In-Class Discussion On Intergovernmental Relations

465 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: The evolution of federalism

Refer to our in-class discussion on intergovernmental relations. Compare and contrast the differences between an alliance, a confederation, and intergovernmental relations. According to my notes, Intergovernmental system is cooperation that the rules that are adopted only bind the States. The more advance a society became, the more advance the government become, it is also a foreign concept of communist in an undeveloped, or an underdeveloped country. The local communities have no real authority and cannot compete with the government subunits. Intergovernmental relation is the structure in which different levels of government reform responsibilities and functions, which are shared among the various level of government. This also include how …show more content…

Vick explained these IRG’s are cakes with thick icings, full of corruption, working your way through indirectly. • Dual Federalism (1789-1933) "layer cake" model, wherein each level of government (national/ state) is supreme within its domain of responsibility. At the federal level (8%-12%), State level (12%-20%), local (65%-80%). The crack began in 1877 with Interstate Commerce Commission. The separation of power between national and state governments; neither level interferes in the affairs of the other. • Cooperative federalism (1933-1964) more like a marble cake, it grew out of the new deal. “Don’t know where it started or ends”). Federal powers expanded to deal with the aftermath of Great Depression. The national and state governments cannot have a debt, the budget must be balanced. This include the ACIR, interstate, WDA, CCC. • Creative federalism (1960-1968) was a form of an up-side –down pineapple cake. This involved you private sector and nonprofits agencies. The Great Society/ head start programs got started along with the antipoverty programs. Lindon Johnson ignored the state government because of the Jim Crow laws. • New Federalism (1969-1981) Blocked grants went to the state, and the Great Society phased out social

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast Johnson And Ronald Reagan

    442 Words  | 1 Pages

    Lyndon B. Johnson and Ronald Reagan had diverse understandings of the part of the government, especially when it came to local arrangement. Lyndon Johnson reported his organization "Great Society." These projects would go past consummation racial bad

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Federalist Federal And Confederate Government

    1036 Words  | 3 Pages

    Confederation- a group of individual states that are in an alliance, but the independent states each have more power than the central government

    Read More

  • New Deal Dbq

    1545 Words  | 4 Pages

    The New Deal sought to create a more progressive country through government growth, but resulted in a huge divide between liberals and conservatives. Prior to the New Deal, conservatives had already begun losing power within the government, allowing the Democratic Party to gain control and favoring by the American people (Postwar 284). With the Great Depression, came social tensions, economic instability, and many other issues that had to be solved for America’s wellbeing. The New Deal created a strong central government, providing the American people aid, interfering with businesses and the economy, allowing the federal government to handle issues they were never entrusted with before.

    Read More

  • Texas Political Culture Essay

    1278 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Articles of Association Every major role in the government. Not satisfied with this system led to the US constitution, increase the power of the national government. Although the national government has imposed its will succeed in suspending the crisis, the question of the exact relationship between the central government and individual states were still open. The civil war is, in part, a struggle over the meaning of the federal system and the appropriate relationship between the national and state governments. After termination of the reconstruction, the United States operates under a dual federal system. The start of the Great Depression in 1929 brought forward new calls to change the current federal system. According to him, the relationship between the national government and the states change in what has been described as cooperative federalism. In an effort to reduce federal control, Nixon has introduced a financing mechanism known as block funding and trying a slightly different version of the Union, which he called the new federal. Add new, federal actions have been described as federal enforcement where federal regulations are used to force states to change their policies in order to achieve national objectives. Under a federal system, the state is basically 50 laboratory setting to experiment with different approaches to the problem of determining which works

    Read More

  • FDR DBQ

    1167 Words  | 3 Pages

    The FDR administration responded well to the challenge of the Great Depression. The Depression was on a scale that had never been seen before, and required an unorthodox response. The administration responded with the New Deal, which had some very successful programs, such as the works programs, and other programs which failed miserably, such as the AAA. The New Deal also made the federal government much more involved with the lives of individual Americans, rather than people as a whole, which it had been. This is mostly the result of the works programs and social security where the government pays attention to the economic needs of specific workers and elderly people. As a result, the precedent of the welfare state was set and has remained to modern day.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Cooperative Federalism

    675 Words  | 2 Pages

    The new federalism started with Richard Nixon's term of presidency. The new federalism tried to move power to the state by bringing together categorical grants to form block grants and give states the power over programs which include welfare among others (Chhibber & Kollman, 2009). The practice gained support from president Regan, he believed that local politicians and states were in close contact with the people and they would know their needs better and how to spend on them. Under the rule of President Clinton, unfunded

    Read More

  • Anti-Federalist vs Federalist

    2017 Words  | 5 Pages

    According to the Federalists in the early stages of the American republic, a strong central government was necessary to provide uniform supervision to the states thus aiding in the preservation of the Union. This necessity for a more organized central government was a result of the ineffectiveness of the Article of Confederation’s government that was without a unifying government body. One component of this philosophy was the creation of an executive and other federal branche...

    Read More

  • political views of federalists and republicans

    357 Words  | 1 Pages

    The federalists view saw the republicans view as a weakness. They insisted on a stronger common government. The federalists had an understanding that there could only be one sovereign in a political system, one final authority that everyone must obey and no one can appeal. They thought this was the only effective way in creating an effective central government. The independent states seemed to think it was clear that each one of them were independently sovereign, although based on history only small countries were suitable for the republican government. With history proving the republicans wrong for trying to create a republican government in the states the federalists were slowly trying to create a stronger central government. There first step was making the sovereign states agree to the Articles of Confederation which established a close alliance of independent states. The federalist central government was referred to as a “confederacy”.

    Read More

  • Assessment of the Success of the New Deal

    1112 Words  | 3 Pages

    After the depression America was in a state mass hysteria as the Wall Street crash had caused a massive crisis among the American public because the impact of the wall street crash caused 12 million people out of work, it also caused 20,000 companies to go bankrupt and there were 23,000 suicides in one year because of the wall street crash this was the highest amount of suicides in a year ever. The main aims of the new deal were Relief, Recovery and Reform, Relief was for the Homeless and Unemployed, recovery was for Industry, Agriculture and Banks and Reform was to prevent the depression form happening again. The structure of The New Deal was the First Hundred Days (1933) where he would focus on relief by helping the homeless and unemployed and recovery by helping industry, agriculture and banks, there was also the Second New Deal where he would focus on Reform, preventing the depression from happening again. Roosevelt believed that the government should help those people worst affected by the depression, this is why he created over 50 alphabet agencies to deal with the problems caused by the depression, this is why he introduced the new deal because he wanted to ease the pressure

    Read More

  • Understanding Federalism: A Study of US Government

    517 Words  | 2 Pages

    Federalism is the power of a country, divided between the state and federal government. Federalism was not included in the articles of confederation, which left the states with all of the power. Federalism was chosen in the United States because the U.S. wanted there to be more control in the National Government. The U.S. State government wanted to keep some of the power, so federalism was a good system of government to choose from because they got to split the powers between them. Federalism has many benefits in California.

    Read More

  • Assessing the Success of Roosevelt's New Deal

    701 Words  | 2 Pages

    For example, the AAA destroyed food when people where hungry and only helped better off farm-owners not farm workers. The CCC was very low paid and was not compulsory. TVA flooded some farm lands also the PWA/WPA provided some jobs which were described as boondoggling. E.g. Balloons to scare away pigeons or sweeping leaves. Right wing critics said it went too far in interfering with people lives, and hated increased taxes and government policies. Whereas, left wing critics said it didn’t do enough for the poor. Roosevelt gave too much power to the federal government and the presidency. The federal government was becoming directly involved in areas which had traditionally been managed by state governments.

    Read More

  • Federal Government Intervention In The Progressive Era

    1613 Words  | 4 Pages

    The federal government always came into play at different time periods, when businesses, economy inflation, or local state laws took advantage of the people, which made forced the federal government to act and set down policies and rules to protect the people of the United States. There was the progressive era, the New Deal, and the Civil Rights Act of 1968, Acts and policies that were passed by the federal government.

    Read More

  • The New Deal

    1629 Words  | 4 Pages

    The New Deal period has generally - but not unanimously - been seen as a turning point in American politics, with the states relinquishing much of their autonomy, the President acquiring new authority and importance, and the role of government in citizens' lives increasing. The extent to which this was planned by the architect of the New Deal, Franklin D. Roosevelt, has been greatly contested, however. Yet, while it is instructive to note the limitations of Roosevelt's leadership, there is not much sense in the claims that the New Deal was haphazard, a jumble of expedient and populist schemes, or as W. Williams has put it, "undirected". FDR had a clear overarching vision of what he wanted to do to America, and was prepared to drive through the structural changes required to achieve this vision.

    Read More

  • Competitive Federalism

    2725 Words  | 6 Pages

    Federalism, by definition, is the division of government authority between at least two levels of government. In the United States, authority is divided between the state and national government. “Advocates of a strong federal system believe that the state and local governments do not have the sophistication to deal with the major problems facing the country” (Encarta.com).

    Read More

  • Federalism

    1206 Words  | 3 Pages

    Federalism is a legal concept that is centered around the concept that law is best handled as a two layered responsibility. Federalism is also built on a belief that sharing power with the local government is key to a successful governance. According to the text book, “the United States was the first nation to adopt federalism as its governing framework” (pg83). The following are a few examples of some advantages, as well as disadvantages of Federalism.

    Read More

More about In-Class Discussion On Intergovernmental Relations

Open Document