Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Prevention from crimes
Prevention from crimes
Prevention from crimes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Prevention from crimes
On 3-11-2017 at about 1440 hrs I was dispatched to a suspicious activity report occurred at 902 37th ST SE #3. Enroute dispatch advised that Clifford Cripes contacted 911 to report that his mother, Patricia Townsend, had given a pistol to Joshua Townsend. Additionally, Clifford reported that he knew Joshua was a convicted felony and was concerned about him possession a firearm. I arrived at the apartment complex at about 1502 hrs. As I walked toward the front door of the apartment I was contacted by a female that identified herself as Cheryl Scott. Prior to entering the apartment, Cheryl explained that she was Joshua's mother and was aware of the situation. Cheryl explained that it was a miss understand, however, Joshua was in fact given …show more content…
a pistol by her mother Patricia. Cheryl explained that the apartment was Patricia's and Joshua and herself were living there for the time being. Cheryl stated that most recently her brother, Clifford moved in as he is going through a divorce. Cheryl explained that Clifford has small children and was concerned that Patricia Cripes a pistol in the residence, so he asked Patricia to remove the pistol while he lives there.
Cheryl stated that the family had a argument about the issue but eventually Patricia gave the firearm to Joshua and told him to drive the firearm to her friend's house. Cheryl stated that this only became an issue because Clifford does not get along with Joshua. Cheryl stated that Clifford is only attempting to get Joshua arrested so that he is not longer living at the apartment. Cheryl stated that she did not witness the exchange of the firearm. Additionally, Cheryl stated that Joshua was no longer at the apartment and was apparently driving the firearm to the unknown friend's residence. I then entered the apartment and contacted Clifford. Clifford also stated that he did not witness the exchange of the firearm, only heard about it from the rest of the family. Clifford expressed a deep concern with Joshua, who Clifford repeatedly told me was a convicted felon, having a firearm. Clifford stated that the real reason that Joshua was given the gun by Patricia was for protection. Clifford stated that Joshua is an addict and was in some sort of dispute with some other people and requested the gun for
protection. After speaking with Clifford, I contacted Patricia, who was alone in her room. Patricia confirmed that she did in fact give her .308 pistol to Joshua. However, Patricia explained that the only reason she did was because Clifford force her to. Patricia stated that she gave the pistol to Joshua and requested that he take it to her friend's house and place it in that friends safe. Patricia stated that the friend, she named as Gregory, lived at an unknown address in Bonney Lake. Patricia did not have a phone number, last name, or a address for Gregory. Patricia stated that she knew Joshua was a convicted felon, but had no other option. Patricia did not provide the brand or serial number of the firearm. I later had Auburn Records check several databases, but they were unable to locate any information on the pistol. Clifford provided Joshua's phone number, which I attempted to call several times, but did not get an answer. I later checked a criminal history for Joshua and learned that he several felony convictions including, assault 2nd degree, assault 3rd degree, possess stolen property, and possession of a stolen vehicle. At this point I have been unable to contact Joshua and this case should be forwarded to Auburn Detectives for follow up.
The meetings took place at the courthouse, and Kelly asserts “were likely in a separate cell away from the general detainees, which has always been my practice.” The meeting that took place at MCI Concord on the eve of the trial, “was to prepare him for his direct and cross-examination inquiry.” During the meeting on the eve of the trial, Dascoli provided Kelly some information from the past that would support the fact that the victim was in fact the “first aggressor.” Despite the late disclosure, Kelly prepared a motion to present to the court, and a portion of the information was allowed to be presented to the jury. Kelly suggests that he had questioned Dascoli about past incidents with his brother, but he did not inform him of any until the trial preparation
around at 4:45. This sets the time frame of the investigation. The next morning, the
A year went by and in January 1983 Joshua was admitted into the local hospital by his father's girlfriend and former sister-in-law, Marie Deshaney. Joshua was treated for significant bruises and abrasions all over his body, In the medical report Marie Deshaney stated that Joshua had been hit in the head by another toddler with a metal toy truck. The examining physician suspected child abuse when he examined Joshua’s wounds and immediately notified the DSS.... ... middle of paper ...
all day long. When walking up to the house you would have to pass the
(Behind the limo shots) Since I was facing the building where the shots were coming from (Texas Book Depository), I just glanced up and saw two colored men in a window straining to look at a window up above them. As I looked up to the window above, I saw a rifle being pulled back in the window. It might have been resting on the windowsill. I didn't see a man. I didn't even see if it had a scope (telescopic sight) on it.
When the first responder got to the scene he adimatately meet the 911 caller, who lead him to a car in an apartment parking lot. The car doors were closed and all of the windows were fogged. The police officer used his flashlight to see inside of the car before opening the door. He found a young African American woman who had been shot several times. The officers quickly called for backup, investigators and medical personnel. While awaiting for their arrival he secured the crime scene with caution tape, creating an initial perimeter setup as discussed in lecture two. Once everyone arrived he left it to them to search the car while he talked to the 911 caller, witnesses and others who had information on who had been present in the car. The investigators were able to collect physical evidence of bullets and cartage casings that were found outside the vehicle and inside the vehicle on the floorboard of the driver’s side. The team determined the bullets came from a 40 caliber. Other types of physical evidence that were found on the scene were the bloody clothing on the victim, the victim’s cell phone and fibers in the car from the driver’s side. personnel at the scene crime took several photographs, powered test for finger prints and did a blood spatter analysis. Stewart’s autopsy revealed that she had been shot at close range in the left hand once and in the
As it was found out later, the arrest was the result of the false report provided by the man who claimed that Lawrence possessed weapons at his home. The report was filed by the neighbor Roger David Nance (41 years old) and he has already been accused before for the similar complaints. The above cause to enter the house, however, was not considered to be the issue in the case hearing and Nance admitted that he provided false report.
According to the article of Brazill v. State district Court of Appeal of Florida written by Gross (2003) Brazill classmates claimed that he appeared to be angry during this time, but students calmed he was not crying or shaking meaning there were no kind of remorse. Brazill frustration began to grow when he wasn’t getting what he wanted and eventually he pulled the slide back onto his grandfather’s weapon while Grunow attempted to close the classroom door as he tried to protect the students and himself, Brazill pulled the trigger and Grunow fell to the floor, with a gunshot wound between the eyes (Gross, 2003). A school surveillance videotape of the hallway revealed that Brazill then had pointed the gun at Grunow for nine seconds before shooting
1. Often, it is concluded that a lone gunman couldn’t have made the shots in the short seconds of the shooting (Rubinstein 4).
One was from a shotgun and the other from either a rifle or a handgun that may have been fired from outside the van. With this law enforcement failed to call a ballistics expert or to produce any ballistic evidence to identify the guns which fired these shots. However the evidence indicates that the law enforcement officers present on the scene and deputy sheriffs and prison guards were armed not only with rifles and handguns, but also with shotguns. This leads us to believe that the shots that killed Judge Haley were fired not by one of the prisoners, but by the so called officers
got off the bus and took a taxi at the next junction at 12:48. This
First, here are the details of the location, time, and crime scene. The incident occurred at Thunder Bay Cafe, in the city of Thunder Bay, CA. The first notification to the authorities was made around 11:34pm, and with witness reports, the time of the actual shooting falls within 11pm to 11:30pm. Mr. McGrew was the bartender working that night and not much is given about his physical appearance. Mr. Quill appeared to have been around 148 pounds, 5 feet, 71/2 inches in height, and in good physical health before his death. The statements made by Mr. McGrew will be presented along with the other statements provided by witnesses, and of course, Mr. Quill made no formal statement.
While looking at research done in Scotland and Canada, Pre-sentence reports (PSR), which are noted as Social Enquiry Reports within Scotland, are considered to be a key and influential aspect within their Criminal Justice System and the decision process on the subject of sentencing a custodial or non-custodial sentencing. While the idea of PSR’s are simple, to provide the court with personal information about the offender, such as circumstances that proved to be such a challenge, that he or she had abnormally excelled and expressed the ability to change for the better, and or have demonstrated that they have had a faulty character that could proveproves that a harsher sentencing is appropriate, or any other relevant information that the report writer deemeds necessary for the court (Tata et all., 2008). Being that report writers (Pprobation officers) are supposed to be impartial while creating their report, which may mean revealing some information that could complicate or compromise their goal of an alternative sentencing, they are to use PSR’s as a “selling point” for the judge (Tata et all., 2008). Although it is true that the role of the PSR can be a very useful tool in the Criminal Justice SystemAlthough the usefulness of PSR’s have been becoming more effective and more and have become more popular since the 1990’s, there are obvious discrepancies in perspectives in what the report is supposed to achieve (Tata et all., 2008). These discrepancies of PSR within the judicial system can be proven to be heavily weighted on their interpretation, narratives, realism, and quality. Moreover, in the Canadian study, Jesseman (2005)they take atakes a deeper look at the role of risk assessment has in PSR’s. While the use of PSR’s are con...
He had a revolver in his hand, but he did not point it at them.
My individual activity space was rather quite boring during this summer. Juggling 2 classes and a full time job is what this summer has been about for me with an occasional going out. My territoriality is LaPorte, my home sweet home. The activity space I roamed about from the week of 07/13 – 07/19 included surrounding Fort Collins area and the surrounding Loveland area. The activities included in the data table are rather same with a few minor changes in the flow of my travels to various places like restaurants and concert venues.