Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nature vs nurture psychology
Nature vs nurture psychology
Developmental psychology short essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nature vs nurture psychology
Select and answer 3 of the questions below. Note: You must answer #4 however. Each of your responses should be about 10-15 single-spaced lines in length 1. The reading titled Developmental Psychology Overview provides us with an introduction to some key issues in the field of developmental psychology. Scroll through the reading and you will find information on the following key issues: Nature-Nurture; Continuity-Discontinuity; Quantitative-Qualitative; Universality-Particularity; and Critical Periods. You might want to browse through some of the other readings for additional information Select and briefly summarize three (3) of these key issues. The Nature-Nurture debate questions how much of an individual's development is due to nature and …show more content…
People who believe that development is a series of stages that people have to work through believe in the Discontinuity theory. Proponents of the continuity view say that development is a continuous process that is gradual and cumulative. For example, a child learns to crawl, and then to stand and then to walk. They are gradually learning how to walk. On the other hand, some people see development as consisting of different unique stages. The discontinuity view of development believes that people pass through stages of life that are qualitatively different from each other. For example, children go from only being able to think in very literal terms to be able to think abstractly. They have moved into the 'abstract thinking' phase of their lives. Abstract thinking is to the discontinuity people a distinct stage, whereas continuity theory people believe the child gradually learned the ability to of abstract …show more content…
However, these periods are no longer thought of as being absolute, since we have discovered that there is great flexibility within these periods for a child to learn. Therefore, if a child misses a learning moment within a period they can still learn later in life. However, it will be harder and more difficult for that child to learn outside the critical period. Therefore, we must make sure that children get the best quality education at a very young age since it will be easier for them to learn at an early age. However, if that window is missed they can still learn later in life, since we essentially discovered that an old dog can learn new tricks. For example, a young child around five years old will learn a second language much easier than an older child of about 15 years old will. However, both can still learn a second language, it just will be more difficult for the older child to learn the second language. Therefore, quality of education is very important and the sooner a child receives it the better for that child. Early interventions are better than later interventions and we must make sure we prepare the child for a successful
The nature-nature debate is about whether an individual is influence more by his or her genetic inheritance or do environmental factors contribute towards one development. Those that argue that nature plays a major role in the development of a person...
The nature vs. nurture controversy is an age old question in the scientific and psychological world with both camps having evidence to support their theories. The controversy lies in which is more influential in the development of human beings. While there is no definitive answer for this, it is interesting to look at each of them separately.
“The term “nature versus nurture” is used to refer to a long-running scientific debate. The source of debate is the question of which has a greater influence on development: someone's innate characteristics provided by genetics, or someone's environment. In fact, the nature versus nurture debate has been largely termed obsolete by many researchers, because both innate characteristics and environment play a huge role in development, and they often intersect”. (Smith, 2010 p. 1)
The nature vs. nurture debate: the nature side, are those such as biologists, psychologists and others in the natural sciences, argue that behavioral traits can be explained by genetics. Those taking the nurture side are sociologists and others in the social sciences, they argue that human behavior is learned and shaped through social interaction. This argument should be dismissed because you don’t have to look far to see that both genetics and our environment, plays a role in who we are and our behaviors. (Glass). The point is there is a complex relationship between nature and nurture, either one alone is insufficient to explain what makes us human. (Colt). Our heredity gives us a basic potential,...
A common dispute that has left people speechless for years is the debate between nature and nurture. Are humans influenced by their environments or their genetic make-up? This theory has not gone unnoticed while many theorists attempt to sway the opinions of their audience. Nature is comprised of our genetic and biological components that make us who we are while nurture is founded on the principle that humans are influenced by experience. I believe nature and nurture fall on a spectrum. Within the spectrum environmental, cultural, and genetic influences comprise a person’s unique
Piaget was firm in his concept of these stages. He was convinced that a person had to progress from one stage to the next, that this was a natural biological process influenced by the environment and experiences. Biology limits the point in time, but the environment determines the quality of development.
This approach has become the stimulus for a number of similar theories which share the same assumptions on psychological development, yet differ in detail. (Gross, R, 2007) Erik Erikson, a neo-freudian himself accepted Freud’s theory but whereas the psychodynamic approach focuses on five main stages of development until adulthood, Erikson theorised that development is lifelong and continues throughout life until death. (Psychology for A Level 2000)
Nurture is constituted by the influence of millions of complex environmental factors that form a child's character. Advocators of nature do not believe that character is predetermined by genes, but formed over time. Although often separated, nature and nurture work together in human development. The human conscience is neither innate from birth or entirely shaped through experience, instead, genetics and environmental influences combine to form human behavior, character, and personality traits that constantly change and develop throughout life. The debate on nature versus nurture has existed for thousands of years.
One of the hottest debates is and has been nature vs nurture for years, but what is the difference between the two? Nature is what people think of as already having and not being able to change it, in other words, pre-wiring (Sincero). Nurture is the influence of experiences and its environment of external factors (Sincero). Both nature and nurture play important roles in human development. Scientists and researchers are both trying to figure out which is the main cause in development because it is still unknown on which it is. The best position to side with is nature. Nature is also defined as genetic or hormone based behaviors (Agin). Regardless of the involvement in everyday life, or nurture, this argumentation centers around the effect genes have on human personalities. Although it is understandable on reasons to side with nurture, nature is the better stand in this controversy. Reasons to side with nature is because of genes and what genes hold. Genes is what
Have you ever heard of the argument “Nature vs. Nurture?” It is the thought that your natural born tendencies have the biggest impact on your future self. Or, the opposing theory is that the way you are raised affects your personal outcomes more. However, clearly, nurture has a bigger impact on your adulthood successes than nature does because the people who have the educational advantages and the mental capacity to learn the correct, acceptable way to do things are consistently better off. With education, the argument for nature being the most important factor for successful development cannot hold true.
The nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest debates, and it continues today. (intro) Nature refers to the genetics of person that contribute to their behavior and nurture refers to the environment in which a person is brought up in (“Nature Nurture in Psychology”). (evidence) Those who are on the nature side believe that people’s behavior is already predetermined by genetics, while those on the nurture side believe the way someone is cared for and the environment they lived in is responsible for their behaviors.
There are a number of different theories about development: Cognitive/Constructivists: Piaget believed that children think and learn according to their age and stage of development. Children adapt to what they believe as their experiences change. They need to extend their experiences in order to extend their learning, so eventually they can think about experiences that they have not yet developed. Psychoanalytic: Freud stated that our personalities are made up of 3 parts: 1 the id: the instinctive part of our personality, it is based on biological needs.
A person can determine the scope of development by observing that how a child responds and behaves in a situation of experiments and as well as in natural settings. How a child is analyzing different factors to reach a conclusion explains the level of development. Moreover, the ability of a child to develop language skills also helps in analyzing the transition. Their interactions with others in the real world and their answers to the hypothetical scenarios reveal a lot about the level of the child's understanding.
This research paper explains what developmental psychology is, how it is applicable and understand how it applies in the life. For this reason, the benefits of developmental psychology obtain the knowledge of human development. In addition, human development acquires several changes and processes in our bodies that will be known even through the years. Also, a developer persists that apart the life and how humans may become indifference aspects of human evolutionary development. Then, human development produces the different stages of various changes depending on a character.
The development milestones consist of four stages in life in which we grow and learn as humans. First, there is the sensorimotor stage which occurs from age zero to age two where the child now understands how his or her actions can affect the environment around them. Second, comes the preoperational stage which involves children from the ages of two to seven where the child now thinks symbolically about the objects around them. Third, is the concrete operational stage which occurs in children between the ages of seven and eleven where the child can now deal with general core education problems such as math. Finally, there is the formal operational stage which occurs in children who are eleven years of age and older where these children are now becoming adolescents and adults and they now have the mental capacity to think absolutely and critically. We can clearly observe these steps in everyday life simply by observing children in their environment and noting how each and every child react to their