Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Printed book vs e book
E-book vs print book advantages and disadvantages
Printed book vs e book
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Into the Electronic Millennium by Sven Birkerts, Birkerts claims that technology has made the engagement of media much more exposed than it was while in print, and the use of electronics has made new generations less likely to understand difficult pieces of literature. He points out that print text forces you to focus more on what it’s saying, while electronic media is easier to read without processing (Birkerts, Paragraph 1). The use of technology has introduced a new way of speaking and communication, which will, in time, alter the way literature is displayed on electronic mediums. Because of these setbacks, literary curriculum is supposedly being made easier than it has been in the past, to accommodate new students that can’t understand more complex texts as much as students in the past have been able to …show more content…
(Birkerts, Paragraph 14, 29). Also, print is permanently written, while electronically displayed information is easily changeable.
“Changes in information storage and access are bound to impinge on our historical memory” (Birkerts, Paragraph 31). With literature moving to electronic databases, new generations will begin to think of the past as a fantasy, not being able to imagine a world that isn’t at their fingertips. New generations will begin to care less about history, as they will be able to access information on it whenever they need to. Finally, Birkerts claims that technology has made it so anyone’s personal information can be accessed through the click of a button, making the privacy of our lives disappear. Even when we are not online, our personal information is, as there is no privacy on the internet. “...It will make almost no sense to speak of the differentiations of subjective individualism” (Birkerts, Paragraph 35). While Birkerts is correct in assuming that technology may alter the way we view history and literature, he fails to mention the infinite resources available to students which can aid in this process, as well as the changing methods in which students
learn. While it is true technology may be making it harder for new generations to understand classical pieces of literature in their original form, electronics give access to learning materials and resources that can help with this. Also, language itself has changed over time, and not just because of emerging technologies. Classical works have always been difficult to comprehend because the world doesn’t speak in the same ways continuously. “...Electronic communication will radically alter the ways in which we use language…” (Birkerts, Paragraph 29). While electronics may change the ways in which we communicate, it is no different than the natural adjustment of language over time. In fact, these new ways of electronic communication not only give students a comprehendible version of the same materials, but it gives access to resources that can help one understand them even further. New generations may not have to be as adept at analyzing classical literature as older generations may have been. Technology was invented to make lives easier, and using it to gain access to information does not make newer generations less successful at comprehension, it makes them more resourceful. The use of electronics into one's everyday life may prove useful. Information, like Birkerts said, will forever be at our fingertips, yet it that principle that will assist new generations of students be more successful and understanding of the world around them.
The article “The Phenomenology of On-Screen Reading: University Students’ Lived Experience of Digitised Text,” written by Ellen Rose covers a multitude of themes in which Ellen Rose interviewed ten participants from the ages of 20-55 and utilized their answers in order to communicate her belief that reading on screen is much different than reading a physical book. Throughout the article she targets her audience on students and uses pathos, ethos, and logos persuasions in order to appeal to her readers and convey that she is credible, trustworthy, and logical. With a close analysis of Ellen Rose’s article “The Phenomenology of On-Screen Reading: University Students’ Lived Experience of Digitised Text” it is safe to say that Rose draws her audience
The word “privacy” has a different meaning in our society than it did in previous times. You can put on Privacy settings on Facebook, twitter, or any social media sights, however, nothing is truly personal and without others being able to view your information. You can get to know a person’s personal life simply by typing in their name in google. In the chronicle review, “Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide,'" published on May 15th 2011, Professor Daniel J. Solove argues that the issue of privacy affects more than just individuals hiding a wrong. The nothing-to-hide argument pervades discussions about privacy. Solove starts talking about this argument right away in the article and discusses how the nothing-to-hide
In the article: “We Want Privacy, but Can’t Stop Sharing” by Kate Murphy, it is presented that in order for an individual to have privacy in an online environment, one should consider not disclosing sensitive information about one’s true self online. It is mentioned that, indeed, there is no privacy when connecting to the World Wide Web. She shows us that googles ads and nude pics of Jennifer Lawrence being hacked, makes us all vulnerable and a possible target according of “cybersnooping”. She references the film, “Minority Report” to show us that, spying is mismatched with a free society. Murphy, remarks that it is difficult to contend for privacy when society keenly reveals personal information online via social media. But most importantly, when revealing information about one self, there is a notion that one is being watched or tracked via social media implying that one’s health is a affected when releasing sensitive information online causing low
In the essay “Into the Electronic Millennium” (1994) Sven Birkerts argues that the “electronic order” (2) is the source of three detrimental effects on the future of society: “language erosion” (19), “flattening of historical perspectives” (21), and “waning of the private self” (23).
First, he provides an overview of the history and development of the book as well as the development of reading. Carr analyzes and explains the effects of these developments on the individuals. Furthermore, he notes that the Internet recreates and alters a medium’s content by the use of hyperlinks, which ultimately distracts readers, and by separating the content into organized chunks. These characteristics make the content “searchable” which stimulates skimming behavior or superficial reading. As a result, readers retain less information due to the lack of deep, analytical reading. In addition, online texts often incorporate opinions, beliefs, or skewed viewpoints of certain topics, which can have negative effects on readers. Carr also addresses that some opponents believe that hardcopy reading was a result of “impoverished access” (111) and that the desire to use the fast paced web is a result of a quickening pace of life and work over the past few
Sadly in todayś society, technology isn´t always being used to educate ourselves and it isn't being used to an advantage. According to Bauerlin, he states
Literature has changed over time. “The “death of print” has been much heralded over the past decade, precipitated by the rising accessibility of devices like tablets and smartphones that have made the electronic medium cheaper and more universal (1).” Literature has evolved
...arena. 500 years ago there was a shift from transcription of texts by hand to a much more efficient process of duplication. The internet has made strides in making the printed book obsolete in the same way. More and more people are retiring their old encyclopedias in exchange for the internet’s fast and broader database of information. The comparison between the printing press and the internet highlights the pattern in which history unfolds. Rufus Historie is famously quoted for saying, “History follows a pattern of events that recur in different eras.” It is true. New inventions evolve and replace the old, the new inventions too become dated and are replaced by something newer. The pattern present in the evolution of handwritten texts to the printing press to the internet represents the cycle of human technological advancement; out with the old, in with the new.
As technology continues to grow and become incorporated in more and more of everyday life, one cannot help but wonder, can privacy and technology coexist? Privacy, along with technology, is very important, so it is critical that the two be able to coexist. There are different types of private information. These include private communications, privacy of the body, personal information, and information about one’s possessions. Yes, technology does allow private information to be stolen or seen by unauthorized persons on occasion, however, technology has also protected just as much information, if not more from being stolen or viewed by someone it was not meant for. Focusing on public expectations of privacy means that our rights change when technology
Throughout the years, technology has brought great advances and conveniences to humanity, but it also comes with a cost of privacy. Nations, Jobs, lives and families depend on the web for their security and prosperity, and we have all come to rely on these corporations to run our lives. Technology has taking over our viability, not just mentally, but physically. 1984 by George Orwell, tells of a society where the technology has superior control over people with no privacy at all. Big Brother is the technology they use to babysit their every move and our own ideation. A society like this seems bizarre, but today's society reflects this theme without us even knowing about it.
As technology as advanced, so has our society. We are able to accomplish many tasks much easier, faster, and in effective ways. However, if looked at the harmful impact it has had on the society, one can realize that these are severe and really negative. One of the main concerns is privacy rights. Many people want that their information and personal data be kept in secrecy, however with today’s technology, privacy is almost impossible. No matter how hard one tries, information being leaked through technological advancements have become more and more common. With personal information being leaked, one does not know exactly how the information will be used, which validates the statement that privacy rights have been diminishing and should be brought to concern. Many people do not realize that their information is being used by third-parties and to consumer companies. In conclusion, technology has had a significant effect on privacy
In Jabr article, he talks about the use of technologies such as Ipads, Ebooks, tablets and kindle may drain more of our mental resources while reading, It makes it harder to remember what we have read. One of my sources, In a study by Anne Mangen, some students were asked to read a comprehension on paper and the other half were asked to read the same comprehension on the computer. In addition, students who read the comprehension on paper performed better in memorization than students who read the comprehension on the computer. This display that you're more likely to scan or skim through information when using technology to read, rather than fully immerse yourself in important details and also reading to understand. When using technology to read, you rely on remembering than knowing. When using technology while reading, you spend a lot of
Looking back over the course of the semester, I feel that I learned many new and interesting uses for technology within the classroom – both for classrooms that have a lot of technology and for classrooms that are limited with technology. For the majority of the class, we utilized William Kists’ book The Socially Networked Classroom: Teaching in the New Media Age (2010), which provided multiple modes of instruction that both utilized and/or created technology. One of the first things that I remember, and consequently that stuck with me through the course’s entirety, is that individuals must treat everything as a text. Even a garden is a text. The statement made me change the way that I traditionally viewed Language Arts both as a student and as a teacher, as I very narrowly saw literature and works of the like as texts only; however, by considering nearly anything as a text, one can analyze, study, and even expand his/her knowledge. Kist (2010) states that society is “experiencing a vast transformation of the way we “read” and “write,” and a broadening of the way we conceptualize “literacy” (p. 2). In order to begin to experience and learn with the modern classroom and technologically advanced students, individuals must begin to see new things as literature and analyze those things in a similar manner.
As technology penetrates society through Internet sites, smartphones, social networks, and other modes of technology, questions are raised as the whether lines are being crossed. People spend a vast majority of their time spreading information about themselves and others through these various types of technology. The problem with all these variations is that there is no effective way of knowing what information is being collected and how it is used. The users of this revolutionary technology cannot control the fate of this information, but can only control their choice of releasing information into the cyber world. There is no denying that as technology becomes more and more integrated into one’s life, so does the sacrificing of that person’s privacy into the cyber world. The question being raised is today’s technology depleting the level of privacy that each member of society have? In today’s society technology has reduced our privacy due to the amount of personal information released on social networks, smartphones, and street view mapping by Google. All three of these aspects include societies tendency to provide other technology users with information about daily occurrences. The information that will be provided in this paper deals with assessing how technology impacts our privacy.
Bolstered by the recent advancements in technology, our society has gradually departed from the culture of the printed word to a computer culture structured by the digital word. Everyday the superior performance of computers appears to render printed literature more obsolete - e-mail and chat rooms have nearly eliminated traditional written letters, the Internet has all but replaced the need for libraries and paper catalogues and, soon, hypertext will completely overtake the realm of the printed novel. Computers have saturated our literary environment to such a degree that it is difficult to imagine a time when print was our most prized communication technology. To make an accurate hypothesis about the computer culture, and how it will affect the way we study and think about literature in the future, it is necessary to examine the development of past societies when faced with equally sweeping changes in literary technology.