Into The Wild Malcolm Gladwell Analysis

497 Words1 Page

Depending on what type of person you are, there are decisions that you have to do as an individual to start or complete your life, and this takes most of your life because without decision making, you wouldn’t know what to do with your life. The truth is decision making is not that hard and can be easy depending on what type of person you are. With factual evidence and good research, Malcolm Gladwell, the author of Outliers, builds a more convincing argument than Krakauer, the author of Into the Wild and here are some examples why.


In the Sports Gene, Malcolm Gladwell talks about a high jumper how he became successful in his life as a high jumper. He states in the book about how this long jumper started with nothing but he worked his way to the top by being a great long jumper and practicing 10,000 hours a month. His genes are what makes him good at high jumping. The way Malcolm Gladwell states his information about genes more than …show more content…

Krakauer and the story Into the Wild, do have some good convincing statements, but some of what Krakauer says does not make sense. For example, Krakauer is very persistent when it comes to being alone and on the road with nobody to help him out, especially rules and responsibilities. In the story Into the Wild, Krakauer says to the readers that read that part of the story is that he felt like he should throw everything away from the past and move on with life but I don’t agree with this one and here is my reason why. My reason why is because back then he had money, a good life, school, and a family. Now, he has absolutely nothing and he has nothing to do with his life now, but he says he is trying his best to get things better. My question would be if he had the motivation to throw his whole entire life away, why couldn’t he have the motivation to strive for greatness in school and have a better

Open Document