Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms word for word
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms word for word
The canadian charter of rights and freedoms essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Canada might only be 148 years old, but its origin of law can be traced back nearly centuries ago. The rule of law dates back to 1215, when King John, in England, issued the Magna Carta. Magna Carta was essentially a document about judicial procedures. The rule of law is intended to be equal and protect individuals and that no one person is above the law. All persons are compelled, obligated, and liable by the law and are entitled to be protected by the very same law. Having ties with England over the course of history, Canada as adopted many standard principles from the English system. Along with the Magna Carta and other documents, the rule of law became the foundation of English law, which also laid the foundation for the Canadian (English-speaking) …show more content…
legal system. April 17, 1982 saw the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms come into force (The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms).
Influences from the English system and the Magna Carta can be seen in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the primary law of the land and guarantees fundamental freedoms, legal rights, and quality rights for all citizens of Canada, including those accused of crimes (Griffiths, 6). These rights and freedoms are outlined by Canadians, which believe is necessary in a free and democratic society. More so, the charter recognizes primary fundamental freedoms (e.g. freedom of expression and of association), democratic rights (e.g. the right to vote), mobility rights (e.g. the right to live anywhere in Canada), legal rights (e.g. the right to life, liberty and security of the person) and equality …show more content…
rights, and recognizes the multicultural heritage of Canadians (The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms). Canada’s legal system is a common law system, which was imported to Canada in the 17th and 18th centuries (Griffiths, 8). Common law originates from Europe and is based on judges in royal courts, making decisions based on the notion of precedent. Precedent is a judicial decision that may be used as a standard in subsequent similar cases. In addition to common law, Canada’s criminal law system consists of statute law and case law. Statute laws are written laws that have been enacted by a legislative body, such as the Parliament of Canada, while case law refers to law that is established by previous court decisions and based on the rule of precedent (Griffiths, 9). The Canadian criminal justice system’s purpose is a very important part in maintaining a just, peaceful, and safe society. By doing so, the criminal justice system maintains public safety, enforces laws, and protects people’s rights all while abiding by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Canada has 4 main levels of criminal courts in which the court system is responsible for determining the innocence or guilt of an accused person. Nunavut is the only exception and consists of one level of court, the Nunavut Court of Justice. Within this one level court system, all judges can hear all types of cases. Aside from Nunavut, all other provinces and territories deal with 4 main levels of courts, which include: provincial and territorial courts, provincial and territorial superior courts, provincial and territorial appellate courts, and the Supreme Court of Canada (Griffiths, 147). Almost all criminal cases begin and end in the provincial and territorial courts, which is the lowest level of courts in Canada. Recently, provincial and territorial courts has seen more serious cases, but in general, this level of court deals with less serious cases such as traffic violations and regulatory offences. This level of court also hears cases under the Youth Criminal Justice Act. Other examples of courts seen under this court system include small claims courts and family courts. In small claims court, people can settle their differences in cases worth up to $25,000 (Ministry of Justice). Family court is a court of law that handles cases involving domestic issues such as divorce and child custody, just to name a few. Provincial and Territorial Courts are administered by the provinces and territories and have judges who are provincially and territorially appointed (Griffiths, 148). This system hears preliminary hearings in serious cases to determine whether there is enough evidence for this case to go to trial. There are no juries within this level of courts. Juries are finders of facts, while the role of the judge is to interpret the law and instruct the jurors (Griffiths, 194). The jury ultimately decides the innocence or guilt of the accused person and the jury decision must be unanimous. Provincial and Territorial Superior Courts are another level of the main 4 courts. Any type of superior court is the highest level of courts in a province or territory. In superior courts, judges are appointed and paid by the federal government (Griffiths, 155). Within superior courts, there are generally two levels: trial and appeal. In trial level courts, cases are heard and usually involve serious criminal offences. On the other hand, the appeal level superior court hears criminal and civil appeals. Juries may be involved in cases under the Provincial and Territorial Superior Courts. Murder is an example of a case that would be heard under this court. After a case has been decided at the trial level, the accused has the right to appeal the verdict or the sentence, or both, to a higher court (Griffiths, 155). There is only one court of appeal in each province and territory with the exception of Alberta and Quebec, these two provinces consist of two court of appeals. Appeal courts focus on reviewing decisions from lower level courts. In most cases, one judge deals with preliminary hearings; final hearings can be dealt with and decided upon 3 judges collectively. Finally, the Supreme Court of Canada otherwise known as the “court of last resort,” hears cases from all provinces and territories and is located in Ottawa. This highest form of court was established under the Constitution Act (1867) (Griffiths, 156). The Supreme Court of Canada has judges who are appointed federally by the Prime Minister. Under the Supreme Court there is the Federal Court, which hears matters related to federal statutes, and the Federal Court of Appeal, which hears appeals and has some limited criminal jurisdiction. In addition to being Canada's court of final appeal, the Supreme Court performs a unique function. Problem solving courts, or specialized courts, has recently developed and is an attempt to divert offenders with special needs from the criminal justice system (Griffiths, 149). Examples of specialized courts include, community courts, drug courts, and mental health courts. There are three main attributes of problem-solving courts. These attributes are to focus on underlying problems of offenders, victims, and communities, interagency and interdisciplinary collaboration, and accountability to the community (Griffiths, 149). The main focus of these attributes and to have problem-solving courts is one of the fundamentals in creating a restorative justice system. It is intended to improve functionality and lives of all people in the community. In Canada, 4 main levels of policing are enforced. These levels include, federal, provincial and territorial, municipal, and First Nations. Along with the 4 main police forces, other police services are established such as the Canadian Pacific Police Service, which fulfills policing roles for its organization and in major urban centers, such as Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver (Griffiths, 69). Other police forces include transit police, which provide security and protection of property and passengers on public transportation systems (Griffiths, 69). The first of the 4 main levels of policing is the federal police, which consist of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). RCMP recruits are all trained at a central location in Regina, Saskatchewan and then placed across the country in detachments. Duties of the RCMP include, federal policing, contract policing at the provincial, territorial, and municipal levels and international peacekeeping. Contract policing means the RCMP is in an agreement with the provinces and territories in which they are serving. RCMP officers are also not unionized (Griffiths, 70). Next are the provincial police, which have 3 police forces under it. These 3 police forces throughout Canada include, the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP), the Sûreté du Québec (SQ), and the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary (RNC). The provincial police forces are responsible for policing rural areas and areas outside municipalities and cities. The third level of policing, municipal policing is responsible for enforcing the law within cities’ boundaries. Their jurisdiction does not go beyond these boundaries of a city. Municipal police officers enforce the Criminal Code, provincial and territorial statues, and municipal bylaws, as well as certain federal statutes, such as the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (Griffiths, 71). Bylaws vary throughout municipalities. The largest police personnel in Canada are made up of the Municipal Police force. Finally, First Nations Police, the 4th main police force, is on the rise and was created to control justice programs.
This force was created largely due to conflicts in the past as well as present day between the police and Aboriginal peoples. First Nations communities can negotiate agreements with other police forces such as the RCMP and OPP to meet basic needs for their communities. The province and territories along with the federal government usually split the cost of funding for the First Nations Police force. There are 3 major Aboriginal police forces in Canada, the Six Nations Police Service in Ontario, the Amerindian Police in Québec, and the Dakota Ojibway Police Service in
Manitoba. In conclusion, Canada’s 3 main parts of the system, legislative (creating laws), adjudication (courts), and corrections (jails, prisons, probation and parole) are implemented to deliver justice for all, by convicting and punishing the guilty and helping them to stop offending, while protecting the innocent. The criminal justice system in Canada is the backbone to the law and order of society. Therefore, a strong, impartial and accountable criminal justice system, which protects the human rights of accused and victims, rich and poor, young and old alike, is the cornerstone of a just and impartial society.
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s 7, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11. Web.
The three most significant events, people or person who influenced Canadian law in Canada in my opinion are Magna Carta, St. Thomas Aquinas, and Napoleon. Magna Carta has a major influence on the Canadian legal system. The rule of law is derived from the Magna Carta and it is the fundamental principle of Canadian law. “Everyone is equal and no one is above or superior to anyone else.” The Law was originally used in the Carta, and is now used in Canada's legal system today. St. Thomas Aquinas greatly influenced the Canadian legal system because be still use some laws in our legal system that were used back them like how suspects are still tried In front of grand jury, trials are still open to the public and how you must swear an oath when in
Philosophers, for several years have made a large impact within Canadian law by engaging in the study of the basic nature of knowledge, reality and existence. Aristotle, one of the philosophers who has made a major influence on Canadian law studied and created the main purpose of law known as just acts. As well, Plato was another philosopher who affected Canadian law through reflecting endless truths and virtues. St. Thomas Aquinas also had significance within Canadian law by believing that the main purpose of human law was being virtuous. Aristotle, Plato, and St.Thomas Aquinas were the most influential legal philosophers in Canadian law because they created the elements of just acts, eternal truths and virtues which are present in Canadian law and the virtuous existence of human laws.
Apart from the other laws in Canada’s constitution, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is an important law that affects every Canadian’s rights and freedoms. It was created in 1981 by former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau to provide legal protection for the most important rights and freedoms. These rights include fundamental freedoms, democratic rights, mobility rights, and legal rights. Most but not all articles included in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are protected in the constitution. However, if a Canadian feels that their rights are violated, they can challenge laws and unfair actions using the justice system. In my opinion, I believe the Canadian Charter of Human Rights somewhat protects Canadians’ rights and freedoms to some extent depending on the situation.
Moreover, although no powers or rights have been explicitly ‘reserved’ to the people, supporters of the charter nevertheless appear to give Canadians hope that the possibility may exist. COMPARISON OF BILL OF RIGHTS AND THE CANADIAN CHARTER... ... middle of paper ... ...
"Bill of Rights (Canada), August 4, 1960." DISCovering World History. Detroit: Gale, 2003. Canada in Context. Web. 4 Dec. 2013.
"Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms." Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 2nd ed. 1982. N. pag. Print.
This great country known as Canada, is governed smoothly because of the agreements and rules that have been in place since the beginning of confederation. The Canadian Constitution is one example of these rules. The Canadian Constitution is not just one single documentation, it is a collaboration of documents that make up one enormous document (Dyck 261). The six basic principles of the constitution are: responsible government, federalism, judicial review, the rule of law, constitutional monarchy and democracy; which all helped to shape the Constitution and therefore Canada (Dyck 266).
What principles and ideals lie at the heart of a free democratic society? Canadians take pride in their country’s values of tolerance, inclusion, and respect, and over Canada’s guaranteed freedom of expression, including the right to vote (Thevenard & Orend, 2015). In democratic Canada, “all eligible citizens have the right to participate, either directly or indirectly, in making the decisions that affect them” ("Democracy Defined"). Voting, in essence, ensures all citizens receive an equal opportunity to express their views by selecting and supporting a political party of their choice. Such an approach provides freedom of expression for all eligible citizens, allowing for the political party with the most votes to take over the ruling.
Democracy is more than merely a system of government. It is a culture – one that promises equal rights and opportunity to all members of society. Democracy can also be viewed as balancing the self-interests of one with the common good of the entire nation. In order to ensure our democratic rights are maintained and this lofty balance remains in tact, measures have been taken to protect the system we pride ourselves upon. There are two sections of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms that were implemented to do just this. Firstly, Section 1, also known as the “reasonable limits clause,” ensures that a citizen cannot legally infringe on another’s democratic rights as given by the Charter. Additionally, Section 33, commonly referred to as the “notwithstanding clause,” gives the government the power to protect our democracy in case a law were to pass that does not violate our Charter rights, but would be undesirable. Professor Kent Roach has written extensively about these sections in his defence of judicial review, and concluded that these sections are conducive to dialogue between the judiciary and the legislature. Furthermore, he established that they encourage democracy. I believe that Professor Roach is correct on both accounts, and in this essay I will outline how sections 1 and 33 do in fact make the Canadian Charter more democratic. After giving a brief summary of judicial review according to Roach, I will delve into the reasonable limits clause and how it is necessary that we place limitations on Charter rights. Following this, I will explain the view Professor Roach and I share on the notwithstanding clause and how it is a vital component of the Charter. To conclude this essay, I will discuss the price at which democr...
It is the belief of first nations that the healing process and renewal of relationships are the essential ingredients for the building of healthy First Nations communities. First nations realize that the current justice process does not address the real issues at hand nor does it fit into their traditional forms of achieving justice. In fact, the current justice process systematically removes the offenders from their people and communities effectively severing all ties and ...
Three decades ago, honorable Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau was establishing the renowned Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Since the three decades of being established, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms has protected the individual rights and freedoms of thousands of Canadians. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms has become a part of the national identity and has become a big patriotic symbol for the country. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the document the truly separates Canada from all the other powerful nations and is really something that Canadian take a pride in. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms brings up many questions, but the biggest and most common question is How effectively does Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms protect your individual rights? . To exactly know how effectively it protects your rights you can look at situations where it has protected and has not protected the rights of Canadians. The Charter of Rights and Freedom protects legal rights of Canadian whether they are a teenager or an adult, protects equality rights of Canadian and provides government services to all Canadians no matter what, ensures all laws are passed according to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and provides equality rights and fundamental freedoms to Canadians for practicing their religion and other rights without interference.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was enacted under the Pierre Trudeau government on April 17, 1982. According to Phillip Bryden, “With the entrenchment of the Charter into the Canadian Constitution, Canadians were not only given an explicit definition of their rights, but the courts were empowered to rule on the constitutionality of government legislation” (101). Prior to 1982, Canada’s central constitutional document was the British North America Act of 1867. According to Kallen, “The BNA Act (the Constitution Act, 1867) makes no explicit reference to human rights” (240). The adoption of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms significantly transformed the operation of Canada’s political system. Presently, Canadians define their needs and complaints in human rights terms. Bryden states, “More and more, interest groups and minorities are turning to the courts, rather than the usual political processes, to make their grievances heard” (101). Since it’s inception in 1982 the Charter has become a very debatable issue. A strong support for the Charter remains, but there also has been much criticism toward the Charter. Academic critics of the Charter such as Robert Martin believe that the Charter is doing more harm than good, and is essentially antidemocratic and UN-Canadian. I believe that Parliament’s involvement in implementing the Charter is antidemocratic, although, the Charter itself represents a democratic document. Parliament’s involvement in implementing the Charter is antidemocratic because the power of the executive is enhanced at the expense of Parliament, and the power of the judiciary is enhanced at the expense of elected officials, although, the notwithstanding clause continues to provide Parliament with a check on...
Policing any community will have many challenges, but policing alongside a Native American tribe can add additional challenges other areas may not experience. In the past Native Americans have had problems with the U.S. government seriously and repeatedly disregarded Indian rights that were guaranteed in the form of binding treaties. To Native American’s police officers have been a symbol of rigid and authoritarian governmental control. They view the justice system as not to be trusted because of the breaches of treaties and contracts.
Many people and nations around the world are deprived of human rights. The government in the countries or nations usually can not help the people being deprived. Either because the government is too poor to, it is not one of the things the government is looking into, or the government does not know or care. Because of this certain people, or even whole populations are denied human rights and their living conditions and way of life are usually not on the positive side of things. There are many wealthier countries trying to help but sometimes that is not enough. To what extent should Canada have a role in working to increase human rights protection in other nations?