Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The rule of law and its importance
Case about rule of law
The rule of law and its importance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The rule of law and its importance
The right to a fair trial is one of the fundamental guarantees of human rights and the rule of law, targeted at ensuring the proper administration of justice. It is linked with numerous interrelated attributes such as the right to life and prohibition against torture and other forms of cruel and degrading treatment. All individuals must have equal rights of access to the courts. Justice need to be administered in a manner that achieves fairness to all, regardless of the identity of the parties of the proceedings. Criminal charges must be determined by a competent and impartial court
In the Darmalingum V State (1999) MR 186, the judicial committee made the following comments regarding Sect 10(1) of the constitution : " it will be observed that Sect 10(1)
…show more content…
This is incidentally not the case in France.
In Mohur v R (1990) MR 138, it was held that 4 elements which in Lord Templeman's view in Bell v DPP (1985) AC 937, a court should consider to determine whether a particular defendent has been deprived of his fundamental rights are namely :
• the length of the delay
• the reasons given by the prosecution to justify the delay
• the responsibility of the accused for asserting his rights and prejudice to the accused.
The court adduced that in United State, a judge of a higher court has an inherent power to decline to allow a prosecution to proceed if he is satisfied that it is oppressive and vexatious and an abuse of the process of the court. By virtue of section 17 of Courts Act, the judges of supreme court possess the same powers.
Nevertheless, justice does not always prevail through the proper administration of the provisions of the constitution. The question arises whether a prosecution which is initiated 18 years after the alleged commisssion of a crime by the reason of time lag and all its natural consequences of probable memory loss be struck down
Defence: Mr John Bell, Mr. A R Castan AM, QC and the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission.
Interpretation of the Eighth Amendment-Rummel, Solem and The Venerable Case of Weems v. United States. Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1984:789. Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2886&context=dlj&sei-redir=1&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fscholar.google.com%2Fscholar_url%3Fhl%3Den%26q%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fscholarship.law.duke.edu%2Fcgi%2Fviewcontent.cgi%253Farticle%253D2886%2526context%253Ddlj%26sa%3DX%26scisig%3DAAGBfm0U6qTJJcBT1EoWmQVHDXIojJgBHw%26oi%3Dscholarr#search=%22http%3A%2F%2Fscholarship.law.duke.edu%2Fcgi%2Fviewcontent.cgi%3Farticle%3D2886%26context%3Ddlj%22
1. The court stated that they did have power to hear this case: "Since the court has consistently exercised the power to construe and delineate claims arising under express powers, it must follow that the Court has authority to interpret claims with respect to powers alleged to derive from enumerated powers."
Civilrights.org. (2002, April 13). Justice on trial. Washington, DC: Leadership Conference on Civil Rights/Leadership Conference on Civil RightsEducation Fund. Retrieved April 12, 2005, from Civilrights.org Web site: http://www.civilrights.org/publications/reports/cj/
Reece H., ‘The paramountcy principle Consensus or construct?’ [1996] 49 Current Legal Problems p. 267-304
Rehnquist, William H., Brennan, William J. "A Casebook on the Law and Society: What Rights
By law a fair trial consists of an unbiased trial, who hears the whole trial out before making a verdict. Many people condone racial profiling out of fear. A fair trial today is not possible due to racial profiling, the way the media presents the trials, and the way the jury is made up.
In closing, the criminal trial process has been able to reflect the morals and ethics of society to a great extent, despite the few limitations, which hinder its effectiveness. The moral and ethical standards have been effectively been reflected to a great extent in the areas of the adversary system, the system of appeals, legal aid and the jury
all judiciary cases in which any fact is involved,) or may they act by representatives, freely and
One of the objections to this institution was that the adversarial principle is violated, this being a fundamental principle of criminal proceedings. But bear in mind that this principle should not be exercised the same in all cases, as simple cases where the facts have been recognized cannot be treated the same way as the most complex cases, where the defendants have not admi...
The Miranda warnings stem from a United States Court’s decision in the case, Miranda v. Arizona. There are two basic conditions that must be met for Miranda warnings to be required: the suspect must be in official police custody and the suspect must be under interrogation. The suspect goes through a booking process after an arrest. The suspect will have a bond hearing shortly after the completion of the booking process or after arraignment. The arraignment is the suspect’s first court appearance to officially hear the charges filed against him or her and to enter a plea. The preliminary hearing or grand jury proceeding determines if there is substantial evidence for the suspect to be tried for the crime charged. In this essay, I will identify and describe at least four rights afforded criminal defendants at the arrest stage and during pretrial. I will analyze the facts presented and other relevant factors in the scenario provided. I will cite legal authority to support my conclusions.
Citizens of the United States are given the right to a fair trial. Over the course of the development of the American jury system, citizens are allowed to the right to meet one’s accuser, be represented by his/her peers and protection from being tried more than once on any convicted crime. The jury system has evolved from a representation of all white men to both men and women from very diverse backgrounds. This is important if one is going to be tried in his/her community of peers.
right to a speedy trial by public and of a jury of their peers (Abadinsky, 2008). All subjects or
"Those who wrote our constitutions knew from history and experience that it was necessary to protect against unfounded criminal charges brought to eliminate enemies and against judges too responsive to the voice of higher authority"(Maravillosa 1). These words said by Justice Byron White are the exact living dispute of the protection of the rights the United States Constitution and its Amendments promise us. The Sixth Amendment protects the rights of the people specifically in the courtroom and the conditions of law. The rights within the Sixth Amendment ensure the American people the rights of an impartial jury, the right to a lawyer, and demonstrate ability of the court system to change.
Everyone in the United States have specific rights when they are criminally accused. “I consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.” This quote was from Thomas Jefferson. Trial by jury goes along with everyone having rights when they are accused, it is one of the basic things in the bill of rights, that when you are accused, you have the right to a trial by jury. There are many other rights as well.