Ingredients of Actus Reus

1749 Words4 Pages

Introduction
This paper provides an understanding of the different ingredients of actus reus in criminal law. It covers relevant literature as well as analyzes case law on the concept.
What is actus reus?
An individual in the normal course of events cannot be accused or be held liable for a serious criminal offence unless two elements are present, firstly, the mens rea or guilty mind and the physical element or actus reus. This principle is often stated in the form of a Latin maxim; actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea which means that a person cannot be held guilty of a crime unless his mind is also guilty.
The actus reus is not just the conduct of the person itself, it includes all other elements and any surrounding circumstances of the offence apart from the mental element. It must be proved that the act which is forbidden by law is caused by the conduct of the person. The law will not interfere or punish people for having evil intentions alone. A crime is only committed when there is some physical manifestation of such intentions, for example an agreement to commit a crime is held to be a physical manifestation of an evil intention and is hence punishable as it constitutes the actus reus of conspiracy. The word actus means a deed or a physical act, while reus means “forbidden by law”.
The element of actus reus can be said to have mainly three parts, (i) the act which is performed by the individual, usually termed as conduct, (ii) The consequences or results of such an act in the surrounding circumstances which is termed as injury and (iii) the act is not permitted by law. Thus the ingredients of actus reus can be said to be broadly divided into voluntary acts, behavior, consequences and circumstances.

These ...

... middle of paper ...

...n, it is possible to say that the principle of actus reus is well established in law. Although there are grey areas in matters such as whether a person’s conduct is held to be an act or omission, the ingredients of actus reus such as the requirement of a voluntary act and causation are well settled and are covered sufficiently in the above sections of this paper.

Works Cited

C.M.V Clarkson and H.M Keating, Criminal Law, 4th Edition (Sweet and Maxwell)
A.P Simester & G.R Sullivan, Criminal Law-Theory and Doctrine, 3rd Edition (2007) (Hart Publishing)
Jonathan Herring, Criminal Law-Texts, Cases and Materials, 3rd Edition (Oxford University Press)
K.I Vibhute, PSA Pillai’s Criminal Law, 11th Edition (LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa)
Card, Cross and Jones, Criminal Law, 18th Edition (Oxford University Press)
Smith and Hogan, Criminal Law, 9th Edition (Butterworths)

Open Document