Indispensable Nation Thesis Statement

777 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: USA foreign policy

Issue 1: Should the United States Seek to Remain the Indispensable Country?

Ted Galen Carpenter, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, challenges conventional wisdom and argues that the United States should not seek to remain the indispensable nation in the international system in “Delusions of Indispensability”. Carpenter depicts the concept of the U.S seeking to remain the indispensable nation as “dubious” and a “blueprint for strategic overextension” of resources leading to a “failed paradigm” (Pg.19). Carpenter frames his argument against the indispensable nation thesis around the following topics: unilateralism versus multilateralism, U.S. engagement as binary light switch, the failure to acknowledge that U.S. engagement can take different …show more content…

policy of acting reaming indispensable and acting unilaterally by providing examples of what differentiates the supporters of unilateralism from multilateralism. He acknowledges that while there are supporters of a multilateralist foreign policy approach, those supports have tendency to be weary if the U.S. is not in control or leading the situation at hand. Supporters of the indispensable nation policy collectively believe that there would be global chaos, resulting in numerous negative repercussions for the U.S. if it decided to reduce its role in global engagements. These supporters have also instilled the idea that the world is dependent on the U.S. to maintain international peace and prevent global …show more content…

The reason being the leadership and credibility U.S. seem to be at risk indefinitely and it is inevitable that both will likely suffer when the U.S. policies of indispensability run into their practical limits of power.

In the next section of Carpenter’s argument, he discusses the failure of the U.S. to recognize the different forms of engagement options. The most constructive alternative to the current indispensable policy is the consortium model of regional actors that has the U.S. serving as the “first among equals” (pg.24) allowing the U.S. to off-load security responsibilities as well as adopting a more detached strategic role would benefit the U.S. at minimal

Show More
Related

  • ?Letter to Americans? by E. P. Thompson

    735 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is somehow strange for today’s reader to find out that the situation with America’s foreign affairs hasn’t changed much. As some clever people have said, “The History book on the shelf is always repeating itself.” Even after nineteen years, Americans think of themselves as citizens of the strongest nation in the world. Even after the September the 11th. Even after Iraq. And Afghanistan.

    Read More

  • Kaufman Vs. Kaufman's American Foreign Policy Legacy

    1676 Words  | 4 Pages

    The book A Concise History of U.S. Foreign Policy, by Joyce Kaufman, and the essay, American Foreign Policy Legacy by Walter Mead both acknowledge the history, and the importance of American foreign policy. The two argue that American foreign policy has always been an essential aspect of the prosperity and health of the United States. After reading these writings myself, I can agree that American foreign policy in the U.S. has always been detrimental to the success of this nation. Throughout history most Americans have had very little interest in foreign affairs, nor understood the importance. This essay will address the importance of foreign policy, why Americans have little interest in foreign affairs, and what the repercussions

    Read More

  • Iran-Contra Affair

    1419 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...es when it comes to implementing controversial foreign policy decisions that directly affect Americans and those in different countries. The main aspect of the affair that greatly influences the United States’ government is ensuring that its past imperialistic motives do not become an integral part of American affairs once again.

    Read More

  • American Foreign Policy: Realpolitiks Vs. Human Rights

    1637 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...hat involve the situation but also the people of the country they are dealing with, because they might cut off aid to a country because the leader of the country might be a dictator the people would have to live in poverty. (14) I think this would be the best position because everyone would benefit from the situation. (15)In the Geneva Conference the U.S should have stayed out of Indochina’s business. The Chilean Revolution they United States should have never cut off aid to Chile for the reason being that the citizens of Chile would live in poverty. In the Panama Canal the United States did the right thing because they built it and owned it for several years and then in the year 2000 it passed it to the government of Panama.(16)in conclusion the United States should keep working on being the leading country of the world and not bring anymore problems upon themselves.

    Read More

  • The Dynastic Cycle

    647 Words  | 2 Pages

    History has proven that every great empire has eventually collapsed and comparing the United States to the Russians and Ottomans should show that the United States is far from a decline. The Ottomans declined due to the failure to modernize with their European opponents and the Russians declined after the people came together to establish a constitutional form of government. The United States would not fail for those same reasons, at least not for another couple of centuries. Over the past hundred years the United States have been tested numerous times through similar situations that caused previous empires to fall and the United States has prevailed and grown stronger because of those hardships. The United States is a rising empire and should take the history of declining empires into consideration for every major decision that is made to prevent a possible decline in the

    Read More

  • Woodrow Wilson and American Diplomacy

    2940 Words  | 6 Pages

    “Until early in [the twentieth] century, the isolationist tendency prevailed in American foreign policy. Then, two factors projected America into world affairs: its rapidly expanding power, and the gradual collapse of the international system centered on Europe” . President Woodrow Wilson was the leader who would initiate the ideologies of American diplomacy in the twentieth century. Up until his Presidency, American foreign policy was simply to fulfill the course of manifest destiny, and to remain free of entanglements overseas. Although he could not convince his fellow politicians on Capitol Hill of the probable success of his ideas, he did persuade the fellow writers of the Treaty of Versailles to use his Fourteen Points. America’s role as a political global superpower was established during his Presidency, as well as the modern policy that peace depends on the spread of democracy, and that national interest consists of adhering to a global system of law.

    Read More

  • The Transformation of America

    1375 Words  | 3 Pages

    In no field other than politics does the justification for action often come from a noteworthy event and the true cause stays hidden behind the headlines. The United States’ transformation from a new state to a global superpower has been a methodical journey molded by international conditions (the global terrain for statecraft), the role of institutions and their programmed actions, and ultimately, the interests of actors (the protection of participants in making policy’s items and i...

    Read More

  • Interventionist or Isolationist?

    1036 Words  | 3 Pages

    So, as you can see, there are advantages and disadvantages to being Isolationist or Interventionist. We can do a lot of good for the world by stepping in, however it is often at a great cost to ourselves. And our country can be seen as a great protector or a greater destroyer. Being only Isolationist or Interventionist would mean we are weak or too controlling. All we can do is try to find a medium and decide when is the right time for action.

    Read More

  • American Imperialism

    746 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the late 19th and 20th century, the United States pursues an aggressive policy of expansionism, extending its political, military, and economic influence across the globe. The events during this ‘age of imperialism’ laid the foundation for America’s international power while simultaneously defining the use of the these powers. The policy that the United States implemented at this time is known as Big Stick Diplomacy which was to speak softly but carry a big stick. This meant that the United States would ask for something or take a stance on an issue and if another nation refused or went against the United States, then the military would be summoned to ‘resolve’ the issues. This domineering foreign policy defined the politics of American Imperialism that was especially prevalent from 1890-1913.

    Read More

  • The Relations of the United States and the United Nations

    4840 Words  | 10 Pages

    ...Furthermore, by offering a little more of its power to the world, the US would appear to bind its hands and encourage cooperation in future operations. The US will not be the world’s strongest power forever, and it would be wise to invest some of its power today in strong norms and international laws that future countries, like China for example, would be bound to follow in the future. The UN is “a theatre of realpolitik where members (the powerful ones, in particular) pursue their own interests.” Over the past sixty years of its existence, it has remained the same picture of the world that it reflected in 1945, but the world has drifted away from this picture. For the UN to regain its effectiveness, especially after the war in Iraq, it must reform. The true test of President Roosevelt’s vision for global peace and security is whether change is possible today.

    Read More

  • Essay On American Exceptionalism

    801 Words  | 2 Pages

    American exceptionalism is a term suggesting that America was the best or superior; it was a term saying that it was different than any other place. Winthrop talks about the city upon the hill, which suggests America being a model or setting an example for other countries. We were supposed to be a beacon of liberty and freedom. During the founding of America, America was different than any other place. At its founding America was exceptional because it was different in the way people interacted with each other, different in the way the government worked, and different in its aspirations. The ideology of America has changed making it where America is no longer exceptional.

    Read More

  • The United States in Decline

    2143 Words  | 5 Pages

    One of the most vigorous debates focuses on the current status of the United States hegemony and whether or not it is in decline. This begs the question, if the United States is indeed declining in status, will it still be an influential player or not? I argue that the United States is losing its prominent position as the hegemonic leader of the world, but will still remain an influential player in global politics in the following decades to come. Its decline is an imminent result of their domestic issues, the violation of international laws and economic deficit, which have posed a grave and serious challenge for the United States. On the other hand, I propose that the United States will remain a dominant force due to its innovation, cultural influences around the world, and military prowess. In their articles, “How Americans Can Survive the rise of the Rest”, by Fareed Zakaria and “America and Europe in the Asian Century”, by Kishore Mahbubani, provides two distinctive and thought provoking arguments from a declinist perspective. However, both articles are susceptible to criticism and will be further examined in order to understand the United States prominent role.

    Read More

  • American Exceptionalism Essay

    1105 Words  | 3 Pages

    American exceptionalism is a belief that the United States is different from other nations around the world and as such superior; the term was coined by Alexis de Tocqueville in 1831, yet the philosophy of American superiority can be traced all the way back to the days before the United States was even an idea. They saw their new culture as “A city upon a hill” and sought to achieve moral and spiritual perfection. With this moral superiority the colonists, later Americans, saw a duty presented upon them by God and nature to instill such superior values into other cultures and the world. One such example can be clearly seen in the work of St. John de Crèvecoeur in Letters from an American Farmer where the narrator “Farmer James” states his belief

    Read More

  • Political Realism

    2261 Words  | 5 Pages

    However, the structure and process of international relations, since the end of World War II, has been fundamentally impacted through an immense growth of a variety of factors at multiple levels, which leads to the liberalist theoretical perspective of global complex interdependency. The complex interdependency is constructed from the liberalist theoretical perspective emphasizing interdependence between states and substate actors as the key characteristics of the international system (Ray and Kaarbo 7), which means that cooperation can be made more te...

    Read More

  • Characteristics of the Modern Nation-State

    1609 Words  | 4 Pages

    This essay will describe the characteristics of the modern nation-state, explain how the United States fits the criteria of and functions as a modern nation-state, discuss the European Union as a transnational entity, analyze how nation-states and transnational entities engage on foreign policy to achieve their interests, and the consequences of this interaction for international politics.

    Read More

More about Indispensable Nation Thesis Statement

Open Document