Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Annotated bibliography sports discrimination
Gender discrimination in the sports world
Impact of racial discrimination in sport
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Annotated bibliography sports discrimination
It’s that time of year again for my fellow baseball lovers - the World Series. Being from Chicago, I have grown up watching the Cubs “Curse of the Billy Goat” be proven true over and over again. Then, it happened. The Chicago Cubs finally made it to the World Series... but against the Cleveland Indians. Since both of these teams have not won the World Series in decades, the whole country went wild. This World Series would make history. Of course, with an event as special and intense as this, there was bound to be plenty of trash talking and stereotyping of the enemies from the fans on both sides. All the trash-talking and stereotyping definitely took its toll on the game and its players. When looking at the World Series from a psychology perspective, …show more content…
I found multiple different ways that social psychology came into play. The psychological concept of ingroup favoritism was a major property of the World Series.
Ingroup favoritism is when we regularly prefer our own ingroup over another outgroup. In other words, it is when we favor those who are similar to us over those who are not similar to us. In the case of the World Series, the Indians fans favored other Indians fans over the Cubs fans and vice versa. This favoritism, in turn, increased the amount of trash talk from Clevelanders to Chicagoans and Chicagoans to Clevelanders because clearly the fans did not like the opposing team. Ingroup favoritism was also seen when the players themselves highly favored their own team over their opponents. Because they loved their team and “disliked” the other team, they may have been motivated to play better and show they are truly better than the other, therefore leading to the Cubs big …show more content…
win. The psychological term, stereotype threat, also played a big role against the Cubbies and Indians in the World Series. Stereotype threat is when a member of a group is at risk for confirming their negative stereotype. This threat can in turn disrupt performance, such as temporarily warping an athlete’s athletic abilities. For the Cubs, we saw this happen in game one. Everyone who is not a Cubs fan (or even some who are) has a stereotype of the Cubs - that they choke under pressure. This stereotype may have caused the Cubs to make more errors than they normally would have for this post-season. Consequently, once an error was made under pressure, the threat increased and the Cubs players then made more errors. This then proved the negative stereotype to be true. The same stereotype threat may have happened to the Indians in game six. For example, Cleveland is stereotyped as “just a joke” to some. Whenever the players made careless mistakes, the stereotype threat may have increased because the players had that particular negative stereotype in the back of their minds. Like the Cubs, they continued to make more errors because the threat affected their performance, which proved their negative stereotype to be true as well. Unfortunately, when these stereotypes were confirmed, it again increased the trash talking of opponents. “They choke under pressure”.
“They’re losers”. Their fans are “yuppies with BMW’s”. It was through these stereotypes that another psychological term became prevalent during this event - discrimination. Discrimination is negative and harmful behavior towards a group based on their group membership. It is unjust treatment towards other groups. The Cleveland Indians’ fans were discriminating against the Cubs and their fans by saying things such as the statements previously mentioned. They discriminated against them because they felt superior to them. For example, Indians’ fans screamed negative remarks at the Cubs players after games as well as tweeted hurtful things about them and their abilities. Sadly, Cubs fans discriminated against the Cleveland Indians, too. Of course, when it comes to rooting for your favorite team, discrimination and trash talking to the rivals is bound to happen one way or
another. Psychological concepts can be found in the most random of ways, such as in baseball or other sports games. Through the concepts of ingroup favoritism, stereotype threat, and discrimination, we can understand why trash talking occurs so commonly around sports. It is also through these social psychology concepts that we can see why any sports players performances either increase or decrease at certain times. In this case, however, the Cubs performance increased overall and their team finally pulled through. Go Cubs Go!
In a generation focused on social justice and the elimination of prejudice from our society, there is still a use of offensive language and terminology in the area of professional sports. In “The Indian Wars” by S. L. Price, Price attempts to make the reader aware of sports teams that use derogatory terms as their team name and their mascot. He does this by highlighting football, and trying to determine whether Native-Americans are offended by team names in sports, or more specifically, the Redskins. Price’s essay is ineffective because although he raises good points, he doesn’t help the reader to form an opinion by adding historical context to the derogatory names used. He also uses inaccurate poll results to make assumptions about the feelings
At this time in baseball history, the Chicago White Sox had the best player in the game on their team. Joe Jackson was simply known as a future Hall of Famer and the best to ever play at this time (Chadwick 35). He proved this by hitting .351 all season which led the Majors as well as hitting .356 his whole lifetime as a player which is still one of the highest averages today (Chadwick 36). However, the White Sox were no one man show they also had the top two pitchers in the league in Eddie Cicotte and Lefty Williams (Chadwick 35). By 1919, the White Sox had already made the World Series two times in a row. They had won the 1917 World Series, but lost in a heartbreaker in the 1918 World Series (Chadwick 35). It...
However backing out from a deal from gangsters was not very easy. When the gamblers learned about that they were gonna start winning games instead of losing like they had agreed they started to threaten them and their families. Game eight of the world series, instead of winning they lost and many people think that they lost on purpose because of the threats that their family had received.
The 1919 World series resulted in the most famous Scandal in Baseball history. Eight players from the Chicago White Sox were accused of throwing the series against the Reds and were banned from Major League Baseball. (“History files-Chicago Black Sox”) All eight players were expelled in an attempt to save the purity of the game. The White Sox lost the opening game of the series nine to one, and then ended up losing the series five games to three. (“Black Sox Scandal”) They had won the American league pennant and were highly favored to beat the Reds in the World Series. (“Bankston, Carl. L”)
I can remember one of my old varsity football games playing mostly an all-white team, and my team was dominantly black with 2-3 whites was the worse feeling ever. Although, we beat the team like 52-0 that and took an easy win. That made their fans very mad at us. After the game was over we usually pick where we want to go eat at, but in this case, we had to take our food home on the bus. I had always asked myself why were we treated like that, but I was only a freshmen in high school so I didn’t understand the feeling of hatred by another color. It was later said we weren 't allow to play them anymore because we didn’t respect the house rules of beating a team very bad. It’s just sad that we couldn’t even eat in their town because how bad we beat their football team, but now that I’m older I realized that most team we played never really didn’t like us; because of the black athletes we had on our
For this rhetorical analysis paper I chose one of my favorite, and most famous, sports speeches of all time, Lou Gehrig’s farewell to baseball address. Lou Gehrig was a famous baseball player in the 1920’s and 30’s. Lou didn’t really need to use a attention getting introduction, he was well known and loved by so many that people piled into Yankee Stadium to watch and listen to him give this speech. Although he didn’t need an attention getter, he began his speech with one of the greatest baseball quotes of all time, “Fans, for the past two weeks you have been reading about a bad break I got. Yet today I consider myself the luckiest man on the face of the earth.” (Gehrig, 1939) Every single time I hear or read that opening line it sends chills down my spine and stops me for a moment to reflect on everything that is going on in my own life.
What has changed the way America’s pastime is looked at forever and prompt worldwide discussion? Joe Jackson and his seven teammates changed the face of baseball forever during the intimate scandal of 1919. No other time in baseball history did Americans question the state of the game. Pete Rose had also brought a debate like no other before in baseball. Since his banishment in 1989 the country has been split on the issue. Gambling by these men and others has caused great problems in baseball. The game of baseball has been destroyed by gambling.
Jiobu, Robert M., “Racial Inequality in a Public Arena: The Case of Professional Baseball”. Social Forces , Vol. 67, No. 2 (Dec., 1988), pp. 524-534 Oxford University Press
On October 9th, 1919 the Cincinnati Reds defeated the Chicago White Soxs the heavily favored team ten to five (Solomon, Alan). Rumors were flying from before the first pitch was thrown about if the game was fixed game. Then months after the bad world series game people started to say that gamblers paid off some off the white sox players to intentionally lose the game. It all started when the first baseman c. arnold they call chick gandil meet up with this gambler joseph sport sullivan met up to discuss some players throwing the world series. The white sox were the divided team they were a half and half team but one
Native Americans have been bullied long enough. The national baseball ball association, those fans who do the Tomahawk chop, and you Mike are guilty of cultural racism. Applying culture relativism is difficult. Behind the smile of the seemingly harmless Cleveland Indian logo hides another example of American cultural absolutism. Are you unconsciously being a racist? Don't be fooled! And by the way Mike, who ended up winning the game?
Times have changed - what was acceptable 30 years ago may not hold up in today’s world. Racially offensive mascots have created division - not unity. If teams like the Indians, Braves and Redskins were to change their names and update their branding, they could potentially benefit more than by holding on to offensive, outdated traditions. Why would a professional sports organization settle for fewer fans, less revenue, and an image that offends its own citizens? By...
The Chicago Cubs are an interesting part of Illinois history, even if they are not always successful. The history of Wrigley Field, the famous players, and the stories behind every game are why Chicago loves the Cubs. It is the atmosphere of the friendly confines when you walk in through those gates. It is jumping out of your seat when the ball is being hit out of the park. It is things as little as singing the 7th inning stretch with all the other Cub fans around you. Rooting for the underdog is special, and that is why Cub fans are so loyal. The history, players, and stories of Chicago Cubs Baseball are the reasons why it is an important part of Illinois history.
They didn’t — none of them called themselves Clevelanders. As I looked around the lounge of Twin Towers, I realized that most of these fans were here to cheer on their home team in the first Cleveland Browns-Pittsburgh Steelers game in three long years. The fans varied in hometown.
The fair weather fans are committed to one team and are only with the team they successful and are successful. Then loyalty to the team does not encompass during down time when the team is losing thus eroding their support for the team. They wear their team colors when their team is winning and are eager and always quick to point to the team’s victories. The opposite is ...
Finally, baseball fans are insanely loyal to the team of their choice. Should the home team's players lose eight in a row, their fans may begin to call them "bums." They may even suggest that the slumping cleanup hitter be sent to the minors or the manager fired. However, such reactions only hide their broken hearts. They still check the sports pages and tune in to get the score. Furthermore, this intense loyalty can make fans dangerous, for anyone who dares to say to a loyal fan that some other team has sharper fielding or a better attitude could risk permanent, physical harm.