Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Perspectives on indian removal act
Trail of tears essay abstract
Trail of tears research question
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Imagine abruptly being forced out of your home. Imagine walking barefoot for miles and seeing people close to you collapse left and right. This is how every Native American on the Trail of Tears lived because of the Indian Removal Act. This act, signed by President Andrew Jackson on May 28 of 1830, granted him the right to grant unsettled lands in exchange for Indian lands. These lands were inhabited by the Five Civilized Tribes - the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole. Due to the Indian Removal Act, these five tribes were forced off their land and sent 1500 miles west to present day Oklahoma. Thousands died of countless illnesses, their sufferings earning the migration its name - the Trail of Tears. The Indian Removal Act …show more content…
was a step in the wrong direction for America because it mercilessly killed thousands of Native Americans, dehumanized the 5 Civilized Tribes, and wasn’t even properly followed through. The act in question first showed its bad footing when it led to the merciless death of thousands of innocent Native Americans. There may be those who say that the countless deaths weren’t America’s fault. However, that is where they are wrong. “...sleep in the wagons and on the ground without fire… twenty-two of them to die in one night of pneumonia due to ill treatment, cold, and exposure”(John G. Burnett’s Story of the Removal of the Cherokees) is not the weather’s fault. Ill treatment, exposure to the cold, and no warmth can easily be fixed by some medicine, a blanket, and a campfire. But did those leading the Trail of Tears do anything to accommodate their victims? Far from it. If anything, they practically left these poor, helpless people to die. This was our fault, and no one else’s. These people encountered “...a terrific sleet and snow storm with freezing temperatures… trail of exile was a trail of death.”(John G. Burnett’s Story of the Removal of the Cherokees) America didn’t do anything to help them then, either. The sad part is that they went through this themselves at Valley Forge, but still did nothing. There were those in the army that died of famine, pneumonia - many of the same reasons as the Native Americans. The two are not so different. But they still did nothing to help those in need, despite America once being the one in need. America’s Indian Removal Act, however, has not only led to countless innocent deaths of Native Americans, but also to the dehumanization of the 5 tribes that walked the Trail of Tears. This act walked further down the wrong path when it dehumanized the Native Americans and robbed them of their dignity. While some may say that “... they would be hailed with gratitude and joy”(Andrew Jackson’s Second Annual Message), the Native Americans were certainly not. “Ever since [the whites came] we have been made to drink of the bitter cup of humiliation; treated like dogs… our country and the graves of our fathers torn from us… we find ourselves fugitives, vagrants and strangers in our own country…”(John Ross). This sounds more like they were hailed with humiliation and mistreatment. Who would find joy in being treated like an animal? Who would be gratuitous for becoming strangers to your own home? These 5 tribes certainly weren’t. It seems only logical to treat others the way you would like to be treated. Imagine how the United States would react if they were treated like dogs and separated from their culture? They wouldn’t like it very much - no one would. So why does it seem okay to do it to people that have never done anything to hurt you? Still, there are those who believe that the government made it their moral duty to protect and preserve the Native American race. On the other hand, John G. Burnett tells us in his account, “... I did not meet one [Indian girl] who was a moral prostitute. They are kind and tenderhearted and many of them are beautiful.” These girls didn’t deserve the treatment they received. None of them were girls looking to be harassed or raped by white men, which they were. The government says it’s their duty to protect these people? While they allow them to be raped by their own “trained” soldiers? Some protection. By doing this, America is robbing these people of their dignity, their pride, and their confidence. They are wearing them down until they are not even human anymore, but simply toys for them to play with. Once again, the Indian Removal Act brought sadness to innocent people by robbing them of their human qualities. But it also could have prevented one of the saddest events in American history. To end the Indian Removal Act’s cursed journey, the act wasn’t even followed through properly.
Many people may believe that the Indian Removal Act was voluntary and peaceful; that those who didn’t want to leave the land didn’t have to. President Jackson’s disregard of agreement says otherwise: “The removal was supposed to be voluntary and peaceful, and it was that way for the tribes that agreed to the conditions. But the southeastern nations resisted, and Jackson forced them to leave.” (PBS.org) This doesn’t sound like migration was voluntary and peaceful. This could have changed everything. If everything went according to the conditions, 4,000 Native Americans wouldn’t have died. If Jackson hadn’t gone against the tribes’ agreed wishes, people wouldn’t have protested America’s actions. If those who didn’t want to leave weren’t met with military force, none of these tragedies would have ever happened. All of this could have also been prevented if this were true: “... to give him[the average Native American] a new and extensive territory, to pay the expense of his removal, and support him a year in his new abode?”(Andrew Jackson’s Second Annual Message) All of these were conditions agreed to in the Indian Removal Act. Did the 5 Civilized Tribes ever see these conditions? No, they did not. This disregard of documents is hypocritical of America. They complained about their treaties with other countries not being paid attention to, but disregarded another document that held thousands of people’s futures in the balance. How do you think America would feel if other nations disregarded the Constitution? They would be upset, just like the Native Americans were, and the tribes were right. The tribes were supposed to have a happy ending, but the disregard of what seemed like another piece of paper to America ended any chance of that for them. That is why the Indian Removal Act was bad for America - it led us to not follow the
rules. So you see, the Indian Removal Act was quite bad for America due its committed crimes. It committed murder - the death of 4,000 Native Americans that never did anything to it. It committed a robbery when it robbed these people of the qualities that make them human. And it committed the crime of ignorance when it led the president to disregard its own conditions in writing. Martin van Buren had a choice to stop it. We have a choice to stand up and stop what we think is wrong to make something right. So what are you waiting for?
Throughout Jackson's two terms as President, Jackson used his power unjustly. As a man from the Frontier State of Tennessee and a leader in the Indian wars, Jackson loathed the Native Americans. Keeping with consistency, Jackson found a way to use his power incorrectly to eliminate the Native Americans. In May 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed into law the Indian Removal Act. This act required all tribes east of the Mississippi River to leave their lands and travel to reservations in the Oklahoma Territory on the Great Plains. This was done because of the pressure of white settlers who wanted to take over the lands on which the Indians had lived. The white settlers were already emigrating to the Union, or America. The East Coast was burdened with new settlers and becoming vastly populated. President Andrew Jackson and the government had to find a way to move people to the West to make room. In 1830, a new state law said that the Cherokees would be under the jurisdiction of state rather than federal law. This meant that the Indians now had little, if any, protection against the white settlers that desired their land. However, when the Cherokees brought their case to the Supreme Court, they were told that they could not sue on the basis that they were not a foreign nation. In 1832, though, on appeal, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokees were a "domestic dependent nation," and therefore, eligible to receive federal protection against the state. However, Jackson essentially overruled the decision. By this, Jackson implied that he had more power than anyone else did and he could enforce the bill himself. This is yet another way in which Jackson abused his presidential power in order to produce a favorable result that complied with his own beliefs. The Indian Removal Act forced all Indians tribes be moved west of the Mississippi River. The Choctaw was the first tribe to leave from the southeast.
The Indian Removal Act was passed by Congress in order to allow the growth of the United States to continue without the interference of the Native Americans. Jackson believed that the Native Americans were inferior to white settlers and wanted to force them west of the Mississippi. He believed that the United States would not expand past that boundary, so the Native Americans could govern themselves. Jackson evicted thousands of Native Americans from their homes in Georgia and the Carolinas and even disregarded the Supreme Court’s authority and initiated his plan of forcing the Natives’ on the trail of tears. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Indians, however Jackson ignored the ruling and continued with his plan. The result of the Indian Removal Act was that many tribes were tricked or forced off their lands, if they refused to go willingly, resulting in many deaths from skirmishes with soldiers as well as from starvation and disease. The Cherokee in particular were forced to undergo a forced march that became known as the Trail of
The generalization that, “The decision of the Jackson administration to remove the Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi River in the 1830s was more a reformulation of the national policy that had been in effect since the 1790s than a change in that policy,” is valid. Ever since the American people arrived at the New World they have continually driven the Native Americans out of their native lands. Many people wanted to contribute to this removal of the Cherokees and their society. Knox proposed a “civilization” of the Indians. President Monroe continued Knox’s plan by developing ways to rid of the Indians, claiming it would be beneficial to all. Andrew Jackson ultimately fulfilled the plan. First of all, the map [Document A] indicates the relationship between time, land, and policies, which affected the Indians. The Indian Tribes have been forced to give up their land as early as the 1720s. Between the years of 1721 and 1785, the Colonial and Confederation treaties forced the Indians to give up huge portions of their land. During Washington's, Monroe's, and Jefferson's administration, more and more Indian land was being commandeered by the colonists. The Washington administration signed the Treaty of Holston and other supplements between the time periods of 1791 until 1798 that made the Native Americans give up more of their homeland land. The administrations during the 1790's to the 1830's had gradually acquired more and more land from the Cherokee Indians. Jackson followed that precedent by the acquisition of more Cherokee lands. In later years, those speaking on behalf of the United States government believed that teaching the Indians how to live a more civilized life would only benefit them. Rather than only thinking of benefiting the Indians, we were also trying to benefit ourselves. We were looking to acquire the Indians’ land. In a letter to George Washington, Knox says we should first is to destroy the Indians with an army, and the second is to make peace with them. The Indian Trade and Intercourse Act of 1793 began to put Knox’s plan into effect. The federal government’s promise of supplying the Indians with animals, agricultural tool...
Andrew Jackson signed the indian removal act in 1830. This act allowed him to make treaties with the natives and steal their lands. The Trail of Tears was a forced relocation of more than 15,000 cherokee Indians. The white men/people gave the natives 2 options: 1. Leave or 2. Stay and Assimilate (learn our culture). The natives couldn’t have their own government. There were 5 civilized tribes including the cherokees. They learned english and went to american schools and when the cherokees went to court they won.
President Andrew Jackson wanted the white settlers from the south to expand owning land from Five Indian tribes, which was called Indian Removal Policy (McNamara). The Five Indian tribes that were affected were Choctaws, Muskogee, Chickasaws, Cherokees, and the Seminoles. In the 1830, the Removal Act went into effect. The Removal Act gave President Andrew Jackson the power to remove Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi river by a negotiate removal treaties (James). The treaties, made the Indians give up their land for exchange of land in the west (James). There were a few tribes that agreed to sign the treaties. The others that did not sign the treaty were forced into leaving their land, this was known as the Trail of Tears.
Unfortunately, this great relationship that was built between the natives and the colonists of mutual respect and gain was coming to a screeching halt. In the start of the 1830s, the United States government began to realize it’s newfound strength and stability. It was decided that the nation had new and growing needs and aspirations, one of these being the idea of “Manifest Destiny”. Its continuous growth in population began to require much more resources and ultimately, land. The government started off as simply bargaining and persuading the Indian tribes to push west from their homeland. The Indians began to disagree and peacefully object and fight back. The United States government then felt they had no other option but to use force. In Indian Removal Act was signed by Andrew Jackson on May 18, 1830. This ultimately resulted in the relocation of the Eastern tribes out west, even as far as to the edge of the Great Plains. A copy of this act is laid out for you in the book, Th...
The removal of the Native Americans was an egocentric move on Jackson’s part. Jackson was only able to see how our removal would benefit the government but was not concerned at all about our values and culture. “It puts an end to all possible danger of collision between the authorities of the general and state governments on account of the Indians” (91). This statement, included in the State of the Union Address, exhibits how Jackson was quick to place blame on the Indians. He was basically saying that if there were any disputes between the general and state governments, it would be because of the Indian’s choice to not leave the land. Jackson was attempting to hold the Indians accountable for a matter that they had no say in. It is evident that Jackson could have are less about the Indian’s home land, where we were birthed and raised our kids. It is clear that the sentimental value of the land did not concern Jackson at all. Jackson felt that he offered us an equitable exchange, but his family was not the one being forcefully removed from their birthland to go to an unfamiliar land. “What good m...
...(Perdue 20). It gave them two years to prepare for removal. Many of the Cherokees, led by John Ross, protested this treaty. However, in the winter of 1838-1839, all of the Cherokees headed west toward Oklahoma. This removal of the Cherokees is now known, as the Trail of Tears was a very gruesome event. During the trip from the southern United States to current day Oklahoma, many of the Cherokees died. Shortly after their arrival in Oklahoma, they began to rebuild. They began tilling fields, sending their children to school, and attending Council meetings (Perdue 170).
... one of the stipulations and had to be settled. The removal of the Natives in an effort to protect the American people on the frontier proceeded, and was all the region of present-day Oklahoma, as shown in document L. These actions are viewed as cruel and unjust, but it was the way that would’ve dealt the least damage. Further delaying the issue would’ve soon set into altercations between the various Native tribes and the United States of America. In retrospect, Jackson served to protect the people.
The trail of tears was a hideous harsh horrible time that the Native Americans will not forget the 1830s about 100,000 Native Americans peacefully lived on 1,000,000 and 1,000,000 of akers. They have been on this land generations before the wight men arrived. There was gold found in Gorga and the land was for ital. They used huge cotton plantations because the people would get rich off of them. In 1830 Andrew Jackson privily sinned the removal act. Te removal act gave the Government the power to trade the land for the land that the Native Americans were on. The Native Americans did not want to move, but the precedent sent troops to force the removal. Solders who looted there homes traveled 15,000 Cherokees, and gunpoint marched over 12,000
The Indian removal was so important to Jackson that he went back to Tennessee to have the first negotiations in person. He gave the Indians a couple simple alternatives. Alternatives like to submit to state authority, or migrate beyond the Mississippi. Jackson Offered generous aid on one hand and while holding the threat of subjugation in the other. The Chickasaws and Choctaws submitted quickly. The only tribe that resisted until the end was the Cherokees. President Jackson’s presidency was tarnished by the way the U.S. government handled the Native Americans. Although financially, and economically Jackson truly was a good leader, some people view him in a negative way because of the “Indian Removal Act.”
The removal of Indian tribes was one of the tragic times in America’s history. Native Americans endured hard times when immigrants came to the New World. Their land was stolen, people were treated poorly, tricked, harassed, bullied, and much more. The mistreatment was caused mostly by the white settlers, who wanted the Indians land. The Indians removal was pushed to benefit the settlers, which in turn, caused the Indians to be treated as less than a person and pushed off of their lands. MOREEE
...ew western home.” More than 13,000 Cherokees were forcefully moved by the American military. They traveled over 800 miles by steamboat, train cars, and mostly by walking. During this trip known as the Trail of Tears, the Cherokees suffered from starvation, exposure, disease, and hardship. “No report was made of the number of Cherokee who died as the result of the removal. It was as if the Government did not wish to preserve any information.” However, it is estimated that at least 4,000 may have died and some believe that as many as 8,000 died.
Could you imagine living during the time when Jackson was President, it would be awful because he was closed minded and did what he wanted, and did not really listen to the citizens, just like a king does. Jackson acted more like a king than a president in many ways. He did what he wanted to during the Indian removal Act, Ignored slavery and racism issue, and ignored Congress and did what he wanted.
When I was really young I always had the same opinion as my father about most things, even if I didn’t know anything about it. I didn’t know much back then so I just followed everything he said and never questioned it because I thought that he was probably right. Then I grew older and matured and realized that I didn’t agree with him about a lot of things. The way that I used to blindly follow whatever my dad thinks is like the Chinese proverb “A wise man makes his own decisions an ignorant man follows the public opinion.” The proverb means that people who just blindly follow the opinion of someone else instead of thinking for themselves are ignorant. The proverb is also saying that people that would rather just go with anything that