More handpicked essays just for you.
Summary of David Entwistle's book Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity 2015
Summary of David Entwistle's book Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity 2015
Similarities between science and Christianity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
4-Mat Review of Integrative Approached to Psychology and Christianity by David N. Entwistle
Mirelida Morales
Liberty University
Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity
Summary
Psychology and Theology, two communities or ways of thinking which share the common goal for providing, guidance, understanding and healing to the audience they serve. In the textbook Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity, David N. Entwistle (2010) posed the question, Are Christianity and science allies or enemies? Furthermore, could these be integrated (p. 32). In order to find the response to these questions Entwistle began by exploring the history and past interaction between the two lines of thought rooting back to Athens
…show more content…
Each model explains varying degrees of integration and views. Entwistle explains enemies, are those individuals Christian or secular whom refuse to believe in the integration, because they view psychology and theology as mutually exclusive (Entwistle, 2010, p. 137). The second model, spies are those individuals that are more interested in uncovering the psychology of the religious system rather holding on to orthodox theology. They employ what they see as useful or beneficial of religion for mental health (Entwistle, 2010, p. 141). The third model, colonialists are those individuals who view theology over psychology. Colonialists appropriate psychological methods or finding that can illustrate theology (Entwistle, 2010, p. 145). The fourth model, neutral parties maintain theology and psychology separately, however, they acknowledge the two may hold parallel findings or knowledge (Entwistle, 2010, p. 147). The last, allies are those who view that psychology and theology, rightly understood can be allies. Above psychology and theology there is the notion that it is God who reigns above all, and all is subject to Him. Their for psychology and theology are a reflection of His word and works (Entwistle, 2010, p. …show more content…
As a third generation Christian, biblical principles have been instilled from a very early age. As a grew, I developed a desire and interest to help those hurting. Which led me to pursue a psychology degree. When I started reading this text I found many of the opening remarks and questions to be reflections of a desire I have carried for years. The interest of learning how to integrate my two passion psychology and theology. But that was the problem, this whole time I have kept them as just that, two separate passions. As I read the different models of integration, it was eye opening. I found myself torn between two models. Although, I strongly believe in the word of God and His works, I almost held the exclusively to my personally life and not towards my studies or future occupational practices. As I read the text it reflected an internal conflict in me. As it relates to how I may practice in the day-to-day clinical setting, the domestic spy model seem to closer align with my idea of integration. Holding onto psychology, yet using the religious system for the benefit of the client. However, when applying it to my own life I have a more allies model point of view, all is by Him, for Him. He is sovereign and author of all truth. As stated in the text, personally my allegiance is not to psychology or theology, but to God who reigns over all spheres of which we are subject to
In the first chapter of Psychology in Christian Perspective by Harold W. Faw the author talks about psychology as a subject, the different aspects of the subject and how psychology fits into the Christian world. Faw begins the chapter by describing what others think psychology and his views on psychology as well. He describes that “psychology can be described as a systematic attempt to understand human behavior and conscious experience” (Faw, 1995, p. 12). He then goes on to describe the many different types of specialties of psychology which include, neurobiological, behavioral, cognitive, humanistic, and psychoanalytic. These specialties are then integrated into the Christian worldview. They are all different so they all fit into
After reading a few of the chapters in "Psychology Through the Eyes of Faith", I feel as if I have learned more in one sitting than many in years of my life. The chapters were not life altering, but simply stated things that I have overlooked. The topics that affected me most were on living with the mysteries of faith, benefits of true rest, and the emotion of happiness. Yes, they are really in no way related, but each of these topics impacted me in a different way, and made me think about what was being presented.
As you read through the chapters you can clearly see that there are times when overlapping ideas and thoughts about human-beings can be seen in theology and psychology. Helping readers become more aware and to understand that their presumptions are the basis to these issues and that our understanding between the relationship between psychology and Christianity are based on the assumptions. After reading this book it can be easily seen it is geared more toward students of psychology and other behavioral sciences as well as pastors that may be interested in the integration. Some questions that have arose after reading through this book is as a Christian Counselor, what are the ethical concerns that one may have in using the models of integration? And for pastors or a Christian outside the behavioral sciences, what does this book help them to achieve if they were to follow the models of
This is David Entwistle 2nd edition book published in 2010 by Wipf and Stock in Oregon. Entwistle is a Christian and a licensed psychologist; he has affiliations with Molone University in Canton, Ohio serving as chair of the Psychology Department and has taught courses related to his licensed field. This book clearly is not written for any newcomers to religion. However, it was written for those interested in the integration of science and religion. The authors’ purpose for writing this book was to define the relationship between psychology and theology. There are three specific areas this book touched upon to help readers’ better approach psychology and Christianity in a personal and more professional manner: The context of philosophical issues and worldview, to help the readers become aware of assumptions or beliefs- making the reader a more critical evaluators, and to introduce and familiarize the reader with five paradigms for integrating psychology and theology.
David Entwistle’s (2010) is the author of the Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity. In the book Entwistle embarks on a journey to explore Psychology and Christianity. As the title suggests several approaches that are used to define the relationship of Phycology and Christianity. In the book Entwistle begins to takes us on shows that psychology and Christianity go in two different directions and meet up someplace in the middle. This allows them to provide different approaches to understanding and studying the human behavior. Entwistle, (2010) took a new approach that has rarely been used in other books that discussed the topic of integration. Entwistle, (2010) began to talk about the relationship of psychology and Christianity
This paper will be reviewing the book “Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity: an introduction to worldview issues, philosophical foundations and models of integration, by David N. Entwistle. As the title states, this book discusses how to integrate psychology and theology. It also dives into to why it is so important to be able to integrate the two. Entwistle explains that just because the two are different does not mean they should be separated and that we have to use both our worldviews. “Weaving together perspectives from psychology and Christian theology can help us understand and appreciate humanity more fully than we could either perspective alone.” (p.3)
Religion has been a controversial topic among philosophers and in this paper I am focusing
“Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity” (2010) is about the purposeful integration of psychology and Christianity. Entwistle, discusses the integration of scripture and nature, holding to historic orthodox Christianity that “Scripture and the natural world have their origins in God’s creativity and revelation” (Entwistle, 2010, p. 136). Theology clarifies the Word of God (Bible), and Psychology corresponds with the works of God. A working definition of integration is offered,
David Entwistle's (2010) Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity is geared more towards Christians with conservative evangelical views and provides the reader an outline to different worldview disputes and truth-seeking groundwork that surround the connection that underlies psychology and theology. In addition to analyzing the possible connection of psychology and theology, Entwisle discusses the consideration of integrating Christian faith with the practice of psychology. “Christian understandings of person-hood, the purpose of human life, our need for God, and the ethical teachings of Christian faith are integral to psychology, not merely parallel to it” (p. 199). Entwistle’s viewpoint on this matter is stated clearly. He believes that it is necessary for theology and psychology be integrated in order to fully understand human nature.
...en civilization and the individual. Living in a nation still recovering from a brutally violent war (Germany), Freud began to criticize organized religion as a collective neurosis, or mental disorder. Freud, a strong proponent of atheism, argued that religion tamed asocial instincts and created a sense of community because of the shared set of beliefs. This undoubtedly helped a civilization. However, at the same time organized religion also exacts an enormous psychological cost to the individual by making him or her perpetually subordinate to the primal figure embodied by God.
In the book Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity, author David N. Entwistle engages with his readers by having them explore and understand the relationship between psychology, theology and Christianity. Before the reader can begin to comprehend the information talked about within the reading, the reader must understand some important terms. Throughout this book Entwistle talks a lot about integrating, which he defined in the reading as a thing that we discover when we are uncovering the fundamental unity that God created (Entwistle, 2010, p16). Because the basis of theology and psychology are different from that of Christianity it is thought that the three cannot be combined. According to Entwistle (2010, p8), during the past century, the relationship between faith and science has been a topic of intense debate. In order to help
Integration: The Allies Model The integration of psychology and Christianity is a very complicated subject that has sprung a heated debate over how best to integrate the two disciplines. Integration is a simple subject with many different definitions. However, according to Entwistle (2015), “The integration of psychology and Christianity is a multifaceted attempt to discern the underlying truths about the nature and functioning of human beings from the unique vantage points of psychology (in its various sub-disciplines, utilizing diverse methodologies) and Christianity (in theology, faith, and practice)” (p. 260).
of each other. Regardless, there are still Christian counselors or therapists that use (or in a
Instead of supplant lies with truth, psychological conduct treatment just replaces unhelpful musings with accommodating ones. This opens wide the way to relativism. The cognitive behavioral perspective of human instinct is inaccurate. The theory is established in naturalism and hence is not discerning of the otherworldly and does not acknowledge the idea of God. All things being equal, in some ways the social cognitive view suggests the way that individuals have a wicked nature. In any case, it likewise recommends that people are equipped for self-salvation. We are most certainly not. Reconsidering our contemplations won 't spare
Are science and religion enemies? Freud seemed to think so, and in this essay, published as a book, he discusses this question from a psychoanalytic viewpoint. Freud viewed Religious beliefs as a problem that was a delicate balance between illusion and delusion. In Freud’s estimation, religion was a problem of culture; and culture [Kultur] is hardly distinguishable from civilization; at least Freud thought.