Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Historical background of criminal law
The beginning of the criminal justice system
Benefit of capital punishment to our nation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Historical background of criminal law
Davis discusses the history of the justice system and how the Penitentiary replaced capitol and corporal punishment. She defines Penitentiary as “Imprisonment was regarded as rehabilitative and the penitentiary prison was devised to provide convicts with the conditions for reflecting on their crimes and, through penitence, for reshaping their habits even their souls.3” though the idea of the penitentiary is arguable a new idea during the American Revolution. The penitentiary process was so that prisoners could learn from what they have done by a process of separation and rehabilitation. After slavery and during the early 20th century the level of crime rates rose during the early 1920’s to 1940’s. In the Article Less crime more punishment Adler4, …show more content…
Used Case Level data for individual evidence during this high crime era. Adler uses examples during the early 1920’s as the rise in crime was riddled with robberies and homicides, but justice system Jurors acquitted almost half of the felony cases. Thus, allowing guilty felony convictions to walk free and see no punishment for their crime. While mostly all cases were the majority of cases were those of African American’s. The jurors would throw these cases of Black on Black crimes away because in the eyes of the jurors these were not high priority cases. When analyzing the date mostly records of cases of white on black crime, would then the justice system be brought to the courts. Subsequently ending in a majority white favor. With the pressure of the citizens to fight the war on crime, the justice system had to change their process of incriminating guilty convicts and punishing them to a higher crime. During the Hoover administration crime rates began to fall because of forceful punishment and the creation of the Federal bureau of investigations. But during the time of lower crime rates incarceration rates began to rise. Through many ideas of increasing a stronger justice system with a hard three strike policy, America begun to experience a larger prison system. Thus, creating a cycle of people being incarcerated, freed and returned, by doing more crimes and receiving harsher punishment. Alexander Article the new “Jim Crow” explains using case studies that citizens who are arrested, and placed in the justice system have a greater chance of being arrested again5.
Thus, continuing to go through the continuous cycle of being incarcerated. Alexander explains that not just the justice system shows this racial bias against African Americans and Latinos, but as a second class society the convicted, are casted out through loosing the right to vote, having no where to work when leaving the prison. Similar to the early segregation system after slavery, she uses and example of the “Caste system.” An example to the caste system theory is that a prisoner’s great Grandfather was a slave and his father grew up during the Jim Crow era were segregation is similar to slavery and him being incarcerated and freed but now a second class citizen because of law. The caste system, explains how in poor neighborhoods families are being raised with multiple family members being “Locked up” and when children are raised in a system where going to prison, it is very likely of the same situation happening to them selves, Increase because of their race and where they are from. The examples used …show more content…
in “Constructing the Carceral State6” explain how one third of the population of races other than white; grow up with one parent being held in the prisons. Most of the time the parent left is not able to provide food for their families and use criminal acts to provide for their family and eventually end up in the same situation as their parents. The system is a continuous procedure of being locked up and left from society and being held as second-class citizens. Using various other articles the argument is withheld that work is being done to show the origin of mass incarceration but a solution is not being enforced. During the mid twentieth century launched another enactment that is “War on Drugs.” The War on drugs started in Nicaragua and was introduced to America and eventually led to the streets of America. The War Led to unfair sentencing of people who are convicted of the use/ distribution of Crack cocaine. 7Kholer uses evidence of political laws placed during the mid twentieth century to put strain on societies of lower class. With the growth of the drug influence din America after the Vietnam war many citizens became addicted to various drugs and were in need of help but instead received harsher punishment from the “war on drugs” legal efforts to rid them of their addiction and punish them for their crimes. Rockefeller drug laws of 1973 were a major influence during this time period, Rockefeller placed harsh rules on New York City to bring the drug problem down by arresting people who were illegally using or selling the drugs (Mainly Heroin). Presidential campaigns ran against the government to lessen the government and put in place harsher drug enforced laws. When Ronald Reagan Launched the “War on Drugs” Rising in drug influenced convictions led to the rise of Incarceration. While cleaning up the streets from drugs the cities were experience hardship with jobs becoming less and less and convictions becoming more common. Neighborhoods became ran down by criminals and led to the creation of the welfare state where people could not provide for them selves whether it be from Addiction, previous arrest, and unemployment. The Carceral and Welfare state intertwine because of the harsh laws placed on drug uses and criminals. One move Rockefeller did make before his harsh laws in 1973 where to place addicts convicted into lengthier drug rehabilitation. They’re for curing them of their addiction and providing them the opportunity to have a restart in life. Mass incarceration is at the forefront in understand the social, political, and economical problems that arise from mass incarceration.
The three-fifths compromise is very comparable when comparing to mass incarceration because prisoners are counted as state residents but are not allowed to vote. Representation. From the reconstruction to Modern history there has been little change in how African American’s are imprisoned and why they are targeted more than other ethnic groups Thus, allowing more power to states that have more political. The privatization of prisons is a major problem and the pay for prisoners is another loop whole escape for corporations to make more money. Mary Ann curtain explains the Corrections cooperation of America. The largest privatized prison corporation is paid per prisoner. If the supply dries up, or too many released too early their profits are affected…8” By engaging in a system of
privatized incarceration, states are liable to pay for each prisoner the private system houses and the more prisoners the more profit there is to be made. So in Angela Davis Book are “prisons obsolete” her information about reformation and the history of mass incarceration. Prisons are indeed obsolete! Cutting out privatized prison corporations and letting the state reanalyze the punishment system can fix the answer to the solution in fixing mass incarceration. By cutting the profit for major companies and allowing more resources to analyze the current state of incarceration a steady decline in numbers would be the result.
Alexander claims the caste system allows segregation to exist. The caste system is set up as slavery, Jim Crow, and mass incarceration. The author feels the black men are imprisoned because of continuing discrimination, poor city life, increased police force, and heavy education of the American people on the drug wars. I agree with Alexander’s perception of the caste system, because in particular African American men are discriminated against. I believe they grow up in tough cities and lack opportunities that whites have. Alexander states, “once again, vagrancy laws and other laws defining activities such as mischief and insulting gestures as crimes were enforced vigorously against blacks” (Alexander 31). Throughout history, many can notice African Americans are placed on the lower end of the spectrum. This is due to one factor only, skin color. Many people are prejudiced against the black men, as seen in recent issues cops are specifically tough on the black
The Punishment Imperative, a book based on the transition from a time when punishment was thought to be necessarily harsh to a time where reform in the prion system is needed, explains the reasons why the grand social experiment of severe punishment did not work. The authors of the book, Todd R. Clear and Natasha A. Frost, strongly argue that the previous mindset of harsh punishment has been replaced due to political shifts, firsthand evidence, and spending issues within the government. Clear and Frost successfully assert their argument throughout the book using quantitative and qualitative information spanning from government policies to the reintegration of previous convicts into society.
It represented a new world of confinement that removed the convict from his community and regimented his life. It introduced society to a new notion of punishment and reform. (Curtis et al, 1985)
The penitentiary movement, begun by Dorothea Dix, reformed the nation’s prisons and insane asylums to improve the living conditions and treatment of criminals, paupers, and emotionally disturbed persons. Separate penitentiaries were later instituted for the reformation of juvenile delinquents. Instead of “confining without distinction the more and less vicious”, where the latter can learn “little but the ways of the wicked”, their separation will salvage the less vicious through “religious and moral instruction” and “render them valuable members of society”. Democratic ideals inspired many reforms from 1825-1850. One such ideal was equality for all people in the United States.
Many young criminals are less likely to become career criminals if punished through public embarrassment than through prison. Prison can be a sign of manliness or a “status symbol” (Jacoby 197). He says “prison is a graduate school for criminals”, providing evidence that criminals want to be convicted and be in prison, to strengthen their status (Jacoby 197). Jacoby knows how to properly get his view across to the reader, by saying that prison is not as effective now, as it used to be.... ... middle of paper ...
Throughout his novel, Texas Tough: The Rise of America’s Prison Empire, author and professor Robert Perkinson outlines the three current dominant purposes of prison. The first, punishment, is the act of disciplining offenders in an effort to prevent them from recommitting a particular crime. Harsh punishment encourages prisoners to behave because many will not want to face the consequences of further incarceration. While the purpose of punishment is often denounced, many do agree that prison should continue to be used as a means of protecting law-abiding citizens from violent offenders. The isolation of inmates, prison’s second purpose, exists to protect the public. Rehabilitation is currently the third purpose of prison. Rehabilitation is considered successful when a prisoner does n...
Today, more African American adults are under correctional control than were enslaved in 1850, a decade before the Civil War began (Alexander 180). Throughout history, there have been multiple racial caste systems in the United States. In her book The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, Michelle Alexander defines a “racial caste” as “a racial group locked into an inferior position by law and custom” (12). Alexander argues that both Jim Crow and slavery functioned as racial caste systems, and that our current system of mass incarceration functions as a similar caste system, which she labels “The New Jim Crow”. There is now a silent Jim Crow in our nation. Mass incarceration today serves the same function as did slavery before the Civil War and Jim Crow laws after the Civil War - to uphold a racial caste system.
Prisons and correctional facilities in the United States have changed from rehabilitating people to housing inmates and creating breeding grounds for more violence. Many local, state, and federal prisons and correctional facilities are becoming more and more overcrowded each year. If the Department of Corrections (DOC) wants to stop having repeat offenders and decrease the volume of inmates entering the criminal justice system, current regulations and programs need to undergo alteration. Actions pushed by attorneys and judges, in conjunction current prison life (including solitary confinement), have intertwined to result in mass incarceration. However, prisoner reentry programs haven’t fully impacted positively to help the inmate assimilate back into society. These alterations can help save the Department of Corrections (DOC) money, decrease the inmate population, and most of all, help rehabilitate them. After inmates are charged with a crime, they go through the judicial system (Due Process) and meet with the prosecutor to discuss sentencing.
Alexander does an incredible job of covering the issue of race in today’s criminal justice system. We discussed in class that it is a relatively difficult issue to discuss and a sore point of our country, but she recognized the need for it to be addressed from start to finish and really paints a picture of how racially biased the laws are and have been since the days of slavery. I think an important framework to discuss race and the causes and responses to crime is something that Alexander deems the new caste system. She argues that our new system is the rebirth of a redesigned caste system. In her introduction, she notes that “to put the matter starkly: the current system of control permanently locks a huge percentage of the African American community out of the mainstream society and economy. The system operates through our criminal justice institutions, but it functions more like a caste system than a system of crime control” (Alexander, 2012, p. 13)
During the early half of the 19th century, there were two new models of prisons being built in the United States. Along with the new styles of prisons being constructed, two new styles of correctional systems were developed, the Pennsylvania system, and the Auburn, New York system (Mays & Winfree, 2009). Although the designs of the actual prisons were dramatically different, both systems shared similar ideals, with regards to how inmates should spend their days. Ultimately, the Auburn system prevailed as the more popular system of corrections in the United States, with some of the system’s correctional philosophies being used well into the 20th century (Mays & Winfree, 2009). Before discussing the actual philosophies, which were used to manage the inmates in each system, we should first look at the difference in the design of the prisons used in each system.
An American resolution: The history of prisons in the United States from 1777 to 1877 by Matthew Meskell. Stanford Law Review.
Every civilization in history has had rules, and citizens who break them. To this day governments struggle to figure out the best way to deal with their criminals in ways that help both society and those that commit the crimes. Imprisonment has historically been the popular solution. However, there are many instances in which people are sent to prison that would be better served for community service, rehab, or some other form of punishment. Prison affects more than just the prisoner; the families, friends, employers, and communities of the incarcerated also pay a price. Prison as a punishment has its pros and cons; although it may be necessary for some, it can be harmful for those who would be better suited for alternative means of punishment.
For many years, there have been a huge debate on the ideal of reform versus punishment. Many of these debates consist of the treatment and conditioning of individuals serving time in prison. Should prison facilities be a place solely to derogate freewill and punish prisoners as a design ideology of deterrence? Should prison facilities be design for rehabilitation and conditioning, aim to educate prisoners to integrate back into society.
Furthermore, it will be looking at whether punishment could be re-imagined, and if so, what would it entail? The use of prison as a form of punishment began to become popular in the early 19th century. This was because transportation to colonies had started to decrease; transportation was the removing of an individual, in this case an offender, from its country to another country; usually for a period of seven to ten years and in some cases for ever. During this time prison was now being used as a means for punishment, this was in response to the declining of transportation to colonies. Thus, instead of transporting offenders to other colonies, they were now being locked away behind high walls of the prison.
middle of paper ... ... Prisons need to be structured, orderly, isolated and individualized in order to really rehabilitate the offender. Despite the very strict methods needed in order to accomplish prisoner reformation, this type of punishment was still a far cry from the public executions that were popular in earlier history. Policy makers, the public and a new generation of thinkers are now focused on stabilizing American society and improving the conditions of mankind (Rotham), particularly when it comes to the criminal justice system rather than simply demonstrating power and control to try and maintain deterrence.