Importance Of The Philosopher King

2523 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Aristotle on leadership

The existence of the Philosopher king Some see a "state" as an ancient institution, going back to Rome, Greece and before, and theorized by Plato, Aristotle and other classical philosophers. Corruption and poverty, these issues and many more has always been present in every city throughout the history of civilization. Others say that a city or a nation is only as good as its ruler but sometimes series of emperors, kings, presidents and rulers in general has been the sole liable cause of their nation’s downfall. To be a ruler is to have the power to govern his subjects, a ruler is respected and a ruler has to be obeyed. But is that enough? With a little amount of power, a man can go crazy, imagine if a man has more. Some would exercise their power in terms of what is good and what is considered right but through time, we became tempted to do what we say we wouldn’t. With the said temptations like money and fame, we can see that the works of different great thinkers within the past …show more content…

In reference to the works of Aristotle and Plato where Aristotle explained that politics affects us all, it is inevitable for us human beings to have a say on politics. We are the overseer of the actions of our leaders, with one mistake we as a rational being always thinks that there must be someone better than the ones who is in the seat of power. One factor also is that, in the concept of the philosopher king, people in the state will then subdue their rights and opinions only to the king thus making it impossible for the philosopher king to exist in our modern day period. A president declaring martial law in its country is hard enough for us to accept. What more if we are to subdue all our rights and opinions on a man who is always referred to as a crazy person, crazy because he is thinking ahead of his time. To this extent we can therefore conclude that the philosopher king cannot exist in our modern

Show More
Related

  • Comparing the Defective Rulers in Henry IV and Richard II

    833 Words  | 2 Pages

    It has been shown again and again throughout history and literature that if there is a perfect human he is not also the perfect ruler.  Those traits which we hold as good, such as the following of some sort of moral code, interfere with the necessity of detachment in a ruler.  In both Henry IV and Richard II, Shakespeare explores what properties must be present in a good ruler.  Those who are imperfect morally, who take into account only self-interest and not honor or what is appropriate, rise to rule, and stay in power.

    Read More

  • Royal Absolutism Through the 15th and 18th Century

    968 Words  | 2 Pages

    In an earlier century, Niccoló Machiavelli, wrote a document called, “The Prince.” This book was about what it takes to be a successful ruler, and the number one rule of course was: “Power is Everything.” How you acquire the power made no difference as long as you had it. Many people repulsed Machiavelli’s idea of power at all costs, but it would soon be the basis of the government in some countries.

    Read More

  • Truth of Humanity in Lord of the Flies

    523 Words  | 2 Pages

    In our society, we have elections to choose our leaders and, most of the time, they lead our countries well. Signs of authority are shown every day by our leaders; whether it be the way they dress, the way they give speeches, or the way they fight their wars. Our society has a checks and balances system, according to Merriam Webster “so that no part can become too powerful”. Societies like this thrive all over the world. Yet...

    Read More

  • Plato vs. Machiavelli

    1692 Words  | 4 Pages

    A longstanding debate in human history is what to do with power and what is the best way to rule. Who should have power, how should one rule, and what its purpose should government serve have always been questions at the fore in civilization, and more than once have sparked controversy and conflict. The essential elements of rule have placed the human need for order and structure against the human desire for freedom, and compromising between the two has never been easy. It is a question that is still considered and argued to this day. However, the argument has not rested solely with military powers or politicians, but philosophers as well. Two prominent voices in this debate are Plato and Machiavelli, both of whom had very different ideas of government's role in the lives of its people. For Plato, the essential service of government is to allow its citizens to live in their proper places and to do the things that they are best at. In short, Plato's government reinforces the need for order while giving the illusion of freedom. On the other hand, Machiavelli proposes that government's primary concern is to remain intact, thereby preserving stability for the people who live under it. The feature that both philosophers share is that they attempt to compromise between stability and freedom, and in the process admit that neither can be totally had.

    Read More

  • Napoleon Power Corruption Analysis

    585 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many view power as a tool to lead societies into corruption. However, depending on how a system of government is set up, that view may be erroneous. Power gives independence to the holder with freedom to use it either for good or bad purposes. When a leader is granted power without any consequences for misuse, unless a perfect human being, that leader will likely turn into some variant of a despot. Powerlessness, therefore, inherently causes corruption as humans suffer from congenital selfishness and greed.

    Read More

  • Theme Of Power And Authority In Antigone

    398 Words  | 1 Pages

    Whether the setting is the twenty-first century or the years prior to the common era, rulers in any society are known to be holders of power who perform justified actions that are beneficial to the state and its citizens. While trying to do what is right, even the fairest leaders are at risk of abusing their supremacy and causing harm. Sophocles explains that power does not affect the man who holds it; instead, the man who holds power and authority has the chance to affect the lives of others. He does not clarify whether this supremacy has a positive or negative effect on others, mostly because this part is up for interpretation. Some leaders bring their nations to success and victory, while others take a turn for the worst, gain hubris, and lead their country to its downfall.

    Read More

  • Democracy in America

    2000 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout the course of history, mankind has been recorded to corrupt itself. Men have grown tired of simply surviving; they have had to take and conquer others. Absolute monarchies control wealth, land, and even lives of men. The conditions of the people were solely dependent on the conditions of the one who was in power in that particular place and time. History has proven that most men rule unwisely in their kingdoms. To avoid tyrannical rule, some make an attempt to set up a government in which the people ruled themselves. This form of government is called a democracy, or “rule of the people.” History has also revealed through the Greeks and the French Revolution, that a democracy that gives complete power to the people, “absolute democracy”, is nothing more than a short prelude to tyranny.

    Read More

  • Aristocracy in Plato's The Republic and to Build a Democratic State

    531 Words  | 2 Pages

    In The Republic by Plato, Plato constructed an ideal city where Philosophers would rule. Governed by an aristocratic form of government, it took away some of the most basic rights a normal citizen should deserve, freedom of choice, worship, and assembly were distressed. Though the idea of philosopher kings is good on paper, fundamental flaws of the human kind even described by Plato himself prevent it from being truly successful. The idea of an ideal democratic government like what our founding fathers had envisioned is the most successful and best political form which will ensure individual freedom and keep power struggle to a minimum.

    Read More

  • Martin Luther King's Successful Philosophy

    1005 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nearly three centuries ago, black men and women from Africa were brought to America and put into slavery. They were treated more cruelly in the United States than in any other country that had practiced slavery. African Americans didn’t gain their freedom until after the Civil War, nearly one-hundred years later. Even though African Americans were freed and the constitution was amended to guarantee racial equality, they were still not treated the same as whites and were thought of as second class citizens. One man had the right idea on how to change America, Martin Luther King Jr. had the best philosophy for advancing civil rights, he preached nonviolence to express the need for change in America and he united both African Americans and whites together to fight for economic and social equality.

    Read More

  • Agamemnon as a Tyrant as Described by Plato's "The Republic"

    1274 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of Plato's goals in The Republic, as he defines the Just City, is to illustrate what kind of leader and government could bring about the downfall of his ideal society. To prevent pride and greed in leaders would ensure that they would not compromise the well being of the city to obtain monetary gains or to obtain more power. If this state of affairs becomes firmly rooted in the society, the fall to Tyranny begins. This is the most dangerous state that the City become on i...

    Read More

  • When the Ends Justify the Means in Machiavelli´s The Prince

    783 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is commonly believed by both lay people and political philosophers alike that an authoritative figure is good and just so long as he or she acts in accordance with various virtues. If the actions of a ruler are tailored toward the common good of the people rather than himself, then that ruler is worthy of occupying the status of authority. By acting in accordance with social and ethical norms, the ruler is deemed worthy of respect and authority. Niccolò Machiavelli challenges our moral intuitions about moral authority in his work, the Prince, by ruthlessly defending the actions made by the state in an effort to preserve power. In particular, all actions made by the state are done in order to preserve its power, and preserving the state’s power preservers its people. In doing so, whatever actions the state exercises are justified with this end goal in mind. Although such reasoning may seem radical, it is practice more readily that most people are inclined to believe. Machiavelli's moral philosophy is deeply embedded in the present day justice administration. Due to this, Machiavelli’s political thought can serve as a reference for illustrating how today’s administrators can benefit from following the examples of other great leaders, such as on matters of global warming.

    Read More

  • Comparing Machiavelli's The Prince and Plato's The Republic

    1784 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many people in history have written about ideal rulers and states and how to maintain them.  Perhaps the most talked about and compared are Machiavelli's, The Prince and Plato's, The Republic.  Machiavelli lived at a time when Italy was suffering from its political destruction.  The Prince, was written to describe the ways by which a leader may gain and maintain power. In Plato?s The Republic, he unravels the definition of justice.  Plato believed that a ruler could not be wholly just unless one was in a society that was also just. His state and ruler was made up to better understand the meaning of justice.  It was not intended to be practiced like that of Machiavelli's. Machiavelli, acknowledging this, explains that it is his intention to write something that is true and real and useful to whoever might read it and not something imaginary,"?for many have pictured republics and principalities which in fact have never been known or seen?(Machiavelli 375)."  Therefore, because one ruler is realistic and the other imaginary, the characteristics of Machiavelli's ruler versus Plato's ruler are distinctly different.

    Read More

  • The English Revolution: Causes Of The English Civil War

    1342 Words  | 3 Pages

    The most important cause, and symptom, of the decay of any government or institution is the loss of prestige and respect among the public at large, and the loss of self-confidence among the leaders themselves in their capacity to rule” (p. 79).

    Read More

  • Corruption of Power and Leadership

    679 Words  | 2 Pages

    If a man has absolute power which human kind cannot be handled, eventually it will be harmful for other people or social order. There is plenty example of historical events in the past which are a proof that power-holders and absolute power-holders corrupt the social order. The most known event is the Holocaust, also known as Shoah. As mentioned before, 6 million Jewish were murdered by a powerful people, Hitler was a dictator so that he could make his army whatever he wants. This kind of huge power causes a lot of people death. Hitler is not only example for this kind of dictator, even in our modern world, there are plenty of leaders who made a lot of people suffer from them not only their nationalities. The writer of the Three Face of Power, Kenneth B. Boulding is also saying that “The dark side of the power of destruction is violence and war” (9). As Bouilding said, the biggest proof for corruption of absolute power is war sometimes a lot of country wage war against each other because of just two men, or so called “leaders”, want other country’s natural goods. Obviously, a lot of people die or injure and become homeless. Two man’s absolute ...

    Read More

  • Idi Amin Dada: Authoritarian Leadership

    2327 Words  | 5 Pages

    Rourke (2008) points out that the form of government most common throughout the history of man was authoritarian; leaders were an individual or group of people who exercised control. The people these leaders ruled had little opportunity to contribute to t...

    Read More

More about Importance Of The Philosopher King

Open Document