Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sri Lanka conflict analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sri Lanka conflict analysis
India is Sri Lanka’s closest neighbor and natural ally with its historic, cultural and linguistic similarities. Relationship between Indian and Sri Lanka is highly matured considering the asymmetric differences and India’s consistent commitment towards Sri Lankan policy. In this decade, India and Sri Lanka build a very strong relationship and came to close contacts at the highest level in terms of politics, growing trade and investment, cooperation in the fields of development, education, culture and defense, and understanding on major issues of international interest. Though there is some turbulence in Indo-Sri Lankan relations particularly with domestic politics playing a new dynamics in relationship between neighboring countries. In a vast …show more content…
Ethnic Identity is more about the consciousness and communication of differences, than about the differences as such. Identity has been cause of dislike during various ethnic conflicts. The key factors underlying these conflicts are political and economic discrimination against minority by majority ethnic group. The Indo-Sri Lanka bilateral relationship is also shaped by an endless conflict between the two main ethnic groups of Sri Lanka. About 74 percent of Sri Lanka's population is Sinhalese who are mostly Buddhists and about 18 percent of Sri Lanka's population is Tamils who are mostly Hindus. Sri Lanka has “one of the most complex plural societies in the world” that includes three main ethnic group and four major religions (Silva, 1986). The conflict began as a demand for greater autonomy by the Tamils in the northern and eastern part of the country and grew into a struggle for a separate state, Tamil Eelam, by the mid-1970 (Anne Noronha, 2008). The minority Tamils was largely discriminated by Sinhalese majority in terms of political power and economic resources which in turn forced Tamils to form Tamil secessionist movement in Sri Lanka, however, the long civil war came to an end but the root cause of the conflict still …show more content…
President Jayewardene signed Indo-Sri Lankan Peace accord with Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in 1987, by signing this bilateral Peace agreement, Sri Lanka acknowledged India’s role as the region’s preeminent power. According to the annexure mentioned in the Accord, India agreed to deploy an Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) at President Jayewardene’s invitation to maintain peace and stability in Sri Lanka. The military intervention was largely unsuccessful, instead of laying down their arms, the Tamil militants fought guerrilla warfare against the IPKF, which cost the lives of many Indian soldiers between 1987 and 1989 (Rao, 1988). After three years of unsuccessful bitter war with Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, India finally pulled out its troops as requested by Sri Lankan President Ranasinghe Premadasa. India’s failure in Sri Lanka raised serious of questions about India’s military capability to solve regional conflicts, but, the close emotional ties between Tamils in both sides of the Palk Strait, a pure military solution leading to disintegration of Sri Lanka is not in India’s own interest. Rather, India supports a policy of maximum devolution of power to Tamil minorities in Sri Lanka. This policy was strongly shaped by Indian concerns over division along ethnic lines would have a spillover effect on the separatist movement in northeastern states
As I have read the primary sources, it became clear to me that African Americans and Indians wants to be treated equally and fairly. As I read "An Indian's View of Indian Affairs" by Chief Joseph of the Nez Perce, the main thing that caught my attention was "Treat all men alike. Give them the same laws." This caught my attention because he clearly talked about the way he was tired of white men having all of the authority and the chiefs who would always talk about equality or fairness, but fails to show it with their actions. Also, he went on to say that everyone should be treated as one because essentially everyone is one and was born the same way. Basically, his view was an argument to state that it's not right to treat one person better or
What is pictured when someone thinks of India? Perhaps the manufactured goods, or diverse people. The truth is, however, that until India gained its independence in 1947, it was ruled entirely by British government. The British then proceeded to “improve” India, driving it into a deeper hole. Although British Imperialism in India had some positive effects, the overall political, economic, and social impacts were negative.
The Effects of British Imperialism in India One could approach this topic from two points of view: the British and the Indian. One could choose either party and find very different opinions. When British colonizers first arrived in India, they slowly gained more and more control in India through many ways, the most prominent being trade and commerce. At first, they managed India’s government by pulling the string behind the curtain. However, soon they had acquired complete rule over India, converting it into a true British colony.
During the second half of the 17th century, Indian-White relations were extremely volatile. The White population was booming and many wanted to claim a piece of the new land as their own. The Whites also felt that they were superior and had a sense of entitlement. They believed that the land and resources were for the taking, without much regard for the Indians. Along with taking the land, the Whites felt that the Indians should conform to their way of life and beliefs. This increased tension between the Whites and Indians- with increased instances of violence, attacks, and disputes.
In Schlesinger 's "The Cult of Ethnicity" he says "group separatism crystallizes the differences, magnifies tensions, intensifies hostilities" between people. Being separate isolates you and brings out differences that
Its population is 21,866,445. The majority of their population are Buddhist the rest are either Muslim, Hindu, or Christian. Buddhism was brought to Sri Lanka in the 5th century B.C. The legend that is told states that Buddha ordered a group of his followers to travel to Sri Lanka and spread Buddhism. According to this legend Buddha said that Buddhism would strive in Sri Lanka for 5,000 years. (Flinkins,3) This legend holds true for the most part, the sinhalese Buddhists have taken down any threat that has been made to their religion. With the knowledge that Buddhism is a religion of nonviolence and peacefulness one may assume that Sri Lanka could be one of the most peaceful nations in the world. Unfortunately this assumption is very wrong. The way the Buddhist tackle the threats to their religion causes this country to be
Lankan victim’s identity to be shaped. Anil’s exposure to both the East and West is
In the excerpt of “The Cult of Ethnicity” by Arthur Schlesinger Jr. reveals that “[e]thnic and racial conflict – far more than ideological conflict – is the explosive problem of our times” (page). After all, it comes down to stereotyping but that doesn’t mean that each individual should set their differences (ethnicity or race) aside for the greater good in preserving a multiethnic society. Any religion in India makes a difference towards the belief of each individual. Religion regarding the native Indian culture creates a better sense of understanding as opposed to a
India is the center of a very serious problem in the world today. It’s a very diverse place with people from many different religious backgrounds, who speak many different languages and come from many different regions. They are also separated economically. Two of the country’s religious sects, Muslims and Hindus, have been in conflict for hundreds of years. Their feelings of mistrust and hatred for each other are embedded in all those years and will not leave easily. What’s most disturbing is that there seems to be no plan for reconciliation available. There are numerous reasons for this conflict.
BOSE, Sugata and JALAL Ayesha. Modern South Asia: history, culture, political economy. London, Routledge, 2011
The British invasion formed into a historical development of British colonialism in India. Despite India under the British rule, Mahatma Gandhi played an important role in gaining Independence. He not only changed India but also strongly fought for India's independence, using various strategies. The British Empire ruled as long as they could to reform India both politically and socially.
We must avoid the temptation if at any given time our individual national economy is more prosperous than those of our other partner states, to be so arrogant as to forget that our economic situation may be suddenly reversed and that therefore we will soon need close links with our partner states in matters concerning both the intra-regional and extra-regional spheres. West Indian history abounds with instances of countries suffering sudden reversals of their economic fortunes.
The causes of ethnic conflict cannot be generalised to fit all incidents, as the conflicts in Sri
“India and Pakistan: Tense Neighbours.” BBC. N.p., 16 Dec. 2001. Web. 15 May 2011. .
A social problem has many definitions. One way to define is that is a social condition/issue which has negative effects on an individual, our social and our physical world. A social problem does not have to be experienced by every individual to be called a problem, it comes from acknowledging that the problem exists and that a particular social condition affects a greater percentage of the population. We as sociologists and psychologists need to be able to face the one-sided reality of a social condition and need to address it as a social problem.