Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of chris mccandless
Character analysis of chris mccandless
Analysis of chris mccandless
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of chris mccandless
The essay
*Chris has decided to go on a journey of self- reflection. It's believed by Jon Krakauer that Chris had no real reflection from college, but needed a further journey to actually build himself to the character he is now. Into the Wild are the steps Chris McCandless took to reflect and truly express himself within many themes. After my graduation, I want to explore more into materialism vs. idealism and “raw, transcendent experience” because these themes would help me build my character.
*In my perspective McCandless went on an adventure to go deeper into his thought of materialism and idealism. He was more observant of nature and was more appreciative for the beauty of nature. Chris sought no need of material to have him happy or feel
…show more content…
obligated to need any “necessities” from any assistances. Chris was more grateful to value the objects he earned or the items he posed. Many people have pointed out that what I do isn't appreciated for what I get. Seems that I'm not grateful for the food and clothing I receive, therefore, I want to build deeper in materialism to understand why I wasn't as appreciative. The moose is an example to my experience. Chris believed that he was going to be using the whole moose for a variety of good source's. The fault of this is he wasn't capable to conserve the moose. This made him feel guilty for not being able to conserve the complete moose. This connects to my situation at Denny's because I was full and unable to eat the rest of the food. My friends weren't either and thought it was a waste to just throw the food away. I didn't understand as to why it was a waste and for that reason i want to grow deeper into materialism and idealism. I'd like to appreciate my food and understand the value it obtains. In Into the Wild McCandless read Thoreau’s Walden stating,”*#*.” This quote reflects how McCandless is now needing to appreciate who was and what he has. He must put value into what he has and understand that there’s more to than just gaining. One must know the value of life and what it means to have food. *Taking into consideration of what I've gone through, throughout my high school experience, it all seems that what I’ve gone through isn't compared to what I'll be experiencing after high school. Chris McCandless felt the same directed to needing more “raw, transcendent experiences.” Chris has decided to grow out from his inner comfort and push through to experience the difference. Going out and travel to go first hand and have a new outstanding experience. What I want to explore is experiences I have not been through and have enough knowledge of many situations. Building up as McCandless, placing himself in situations and experiencing the world in a new perspective. Seems as I go through these experiences I would like to record just as Chris’s camera and photographs. Photos hold a great value to capture a deeper feeling and understanding of an experience within our own perspective. Chris has photographs that expressed his deeper emotion and may even display his struggle. Having experiences that are raw and transcendent can build up a character from not knowing much. Chris McCandless quoted,”*#*.” Chris understood that having any experiences you would grow knowledge and growing knowledge opens up your world. A world is limited to small parts of only knowing the minor, but if one begins to place themselves in experiences it is what has our minds grow just as McCandless begins to develop. The goal after high school is to place myself into situations, to grow, to become a character of depth that can understand so much. May mean going through pain or isolation, but I want to experience it all. *The mind of an ordinary man may be enclosed to a certain extent.
This can be true to all men and women, but does not apply to Chris McCandless. Chris went out into the wild to have an idealism connection within himself. May seem complicated, but Chris developed an appreciation for nature and was able to have a deeper meaning than what any other individual can make of it. Chris’s knowledge of context was so developed. McCandless inner reading is what I would like to explore the next following years. Seems as you read more into it and make connections it is what grows knowledge. I read what is written. If I was more into context as Chris McCandless was I would understand more. This connects to my Psychology class. My teacher has idealism similar to Chris and when my teacher reads he develops a discussion that goes in depth and not just what is written. Jon Krakauer looked into Chris’s books. It is all ideal because Chris connects to quotes of books and makes a notation. There is a quote in Into the Wild that states,”*#*.” Chris became more ideal and reading these books had him more into understanding deeper meaning. This quote details that Chris has become more complex and can really grow into his knowledge. My knowledge is set growth and I want to develop the next years to be more ideal and understand quotes for their real
meaning. *The journey one must take is similar to the journey Chris McCandless was in. Chris didn't find himself in college and found it necessary to truly be himself and figure out the type of person he truly is. Push past what is impossible or uncomfortable. Those limits are common within every person and is commonly why it is necessary for many individuals to go on a journey as Chris McCandless.
...en writing a book based on ethos, logos and pathos, it is very challenging for an author to stay completely objective. In Krakauer’s case, his bias comes out strongly in certain chapters, sometimes detracting from his argument. Some faults exist in his credibility and logic, but his use of emotional appeal makes up for what those areas lack. Krakauer does an excellent job developing the character of Chris McCandless. The author brings him back to life with his descriptions and is able to make him tangible to the reader. The discussion over what McCandless's thoughts were when he went on his fatal trek will continue as long as his memory lasts. Ultimately, the readers of Into the Wild are left to form their opinion of McCandless, with Krakauer nudging them along the way.
Chris McCandless was a young man who did everything in his power to try and represent that freedom he was searching for. McCandless had everything before we went out but he decided to go out and travel by choice. He was considered a selfish man because when someone offered him to help him he rejects it in a nice way since we wants to do things himself. In the book Into the wild he states that,"You don't need to worry about me. I have a college education. I'm not destitute. I'm living like this by choice."
Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, describes the adventure of Christopher McCandless, a young man that ventured into the wilderness of Alaska hoping to find himself and the meaning of life. He undergoes his dangerous journey because he was persuade by of writers like Henry D. Thoreau, who believe it is was best to get farther away from the mainstreams of life. McCandless’ wild adventure was supposed to lead him towards personal growth but instead resulted in his death caused by his unpreparedness towards the atrocity nature.
A good portion of Into the Wild, by Jon Krakauer, focuses on the characterization of the protagonist, Chris McCandless. Krakauer shares his opinions on Chris frequently throughout the duration of his book. Chris is portrayed through anecdotes told by people who knew him and through Krakauer’s own personal relation to him. Through these two methods the reader is given a very clear image of Chris. Into the Wild, focuses a lot on Chris’s youth and especially how that influenced his decisions. Krakauer compares Chris’ leneincey on his literary heres versus his harsh judgments on his parents. Chris’ tense relationships with his parents are also used to help show how young Chris really is. After Chris’ youth is made apparent to the reader Krakauer
The epigraphs presented by Krakauer before each chapter of the memoir Into the Wild dive deep into the life of Chris McCandless before and after his journey into the Alaskan wilderness. They compare him to famous “coming of age characters” and specific ideas written by some of his favorite philosophers. These give the reader a stronger sense of who Chris was and why he made the decision to ultimately walk alone into the wild.
Throughout Into the Wild, Krakauer portrays Christopher McCandless as an infallibly eager young man hoping to distance himself from the society he so obviously loathes, to "live off the land," entirely independent of a world which has "conditioned [itself] to a life of security." Chris, contrarily to this depiction, is disparagingly viewed by some as a "reckless idiot" who lacked the sense he needed to survive in the Alaskan wilderness. This derogatory assessment of Chris's mindset is representative of the society he hopes to escape and contains all the ignorance that causes him to feel this way. Nevertheless, he is misjudged by these critics, allowing Krakauer to hold the more accurate interpretation of Chris's character, his goals, and his accomplishments.
...elligence to help him last an extended period of time in the Alaskan wilderness. In truth, McCandless was someone who wanted to find himself. He wanted to get away from a life in which he could not find fulfilment, which is something many others would be able to relate to. Although most people would not go to such extremes to find fulfilment, everyone has a different way of finding happiness and going after what their heart truly desires. For McCandless, his desire was to live out in the wild. Unfortunately, this man of great character did not succeed in getting out alive. However, that does not change the fact that he tried. McCandless knew what he wanted for himself and he persisted, regardless of the obstacles he faced. He put an incredible amount of effort into accomplishing his goals and never gave up, and that is why Christopher McCandless is someone to admire.
The story of Chris McCandless is a long story that is complex to tell in its entirety. This essay will analyze Jon Krakauer’s book, Into The Wild, in an attempt to pursued you that Krakauer did a magnificent job telling McCandless’ story up to his death.
In one the passage was highlighted in the book “Family Happiness” that Chris brought with, the author Leo Tolstoy talked about how a person's life should be. “I wanted movement and not a calm course of existence. … which found no outlet in our quiet life.” (p.15) Tolstoy explained how a life should be excited and interesting not just living day by day without any enjoyment. Chris followed his beliefs. He believes that he should live a life that he would not regret later on. That could be one of his reason he was going into the wild to make an excited life. Another passage was also found with McCandless’s belongings is from Henry David Thoreau’ “Walden”. “All nature is your congratulation, and you have cause momentarily to bless yourself. … a segment of the rainbow which I have clutched.” (p.47) This passage explains the fact that happiness can found in nature. McCandless wanted to found his purpose of his life and Thoreau stated about the importance of the nature. And McCandless believed Thoreau. If Chris McCandless had believed some authors, he would follows that in his whole
Chris McCandless lived a life in which he disgusted by human civilization, and left it, eventually being led to his death in Alaska. McCandless entered the Alaskan wilderness severely unprepared, a brutal error that cost him his life. In the novel, Into the Wild by John Krakauer, Chris glances into his mindset by they way of his journal, history, and analysis of his life reveals that Chris McCandless as an arrogant and judgemental narcissist, while not mentally unstable, had a condescending attitude towards society and perished not only from his reckless stupidity but also from his unparalleled ego. Chris McCandless was immune to love and had an obsession with nature and society, him showing characteristics that created the appearance of McCandless
Chris McCandless had a reputation for being overly ambitious since grade school. His teachers noticed at young age he was abnormally strong-willed which he coupled with intense idealism and strong physical endurance. In high school, Chris served as the captain of his cross country team asking them to treat each race as a spiritual experience. After graduating high school Chris continued on to college where he would graduate with a bachelor’s degree, doub...
Into the Wild, written by John Krakauer tells of a young man named Chris McCandless who 1deserted his college degree and all his worldly possessions in favor of a primitive transient life in the wilderness. Krakauer first told the story of Chris in an article in Outside Magazine, but went on to write a thorough book, which encompasses his life in the hopes to explain what caused him to venture off alone into the wild. McCandless’ story soon became a national phenomenon, and had many people questioning why a “young man from a well-to-do East Coast family [would] hitchhike to Alaska” (Krakauer i). Chris comes from an affluent household and has parents that strived to create a desirable life for him and his sister. As Chris grows up, he becomes more and more disturbed by society’s ideals and the control they have on everyday life. He made a point of spiting his parents and the lifestyle they lived. This sense of unhappiness continues to build until after Chris has graduated college and decided to leave everything behind for the Alaskan wilderness. Knowing very little about how to survive in the wild, Chris ventures off on his adventure in a state of naïveté. It is obvious that he possessed monumental potential that was wasted on romanticized ideals and a lack of wisdom. Christopher McCandless is a unique and talented young man, but his selfish and ultimately complacent attitude towards life and his successes led to his demise.
McCandless used the idea of escaping society from “Walden” by Henry David Thoreau and tried to mesh it together with the ideas of solitude and isolation to form his own beliefs. McCandless misinterpreted what Thoreau was saying. Thoreau states, “I had not lived there a week…It is true, I fear, that others may have fallen into it, and so helped to keep it open.” (Thoreau 3).Thoreau specifically states in this quote that he does not want others to follow or even go do what he did. He also did build the cabin a few miles away from a town because he knew he would go back one day. Thoreau was a sane person in doing this because crazy people stray too far away from society despite the consequences. He believed that he had other things to do with his life and not spending a minute more in that lifestyle. McCandless still went out into the wilderness away from society against Thoreau’s words. Chris was crazy to shun s...
He went through many obstacles that could have proved fatal. From canoeing in the Colorado River to picking the right berries, he was testing his intelligence. Chris had a true confidence in the land and in himself to set out on a mission so dangerous. “Wilderness appealed to those bored or disgusted with man and his works. It not only offered an escape from society but also was an ideal stage for the Romantic individual to exercise the cult that he frequently made of his own soul. The solitude and total freedom of the wilderness created a perfect setting for either melancholy or exaltation” (Nash; Krakauer 157). Chris longed to escape from society and rely on only mother nature. An innumerable amount of people desire to withdraw from society as Chris did; but they are so comfortable and secure with a normal life they do not dare take such a gutsy
...can be a life-changing experience. McCandless entered the wild as an overly confident hitchhiker and left as a self-accepting and humble man. He thought that human relationships were futile, he was impervious to materialism, and that he could understand nature on a scientific level. However, McCandless left the wild with a newfound appreciation for humanity, some clarity on his purpose in life, and the ability to create his own legacy. Many people finish reading Into the Wild and form negative opinions about McCandless’ reckless behavior. However, it is important to focus on how being in the wild brought McCandless closer to understanding himself. Into the Wild should motivate humans to participate in explore the wilderness to discover the true meaning of life.