Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of employee ethical behaviour
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of employee ethical behaviour
As an employer, one must be prepared for the possibility of an internal workplace investigation. The manner in which these investigations are handled is of the utmost importance to all parties involved. The employer has the obligation to conduct a fair, legal, and timely investigation, without bias. Many investigations are the result of direct or indirect notification that harassment or discrimination has occurred. Investigations may also be warranted due to suspicion of substance abuse, theft, threatening remarks, etc. Once the employer has been notified, there are ten steps that, if followed, will ensure a complete and legal investigation has been completed. Step 1: Decide whether to investigate. Not every problem in the workplace requires an investigation. If all employees involved agree on the facts, the situation may be resolved by the mediator simply consulting the policy manual or …show more content…
The final action needed is to follow up with the employees that were involved with the investigation. It is not necessary to reveal the actions that were taken to either employee, but it is necessary to let them know the situation has been resolved. The investigator will want to make sure the misconduct has stopped and no retaliation has occurred. If any disciplinary actions were recommended, it is important to know those actions have been addressed and documented. If the case involved some confusion around company policy, perhaps additional training would be in order. A workplace investigation should not become a witch hunt. The investigator is obligated to be fair, just and unbiased while performing his investigation. He or she should be well organized and prepared and not have any preconceived ideas on the outcome of the investigation. The investigator should have the best interest of the company and employees in mind. His mission should be to uncover the truth and to use this information to resolve the situation as quickly as
The duty of prosecutorial disclosure is one that is safely entrenched in our understanding of the legal system. The prosecution must disclose evidence that relates to the case and is favorable to the defendant. While not explicitly stated in that duty, it also means that the histories of the witnesses are available to the defense. And when police officers are called to testify at cases, their disciplinary histories come into play as a factor in their credibility. Taking all this prior information into account when addressing the dilemma of the police officer with a good record who used the department computers to look at pornography using his login information, and then lied about it only to confess when the internal investigation proved
The popular sitcom that is now one of today’s pop culture`s favorites, is based on the original British sitcom The Office and later began to air on NBC. With characters that are relatable to any office environment, The Office does cause many to question the violation of ethics in this sitcom. The show features Michael Scott the manager at Dunder Mifflin, who is the center of many questionable actions. Because every show needs a good love story; Pam and Jim are introduced as the office lovers who win the award for “relationship goals”. Besides the main characters, the cast consists of unmotivated employees.
Bush implicated Bin Laden and his associates of Al Qaeda, and gave some information about the victims of the act of terrorism. This plan of action would have a double purpose. The first and most obvious was the simple distribution of the information to the American people. The other, which would hel...
Their organizational initiatives are often self-serving; however, the emerging workforce isn’t motivated by selfish managers. This selfish behavior often turns into unethical conduct. Unethical dealings in the workplace are always wrong. It is crucial to promote ethical behavior. Everyone must understand that once caught, unethical behavior is not just a problem for those directly involved, it is everyone’s problem.
The company has a culture of unquestioning when something wrong surfaced in the company. Take for example the Lockheed documents incident, where the 25000 documents were seen in the company for nearly 3 years before someone voiced his concerns regarding it. This unhealthy culture not only allows unethical practices to prevail, it also hinders company’s growth.
The purpose of this paper is to analyze a specific, hypothetical employment situation encountered and to include the information regarding employment conflicts, questions, grievances, lawsuits, etc., in terms of how the situation was handled or resolved. Employment conflicts are a constant issue everyday in any organization; it is how you handle them both legally and professionally that counts.
Internal affair investigations is a social control measure put in place by police departments to ensure assigned officers do not commit ethical violations or actions that result in professional misconduct. Due to the sensitive nature of these investigations, all facts presented in favor of and against the accused must be thorough and accurate. Proper training of department supervisors is critical to the discipline and performance of subordinate officers.
regulations set in place to ensure personal feelings are cast aside, and the investigation is conducted
On the study “quantitative and qualitative analyses are conducted of 33 cases of internal and external whistleblowers wrongfully fired for reporting wrongdoing” The results were “An employee's tenure in the organization likely impacts his or her choice of internal versus external channels for reporting wrongdoing. Newcomers tend to be less familiar with appropriate channels for internal reporting or effecting change (Miceli and Near, 1992, p. 117), they may identify less with the firm's goals, and they may lack knowledge of shared norms or how the corporate culture operates (Terry).” They also found “external whistleblowers have less tenure with the organization, greater evidence of wrongdoing, and they tend to be more effective in changing organizational practices
It is necessary for every leader or manager to become sensitized to diversity and fully understand how to effectively handle difficult and controversial situations. As a boss, one also needs to understand that they are calling the shots, not the employee. There are two types of disciplinary action plans, formal and informal. A formal disciplinary action plan benefits companies that exercise a centralized organizational structure, where decisions descend from one individual. The benefit of a formal disciplinary action plan is that all of the rules and regulations are evenly and consistently distributed among the employees. An informal disciplinary action plan benefits companies that exercise a decentralized organizational structure, where employee decisions are made by each individual department on a circumstantial
The part of the unit known as the internal affairs department is under the inspection unit section. The main job of an internal affairs investigator entails keeping a close eye on department’s policies and procedures by conducting “internal quality control inspections” (Dempsey, Frost, & Carter, 2014) (p. 99). Other duties that one must consider when working in this area of the unit according to (Dempsey, Frost, & Carter, 2014) is to focus on suspected “misconduct and corruption of other officers” (p. 99). They must ensure that all employees within the department are adhering to the rules and conducting themselves in the manner that the system, guidelines and policies requires. Another main objective that the internal affairs division has is to uphold the integrity of the department. In fact, according to (Dempsey, Frost, & Carter, 2014), “they are the police that police the department” (p. 247).They do so by making any improvements and putting new practices into practice and making sure officers are abiding in those protocols and
Employees have options available to them for dealing with a toxic employer, such as formal complaints, legal action or by ending their employment with the company. Employees can go to their human resources department where they work and confide in...
First of all in an investigation a set of rules or guidelines must be set and stoned when
In relation to Misconduct, the employer must conduct an investigation to determine whether there are grounds for disciplinary action or dismissal.
They including interviews with eight HR managers, nine operations managers, nine union representatives. The research discovered that all the organizations had written disciplinary and grievance procedures that were compliant with labor laws at the time. These formal procedures were commonly divided into four steps, verbal warning, written warning, final written warning, and dismissal. There were two organizations that provided additional steps and procedures but they included the four common steps as well. Overall the operations managers had the primary role for investigating any and all alleged disciplinary violations and decisions for deciding punishment. The human resource managers were not directly involved in the decision making during the formal discipline process. Their role was described as, “…To provide support, advice and guidance to line and operational managers. They were seen as the ‘technical’ legal experts whose main function was to ensure consistency and the robust application of procedure.” (Jones & Saundry, 2012 pg. 258) Though most HR professionals were comfortable with being in this role and having no involvement, some were still involved in disciplinary dispute resolutions. Often they were assisting operations managers who had little confidence or experience, and often feared they would be the cause of a lawsuit filed by an