex committed. he yelled out I'm angry, as I may be about activist undertaken without my knowledge I am still accountable for those activities. As disappointed as I may be in some who serve me, I'm still the one who must answer the American people for this behavior. he said a few months ago before that he had told the American people he did not trade arms for hostages. His heart and best intentions still tell him that that's not true, what the facts tell him in his mind that that is not true. after power board reported, Ronald Reagan said that the plan failed on its own and that is strategic plan to open was nothing but a big slap in the face. A website called aftermath scandal from EBSCO host states the author on his story says that Reagan would argue with himself. his words worth this runs counter to my own beliefs, administration policy, and to the original strategy we had in mind, Iranians never acted on their part it was my fault that the hostages were kept the longer and longer. I personally believe everybody has their own take on this, when my money was running for president he had given a speech that the Iranians how to release hostages because of break ins approach to the foreign policy was an absolute outrage and basically a crime and he himself as a president wouldn't do that to his country. All 444 hostages were held for 144 days and minutes after President Ronald Reagan came into his second term in office there wasn't enough hard evidence in New York Times proving that Reagan's address had no reference at all to the long awaited release of the hostages. He restrained himself from saying the hostages were held in Iran. Also I think he reigns in troubles had happened after the fact of the Contra affair was doing hostages for weapons. most was actually done after everything was over From my understanding and point of view no rescue teams no military and no army was set for hostages and nothing was done except for dealing arms. I think Ronald Reagan should take the blame for this because the year 1981 March 9th, Reagan authorizes CIA to help arms trafficking to El Salvador but does not give him the power to armed rebel groups. The year 1981 December 1st, Reagan signs to order for CIA to support the Contras with arms, equipment, and money in order to put pressure on Nicaragua. Lol I think its a bad idea that they give them arms because I'm not sure they would be trained, they were promising that they would win, and that they would also not turn on us. I also don't know how people never noticed intercraft going out to Iran and that a lot of weaponry such as missiles assault rifles hand weapons grenades and other highly dangerous explosives was shipped over there. I think this subject relates to the theme because the US, trades with Iran and explores the Contras then their troubles with their revolution war, and how they trade people. About 11 million dollars in arms equipment in one month was set overseas to the Contras. On a regular month basis there would be up to 3.2 million, 1 million, and even up to 5 million dollars and weapons aircraft and armor sent to Iran . My opinion on all of this, it was never a good idea because the u.s. had sent many many weapons And it would also never get hostages in return they would always get promises and never get hostages. On the contrary the Contras had taken down their leaders and had put in a system like the US by one of our own generals, and now Nicaragua is a nice country with nice people. More than 100 million weapons was sent over there, and more than almost only a billion dollars had been given to the us and half of that was given to the Contras. November 1986, Julie Bernice newspapers break story of arms deal, arms deal comes to an end. Iran didn't want anything else to do with the us both privately or publicly to try to avoid conflict with the US such as starting a potential war or world war.
When focusing on Nicaragua one will need to pay close attention to the rebel group called the Sandinistas who took over Nicaragua’s previous dictator, Anastasio Somoza in 1979, in which the United States Congress decided it would be best to provide them with aid that lasted till 1981.1 Nicaragua’s geographic location made it a big concern for President Reagan based on his philosophy that surrounded the Reagan Doctrine. At that point, President Reagan ended the aid deal and adamantly advised that support be sent to those who were trying to over throw the new socialized, Sandinista leadership.2 Furthermore, the Nicaraguan’s were dealing with some of the worst warfare ever, by the mass killings that took place, which were at the mercy of death squads.3 This gruesome realization allowed President Reaga...
Kinzer tells us that the Iranians celebrated their nationalism in taking control of their oil, but their success was a shock to the British multinational companies in Iran. They did not like the idea of Iran nationalization, so they plan a coup to overthrow the Prime Minister Mossadegh. But this plan failed and the British were disarmed and sent back to their country closing down their embassy in Iran. The British tried to present their case to the United State in a way that the United State would intervene. So they presented a case that Mossaghe is not only nationalizing the Iranians oil, he is also leading Iran into communism. This case stirred the American action and they feared if they assassinate Mossaghe, his seat will be open and communist ...
Iran-Contra Affair With the 1960s and 1970s, came a growing need for change among the American people. A previously dominant liberal government was not taking a hard enough stance on the fight to end communism. All it took, was a final nudge to shift the vote from democratic to republican. For decades, U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East had depended on a friendly government in Iran. The newly appointed leader, the shah of Iran, began Westernizing the country and taking away power from the Ayatollah, powerful religious leaders.
The Iran-Contra Affair involved the United States, Iran, and Lebanon. The affair coincided with the Iranian hostage crisis, which promoted the United States’ actions in sending weapons to Iran. The Reagan administration decided to trade arms for hostages in hopes of successfully retrieving American hostages from Iran. Iran was at the time under the power of Ayatollah Khomeini, who had put his full support behind the hostage crisis and believed there was nothing that the United States could do to Iran. America’s only chance of rescuing the hostages was to put their support behind Iran in the Iran-Iraq War, which involved the shipment of weapons to Iran f...
Reagan had said he would never deal with supporters of terrorists, which he considered Iran's leaders to be. But he and his advisers believed Iran could get the hostages released. Members of the Administration arranged for the CIA to secretly purchase arms from the Department of Defense. Private individuals bought the arms from the CIA and sold them to Iran in return for its promises of help in the hostage release. But the sales led to the release of only three hostages, and three more Americans were taken hostage during the same period.
HIV was identified as a virus causing AIDS, which resulted in an intense worldwide search for a cure from 1981 to 1984. The Iran-Contra scandal resulted in illegal arms for hostages exchange by the Reagan administration from 1985 to 1986. President Ronald Reagan unveiled the Strategic Defense Initiative, which ramped up United States development of missile defenses in 1983. Gorbachev signed the INF treaty and withdrew the Soviets from Afghanistan.
There were many problems in which Carter had been blamed for, especially the Iran hostage crisis which proved to be very humiliating. He failed to deal with any of these situations. Either as hesitant or ineffective is how many Americans viewed Carter. He also had attacked Reagan as a dangerous radical after he defeated Tom Kennedy for the nomination. For his part Reagan, the charismatic ex-Governor of California, repeatedly made fun of Carter's powerlessness , and won a landside victory that carried the United States Senate for the first time in 28 years. Reagan's victory marked the beginning of the "Reagan Revolution."
“Just as the Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev and Chinese leader Mao reinforced armed revolutions against colonial or U.S.-aligned states, American power would now reassure and upkeep rebels against communist states” (“The Reagan Doctrine”, and for some of the rebels who were rendering efforts, with the aid of the U.S., to banish the Soviet supported regimes in their individual nations. The practical implementation of some of the policies of the doctrine prompted confusion in the U.S. political dominion itself. If one would examine, to turn the doctrine’s theory into practice Reagan allowed the sale of weapons to Iran, and the profit of such trade was meant to provide monetary aid to the contras – the anti-Sandinista rebels who were secretly trained by the U.S. Special Forces (“The Reagan Doctrine”, n.d.). Additionally, as the contras were both supported and tactically developed by the U.S. and were used against the Soviet supported regimes, the “Exposure of the Iran-Contra affair in late 1986 provoked a chief congressional examination. The scandal seriously weakened the influence of the president” (“The Reagan Doctrine”, n.d.).
hoping that this would produce a whitewash. Between May and November 1973, the investigations went on, and all the Presidents chief advisers were involved. In America, all the hearings were held in public, creating a huge scandal. The saga of the saga. Like in a court of law, all the President's advisers were.
" We were eyeball to eyeball, and I think the other fellow just blinked" (Shmoop). This
The "Iran-Contra Affair. " The Encyclopedia of the Cold War: Political, Social, and Military History. Ed. Spencer C. Tucker, b. 1875.
In 1987 Kuwait asked for Soviet and U.S. aid during the Iran-Iraq war in the Persian Gulf. The last two years of Reagan's presidency were marred by a political scandal, which badly damaged his reputation as an honest person and committed to principle. The scandal was that the U.S. had secretly sold weapons to Iran and had diverted the profits from the sale to help the contras. Reagan denied the allegations. There was also said to be a law saying that the U.S. couldn't aid the contras. This revealed to be true and Reagan lost his image.
By the early 1960’s the U.S. had cut off ties with Cuba and was engaging to overthrow the Castro regime. In 1961 the Bay of Pigs Invasion, a fumbled CIA attempt to crush the government, inflamed
This scandal caused President Nixon to attend court and resign. This was a major piece to the distrust in the United States government. Additionally, the book says, “Much of the antigovernment mood that prevailed in the United States from the 1970s through the end of the century can be traced directly to the Watergate and subsequent presidential scandals and attempted cover-ups” (337). With each scandal with the American Presidents caused more and more distrust overall. However, the Watergate scandal was one of the biggest scandals. One piece of evidence is, “Indeed, Watergate sank so deeply into the public consciousness that subsequent scandals were often given nicknames that involved the suffix -gate, such as Irangate” (337). This scandal was too major to just be brushed aside by the American people. The American people may use that suffix to show that they are still not truly over the entire situation with Nixon and the Watergate scandal that involved some of the government officials in his
It has been three weeks sense the incident where the White House kidnapping occurred. The First Lady is still being held hostage; hopefully she is not dead. This, in my opinion, is absolutely ridiculous that they think their only solution was to kidnap the First Lady! After that monstrosity, the people of North Carolina decided to rise and make a group against the BBCF (Bring Back Communication for the Future). Boy, did they make tensions increase! Instead of people striking outside of the Governor’s house, they were trying to break into his house to persuade him to join the group trying to get rid of the BBCF. The governor made no appearance. Actually, they had no clue if he was even at his house.